BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES - Universitatea de Medicină şi Farmacie

BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES - Universitatea de Medicină şi Farmacie BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES - Universitatea de Medicină şi Farmacie

01.06.2013 Views

permanence, transcending individual human lives and intentions, and with the making and enforcing of rules governing cooperative human behavior. 3.2. The Concepts of Social Status and Role The first person who gives the definition to the concept of status was R. Linton (1936). He defined status simply as a position in a social system. Eventually one occupies the statuses son or daughter, playmate, pupil, husband, mother bread-winner, cricket fan, and so on, one has as many statuses as there are groups of which one is a member. For analytical purposes, statuses are divided into two basic types: ascribed and achieved. Ascribed statuses are those which are fixed for an individual at birth. Ascribed statuses that exist in all societies include those based upon sex, age, race, ethnic group and family background. Achieved statuses are those which the individual acquires during his or her lifetime as a result of the exercise of knowledge, ability, skill and/or perseverance. In other words achieved status is when people are placed in the stratification structure based on their individual merits or achievements. This status can be achieved through education, occupation, and marital status. Their place within the stratification structure is determined by society's bar, which often judges them on success, success being financial, academic, and political and so on. America most commonly uses this form of status with jobs. The higher you are in rank the better off you are and the more control you have over your co-workers. Societies vary in both the number of statuses that are ascribed and achieved and in the rigidity with which such definitions are held. Both ascribed and achieved statuses exist in all societies and these are directly related to the stratification of society that describes the way people are placed in society. It is associated with the ability of individuals to live up to some set of ideals or principles regarded as important by the society or some social group within it. The German sociologist Max Weber developed a theory proposing that stratification is based on three factors that have become known as "the three p's of stratification": property (i.e. material possessions), prestige (respect) and power (i.e. ability to do what one wants, regardless of the will of others). These factors all together or one by one can show the position of a person in the society. For example, a teacher may have a high status because of the prestige of the profession while having no propriety or power. 47

In relation to the stratification of society is elaborated and idea of status groups. Status groups are communities that are based on ideas of proper lifestyles and the honor given to people by others. These groups only exist because of people's ideas of prestige or dishonor. Also, people in these communities are only supposed to associate with people of like status, and all other people are looked at as inferiors. Thus human are likely to interact with people with the same personal income, the same political views/position, the same religion, nationality, race or social class. Status can be changed through a process of social mobility, understood as change of position within the stratification system. A move in status can be upward (upward mobility), or downward (downward mobility). Social mobility allows a person to move to another social status other than the one he or she was born in. Social mobility is more frequent in societies where achievement rather than ascription is the primary basis for social status. The term social role is borrowed by social scientists originally from the Greek Drama. Greek actors wore masks when they performed in their drama. This leads us directly to the definition of the concept of social role. A social role is a set of social norms that govern a person's behavior in a group and determine his relationships with other group members. Put somewhat differently a role is the expected pattern of behavior associated with a given social status. Status and role are reciprocal aspects of the same phenomenon. Status, or position, is the static aspect that fixes the individual's position in a group; role is the dynamic behavioral aspect that defines how the person who occupies the status should behave in different situations. Each of the statuses involves a role, set of behavior or actionpatterns that people belonging to a given status are expected to perform. One plays as many roles as he has statuses. A given man may both concurrently and sequentially enact the roles of husband, father breadwinner, and football fan and so on. Social roles may be linked to blue-prints for behavior that are handed to the individual, hypothetically, when he becomes a member of a group. As such these constitute the group's expectations concerning how one would behave. Thus, whereas the status of a person tells us what he is, his role will tell us what he does as a member of a status group. There are no roles without statuses and no statuses without roles. Indeed, there are some exceptions. Though all statuses imply some role or roles, it is not always possible to infer people's statuses from what they do, as for 48

In relation to the stratification of society is elaborated and i<strong>de</strong>a of<br />

status groups. Status groups are communities that are based on i<strong>de</strong>as of<br />

proper lifestyles and the honor given to people by others. These groups<br />

only exist because of people's i<strong>de</strong>as of prestige or dishonor. Also, people<br />

in these communities are only supposed to associate with people of like<br />

status, and all other people are looked at as inferiors. Thus human are<br />

likely to interact with people with the same personal income, the same<br />

political views/position, the same religion, nationality, race or social class.<br />

Status can be changed through a process of social mobility,<br />

un<strong>de</strong>rstood as change of position within the stratification system. A move<br />

in status can be upward (upward mobility), or downward (downward<br />

mobility). Social mobility allows a person to move to another social status<br />

other than the one he or she was born in. Social mobility is more frequent<br />

in societies where achievement rather than ascription is the primary basis<br />

for social status.<br />

The term social role is borrowed by social scientists originally<br />

from the Greek Drama. Greek actors wore masks when they performed in<br />

their drama. This leads us directly to the <strong>de</strong>finition of the concept of social<br />

role. A social role is a set of social norms that govern a person's behavior<br />

in a group and <strong>de</strong>termine his relationships with other group members. Put<br />

somewhat differently a role is the expected pattern of behavior associated<br />

with a given social status. Status and role are reciprocal aspects of the<br />

same phenomenon. Status, or position, is the static aspect that fixes the<br />

individual's position in a group; role is the dynamic behavioral aspect that<br />

<strong>de</strong>fines how the person who occupies the status should behave in different<br />

situations. Each of the statuses involves a role, set of behavior or actionpatterns<br />

that people belonging to a given status are expected to perform.<br />

One plays as many roles as he has statuses. A given man may both<br />

concurrently and sequentially enact the roles of husband, father breadwinner,<br />

and football fan and so on.<br />

Social roles may be linked to blue-prints for behavior that are<br />

han<strong>de</strong>d to the individual, hypothetically, when he becomes a member of a<br />

group. As such these constitute the group's expectations concerning how<br />

one would behave. Thus, whereas the status of a person tells us what he is,<br />

his role will tell us what he does as a member of a status group. There are<br />

no roles without statuses and no statuses without roles. In<strong>de</strong>ed, there are<br />

some exceptions. Though all statuses imply some role or roles, it is not<br />

always possible to infer people's statuses from what they do, as for<br />

48

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!