The 1994-2004 Al Hoceima (Morocco) earthquake sequence ... - ESA
The 1994-2004 Al Hoceima (Morocco) earthquake sequence ... - ESA The 1994-2004 Al Hoceima (Morocco) earthquake sequence ... - ESA
The 1994-2004 1994 2004 Al Hoceima (Morocco) earthquake sequence: Conjugate fault ruptures deduced from InSAR A. Akoglu (1), Z. Cakir* Cakir (2), M. Meghraoui (2), N. Jabour (3), S. Belabbes (2), L. Ait-Brahim Ait Brahim (4), S. Ergintav (5) (1) ITU, Istanbul, Turkey; (2) IPG Strasbourg, France; (3) CNRST, CNRST, Rabat, Morocco; (4) U. Mohammed V, Rabat, Morocco Morocco (5) TUBITAK MRC, Izmit, Turkey; * presenter ESA CAT-1 CAT 1 2532 project 1/18
- Page 2 and 3: The 1994 and 2004 Al Hoceima earthq
- Page 4 and 5: InSAR data 4/18
- Page 6 and 7: 230 Solutions from InSAR 280 6/18
- Page 8 and 9: 1994 2004 Location of the 1994 eart
- Page 10 and 11: 1994 2004 Modeling coseismic interf
- Page 12 and 13: 1994 2004 Best models for the 1994
- Page 14 and 15: Modeled slip distributions 14/18
- Page 16 and 17: Proposed fault ruptures for the 199
- Page 18 and 19: Summary of conclusions • The 1994
- Page 20 and 21: 20/18
- Page 22 and 23: 22/18
<strong>The</strong> <strong>1994</strong>-<strong>2004</strong> <strong>1994</strong> <strong>2004</strong> <strong>Al</strong> <strong>Hoceima</strong> (<strong>Morocco</strong>) <strong>earthquake</strong> <strong>sequence</strong>:<br />
Conjugate fault ruptures deduced from InSAR<br />
A. Akoglu (1), Z. Cakir* Cakir (2), M. Meghraoui (2), N. Jabour (3),<br />
S. Belabbes (2), L. Ait-Brahim Ait Brahim (4), S. Ergintav (5)<br />
(1) ITU, Istanbul, Turkey; (2) IPG Strasbourg, France; (3) CNRST, CNRST,<br />
Rabat, <strong>Morocco</strong>; (4) U. Mohammed V, Rabat, <strong>Morocco</strong> <strong>Morocco</strong><br />
(5) TUBITAK MRC, Izmit, Turkey;<br />
* presenter<br />
<strong>ESA</strong> CAT-1 CAT 1 2532 project<br />
1/18
<strong>The</strong> <strong>1994</strong> and <strong>2004</strong> <strong>Al</strong> <strong>Hoceima</strong> <strong>earthquake</strong>s<br />
2/18
Proposed ruptures for the <strong>1994</strong> and <strong>2004</strong><br />
<strong>earthquake</strong>s<br />
<strong>1994</strong><br />
<strong>2004</strong><br />
3/18
InSAR data<br />
4/18
InSAR data<br />
5/18
230<br />
Solutions from InSAR<br />
280<br />
6/18
<strong>1994</strong><br />
<strong>2004</strong><br />
Coseismic interferograms<br />
ascending descending<br />
7/18
<strong>1994</strong><br />
<strong>2004</strong><br />
Location of the <strong>1994</strong> <strong>earthquake</strong> rupture<br />
ascending descending<br />
8/18
<strong>1994</strong><br />
<strong>2004</strong><br />
Locations of the <strong>1994</strong>-<strong>2004</strong> <strong>1994</strong> <strong>2004</strong> <strong>earthquake</strong>s ruptures<br />
ascending descending<br />
9/18
<strong>1994</strong><br />
<strong>2004</strong><br />
Modeling coseismic interferograms<br />
with Poly3D<br />
ascending descending<br />
10/18
Modeling the <strong>2004</strong> <strong>earthquake</strong><br />
Cakir et al., BSSA in press<br />
11/18
<strong>1994</strong><br />
<strong>2004</strong><br />
Best models for the <strong>1994</strong> & <strong>2004</strong><br />
interferograms<br />
ascending descending<br />
12/18
<strong>1994</strong><br />
<strong>2004</strong><br />
Residuals (observed – modeled)<br />
ascending descending<br />
13/18
Modeled slip distributions<br />
14/18
Proposed fault ruptures for<br />
the <strong>1994</strong> and <strong>2004</strong> <strong>earthquake</strong>s<br />
15/18
Proposed fault ruptures for<br />
the <strong>1994</strong> and <strong>2004</strong> <strong>earthquake</strong>s<br />
16/18
Stress field in the <strong>Al</strong> <strong>Hoceima</strong> region<br />
(See poster of Belabbes et al. for details)<br />
17/18
Summary of conclusions<br />
• <strong>The</strong> <strong>1994</strong> & <strong>2004</strong> <strong>earthquake</strong>s in the Rif mountains took<br />
place on N31°E and N43°W trending conjugate faults.<br />
• Modeled faults are consistent with focal mechanism<br />
solutions.<br />
• <strong>The</strong> Rif is now deforming under a strike-slip regime.<br />
• InSAR appears to be the best method for characterizing<br />
the seismic source parameters, especially in the<br />
absence of surface faulting.<br />
18/18
Acknowledgments ☺<br />
European Space Agency provided Envisat ASAR<br />
and ERS1-2 ERS1 2 SAR data under the projects:<br />
AOTR.2436 (Interseismic Strain Accumulation and Earthquake Mechanisms Mechanisms<br />
in<br />
Turkey and Surrounding Regions Using Envisat and ERS SAR<br />
Interferometry [PI:Z.Cakir [ PI:Z.Cakir]) ])<br />
CAT1-2532 CAT1 2532 (Studying crustal deformation in Middle East and North Africa Africa<br />
using<br />
SAR Interferometry [PI:M.Meghraoui<br />
[ PI:M.Meghraoui]) ])<br />
Financial support is from EC project RELIEF and<br />
APAME<br />
19/18
20/18
21/18
22/18
23/18