01.06.2013 Views

BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES - Universitatea de Medicină şi Farmacie

BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES - Universitatea de Medicină şi Farmacie

BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES - Universitatea de Medicină şi Farmacie

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

contemporary social conditions. Demographic, social, and technological<br />

trends that <strong>de</strong>veloped over the second half of the twentieth century<br />

fostered conditions in which the value of good health information, and<br />

thus the value of effective health communication, became increasingly<br />

clear. Public health communication inclu<strong>de</strong>s a continuum of activities that<br />

span from research to interventions. Communication interventions are<br />

effectively used in or<strong>de</strong>r to change risky behavior and to improve health<br />

outcomes. For example, the National Institutes of Health of USA recently<br />

(in partnership with health professional associations, voluntary health<br />

agencies, and pharmaceutical companies) has conducted a communication<br />

campaign that has contributed to more than a 60 percent reduction in the<br />

<strong>de</strong>ath rate from stroke. Sud<strong>de</strong>n infant <strong>de</strong>ath syndrome (SIDS) campaigns<br />

conducted around the globe during the 1990s led to rapid and dramatic<br />

(50–80%) reductions in <strong>de</strong>ath rates from SIDS.<br />

More over communication for behavior change is also economically<br />

efficient. Treatment of behavior-related diseases like cancer is expensive,<br />

while the cost of behavior change interventions is low. For example each<br />

Quality Adjusted Life Year (QALY), say one England journal, gained via<br />

a brief smoking cessation intervention costs £500 compared with £30,000-<br />

£40,000 per QALY for treating patients with advanced cancer.<br />

Many distinctions can be ma<strong>de</strong> between the various types of health<br />

communication activities. The most important of them are the activities<br />

that seek to influence the actions of individuals and small groups or the<br />

actions of larger groups such as workplaces, communities, states, or<br />

nations. The objectives of communication interventions at the larger levels<br />

are focused on bringing about changes in policies. Example inclu<strong>de</strong>s<br />

improved safety a policy is the law prohibiting the driving un<strong>de</strong>r the<br />

influence of alcohol. At the individual (or small group) level there are two<br />

forms of activities. The first one is informed <strong>de</strong>cision-making<br />

interventions that seek to inform people for the purpose of enabling them<br />

to make better health <strong>de</strong>cisions. The second is persuasion-oriented<br />

interventions seek to persua<strong>de</strong> people to change their behaviors or beliefs.<br />

Situational factors <strong>de</strong>termine which of these two approaches is most<br />

appropriate.<br />

Persuasion-oriented interventions are appropriate when there is clear<br />

evi<strong>de</strong>nce that the behavior change is likely to benefit the individual, and<br />

when society is able to reach consensus about the worthiness of the<br />

behavior as a societal goal. Examples inclu<strong>de</strong> promotion of teen substance-<br />

156

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!