a tripartite report - Unctad
a tripartite report - Unctad a tripartite report - Unctad
ZAMBIA Box 7: Commission Communiqué on the Repeal of the Competition and Fair Trading Act, 1994 and the Coming into Force of the Competition and Consumer Protection Act, 2010 The Competition and Consumer Protection Commission (CCPC) formerly called Zambia Competition Minister of Commerce, Trade and Industry on 4th October 2010. The Order has repealed the Competition and Fair Trading Act, CAP 417 of the laws of Zambia enacted in 1994, aimed at promoting competition and consumer welfare in the economy. The newly enacted Competition and Consumer Protection Act No. 24 of 2010, is poised to improve enforcement of competition law and consumer protection in Zambia. The Competition and Consumer Protection Act No. 24 of 2010 seeks to safeguard and promote competition and protect consumers against unfair trade practices in Zambia. The CCPC that replaces ZCC will also advise the government on laws affecting competition and consumer protection and provision of information for the guidance of consumers regarding their rights and obligations. for violating both competition and consumer provisions of the Act. It not only gives administrative powers to provides for the establishment of the Competition and Consumer Protection Tribunal which is a milestone in The law among other things clearly prohibits: 1. Display of disclaimers in trading places such as ‘No Return, No Refund’. 2. False or misleading representation such as claiming that goods sold are new when they are not. 3. Supply of defective goods, e.g., pressing iron that does not get hot. 4. Sale of goods which are not properly labelled, i.e., without product name and ingredients. 5. Charging a consumer more than the price indicated or displayed on a product or service. 6. Sale of goods that do not conform to the mandatory safety standard set by the Zambia Bureau of Standards or other relevant bodies. Source: Commission Communiqué on the Repeal of the Competition and Fair Trading Act, 1994 and the Coming into Force of the Competition and Consumer Protection Act, 2010. Zambia’s competition law is enshrined in the Competition and Consumer Protection Act, 2010, which captures the gist of the country’s competition policy. The Act’s date of Assent by the President of Zambia was 14 August 2010. The preamble to the Act gives its broad objectives as follows: “An Act to continue the existence of the Zambia Competition Commission and to re-name it as the Competition and Consumer Protection Commission; safeguard and promote competition; protect consumers against unfair trade practices; provide for the establishment of the Competition and Consumer Protection Tribunal; repeal and replace the Competition and Fair Trading Act, 1994; and provide for matters connection with, or incidental to, the foregoing”. 107 The import of the above preamble to the new Act is that it clearly provides for the continuation of the activities of ZCC under the re-named Competition and Consumer Protection Commission (CCPC). This is important since it removes the legal uncertainty and juridical problems over cases initiated by ZCC under the old law, as well as over all other operations and decisions of ZCC. Most of the other objectives of the Act remain more or less similar to those of the old Act. As stated in the Commission’s communiqué to the business community and consumers on the coming into force of the Act, the new law comprehen- This facilitates the proper interpretation of the law, ZAMBIA
108 VOLUNTARY PEER REVIEW OF CLP: A TRIPARTITE REPORT ON THE UNITED REPUBLIC OF TANZANIA – ZAMBIA – ZIMBABWE and minimizes time and resource consuming disagreements on its application. As stated in UNCTAD reading of the law easier, and prevent confusion or ambiguity. For that purpose, they stipulate those elements that are essential for the application of term which in ordinary usage may have uncertain or multiple meanings. As opposed to the old Act, which only had one tions, which lists terms used in the legislation, as plied only in the section of the legislation where of the term ‘merger’ is not found in the general term ‘unfair trading practice’ is found in section 45 (Part VII on Consumer Protection). This is in order since it removes confusion and uncertainty over the general application of the terms in other parts of the Act. interpretation section 2 of that Act, while 47 terms the new terms facilitate the proper interpretation of the law, and thus its effective enforcement. For terms of section 2(1) of the Act include the following in Box 8: “acquired” means acquired by takeover, purchase of shares or assets, or any other means through which an enterprise obtains, secures or gains a legal interest in another independent enterprise; “agreement” means any form of agreement, whether or not legally enforceable, between enterprises which is implemented or intended to be implemented in Zambia and includes an oral agreement or a decision by a trade association or an association of enterprises; and intangible assets including goodwill, intellectual property rights and knowhow; “bid-rigging” means a horizontal agreement between enterprises where: (a) one or more parties to the agreement agrees not to submit a bid in response to a call for bids; or (b) the parties to the agreement agree upon the prices, terms or conditions of a bid to be submitted in response to a call for bids; “concerted practice” means a practice which involves some form of communication or coordination between competitors falling short of an actual agreement but which replaces their independent action and restricts or lessen competition between them; prise, has a particular economic value and is not generally available to, or known by, others; “consumer” means: (a) for the purposes of Part III (restrictive business and anticompetitive trade practices), any person who purchases or offers to purchase goods or services supplied by an enterprise in the course of business, and includes a business person who uses the product or service supplied as an input to its own business, III, any person who purchases or offers to purchase goods or services otherwise than for the purpose of re-sale, but does not include a person who purchases goods or services for the purpose of using the goods or services in the production and manufacture of any other goods for sale, or the provision of another service for remuneration; “dominant position” means a situation where an enterprise or a group of enterprises possesses such economic strength in a market as to make it possible for it to operate in that market, and to adjust prices or output, without effective constraint from competitors or potential competitors; or indirectly controlled by them; “goods or products” includes services, buildings and other structures;
- Page 61 and 62: 56 VOLUNTARY PEER REVIEW OF CLP: A
- Page 63 and 64: 58 VOLUNTARY PEER REVIEW OF CLP: A
- Page 65 and 66: 60 VOLUNTARY PEER REVIEW OF CLP: A
- Page 67 and 68: 62 VOLUNTARY PEER REVIEW OF CLP: A
- Page 69 and 70: 64 VOLUNTARY PEER REVIEW OF CLP: A
- Page 71 and 72: 66 VOLUNTARY PEER REVIEW OF CLP: A
- Page 73 and 74: 68 VOLUNTARY PEER REVIEW OF CLP: A
- Page 75 and 76: 70 VOLUNTARY PEER REVIEW OF CLP: A
- Page 77 and 78: 72 VOLUNTARY PEER REVIEW OF CLP: A
- Page 79 and 80: 74 VOLUNTARY PEER REVIEW OF CLP: A
- Page 81 and 82: 76 VOLUNTARY PEER REVIEW OF CLP: A
- Page 83 and 84: 78 VOLUNTARY PEER REVIEW OF CLP: A
- Page 85 and 86: 80 VOLUNTARY PEER REVIEW OF CLP: A
- Page 87 and 88: 82 VOLUNTARY PEER REVIEW OF CLP: A
- Page 89: 84 VOLUNTARY PEER REVIEW OF CLP: A
- Page 93 and 94: 88 VOLUNTARY PEER REVIEW OF CLP: A
- Page 95 and 96: 90 VOLUNTARY PEER REVIEW OF CLP: A
- Page 97 and 98: 92 VOLUNTARY PEER REVIEW OF CLP: A
- Page 99 and 100: 94 VOLUNTARY PEER REVIEW OF CLP: A
- Page 101 and 102: 96 VOLUNTARY PEER REVIEW OF CLP: A
- Page 103 and 104: 98 VOLUNTARY PEER REVIEW OF CLP: A
- Page 105 and 106: 100 VOLUNTARY PEER REVIEW OF CLP: A
- Page 107 and 108: 102 VOLUNTARY PEER REVIEW OF CLP: A
- Page 109 and 110: 104 VOLUNTARY PEER REVIEW OF CLP: A
- Page 111: 106 VOLUNTARY PEER REVIEW OF CLP: A
- Page 115 and 116: 110 VOLUNTARY PEER REVIEW OF CLP: A
- Page 117 and 118: 112 VOLUNTARY PEER REVIEW OF CLP: A
- Page 119 and 120: 114 VOLUNTARY PEER REVIEW OF CLP: A
- Page 121 and 122: 116 VOLUNTARY PEER REVIEW OF CLP: A
- Page 123 and 124: 118 VOLUNTARY PEER REVIEW OF CLP: A
- Page 125 and 126: 120 VOLUNTARY PEER REVIEW OF CLP: A
- Page 127 and 128: 122 VOLUNTARY PEER REVIEW OF CLP: A
- Page 129 and 130: 124 VOLUNTARY PEER REVIEW OF CLP: A
- Page 131 and 132: 126 VOLUNTARY PEER REVIEW OF CLP: A
- Page 133 and 134: 128 VOLUNTARY PEER REVIEW OF CLP: A
- Page 135 and 136: 130 VOLUNTARY PEER REVIEW OF CLP: A
- Page 137 and 138: 132 VOLUNTARY PEER REVIEW OF CLP: A
- Page 139 and 140: 134 VOLUNTARY PEER REVIEW OF CLP: A
- Page 141 and 142: 136 VOLUNTARY PEER REVIEW OF CLP: A
- Page 143 and 144: 138 VOLUNTARY PEER REVIEW OF CLP: A
- Page 145 and 146: 140 VOLUNTARY PEER REVIEW OF CLP: A
- Page 147 and 148: 142 VOLUNTARY PEER REVIEW OF CLP: A
- Page 149 and 150: 144 VOLUNTARY PEER REVIEW OF CLP: A
- Page 151 and 152: 146 VOLUNTARY PEER REVIEW OF CLP: A
- Page 153 and 154: 148 VOLUNTARY PEER REVIEW OF CLP: A
- Page 155 and 156: 150 VOLUNTARY PEER REVIEW OF CLP: A
- Page 157 and 158: 152 VOLUNTARY PEER REVIEW OF CLP: A
- Page 159 and 160: 154 VOLUNTARY PEER REVIEW OF CLP: A
- Page 161 and 162: 156 VOLUNTARY PEER REVIEW OF CLP: A
108 VOLUNTARY PEER REVIEW OF CLP: A TRIPARTITE REPORT ON THE UNITED REPUBLIC OF TANZANIA – ZAMBIA – ZIMBABWE<br />
and minimizes time and resource consuming disagreements<br />
on its application. As stated in UNCTAD<br />
<br />
reading of the law easier, and prevent confusion or<br />
ambiguity. For that purpose, they stipulate those<br />
elements that are essential for the application of<br />
term which in ordinary usage may have uncertain<br />
or multiple meanings.<br />
As opposed to the old Act, which only had one<br />
<br />
tions,<br />
which lists terms used in the legislation, as<br />
plied<br />
only in the section of the legislation where<br />
<br />
of the term ‘merger’ is not found in the general<br />
<br />
<br />
term ‘unfair trading practice’ is found in section 45<br />
(Part VII on Consumer Protection). This is in order<br />
since it removes confusion and uncertainty over<br />
the general application of the terms in other parts<br />
of the Act.<br />
<br />
interpretation section 2 of that Act, while 47 terms<br />
<br />
the new terms facilitate the proper interpretation<br />
of the law, and thus its effective enforcement. For<br />
<br />
terms of section 2(1) of the Act include the following<br />
in Box 8:<br />
<br />
“acquired” means acquired by takeover, purchase of shares or assets, or any other means through which an<br />
enterprise obtains, secures or gains a legal interest in another independent enterprise;<br />
“agreement” means any form of agreement, whether or not legally enforceable, between enterprises which is<br />
implemented or intended to be implemented in Zambia and includes an oral agreement or a decision by a trade<br />
association or an association of enterprises;<br />
<br />
and intangible assets including goodwill, intellectual property rights and knowhow;<br />
“bid-rigging” means a horizontal agreement between enterprises where: (a) one or more parties to the agreement<br />
agrees not to submit a bid in response to a call for bids; or (b) the parties to the agreement agree upon the prices,<br />
terms or conditions of a bid to be submitted in response to a call for bids;<br />
“concerted practice” means a practice which involves some form of communication or coordination between<br />
competitors falling short of an actual agreement but which replaces their independent action and restricts or lessen<br />
competition between them;<br />
prise,<br />
has a particular economic value and is not generally available to, or known by, others;<br />
“consumer” means: (a) for the purposes of Part III (restrictive business and anticompetitive trade practices),<br />
any person who purchases or offers to purchase goods or services supplied by an enterprise in the course of<br />
business, and includes a business person who uses the product or service supplied as an input to its own business,<br />
<br />
III, any person who purchases or offers to purchase goods or services otherwise than for the purpose of re-sale,<br />
but does not include a person who purchases goods or services for the purpose of using the goods or services in<br />
the production and manufacture of any other goods for sale, or the provision of another service for remuneration;<br />
“dominant position” means a situation where an enterprise or a group of enterprises possesses such economic<br />
strength in a market as to make it possible for it to operate in that market, and to adjust prices or output, without<br />
effective constraint from competitors or potential competitors;<br />
<br />
<br />
or indirectly controlled by them;<br />
“goods or products” includes services, buildings and other structures;