the awards editions 2010-2011

More documents

Recommendations

Info

i n a career now spanning more than 20 years, Peter Morgan has become one of the film industry’s most reliable writers, best known for crafting screenplays based on real–life people and events. In 2006 his original screenplay for The Queen was Oscar nominated, winning numerous other awards including a Golden Globe. The same year he won a BAFTA award for The Last King Of Scotland. Then he won an Oscar nod for adapting Frost/Nixon (2008) based on his own play. This year, he is writer and executive producer of his latest film Hereafter, directed by Clint Eastwood. A complete departure from his previous scripts, it’s a mult–character study telling three distinct stories about people affected by death or near death. It’s also the most personal of all Morgan’s work and something he wrote on spec not knowing if it would ever be made. DeaDline: What was your reaction when you saw the movie? peTeR moRgan: I spent most of the time when I watched for the first time loathing my work, wishing I had done more here or there. And then the second time, at the New York Film Festival, I really enjoyed it — not my work but the pace, of being allowed in. There are extremely honest things about it. I can assure you this is the most honest piece of writing I have ever done. I wrote it in a hut on a mountain for nobody because I wanted to. I don’t know, it just came to me. DeaDline: What drew you to this material? moRgan: The stuff that I have perhaps become known for that’s based on fact, and English statesmen shouting at each other all the time, doesn’t entirely represent who I am. I am not a politics wonk. I like the idea of my writing reflecting more about who I am or other people. I wrote this not thinking for a minute that it would get made. I mean, the tsunami sequence — anyone in England would know if you write something like that, it’s just going to get taken out. You can’t afford anything like that. I wrote the first draft on my own in between assignments where I was being paid. I wasn’t paid to write this. I wrote it for myself and wrote it quite quickly and left it in a drawer. DeaDline: How did Clint Eastwood become involved in the film? moRgan: I sent it to my agent and he then sent it to producer Kathleen Kennedy and she sent it to Steven Spielberg. He rang me up. Having a phone call from him was just a fantastic rite of passage. I loved it, and he was very focused, very likable, strictly business, and really sharp. The phone call lasted about three hours and I loved his ideas. I then changed the script based on the notes he’d given me and was thrilled with it. I then got a phone call saying, “Would you please come out to California as soon as possible.” So I jumped on a plane, went to the Universal lot for a meeting at 1 o’clock, went into the boardroom, an assistant came in and drew the curtains and said Mr. Spielberg has taken to having his meetings in the dark. She turned all the lights off, and then she left and I thought, “Well, he’s really not here. It must be an imposter. But soon there he was, and we had a really long lovely meeting in which he said the notes he had given me had harmed the script and I said, “No, it was good,” and he said, “No, no, it isn’t good and I damaged your work, and I don’t want to touch it again, and I want to go back to the original script that you sent me, and I want to give it to my friend 16 deadline.com By Pete Hammond THE SURPRISING HEREAFTER PEtEr morgAN IS a maSteR oF manIPULatInG CHaRaCteRS, BUt not In tHIS SCReenPLay tHat manIPULated HIm Clint Eastwood.” Then I got this phone call saying Clint Eastwood wants to do it, and I said, “Wow, I can’t wait to start working.” But I not only didn’t have to do any rewrites, I wasn’t allowed to. I wondered why not since it was my material and I wanted to change it. But Clint said, “Don’t touch it. Don’t change it. I like it as it is. I want to make it as it is.” DeaDline: Was that reaction a surprise to you? moRgan: I’m not accustomed to that at all, I am accustomed to pain and self–destruction and draft after draft. On the one hand, you might think for a writer this was a dream come true. We finally came to this rather profound difference in our approaches. He likes the mess, the imperfection, the instinct. And it is full of bumpiness: it’s full of things that don’t quite add up or work that could be honed a bit more. But his view is the looseness and the imperfection allows an audience in. And it’s sort of the antithesis of overworked controlled freakery that so much of the entertainment process is. There was something about the rawness of the first impulse that he wanted to preserve and protect. It’s a very different way of working than I’ve come across before. DeaDline: What kind of tone were you trying to achieve? moRgan: Writing this was in part an effort to help medicate the ever–present fear of death that you sort of live with. But it isn’t all about that. It feels to me like it’s a real correlation between grief and romance. And so somehow there’s the blur between loneliness and grief in the story. The story needs to be harsh but it can be quite sweet or a sweet melancholy, and I think that was the tone I was after. I love how simple it is, and it’s not that emotionally manipulative. DeaDline: Do you feel the film was faithful to your script and were there any scenes that weren’t shot? moRgan: No. I’ve never known anything like this before. For example, Clint told me the scenes with the Matt Damon character were shot in San Francisco. I originally wrote them for Chicago. And Clint rang me up to say, “I hope you don’t mind, but we are going to actually change the heading of the scene to say ‘San Francisco’ on the script.” I said, “I think that’s very appropriate.” DeaDline: What is your motivation to write? moRgan: Sometimes you are lucky enough to get offered things and there is no rhyme or reason. I am very lucky because I come from England and you have a whole range of things offered to you from television plays and shows and theatre so much more to explore, so it’s never really money. But it’s always what it is that interests you, although I’m not interested in Tony Blair so I don’t know why I keep writing about him. I am drawn to characters so full of internal contradictions. Idi Amin was one. I loved writing him. DeaDline: Do you want to direct? moRgan: The real beauty in my professional experience has been friendships and collaborations with filmmakers. I don’t want to direct. I have no directing ambition whatsoever. And as long as I meet filmmakers like Tom Hooper, Stephen Frears and others who allow that collaboration, I can’t see why I would ever want to direct.
F O R Y O U R C O N S I D E R A T I O N MATT BOMER Best Performance by an Actor In A Television Series - Drama “ Bomer gives White Collar the charm, wit WHITECOLLAR.USANETWORK.COM and sex appeal...” USA TODAY “ Terrific acting...” “Sparkling, snappy, bursting with energy...” LOS ANGELES TIMES “Slick and smart.” “...charming escapism.” ENTERTAINMENT WEEKLY “ Mr. Bomer makes it seem entirely plausible that someone who looks like a Brioni model could have an I.Q. as high as a physicist’s.” NEW YORK TIMES “...White Collar takes off in its own refreshing directions, with enough wit and sparkle to make the time fly by.” THE WALL STREET JOURNAL WHITE COLLAR Best Television Series - Drama
Page 1 and 2: the awards editions 2010-2011 premi
Page 3 and 4: F O R YO U R C O N S I D E R AT I O
Page 5 and 6: Indie hit has special appeal for ol
Page 7 and 8: F O R Y O U R C O N S I D E R A T I
Page 9 and 10: “ EXTRAORDINARY! ‘Winter’s Bo
Page 11 and 12: doing The Perfect Storm, portraying
Page 13 and 14: For your consideration Best Animate
Page 15 and 16: DeaDline: What went through your mi
Page 17: FOR YOUR CONSIDERATION BEST PICTURE
Page 21 and 22: JJAMEs FRANcO ON THE pERFORMANcE OF
Page 24 and 25: BAFFLING BAFTA Extravagant film pro
Page 26 and 27: tHe GoLden GLoBeS’ tv CateGoRIeS

the awards editions 2010-2011

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?