BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES - Universitatea de Medicină şi Farmacie
BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES - Universitatea de Medicină şi Farmacie
BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES - Universitatea de Medicină şi Farmacie
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
transitional. Szasz and Hollen<strong>de</strong>r's (1956) work refined Parsons by<br />
elaborating different doctor-patient mo<strong>de</strong>ls arising around different types<br />
of illness:<br />
(1) Patient passivity and physician assertiveness are the most<br />
common reactions to acute illness;<br />
(2) Less acute illness is characterized by physician guidance and<br />
patient cooperation;<br />
(3) Chronic illness is characterized by physicians participating in a<br />
treatment plan where patients had the bulk of the<br />
responsibility to help themselves.<br />
Critics have also shown that there is a great <strong>de</strong>al of inter-cultural<br />
and inter-personal variation in sick roles and norms. The "American" sick<br />
role is not as useful a concept as the more specific "white, Midwestern,<br />
Scandinavian, male" sick role. There is also cross-class variation. Some of<br />
the poor adapt to their lack of access to medical care by becoming<br />
fatalistic, rejecting the necessity of medical treatment, and coming to see<br />
illness and <strong>de</strong>ath as inevitable. On the other hand, the educated classes<br />
have become more assertive in the relationship, rejecting the norm of<br />
passivity in favor of self-diagnosis or negotiated diagnosis. There is also<br />
inter-cultural variation in physician roles, and variation among physicians<br />
in the success of their role socialization. While Parsons' mo<strong>de</strong>l of doctors'<br />
affective neutrality, collective-orientation, and egalitarianism towards<br />
patients did express the professional i<strong>de</strong>al, some physicians are more<br />
affectively neutral than others. Following Parsons' lead, some sociologists<br />
began to focus on the socialization (professionalization) of physicians and<br />
the factors in medical school and resi<strong>de</strong>ncy that facilitated or discouraged<br />
optimal role socialization to doctor-patient relationships.<br />
Thus, Conrad (1989) consi<strong>de</strong>rs that the Parsons’ work generally<br />
took the division of labor in medicine for granted, and painted a more or<br />
less heroic picture of medical self-sacrifice. Beginning to focus on aspects<br />
of the physician role and medical education which themselves militated<br />
against humanistic patient care he suggested that medical schools and<br />
resi<strong>de</strong>ncies socialized physicians into "<strong>de</strong>humanization," and to place<br />
professional i<strong>de</strong>ntity and camara<strong>de</strong>rie before patient advocacy and social<br />
i<strong>de</strong>alism.<br />
James "J." Hughes consi<strong>de</strong>rs that the most important weakness of<br />
Parsons' functionalist account of the doctor-patient relationship arose from<br />
his poor un<strong>de</strong>rstanding of the ecological concepts of dysfunction and niche<br />
62