Untitled - University of Oxford
Untitled - University of Oxford
Untitled - University of Oxford
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
OFI OCCASIONAL PAPERS<br />
No 49<br />
The Natural Management <strong>of</strong> Tropical Forests<br />
for Timber and Non-Timber Products<br />
Sarah Laird<br />
1995<br />
ISBN 0 85074 136 X<br />
ISSN 0269 - 5790<br />
<strong>Oxford</strong> Forestry Institute<br />
Department <strong>of</strong> Plant Sciences<br />
<strong>University</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Oxford</strong>
Table <strong>of</strong> Contents<br />
Acknowledgements ii<br />
I. Introduction 1<br />
11. Sustainable Forestry 2<br />
Ill. The Economic Underpinnings <strong>of</strong> Natural Forest Management 4<br />
- Box 1: Lesser-Known Timber Species 9<br />
- Box 2: The Economic Valuation <strong>of</strong> Non-Timber Forest Products 10<br />
IV. The Ecologically Sustainable Harvest <strong>of</strong> Non-Timber Products<br />
from Tropical Forests 11<br />
- Plant Parts Used in Non-Timber Forest Products 14<br />
- Wildlife as a Non-Timber Forest Product 17<br />
V. The Ecological Underpinnings <strong>of</strong> Natural Forest Management 18<br />
VI. Harvesting Operations in Managed Natural Forest 20<br />
- Box 3: Inventories <strong>of</strong> Non-Timber Forest Products for<br />
Natural Forest Management 25<br />
VII. Silvicultural Systems for Natural Forest Management 26<br />
- Box 4: Examples <strong>of</strong> MUlti-purpose Amazonian Species with<br />
Present and Future Potential for Natural Forest Management 33<br />
VIII. Traditional Management <strong>of</strong> Neotropical Forests for Timber and<br />
Non-Timber Products 35<br />
IX. Natural Forest Management and the Conservation <strong>of</strong> Biodiversity 38<br />
- The Impact <strong>of</strong> Natural Forest Management on Wildlife 42<br />
x. Conclusion. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 45<br />
Bibliography 49<br />
Page
ii<br />
Acknowledgements<br />
I would like to thank the following for their valuable comments, advice and thoughts on this<br />
document: Trish Shanley, Mike Arnold, Nick Brown, and Peter Kanowski.
I. Introduction<br />
The tenn "non-timber forest products" (NTFPs) describes a wide range <strong>of</strong> products, including<br />
medicinal plants, fibres, resins, latexes, fruits, foods, construction materials, and bushmeat. The plant<br />
products may be taken from a variety <strong>of</strong> life forms and plant parts, including reproductive propagules,<br />
plant exudates, vegetative structures, roots and bark. NTFPs may be harvested for subsistence<br />
consumption, for small local markets, or for regional or even international trade. They may have long<br />
histories in traditional resource use, or they may be recently developed, and have applications <strong>of</strong><br />
primary importance to industrial cultures. NTFPs may be sourced from high-diversity primary forest,<br />
low diversity "oligarchic" forests, or secondary forests. These forests may be in various states <strong>of</strong><br />
repair, and may exist in extractive reserves, indigenous reserves, communally-held and managed<br />
forests, privately-owned lands, reserves demarcated for conservation purposes, timber concessions,<br />
or government lands. NTFPs may be harvested from areas with high population densities with welldeveloped<br />
labour and trade patterns, or in areas that are sparsely populated. Harvesters may be rural<br />
peoples (in which case they might be indigenous, long-term settlers <strong>of</strong> mixed ethnicity, or recent<br />
immigrants from other rural areas or urban centres), or teams <strong>of</strong> individuals from urban areas. These<br />
harvesters mayor may not operate under traditional systems <strong>of</strong> resource management and harvesting<br />
controls. Products might be consumed in rural areas or urban centres. Trade patterns may be complex,<br />
with a variety <strong>of</strong> intermediaries, or fairly simple. This is all to say that when we speak <strong>of</strong> "non-timber<br />
forest products" (a term which in itself has been questioned, due to the implied primacy <strong>of</strong> timber<br />
forest products), we are speaking <strong>of</strong> many things (Padoch et al., 1992; Pendleton, 1992; Vasquez and<br />
Gentry, 1989).<br />
Timber production can have a number <strong>of</strong> effects on the production <strong>of</strong> non-timber forest products.<br />
Destructive harvesting operations can cause direct damage to species in residual stands and those that<br />
make up the understorey and ground cover <strong>of</strong> forests, many <strong>of</strong> which are important NTFPs.<br />
Subsequent silvicultural treatments can reduce species diversity by promoting an increased proportion<br />
<strong>of</strong> commercial species, and removing the competing "undesirables", many <strong>of</strong> which are important<br />
NTFPs. In some cases, timber species will have important non-timber uses locally, and the overharvesting<br />
<strong>of</strong> these species for timber will reduce collection <strong>of</strong> these species for their non-timber uses.<br />
The harvest <strong>of</strong> NTFPs could, at times, reduce the number and regeneration success <strong>of</strong> timber species,<br />
as well. For example, if bark is stripped, reproductive propagules over-harvested, or exudates tapped<br />
heavily, growth rates and reproduction <strong>of</strong> timber species can be impaired.<br />
Timber harvesting and silvicultural treatments, by reducing the structural and species diversity <strong>of</strong> a<br />
forest, can also produce a number <strong>of</strong> still largely unknown ecological repercussions. These result in<br />
reductions in numbers <strong>of</strong> pollinators, seed dispersers, and alterations in plant-herbivore relationships,<br />
and may ultimately produce conditions in which it is difficult for many forest species to regenerate.<br />
A wide range <strong>of</strong> NTFPs are usually harvested from a given forest, so reductions in species diversity<br />
can directly impact the collection <strong>of</strong> these products, and the consumption and trade patterns <strong>of</strong> local<br />
people dependent upon them for their livelihoods and survival.<br />
Timber and non-timber products can be incorporated into multi-purpose systems <strong>of</strong> natural forest<br />
management that both minimize the negative impacts <strong>of</strong> timber extraction and capitalize on the many<br />
benefits provided by a range <strong>of</strong> forest products. Following is a discussion <strong>of</strong> some <strong>of</strong> the economic,<br />
cultural and ecological issues involved in this type <strong>of</strong> system, with particular emphasis on the<br />
Neotropics, and general suggestions for guidelines that might assist with the integration <strong>of</strong> non-timber<br />
and timber products in forest management.<br />
1
2<br />
11. Sustainable Forestry<br />
Duncan Poore (1989), in his popularly quoted definition <strong>of</strong> sustainable timber production, describes<br />
"the single most important condition to be met is that nothing should be done that will irreversibly<br />
reduce the potential <strong>of</strong> the forest to produce marketable timber - that is, there should be no<br />
irreversible loss <strong>of</strong> soil, soil fertility or genetic potential <strong>of</strong> marketable species". Sustained yield<br />
timber production implies the management <strong>of</strong> timber crops so as to produce a continuous flow <strong>of</strong><br />
wood output, while safeguarding the productive potential <strong>of</strong> the forest (Gane, 1992). Sustainable<br />
forestry implies a much broader, multi-sectorial agenda that attempts to "balance use", includes the<br />
production <strong>of</strong> non-timber as well as timber products, conserves forest ecosystems and the genetic and<br />
species diversity contained within them, and generates income, employment, consumption, and<br />
investment benefits for local forest dwellers, as well as nations (Gane, 1992; Poore, 1989; Barbier,<br />
1987).<br />
While there is a general agreement that ecological and technical abilities are sufficient to achieve<br />
sustainable timber production, it could be questioned whether they are up to the job <strong>of</strong> sustainable<br />
forestry, as described above. The complexities <strong>of</strong> natural forest management appear to only multiply<br />
as more knowledge is acquired, and the shifting <strong>of</strong> priorities from timber production to multiple use<br />
natural forest management carries with it an enormous burden <strong>of</strong> ignorance. Not only is little known<br />
about the ecological requirements <strong>of</strong> individual commercial timber species, less still is understood<br />
about non-timber commercial species.<br />
The Supply <strong>of</strong> Tropical Timber<br />
Global demand for industrial wood has been projected to grow by margins <strong>of</strong> 15% to 40% over 15<br />
years, and from 35% to 75% over 50 years (Arnold, 1991). Tropical hardwoods from Southeast Asia<br />
currently fonn the bulk <strong>of</strong> the export market from developing countries, accounting for 84% <strong>of</strong> the<br />
market in 1981; 14% <strong>of</strong> these exports come from Africa, and 1% from Latin America (although<br />
forests are logged heavily in Africa and Latin America for regional consumption (Prescott-Allen,<br />
1982; Schmidt, 1991; Repetto and Gillis, 1988)1. Of this, the FAO found in 1985 that over 90%<br />
came from unmanaged natural forest, roughly divided between primary and once-logged forest'. Of<br />
the 800,000,000 ha <strong>of</strong> forests in IITO producer member countries, only 1,000,000 ha are managed<br />
under sustained yield (Poore, 1989). In the Neotropics, for every 1 ha <strong>of</strong> tropical moist forest<br />
managed under sustained yield management, 35,000 ha are not (Wadsworth, 1987).<br />
Although plantations will play an increasing role in timber production in tropical countries, alone they<br />
will not be able to satisfy the increasing demand for wood. Plantations must also compete with<br />
agriculture for valuable land and must be near processing industries; they tie up capital - <strong>of</strong> which<br />
there is <strong>of</strong>ten little in these regions; they are vulnerable to attacks by pests and diseases, and are<br />
generally perceived as a risk to investors (Wadsworth, 1987; Schmidt, 1991). Natural forest<br />
1 Regional markets <strong>of</strong>ten consume the bulk. <strong>of</strong> a country's timber. For example, in Brazil, 80% <strong>of</strong> the wood produced<br />
in Amazonia is consumed by regional markets, with national and international markets making up the remaining 20% (UbI<br />
et ai., 1989).<br />
2 Rotations, regeneration periods, felling cycles, harvestable girth limits, etc. were not based on growth rates and<br />
regeneration requirements <strong>of</strong> the species, but on the demand for wood, so forests are usually harvested in excess <strong>of</strong> the<br />
allowable cut, and logging damage tends to be severe (Nair, 1991).
management and plantations <strong>of</strong> tropical timber, therefore, must play complementary roles in the<br />
production <strong>of</strong> tropical timber (Schmidt, 1991; Anderson, 1990).<br />
Natural Forest Management<br />
Many <strong>of</strong> the problems associated with natural forest managemenf result from the limited objectives<br />
set in the past by forest managers 4 • The best way to ensure success in natural tropical forests is to<br />
use as much <strong>of</strong> the great species and genetic diversity as possible (Gomez-Pompa and Burley, 1991;<br />
Hart, 1980; Clay and Clement, 1993; Gentry, 1992; Hidalgo, 1992). The diversity <strong>of</strong> tropical forests<br />
has been seen in the past as a major obstacle to its commercial exploitation, and numerous forest<br />
management efforts have failed because they fought against this diversity, rather than capitalized on<br />
it. But natural forests managed for multiple purposes have a number <strong>of</strong> significant advantages: they<br />
produce a variety <strong>of</strong> products, and so can flexibly adjust to changing markets for forest products; the<br />
costs <strong>of</strong> management are significantly lower than more intensive land-use systems; there is less<br />
likelihood <strong>of</strong> pests, disease, or natural disasters destroying their productive capacity; they are more<br />
easily adapted to local social and cultural conditions; and they maintain the ecological functions <strong>of</strong><br />
the forest (Poore and Sayer, 1991; Anderson, 1990). Ultimately, natural forest management provides<br />
the best compromise between the need to use valuable forest resources and the need to conserve<br />
forests and the diversity <strong>of</strong> species they contain (ITIO, 1992; Salick, 1992). As Schmidt (1991) said,<br />
"is natural forest management uneconomic or is it the only economic alternative?".<br />
Standing tropical forests provide numerous non-timber benefits, including climatic and environmental<br />
services, wild relatives <strong>of</strong> crops, potential phannaceutical compounds 5 , and numerous non-timber<br />
forest products. Non-timber products like medicines, resins, essential oils, fibres) and foods, generate<br />
large amounts <strong>of</strong> income in the local and regional markets <strong>of</strong> tropical countries, and some species,<br />
like rattan, rosewood oil, chicle, and Brazil nuts, are traded widely on the international market 6 • The<br />
non-timber forest products <strong>of</strong> three areas in Latin America, for example, yielded greater potential<br />
returns!hectare than timber extraction, cattle ranching, and plantation forestry (Peters et al., 1989;<br />
Balick and Mendelssohn, 1992; Grimes et al., 1993). More than 1.5,000,000 people in the Brazilian<br />
Amazon earn the bulk <strong>of</strong> their living from the extraction <strong>of</strong> forest products (Richards, 1993). The<br />
3 Natural forest management can be defined as the extraction <strong>of</strong> some <strong>of</strong> the forest products without significantly<br />
disturbing the ecosystem as a whole. Forest manipulation and conservation occur through an efficient natural or induced<br />
regeneration <strong>of</strong> the forest ecosystem, which is only lightly disturbed (Gomez-Pompa and Burley, 1991; Schmidt, 1991).<br />
The sustainable implementation <strong>of</strong> this system results in the maintenance <strong>of</strong> ecological processes and significant levels<br />
<strong>of</strong> biodiversity, and requires the sustainable harvest <strong>of</strong> non-timber and timber products alike (poore and Sayer, 1991).<br />
4 The failure <strong>of</strong> sustainable natural forest management has been attributed to a number <strong>of</strong> factors, including: high<br />
extraction costs (in relation to prices) associated with selective logging; low volume commercial woods available/unit area,<br />
and so low economic returns; lack <strong>of</strong> understanding <strong>of</strong> the silvics <strong>of</strong> tropical tree species, and resulting difficulties in<br />
management; vulnerability to disruptive land uses, such as shifting cultivation; government policies that make sustainedyield<br />
forestry economically unattractive; and forestry agencies that don't effectively regulate forestry practices (UbI et<br />
al., 1989; Anderson, 1990).<br />
s Principe (1992) estimates that the value for prescription and over-the-counter medicines in OEeD countries in 1985<br />
was $43,000,000,000. Additionally, the World Health Organization estimates that the vast majority (80%) <strong>of</strong> the world's<br />
population depends upon traditional, natural product-based medicines for their primary healthcare.<br />
6 Exports <strong>of</strong> non-timber forest products from Indonesia reached $125,OOO,OOO/year in the early 1980s. In 1973, nonwood<br />
products accounted for 2.9% <strong>of</strong> the total forest product export value, but in 1982 had increased to 13.3%. The rattan<br />
industry alone employs 70,000 - 100,000 people, not including collectors (De Jong and Mendelssohn, 1992).<br />
3
4<br />
yields on alternative land-uses for the tropics have been greatly overestimated. Poor soils and<br />
invasions by pests and weeds have led to the failure <strong>of</strong> most intensive land-use systems (Peters et<br />
al., 1989; Balick and Mendelssohn, 1992). Natural forests can be managed to efficiently utilize the<br />
wide variety <strong>of</strong> possible forest resources, providing the maximum total benefit over the long run, and<br />
avoiding the environmental degradation associated with many other land-use options in the tropics<br />
(Repetto and Gillis, 1988).<br />
Ill. The Economic Underpinnings <strong>of</strong> Natural Forest Management<br />
Economics is a way <strong>of</strong> thinking about problems, not a recipe for solving them - Keynes, 1936<br />
Economic theory suffers from a tendency to assume that the world is a sum <strong>of</strong> its parts - that if we<br />
objectively understand the many components <strong>of</strong> a system, we will understand the whole. But in<br />
economics, as in ecology, the reality is far more complex and there exist no "universal truths"; the<br />
"parts" represent constantly co-evolving, dynamic and interdependent relationships, difficult to<br />
understand and impossible to separate from each other in any applicable analysis (Norgaard).<br />
Neoclassical economic theory has for decades determined the type <strong>of</strong> forestry and "development"<br />
practised in the tropics, promoting national capital accumulation as a measure <strong>of</strong> a linear type <strong>of</strong><br />
"progress".<br />
Microeconomic models utilizing comparative advantage, specialization, and gains from exchange<br />
were employed to increase GNP and per capita incomes, but little "real" development resulted.<br />
Although overall growth was achieved in many countries, it was <strong>of</strong>ten at the expense <strong>of</strong> natural<br />
resource wealth and resulted in only wider gaps between rich and poor (Schwartzman, 1992; Burns,<br />
1986; Barbier, 1987). The concept <strong>of</strong> development, much as with "sustainability", has been revised<br />
to emphasize meeting the basic needs <strong>of</strong> the poor, to advocate cultural sensitivity, and to encourage<br />
"grassroots" participation in the development process. In theory, this means that political, social and<br />
cultural values are added to measurements <strong>of</strong> economic activity when assessing development, and<br />
smaller, adaptive projects are encouraged (Barbier, 1987).<br />
Neoclassical economic theory holds that resources will be efficiently allocated when prices reflect<br />
true resource scarcity, there exists a right <strong>of</strong> ownership and therefore freedom to trade, and when<br />
consumers have access to information about the total amount <strong>of</strong> a resource available (National<br />
Research Council, 1992). But tropical forest resources have consistently been undervalued, and their<br />
over-exploitation has been considered net income, rather than a loss <strong>of</strong> wealth (McNeely, 1988). As<br />
a result, under this system the only biodiversity remaining will be that which is too expensive to<br />
exploit, due to difficulties in access, and too immediately valuable to destroy, such as ground water.<br />
The failure in this system to value biodiversity results from a combination <strong>of</strong> market failures,<br />
intervention failures, and global appropriations failures (Pearce, 1993), including: biodiversity<br />
provides many non-marketed environmental services (like erosion prevention and flood control), and<br />
supplies "invisible" products (like NTFPs traded only on local markets), and many potential products<br />
(like lesser-known-timber species); government interventions, such as (perverse) incentives, tax<br />
provisions, and tax credits, distort commodity prices and promote short-tenn pr<strong>of</strong>its through resource
depletion 7 ; biodiversity and many forests are a "public good" and therefore are not "owned", so can<br />
result in infinite discounting <strong>of</strong> future costs on the part <strong>of</strong> users; consumers do not have adequate<br />
access to infonnation about the total value <strong>of</strong> natural resources and so prices do not reflect scarcity;<br />
timber and some other forest products have long gestation periods, and so the discount rates applied<br />
by current economic planners make its long-term sustainable use appear uneconomic; knowledge <strong>of</strong><br />
the multiplicity <strong>of</strong> potential useful forest species is limited, and so not factored into assessments <strong>of</strong><br />
its value; and forest products are most widely used by the poor and politically and economically<br />
powerless (McNeely, 1988; National Research Council, 1992; Pearce, 1992; Barbier, 1987;<br />
Schwartzman, 1992; Repetto and Gillis, 1988; Swanson, 1992; Repetto and Gillis, 1988; Uhl et al.,<br />
1989).<br />
Causal mechanisms also influence the use <strong>of</strong> forest resources. These might include economic<br />
instruments used to stimulate the economy, property rights 8 , external debt, international trade<br />
policies, the over-valuation <strong>of</strong> currency, inflation (which encourages cattle ranching, for example,<br />
because cattle are - in effect - inflation-pro<strong>of</strong>), price instability <strong>of</strong> major export crops, the structure<br />
(time and cost) <strong>of</strong> concessions, etc. (National Research Council, 1992; Repetto and Gillis, 1988)9.<br />
Direct economic incentives and disincentives can also influence the nature <strong>of</strong> resource use.<br />
Disincentives for destruction include the posting <strong>of</strong> environmental bonds by logging companies;<br />
incentives might include the employment <strong>of</strong> local people in reserved areas (McNeely, 1988).<br />
Proper valuation techniques are necessary for the many timber and non-timber values generated by<br />
tropical forests, and for the appraisal <strong>of</strong> forestry projects and alternative forest uses. Assessments <strong>of</strong><br />
the financial value <strong>of</strong> various forest management systems does not even roughly approximate the<br />
wider economic value <strong>of</strong> all benefits (irrespective <strong>of</strong> who receives them), against all the costs<br />
(irrespective <strong>of</strong> who bears them) (Leslie, 1987). Foresters have been forced to increase the fmancial<br />
perfonnance <strong>of</strong> natural forest management by increasing revenues and decreasing costs; silvicultural<br />
systems strive to increase growth rates and yield, shorten rotations and lower treatment and protection<br />
costs; lesser-known species are sought to increase yield per unit area (Leslie, 1987). But forests<br />
provide numerous benefits and excessive exploitation incurs many costs not measured by financial<br />
analysis.<br />
A number <strong>of</strong> economic valuation techniques have been developed to incorporate non-marketed goods<br />
and services provided by forests, so as to be comparable with values placed on marketable goods.<br />
These include costs <strong>of</strong> replacement, hedonic price analysis, travel cost methods, and contingent<br />
valuation. These are used to measure both direct and indirect use <strong>of</strong> a resource (timber, plant<br />
7 For example, in the Brazilian Amazon subsidies and other policy distortions are estimated to have accounted for<br />
at least 30% <strong>of</strong> all forest altered by 1980. Over the past three decades> 10,000,000 ha <strong>of</strong> Amazonian rainforest have been<br />
converted to cattle pastures, largely through government policies. For every 1/4 lb. hamburger that cost US$ 0.26 to<br />
produce, the government <strong>of</strong> Brazil expended US$ 0.22 (Anderson, 1990). From 1970-1988, US$23,OOO,OOO,OOO was spent<br />
subsidizing cattle ranching, agriculture and colonization projects, and the building <strong>of</strong> roads in the Amazon (Schwartzman,<br />
1992).<br />
8 Private property and communal property rights best protect forest resources in the long-term. Open-access and<br />
insecure land tenure, because they do not guarantee the user any future access, usually results in a "tragedy <strong>of</strong> the<br />
commons" in which the future is discounted infmitely and user costs are ignored.<br />
9 Mather (1990) suggest that policies for land use systems other than forestry have had a larger impact on forests than<br />
any forestry policy.<br />
5
6<br />
breeding, landscape, recreation, biodiversity, watershed, recreation, etc.), option values (biodiversity,<br />
recreation, potential phannaceuticals, landscape, etc.) and existence values (biodiversity, landscape,<br />
etc.) (Pearce, 1991; 1992).<br />
Standard cost-benefit analysis <strong>of</strong> the variety <strong>of</strong> products produced by a forest can also be used in<br />
some cases to provide strong arguments for sustainable use, although Leslie (1987) and others find<br />
it "tactically" naive to fight the battle for natural forest management on financial grounds (National<br />
Research Council, 1992; Pearce, 1991, 1992; Leslie, 1987; ITTO, 1990) But because most policymakers<br />
use cost-benefit analysis when making decisions about land-use options, it is important that<br />
these be expanded to include the range <strong>of</strong> marketable products, including NTFPs. However, because<br />
the trade in NTFPs is largely local or regional and takes place in the "infonnal sector", few records<br />
exist on their economic value; as a result, although NTFPs make up a significant percentage <strong>of</strong> the<br />
actual value <strong>of</strong> the forests, they are not figured in to policy and management decisions (Padoch et<br />
al., 1992; Cleary, 1992).<br />
Comparative economics has been used to successfully demonstrate the economic importance <strong>of</strong><br />
conservation and multi-purpose use <strong>of</strong> natural forests, by demonstrating the superior economic<br />
perfonnance <strong>of</strong> NTFPs when compared with other land-use options in tropical forests (Peters et al.,<br />
1989; Balick and Mendelssohn, 1992; Godoy and Lubowski, 1992; Falconer, 1990; De Beer and<br />
McDermott, 1989; Phillips, 1992; Grimes et al., 1993). Additionally, the harvest <strong>of</strong> NTFPs throughout<br />
the economically "unproductive" building phase <strong>of</strong> timber trees can subsidize silvicultural and<br />
management expenses, and can lessen the blow struck to financial analyses <strong>of</strong> natural forest<br />
management by compounded interest 10 • For local peoples, non-timber products can provide<br />
consistent, if relatively small, sources <strong>of</strong> income, complemented by the periodic concentration <strong>of</strong><br />
capital produced by the felling <strong>of</strong> timber (Leslie, 1987; Salick, 1992; Reining and Heinzman, 1992;<br />
Malhotra et al., 1991).<br />
But valuation is clearly not enough. Peters et al. (1989) note that, although NTFPs have a superior<br />
economic value in the area <strong>of</strong> Peru they studied, timber continues to be considered <strong>of</strong> primary<br />
importance, largely due to its sale on international markets and generation <strong>of</strong> foreign exchange.<br />
NTFPs, on the other hand, are collected and sold in local markets by an incalculable number <strong>of</strong><br />
subsistence farmers, forest collectors, middlemen and shop owners. These decentralized trade<br />
networks are extremely hard to monitor and easy to ignore (Peters et al., 1989; Padoch, 1992).<br />
Some Socioeconomic Considerations for the Sustainable Use <strong>of</strong> NTFPs<br />
In order for non-timber forest products to be incorporated into natural forest management and<br />
generate sustainable income for local peoples, a number <strong>of</strong> basic issues must be addressed ll . These<br />
include: land tenure, fluctuations in markets, local value-added processing, over-harvesting <strong>of</strong> species,<br />
transportation, and the expansion <strong>of</strong> markets overseas.<br />
10 For example, rattan species have been planted in logged-over forest in Southeast Asia to both "rehabilitate"<br />
degraded forests and provide a significant interim income while the forest recovers from logging pressure (Sayer, 1991).<br />
11 Ifnatural forest management is to succeed, forest managers must better understand the ideological assumptions from<br />
which their decisions are made, and correct deficiencies in their understanding <strong>of</strong> the socioeconomic context in which<br />
forestry projects operate. This is particularly important when incorporating NTFPs into forest management, because<br />
ignorance <strong>of</strong> the socioeconomic dynamics <strong>of</strong> these complex collection and trading systems could lead to projects that<br />
would restrict and potentially damage local livelihoods, rather than enhance the productivity <strong>of</strong> a forest (Cleary, 1992).
Land Tenure<br />
Land tenure and resource rights for forest residents are essential prerequisites to sustainability in an<br />
economy based on natural forest management that utilizes a wide range <strong>of</strong> products over long periods<br />
<strong>of</strong> time (Clay and Clement, 1993; Schwartzman, 1992; Allegreti, 1990; Cleary, 1992; De long and<br />
Mendelssohn, 1992). Because <strong>of</strong> the scattered nature <strong>of</strong> most species in the tropical forest, and the<br />
low productivity per unit area, sustainable, lower-yielding systems are only attractive if collectors<br />
retain long-tenn security <strong>of</strong> access to the forest and its resources (Phillips, 1993).<br />
Unpredictable Markets<br />
External markets for NTFPs tend to be unpredictable, operating on boom-bust cycles, with synthetics<br />
substituting for natural products once an economy <strong>of</strong> scale is achieved (Padoch, 1992; Richards,<br />
1993; Sizer, 1992). For example, during the early part <strong>of</strong> this century, Brazil exported 40 different<br />
vegetable oils from the Amazon. The spread <strong>of</strong> electricity (and so decreased reliance on candles) and<br />
extensive cultivation <strong>of</strong> corn and soybeans (which became the most popular vegetable oils<br />
internationally) resulted in the decline <strong>of</strong> markets for these oils (Clay and Clement, 1993). But today,<br />
there exists an increasing global market for vegetable oils, especially exotic, on the part <strong>of</strong>companies<br />
looking for environmentally-sound substitutes for plantation-grown palm oil. Chicle (used in chewing<br />
gum) and tagua (used to make buttons) were both displaced by synthetic substitutes, but have recently<br />
regained popularity through expanded marketing ventures in the United States (Reining and<br />
Heinzman, 1992; Ziffer, 1992).<br />
By maintaining a diversity <strong>of</strong> products in the extractive economy, rather than depending upon a few,<br />
the potential impacts <strong>of</strong> individual product price fluctuations on the value <strong>of</strong> the forests for all NTFPs<br />
can be minimized (Grimes et al., 1993; Clay, 1992; Clay and Clement, 1993). Markets for a single<br />
NTFP species can also be diversified. For example, Brazil nut (Bertholletia excelsa) can be used as<br />
nuts, in ice cream, baked goods, candy, oil, and as a flour (Clay and Clement, 1993).<br />
It is important to note, however, that the bulk <strong>of</strong> NTFPs are traded on local or domestic markets.<br />
While some <strong>of</strong> these markets might decline or disappear over time, either because the product is an<br />
"inferior good" that drops out <strong>of</strong> consumption patterns as incomes rise, or because <strong>of</strong> competition<br />
from factory-made alternatives, much <strong>of</strong> this trade is in products which enjoy stable or growing<br />
markets (Arnold, pers. comm., 1994).<br />
Adding Value Locally to NTFPs<br />
Adding value to products destined for markets can be an important way to increase benefits for local<br />
forest residents. Because adding value to forest products involves the combined efforts <strong>of</strong> collectors,<br />
producers and marketers that do not usually work together, these efforts can be plagued by the<br />
politics <strong>of</strong> ownership and control over infrastructure and processing facilities (Clay and Clement,<br />
1993; Clay, 1992). The quality <strong>of</strong> products produced through local processing must be comparable<br />
with that produced elsewhere, or these products will not sell on the open market.<br />
Expanding the Markets Overseas<br />
Wild plants and animals are subject to a management "Catch 22": if their economic utility is<br />
overlooked or ignored, or if their use is in competition with another form <strong>of</strong> land use, they may<br />
suffer from habitat destruction; if, however, their economic utility is evident, they are likely to be<br />
over-exploited (Prescott-Allen, 1982). In building up markets for NTFPs located in a forest, a number<br />
<strong>of</strong> international marketers <strong>of</strong> NTFPs and researchers suggest that one should begin with existing<br />
products, rather than attempt to develop new ones, ideally replacing an existing commodity with<br />
something superior or cheaper, or, in some cases, supplying unfilled demand (FAO, 1991; Gentry,<br />
7
8<br />
1992; Ziffer, 1992; Clay, 1992). These should be those products with the highest market price, the<br />
most reliable supply, and the greatest potential for future market expansion (Peters, 1993).<br />
"Green" markets in developed countries for sustainably-produced NTFPs appear to be significant and<br />
growing. For example, in 1991 39% <strong>of</strong> the American public considered themselves environmentalists<br />
and 50% said that they would select a product for purchase based on environmental concerns (Dixon<br />
et al., 1991; Clay, 1992).<br />
The Over-Exploitation <strong>of</strong> Forest Products<br />
Expanding production to enter new markets, or fill increased demand in existing markets, can result<br />
in production problems. There exists a lag time between increased demand and adequate supplies,<br />
as producers attempt to develop systems that will supply the quantity and quality <strong>of</strong> the product<br />
desired (FAO, 1991). The harvesting <strong>of</strong> forest products for subsistence or small-scale trade locally<br />
is usually based on traditional systems <strong>of</strong> forest management which have, through trial and error over<br />
many years, developed sustainable methods <strong>of</strong>extraction. When demand increases, however, existing<br />
harvesting methods usually will not suffice; additionally, collectors from outside the area will enter<br />
the forest to harvest valuable products 12 (Padoch, 1992; Cunningham, 1991; Vasquez and Gentry,<br />
1989; Falconer, 1990; Godoy et al., 1992). Vasquez and Gentry (1989) describe this as the "critical<br />
behavioral bottleneck" in the process <strong>of</strong> conversion from local consumption to commercial<br />
exploitation.<br />
Traditional resource management usually involves inadvertent (taboos, religious, seasonal and social<br />
restrictions on gathering and the nature <strong>of</strong> equipment used) and at times direct management <strong>of</strong><br />
resources if harvesting practices appear to create shortages in a resource <strong>of</strong> value to society or the<br />
socio-political nature <strong>of</strong> society depends upon it (Cunningham, 1991; Davies and Richards, 1991;<br />
lain, 1992). When large demand for a forest resource is created, harvesting practices <strong>of</strong>ten change<br />
in communities that have entered the cash economy, suffer from increasing unemployment, or have<br />
undergone cultural change 13 (Cunningham, 1991; Vasquez and Gentry, 1989). Protecting these<br />
resources by establishing laws or policing them will not, however, protect them from exploitation (De<br />
long and Mendelssohn, 1992; Peluso, 1992).<br />
Transportation<br />
The costs <strong>of</strong> transportation and the perishability <strong>of</strong> a forest product determines how far away products<br />
will be harvested 14 (De long and Mendelssohn, 1992). NTFPs tend to be difficult to ship due to<br />
12 For example, pau rosa (Aniba roseadora) is currently over-harvested to the point <strong>of</strong> elimination in the Amazon,<br />
but could 'be replanted and sustainably managed. Copaiba oil (Copaifera multijuga) can easily be harvested by drilling<br />
a hole with a brace and bit and tamping it, but is more <strong>of</strong>ten destructively harvested by cutting a hole with an axe.<br />
13 For example, Wamulwange (1993) reports from Zambia: "In the past the traditional government would charge a<br />
sum <strong>of</strong> five pounds for cutting timber without a license. One pound for cutting a fruit tree, but no charge for the<br />
collection <strong>of</strong> fIrewood. Some areas were declared as forest reserves where a culprit would be charged the sum <strong>of</strong> ten<br />
pounds for grazing, ten pounds for cutting and one pound for trespassing. People are not respecting these laws anymore."<br />
14 Assai is found in nearly monocrop stands, both naturally occurring and created, near the mouth <strong>of</strong>the Amazon and<br />
in varying densities along the river all the way to Bolivia. In 1990, the market for assai fruit, which was entirely domestic,<br />
was nearly US $100,000,000. The main market for the fruit is in Belem, where as many as 50,000 I <strong>of</strong> unprocessed fruit<br />
are sold daily. Harvesters in the area earn as much as US$10 to $US15 per hour. The Belem market can only be supplied<br />
by fruit that is no further than a single night's boat trip away because after 24 hours it spoils. Within this area, then, assai<br />
is very valuable. Outside <strong>of</strong> this radius, assai stands are decimated and sold for palm heart (Bovi and de Castro in: Clay<br />
and Clement, 1993; Clay and Clement, 1993).
spoilage, although many have a much higher kilogram value than even the most expensive timber<br />
(Clay and Clement, 1993; Richards, 1993).<br />
Box 1: Lesser Known Timber Species<br />
In addition to non-timber forest products, the use <strong>of</strong> a larger number <strong>of</strong> timber species in a natural<br />
forest can increase yield/unit area, and could improve the economic outlook <strong>of</strong> natural forest<br />
management. Generally, only 10-50 <strong>of</strong> the thousands <strong>of</strong> tropical tree species have been commercially<br />
exploited, but high-grading has depleted stocks <strong>of</strong> premium timbers and deforestation has made timber<br />
scarce (Hartshorn, 1990). As a result, efforts have been undertaken to promote the lesser known species<br />
(LKS) <strong>of</strong> high-diversity tropical forests. Although if done to excess, this could result in the depletion <strong>of</strong><br />
nutrients in forest ecosystems, it is generally accepted that - if done sustainably - the harvest <strong>of</strong> LKS<br />
would make better use <strong>of</strong> the forest resource, and less forest could be harvested to meet demands for<br />
timber. In order for LKS to succeed, the conservatism within the timber trade must be overcome,<br />
species must be marketed 10 consumers, infonnation on the wood properties <strong>of</strong> these species must be<br />
made available, and consistent supplies ensured (Jonson and Lindgren, 1990).<br />
In general, the more distant a timber consumer market is from its timber supply area, the more selective<br />
it is about the number <strong>of</strong> wood species it consumes. In part, this is due to the costs <strong>of</strong> transJX>rt. Local<br />
markets in the Amazon, for example, appear to be the least discriminating, with national markets<br />
accepting a large percentage less and international markets even fewer (Browder, 1986; Feamside,<br />
1990). Browder found, for example, that <strong>of</strong> the 7 principle Brazilian Amazon woods exported to the<br />
United States in 1982, mahogany accounted for 84%.<br />
In Queensland only one species, Red cedar (Toona Australis) was used by the early settlers, 10 species<br />
were used by 1930, and over 100 species by 1945. Leslie (1987) suggests that this is a function <strong>of</strong> the<br />
growing scarcity <strong>of</strong> prime species and thus the greater acceptance <strong>of</strong> alternatives and <strong>of</strong> small-sized<br />
species.<br />
In Malaysia, only 30 timber species are harvested for export in significant quantities (JoOOs, A.D.,<br />
1992). In the Brazilian Amazon, Uhl et al. (1989) reported that 222 trees <strong>of</strong> only 30 species were<br />
extracted from a 52 ha forest tract in Para, although the total number <strong>of</strong> timber species in the Amazon<br />
is estimated by Martini et al. (1993) at 335, and local mills now use approximately 140 species (as<br />
opposed to 6 species 40 years ago). Nair (1991) found that for an area in India, 30 species were listed<br />
for felling, but in fact a disproportionately large number belonging to 3 or 4 species were removed for<br />
specific ends.<br />
Martins (1992) reports that the promotion <strong>of</strong> lesser-known or non-traditional wood species in Honduras<br />
looked promising. Because the traditional mahogany and Spanish cedar species are increasingly scarce,<br />
room in the market has been created for the LKS species. Promotional activities, such as an exhibit <strong>of</strong><br />
fInished furniture pieces <strong>of</strong> high quality made entirely <strong>of</strong> LKS, have proved to be a success (Martins,<br />
CIDA, pers. comm., 1992).<br />
9
10<br />
Box 2: The Economic Valuation <strong>of</strong> Non-Timber Forest Products<br />
The harvest <strong>of</strong> medicinal plants for local use in Belize was estimated to have a net present value (NPV)<br />
<strong>of</strong> $726/ha in 30 year old forest and $3,327/ha in 50 year old forest. The plots in which medicinals<br />
were collected also contained other valuable income-generating NTFPs, like chicIe (Manilkara zapota)<br />
and allspice (Pimenta dioica), which were not included in these values. This compares favourably with<br />
alternative land uses. Estimates <strong>of</strong> the value <strong>of</strong> intensive agriculture in the Brazilian rainforest are<br />
$339/ha, and in Guatemalan forests $288/ha. The most successful pine plantations proposed for the<br />
tropics yield only $3,184/ha (Balick and Mendelssohn, 1992).<br />
Peters et al. (1992) similarly demonstrated the economic superiority <strong>of</strong> NTFPs using standard costbenefit<br />
analysis for a forest in Peru. The NPV <strong>of</strong> sustainable fruit and latex harvests was estimated at<br />
$6,330/ha, and <strong>of</strong> total NTFPs at $6,820. The standing volume <strong>of</strong> merchantable timber in this tract <strong>of</strong><br />
forest was 93.8 m 3 jha if liquidated in one felling, and a net revenue <strong>of</strong> $1,000 would result upon<br />
delivery to the sawmill. A logging operation <strong>of</strong> this intensity, however, would so damage the residual<br />
stand that future revenues from the site would drastically reduce or eliminate future harvests <strong>of</strong> NTFPs.<br />
The net financial gains from timber extraction would be reduced to zero if as few as 18 fruit trees were<br />
damaged by logging. Periodic selective cuttings <strong>of</strong> the 60 commercial species at the site, however,<br />
would produce volumes <strong>of</strong> 30 m 3 /ha every twenty years, which would produce net revenues <strong>of</strong> about<br />
$310 at each cutting cycle, or an NPV <strong>of</strong> $490 (peters et al., 1989).<br />
In Ecuador, Grimes et al. (1993) found that the three plots in their study produced NPVs for NTFPs <strong>of</strong><br />
$2939/ha, $2721/ha, and $1257/ha (with upland forest providing the largest returns). Timber resources<br />
calculated on a 40 year rotation length produced an NPV <strong>of</strong> $188/ha. Cattle ranching has a NPV <strong>of</strong> $57<br />
in the same area. Markets for NTFPs appeared to be expanding locally, regionally, and nationally. The<br />
values calculated for NTFPs do not include medicinal herbs or shrubs, flowers, wildlife, tourism or the<br />
wide range <strong>of</strong> environmental services provided by intact forests, all <strong>of</strong> which would greatly enhance the<br />
forest's economic value. For example, one guanta (Paca agouti), a forest rodent, sells for $20.69 in the<br />
local market, and decorative butterflies sell to tourists for a similar price. Selective, low-impact<br />
harvesting <strong>of</strong> timber species would additionally add to the NPV for the forest area (Grimes et al.,<br />
1993).<br />
The results <strong>of</strong> these valuations <strong>of</strong> non-timber products will vary depending upon the biological and<br />
economic diversity <strong>of</strong> study sites, temporal changes in market prices, production levels and harvest<br />
intensities, and the methods and reporting procedure employed by the researchers15. Although these<br />
studies usefully demonstrate the previously ignored "invisible" economic value <strong>of</strong> NTFPs, the<br />
methodology employed is still in development and there remain a number <strong>of</strong> doubts as to the practical<br />
relevancy <strong>of</strong> the results. For example, many <strong>of</strong> these valuations do not take into consideration the<br />
impact <strong>of</strong> greatly increased supplies on the market and prices, transport costs from more remote areas,<br />
the non-sustainable nature <strong>of</strong> some harvesting, the shortcomings <strong>of</strong> basing values on returns to land<br />
rather than labour (which is the scarce factor), the assumption that local populations would base<br />
decisions on discounted future values, and the great importance <strong>of</strong> institutional factors (such as insecure<br />
land tenure) that influence local decisions about the use <strong>of</strong> forest resources (Amold, pers. comm., 1994;<br />
Godoy and Lubowski, 1992; Pinedo-Vasquez et al., 1992).<br />
IS Godoy and Lubowski (1992) suggest that because many <strong>of</strong> these studies measure costs, quantities extracted, and<br />
prices in different ways, the results cannot be directly compared with each other; researchers, therefore, must pay more<br />
attention to their methods so that future studies can produce genemlizable results (Godoy and Lubowski, 1992).
12<br />
Because <strong>of</strong> the unpredictable nature <strong>of</strong> markets for non-timber products and the irregularity <strong>of</strong> yields<br />
from these species, it is generally best to manage forests for a wide range <strong>of</strong> species and potential<br />
products 18 •<br />
When selecting species for natural forest management, Peters (1993) suggests that, given a group <strong>of</strong><br />
species with similar economic pr<strong>of</strong>iles, ecological criteria should be incorporated to assess the<br />
potential for sustained-yield management: the life cycle characteristics, the multiplicity <strong>of</strong> uses and<br />
types <strong>of</strong> resources produced, the abundance in different forest types, and the size-class distribution<br />
<strong>of</strong> populations.<br />
Species that are annually fruiting, hermaphroditic, and pollinated by a common, generalist vector are<br />
much easier to work with than an unpredictably fruiting, dioecious species requiring specialized<br />
animal vectors for pollination and seed dispersal 19 • Primary forest species adapted for growth and<br />
regeneration under a closed canopy, such as Carapa guianensis, Copaijera multijuga, Theobroma<br />
grandijlorum, and Coumarouna odorata in the Amazon will, in most cases, be preferable to fastgrowing<br />
early pioneers which require large gaps for seedling establishment (Peters, 1993; Smith et<br />
al., 1992). Following logging, however, larger-sized gaps can be filled with useful pioneer species,<br />
such as Croton cajucara in the Amazon or Rauvolfia vomitoria and Musanga species in West<br />
Africa 20 •<br />
The abundance, or current density and distribution, <strong>of</strong> a species will also affect the ease with which<br />
they can be managed, their yield per unit area, and the likelihood that they can be sustainably<br />
managed (Peters, 1993; Gentry, 1992; Reining and Heinzman, 1992; Reining et al., 1992;<br />
18 For example, a good year <strong>of</strong> Brazil nut harvest is usually followed by a bad one, as the tree uses most <strong>of</strong> its<br />
accumulated reserves and takes more than a year to accumulate more. Fruiting is said to be heavy in alternate years only<br />
(Clay and Clement, 1993). The quantity <strong>of</strong> copaiba (Copaijera multijuga) drawn from each tree depends upon the<br />
botanical species <strong>of</strong> the tree, its age, the lapse <strong>of</strong> time since the previous tapping and upon season.<br />
19 The Brazil nut (Bertholletia excelsa), for example, has well-established and lucrative markets, but is cross pollinated<br />
by non-social or semi-social large bees with enough strength to pry open flowers, and has seeds which are dispersed by<br />
agoutis (Dasyprocta aguti) and squirrels (Sciureus spp.), which appear to be the only species capable <strong>of</strong> gnawing through<br />
the extremely woody pericarp (Mori, 1992).<br />
A lack <strong>of</strong> Brazil nut regeneration on the forest floor has been observed throughout Amazonian, but has not been<br />
adequately explained. It is possible that, because the large capsule fruits are so easy to find, gatherers do not leave enough<br />
seed on the forest floor to be dispersed by agoutis and develop into seedlings. In addition, lack <strong>of</strong> regeneration could be<br />
due to reduced populations <strong>of</strong> the major dispersal agent (agoutis) through hunting, low fertilization/germination rates, seed<br />
vulnerability to fungus, seedling dependence on large openings, the burning beneath adult trees to facilitate collection and<br />
nut production, or a lack <strong>of</strong> pollinators in cases where trees are not in proximity to the natural forest on which the bees<br />
depend (Nepstad et al., 1993; Mori, 1992; Smith et al., 1992).<br />
20 Rauvolfia species have yielded reserpine, the starting point for traditional and phannaceutical treaunents for<br />
hypertension. The crushed root, seeds and leaves are used locally in a variety <strong>of</strong> traditional remedies. The ashes <strong>of</strong>burned<br />
Musanga spp. are used as a salt substitute, its wood for a variety <strong>of</strong> construction purposes, and various plant parts are<br />
used in traditional medicines (Abbiw, 1990).
Cunningham, 1992)21. Clearly, rare species are in more danger from the essentially random damage<br />
inflicted by logging operations than common species are (lohns, A.D., 1992); similarly, unsustainable<br />
harvesting <strong>of</strong> plant parts or entire trees for non-timber forest products will endanger populations <strong>of</strong><br />
rare individuals more than the common. Although high-density populations <strong>of</strong> species are easier to<br />
manage than low, the vast majority <strong>of</strong> tropical species occur at low densities (Sayer, 1991; Peters,<br />
1993; Peters et al., 1989). Additionally, most traditional management systems promote and depend<br />
upon a wide-range <strong>of</strong> forest vegetational zones and products, and so are directly linked to high<br />
species diversity. (Nair, 1991; Salick, 1992; Toledo, 1992; Alcorn, 1990; Phillips, 1989)22. In<br />
economic tenns, the harvest <strong>of</strong> a multiplicity <strong>of</strong> non-timber forest products is preferable to the harvest<br />
<strong>of</strong> a few because it minimizes the potential impacts <strong>of</strong> individual product price fluctuations (Grimes<br />
et al., 1993).<br />
In the Amazon, most <strong>of</strong> the major non-timber product species occur at extremely low densities, but<br />
have wide geographic distributions. Carapa guianensis, Hymenaea courbaril, Platonia insignis,<br />
Dipteryx odorata, and Caryocar villosum average less than one tree!hectare (although densities <strong>of</strong>4-6<br />
trees!ha have been reported for Carapa in northeast Costa Rica). Copaijera multijuga averages just<br />
over 1 tree/ha (Clay and Clement, 1993; lonson and Lindgren, 1990). Theobroma grandiflorum can<br />
reach 14 trees!ha and Bertholletia excelsa as many as 20 trees!ha, but this type <strong>of</strong> abundance results<br />
most likely from Amerindian intervention 23 •<br />
Many timber species also provide non-timber products, which can generate revenue throughout the<br />
economically "unproductive" building phase following logging operations (Salick, 1992; Reining and<br />
Heinzman, 1992; Malhotra et al., 1991)24. Martini et al. (1989) found that <strong>of</strong> the 335 timber species<br />
utilized in the Brazilian Amazon, one-third were also valued for their fruits, medicinal properties,<br />
and/or gums and resins. The bulk <strong>of</strong> these have "high" (but not greater than $40/m 3 ) wood values and<br />
are under "high" logging pressure (Martini et aI., 1993). In some cases, such as rosewood (Aniba<br />
duckei), non-timber values exceed timber values (Clay and Clement, 1993). The physiological trade<strong>of</strong>fs<br />
<strong>of</strong> harvesting multiple resources from a single tree should be assessed prior to initiating such a<br />
21 In the Maya Biosphere Reserve in Peten Guatemala, three important NlFPs occur in remarkably high densities:<br />
xate (Chamaedorea spp.), the leaves <strong>of</strong> which are exported to the United States and Europe, where they serve as a green<br />
backdrop for cut flower arrangements; chicle (Manilkara zapota), a natural latex used in the manufacture <strong>of</strong> chewing gum<br />
bases; and allspice, the berry <strong>of</strong> Pimienta dioica used as a condiment, to preserve fish, and as a flavouring and curing<br />
agent in processed meats and bakery products. It is likely that this results from Mayan forest gardens and management.<br />
As Reining and Heinzman (1992) described it: "it is as if this is a pre-managed forest". High density and numbers <strong>of</strong><br />
these NlFPs and dozens <strong>of</strong> secondary timbers, thatching palms, construction materials and medicinal plants facilitate<br />
sustainable management in this area (Reining and Heinzman, 1992; Reining et al., 1992).<br />
22 An ethnobotanical study <strong>of</strong> eight indigenous groups in the tropical moist zones <strong>of</strong> Mexico showed that 1,380 plant<br />
species were identified as having one or more uses. Of these, 465 are primary forest species, 712 are secondary forest<br />
species (153 <strong>of</strong> the two preceding figures are species found in both), and 356 are species without ecological specification<br />
<strong>of</strong> habitat (Toledo, 1992).<br />
23 Forests dominated by stands <strong>of</strong> Brazil nut trees are called castanhais. They occur over an area <strong>of</strong> 8000 km 2 in the<br />
Amazon Basin (Balee, 1989).<br />
1A For example, in Southwest Bengal the pioneer species Diospyrros melnoxylon is harvested to provide a wrapper<br />
for Indian cheroots (bedi) in degraded forest prior 10 shading out by the canopy <strong>of</strong> timber species (Shorea robusta).<br />
Enrichment planting <strong>of</strong> mushrooms and medicinal also contributed significantly to economic returns after canopy closure<br />
(Malhorta, et al., 1991).<br />
13
14<br />
program; for example, tapping oleo-resin or latex will undoubtedly have some effect on the<br />
production <strong>of</strong> fruit (Peters, 1993).<br />
For the vast majority <strong>of</strong> non-timber forest species, we have little data on tree density, productivity<br />
and population structure. Many species are as yet undefined 25 • In order for sustained-yield <strong>of</strong> these<br />
species to be possible, however, we must know: the location and identity <strong>of</strong> the resource; the<br />
resource's history <strong>of</strong> exploitation; the total number <strong>of</strong> harvestable trees per hectare; the current<br />
population structure or size-class distribution <strong>of</strong> the species and the quality <strong>of</strong> regeneration; the<br />
productive capacity <strong>of</strong> the species being exploited, and the relationship between tree size, site, and<br />
productivity; and the maximum amount that can be exploited - i.e. the sustainable harvesr 6 •<br />
Plant Parts Used In Non-Timber Forest Products<br />
The sustainable harvesting <strong>of</strong> non-timber forest products depends in large part on the part <strong>of</strong> the plant<br />
that is used (Cunningham, 1991; 1992). The bulk <strong>of</strong> NTFPs can be grouped into three basic<br />
categories based on the type <strong>of</strong> plant tissue or compound actually exploited: reproductive propagules<br />
(fruit, nut/seed, oilseed); plant exudates (latex, resin, and floral nectar); and vegetative structures<br />
(stem, leaf, root bark, and apical bud) (Peters, 1993).<br />
Reproductive Propagules<br />
The harvest <strong>of</strong> fruits, nuts and oilseeds removes plant embryos from the site, and hence reduces the<br />
total number <strong>of</strong> seedlings that can potentially be recruited into the tree population under exploitation,<br />
alters populations structure, genetic variability, and can impact the foraging behaviour <strong>of</strong> local animal<br />
populations 27 • Low density populations which display an obligate relationship with a specific<br />
pollinator or seed disperser will have a much lower sustainable yield <strong>of</strong> fruit, and will be more prone<br />
25 For example, the most important construction timber <strong>of</strong> the Iquitos, Peru area (72-74% <strong>of</strong> the wood used for general<br />
construction came from this species) was recently collected by botanists and found to be a species new to science. "Boa<br />
caspill", the main construction timber at Jenaro Herrera on the Rio Ucayali, turned out to be an undescribed species <strong>of</strong><br />
Havloclathra, so distinctive it was frrst suspected to be a new genus (Gentry, 1992).<br />
26 The most immediate and cost-effective way <strong>of</strong> doing this is by monitoring (in permanent sample plots) the<br />
population impact <strong>of</strong> exploitation and sequentially adjusting harvesting levels over time to obtain a sustainable yield; this<br />
method is known as successive approximation. In practice, achieving sustained yield through successive approximation<br />
will probably involve a considerable number <strong>of</strong> harvest adjustments. There is frequently a tag time in the demographic<br />
response <strong>of</strong>a population to perturbations, such as logging or high-intensity harvest, and after several cycles <strong>of</strong> apparently<br />
stable results from PSPs, populations may exhibit drastic fluctuations in seedling and sapling densities. Sustainable<br />
harvesting levels can thus be achieved through a process <strong>of</strong> reciprocal feedback and "fine-tuning" (peters, 1993; Malhorta<br />
et al., 1991). Frequently, too, local peoples have determined sustainable levels <strong>of</strong> harvest from trial and error, and<br />
ethnobotanical information can reveal a substantial amount <strong>of</strong> information concerning the sustainable productivity <strong>of</strong><br />
tropical forest resources (De long and Mendelssohn, 1992).<br />
27 If a tree population produces 1,000 seeds and 95% <strong>of</strong> the new seedlings produced from these seeds die during the<br />
frrst year, the population still has recruited 50 new progeny. If, on the other hand, intensive fruit harvesting removes all<br />
but 100 <strong>of</strong> these seeds from the site prior to germination, the maximum number <strong>of</strong> seedlings that can be recruited into<br />
the population is reduced to only 5. This ten-fold shortfall in recruitment rate can cause serious changes in the structure<br />
<strong>of</strong> the population (peters, 1993).
to over-exploitation than species with abundant regeneration, not prone to extreme post-dispersal seed<br />
predation, that are pollinated and dispersed by either "generalist" animals or abiotic factors (Peters,<br />
1993)28.<br />
In some cases, poor harvesting practices can lead to drastic species decline not associated directly<br />
with removal <strong>of</strong> the reproductive propagules. For example, trees are <strong>of</strong>ten felled to collect fruits. In<br />
the Peruvian Amazon, female trees <strong>of</strong> the dioecious aguaje palm (Mauritia fleusosa) are felled by<br />
commercial collectors and after a few such "harvests" the forest is left with a preponderance <strong>of</strong><br />
barren male trees (Peters, 1993).<br />
Plant Exudate<br />
When properly conducted, the tapping <strong>of</strong> latex, resins and gums does not disturb the forest canopy,<br />
kill the exploited tree or remove its seed from the site (Peters, 1993). In theory, this activity can<br />
easily be sustainable, but in practice poor harvesting techniques plague these products, as well.<br />
Copaiba (Copaifera multijuga), for example, can be tapped through its lifespan if a brace and bit are<br />
used, and holes are filled following tapping. In practice, however, axes are <strong>of</strong>ten used to create holes<br />
and the wounds created do not heal (Clay and Clement, 1993). Additionally, many species, such as<br />
the Amazonian Couma macrocarpa, which produces valuable fruits and latex, are felled to harvest<br />
plant exudate that could be easily tapped 29 (Peters, 1993). It is also likely that repeated tapping, for<br />
example <strong>of</strong> Hevea brasiliensis, reduces vegetative growth and total fruit production (Peters, 1993).<br />
Vegetative Structures<br />
Although the origin and use <strong>of</strong> plant products from root, stems, leaves, barks, or apical buds, is very<br />
different, their harvest produces a similar ecological impact. The plant species will either be killed<br />
during harvest or will survive and regenerate the vegetative structures removed (Peters, 1993).<br />
Stems<br />
Rattan harvest in Southeast Asia is an example <strong>of</strong> particularly destructive harvesting <strong>of</strong> commercial<br />
quantities <strong>of</strong> stem fibre. Rattan is harvested by cutting the plant at the base and then pulling the<br />
(<strong>of</strong>ten more than 100 m long) stems and leaves out <strong>of</strong> the forest canopy. Large-caned, single<br />
stemmed rattan, such as Calamus manan, do not resprout after cutting, so harvesting kills these<br />
individuals. Small-caned, multi-stemmed individuals, such as C. caesius and C. trachycoIus, can<br />
eventually resprout after harvesting, and individual stems can be cut from the clumped vegetation<br />
every 2-3 years after an initial 8-10 years <strong>of</strong> growth (de Beer and McDermott, 1989; Peters, 1993).<br />
Over-exploitation <strong>of</strong> both small- and large-caned stems, including cutting them too close to the<br />
28 The illipe nut <strong>of</strong> Shorea species in Southeast Asia, for example, produces a high quality oil used in the cosmetic<br />
industry and as a substitute for cocoa to harden chocolate. But many <strong>of</strong> the most important Shorea species providing illipe<br />
nut are fruit masting, and set flowers every five years, so productivity is low (De Jong and Mendelssohn, 1992; Dixon<br />
et al., 1991).<br />
29 Gaharu wood (Aquilaria spp.) is an extremely valuable aromatic resin resulting from infections <strong>of</strong> trees by unknown<br />
pathogens. Aquilaria spp. are found in the primary forests <strong>of</strong> Southeast Asia. The collection <strong>of</strong> gaharu usually involves<br />
felling the trees, which resprout weakly, if at all. Because there are no external signs to indicate whether a tree contains<br />
the valuable exudate, collectors frequently fell every Aquilaria tree they find (although the Penan are successful at<br />
identifying the desirable trees without felling). Uncontrolled exploitation and wasteful felling in search <strong>of</strong> gaharu has led<br />
o its rapid decline (Padoch et al., 1992; Peters, 1993; Zemer, 1993; Stockdale, pers. comm., 1993).<br />
15
16<br />
ground and at too young an age, coupled with increased logging pressures on the forests in which<br />
the vast majority <strong>of</strong> commercial species are harvested, have led to increasing scarcity <strong>of</strong> valuable<br />
rattan species (Peters, 1993; Sayer, 1991; De Jong and Mendelssohn, 1992)30.<br />
The harvest <strong>of</strong> chewsticks, made from the stems <strong>of</strong> primarily Garcinia epunctata and Garcinia afzelii,<br />
provides the main means <strong>of</strong> dental care for 90% <strong>of</strong> the population in southern Ghana. Despite the<br />
increasing popularity <strong>of</strong> Western-style toothbrushes, toothpaste is hard to come by, and demand for<br />
chewsticks continues to rise (Falconer, 1992; Cunningham, 1992). Trees are cut from the forests,<br />
usually by groups <strong>of</strong> gatherers who come out from the cities specifically for this purpose, and the<br />
harvest is then taken back by truck to the urban markets. Falconer (1992) found that 2,000-6500 trees<br />
a month are harvested in the Kumasi region alone, and that almost every gatherer claims that these<br />
species are becoming increasingly scarce in the forest.<br />
Leaves<br />
The harvesting <strong>of</strong> leaf fibres may have a negligible effect on the structure and abundance <strong>of</strong> plant<br />
populations being exploited if: individual plants are not killed in the process, a few healthy leaves<br />
are left on each plant to photosynthesize, reproductive structures and meristems are not damaged, and<br />
sufficient time is allowed between successive harvests for the plant to produce new leaves (Peters,<br />
1993). Many traditional medicines and internationally-traded herbal medicines come from leaves 31 •<br />
In many cases, the extent <strong>of</strong> demand for leaves has resulted in diminished populations, due to the<br />
factors described above. Leaves stripped from the Amazonian Pilocarpus spp., for example, provide<br />
the active compound pilocarpine, which is used in the pharmaceutical treatment <strong>of</strong> glaucoma 32 • In<br />
1989, over 1300 tons <strong>of</strong> dried plant material were exported to the United States alone (Elisabetsky,<br />
1991). Due to scarcity and the desire to control supply, the pharmaceutical company E. Merck <strong>of</strong><br />
Germany has spent ten years attempting to cultivate Pilocarpus spp. It has had a difficult time doing<br />
so, as leaves with adequate quantities <strong>of</strong> the desired chemical compounds have been difficult to<br />
produce in plantation (Sheldon et al., 1993). The secondary compounds useful in medicines are <strong>of</strong>ten<br />
not produced when plants are grown outside <strong>of</strong> the difficult and competitive atmosphere <strong>of</strong> their<br />
natural environment. As a result, wild sources will continue to be an important source <strong>of</strong> raw material<br />
for even the most "high-tech" <strong>of</strong> medicines.<br />
Roots and Bark<br />
The collection <strong>of</strong> roots and bark usually kills or fatally weakens the exploited tree species,<br />
particularly with high-intensity harvests (Peters, 1993). Bark can be renewably harvested if trees are<br />
30 Stockdale (pers. comm., 1993) reports that traditional management and harvesting practices in East Kalimantan have<br />
<strong>of</strong>ten been overlooked by outside collectors and are being dismissed by some <strong>of</strong> the younger members <strong>of</strong> the community.<br />
For example, the traditional practice <strong>of</strong> cutting the stem 1 m from the ground and then bending the tip <strong>of</strong> the stump back<br />
into the earth to prevent fungal infection spreading from the stump into the rest <strong>of</strong> the clump, is perceived as wasteful<br />
<strong>of</strong> valuable cane.<br />
31 For example, sacaca (Croton cajuacara) leaves, dried and made into teas or sold in gelatin capsules, have become<br />
"the most" fashionable medicinal plant in Belem these days. It is used to treat diabetes, diarrhoea, and to lower<br />
cholesterol. Because it is a weedy pioneer species, its survival will probably not be severely affected even by the rapidly<br />
increased demand that has recently occurred (Venturieiri and Ribeiro in: Clay and Clement, 1993).<br />
32 In 1989, the estimated sales <strong>of</strong> pilocarpine in the United States alone reached US$28,000,000 (Elisabetsky, 1991).
not girdled, but management strategies <strong>of</strong> this kind are <strong>of</strong>ten disregarded, or succumb to enonnous<br />
market demand for the species 33 • The harvest <strong>of</strong> roots will kill the individual plant, but management<br />
<strong>of</strong> these species, including regulating <strong>of</strong>f-take, can minimize the impact on populations 34 • Both barks<br />
and roots can be harvested from multi-purpose trees felled for timber, prior to or post-harvesting. The<br />
bark <strong>of</strong> Pau d'arco (Tabebuia serratifolia), for example, is harvested for use in medicines used<br />
regionally and internationally, prior to logging operations in Brazil.<br />
Apical Buds<br />
Palm hearts are the most important and well-known example <strong>of</strong> apical bud use. In a single-stemmed<br />
palm species, harvesting the "heart", or apical meristem, necessarily kills the tree. Euterpe precatoria,<br />
for example, was widely harvested for a palm heart canning factory near Iquitos, Peru, which was<br />
subsequently forced to close due to scarcity <strong>of</strong> raw materials. The multi-stemmed growth fonn <strong>of</strong> E.<br />
oleracea in the Amazon enables the species to sprout back after cutting, and collectors in the eastern<br />
Amazon have taken advantage <strong>of</strong> this to manage for a sustained-yield harvest (Peters, 1993).<br />
Wildlife as a Non-Timber Forest Product<br />
Wild game is <strong>of</strong>ten overlooked as an important non-timber forest product, but is one <strong>of</strong> the most<br />
marketable and higher value forest products. The rural population's dependence on wild meat for<br />
subsistence is also extremely important. For the hunter and his family, hunting is free or very cheap<br />
in monetary tenns. This is important because large sectors <strong>of</strong> the rural population still have limited<br />
access to cash with which to buy substitutes (Caldecott, 1988).<br />
Caldecott (1988) calculated that about half the minimum protein supply in Sarawak is derived from<br />
fresh meat, almost 60% from the wild, including fish. Meat also provides a "buffer" in times when<br />
other crops are inadequate 35 • Hunting constitutes the major source <strong>of</strong> yearly revenue for the families<br />
in the northern Congo studied by Wilkie et al., (1991). Many families reported that without revenue<br />
obtained from hunting, they would be unable to buy cooking utensils, clothing, medicine, and<br />
educational materials for children. Logging operations in this area had directly and indirectly<br />
contributed to the depletion <strong>of</strong> local stocks <strong>of</strong> wildlife (Wilkie et al., 1991).<br />
33 The bark from the Cameroonian species Pygeum ajricanus, for example, is used to treat urinary problems associated<br />
with enlarged prostate glands. By removing bark from opposite quarters every 5 years, and stripping up to 20 m above<br />
ground, the bark <strong>of</strong> P. africanus can probably be sustainably harvested, as it appears to be very resilient to bark removal.<br />
In practice, however, trees are <strong>of</strong>ten felled to collect the bark, or entire trees are stripped. By 1989, most <strong>of</strong> the forests<br />
where the bark was sOUTced in Cameroon were depleted <strong>of</strong> P. africanus (Cunningham, 1993; Sheldon et al., 1993).<br />
34 The root <strong>of</strong> the slow growing understorey herb ipecac (Cephaelis ipecacuanha) has long been used traditionally<br />
to treat dysentery and as an expectorant. The scale <strong>of</strong> current international demand for ipecac (as an ingredient in<br />
expectorants and in a treatment for amoebic dysentery) has led to over-harvesting in the wild and severe reductions in<br />
local populations (Sheldon et al., 1993; Husain, 1992). In Nicaragua, local communities successfully managed the<br />
extraction <strong>of</strong> ipecac, which is one <strong>of</strong> the most important NTFPs in the region, by planting beds below the forest<br />
overstorey (Salick, 1992).<br />
35 The contribution <strong>of</strong> wild meat to human nutrition in the interior is illustrated by rations for pupils at boarding<br />
schools: 203 tonnes <strong>of</strong> meat and fish were consumed at 63 schools in 1984-85; the largest single component was wild<br />
pig meat at 32%, with other wild meat contributing about 7%, fish about 18% and domestic pork, beef and chicken 13<br />
16% each. In 1984 the estimated traffic in wild pig and deer meat exceeded $4,000,000 in the Rajang basin.<br />
17
18<br />
Wild game is also one <strong>of</strong> the most popular foods in Ghana. It is in equally high demand in urban and<br />
rural areas. Forests and fallow fields provide the habitat for many commonly consumed wildlife<br />
species. Forest-dependent animals are particularly important in humid West Africa because substitutes<br />
are <strong>of</strong>ten not available. Tsetse flies are endemic to this area and make cattle production difficult.<br />
Wild animals contribute between 20-90% <strong>of</strong> the total animal protein consumed (Falconer, 1992;<br />
1990). A.G. Davies (1987) similarly found that in the Gola Forest Reserve in Sierra Leone,<br />
unfavourable conditions for cattle and other livestock had lead to a traditional reliance on fish and<br />
bushmeat as sources <strong>of</strong> animal protein. While different communities have different preferences, for<br />
example Moslems disdain monkey meat, hunting <strong>of</strong> wildlife in this area is a major activity.<br />
In addition to the economic and nutritional importance <strong>of</strong> wildlife must be added the role <strong>of</strong> hunting<br />
in many indigenous cultures. Hunting is central to the culture <strong>of</strong> the Penan, many <strong>of</strong> whom are still<br />
hunter gatherers. It is also integral to shifting cultivation and its associated cultures. As Caldecott<br />
(1988) said, for centuries, "to be a Dayak was to be a shifting-cultivator, was to be a hunter".<br />
Redford (1991) notes that in the Neotropics many indigenous communities associate hunting with<br />
social status and power. In the sharing <strong>of</strong> game with the rest <strong>of</strong> the community, the hunter builds<br />
debts, acquires allegiances and contributes to social cohesiveness. Shortages in meat have been known<br />
to create social tension and even village fission, and hunters in some cases must engage in wage<br />
labour to purchase canned meat and fresh fish, with repercussions in the community cohesiveness.<br />
Decreases in game yields or prohibitions on hunting can have repercussions well beyond the strictly<br />
nutritional (Redford, 1991). (See below for a discussion <strong>of</strong> the "Impact <strong>of</strong> Natural Forest Management<br />
on Wildlife").<br />
v. The Ecological Underpinnings <strong>of</strong> Natural Forest Management<br />
The sustainable harvest <strong>of</strong> timbers from tropical forests is dependent upon a variety <strong>of</strong> factors and<br />
complex ecological relationships, most <strong>of</strong> which remain largely unknown. Despite ignorance <strong>of</strong> the<br />
intricacies <strong>of</strong> tropical forest ecosystems, general ecological principles have and continue to guide the<br />
design <strong>of</strong> natural forest management objectives and the harvesting operations and silvicultural systems<br />
they employ. These, in turn, influence the diversity <strong>of</strong> species and forest structure, and the harvest<br />
<strong>of</strong> non-timber forest products that rely on this diversity.<br />
Forest management - whether manifested in logging operations or silvicultural treatments - creates<br />
disturbances. It is in the extent that these disturbances mimic the size, duration and frequency <strong>of</strong><br />
naturally-occurring disturbance that ecological sustainability is achieved. Tropical forests are dynamic<br />
- not homogenous and static - mosaics <strong>of</strong> young, middle-aged and mature patches in different stages<br />
<strong>of</strong> regeneration (Putz and Brokaw, 1989; Uhl et al., 1990; Swaine, 1986)36. The concept <strong>of</strong> a steadystate<br />
"climax" forest has been questioned by many who feel that it does not reflect the dynamic<br />
nature <strong>of</strong> tropical moist forests, and some suggest that in fact forest virginity is "relative" (Hartshorn,<br />
36 Whitmore defmes three growth cycle phases in tropical forests: the gap phase, which is the opening <strong>of</strong> the canopy;<br />
the building phase, which consists <strong>of</strong> young trees, mostly shade-intolerant, growing rapidly to fIll the gap and attain the<br />
canopy; and the mature phase, formed by an intact canopy <strong>of</strong> large trees (Whitmore, 1991; Hartshorn, 1980).
1980; Niering, 1987)37. Not only have indigenous inhabitants long modified the forest environment,<br />
but small-scale natural occurrences such as treefalls, and large-scale disasters such as hurricanes,<br />
fires, landslides, and droughts, have created forests in a constant state <strong>of</strong> repair. Although a<br />
directional change in floristics will not occur in a mature phase forest as a whole, the composition<br />
at a given spot, from one tree to the next, will change. (Balee, 1989; Hartshorn, 1980; Whitmore,<br />
1991; 1992; Brown, 1992). Hartshorn (1980) found that in mature La Selva forest in Costa Rica, the<br />
turnover rate between two successive gaps occurring at the same spot in the forest was as high as<br />
118 +/- 27 years. Uhl et al. (1990) found that 4-6% <strong>of</strong> the forest area in Amazonian Venezuela was<br />
in a "gapped" condition at anyone time.<br />
Fundamental to most harvesting operations and silvicultural systems is the importance <strong>of</strong>regeneration<br />
in the gaps created by logging, and forest management systems have been developed to explicitly<br />
stimulate the growth <strong>of</strong> the pool <strong>of</strong> desirable species 38 . Gap size is manipulated during logging<br />
operations to match the growth characteristics <strong>of</strong> commercial species and silvicultural treatments are<br />
applied to release the advanced regeneration <strong>of</strong> desirable individuals and suppress the<br />
"undesirable"39 (Uhl et al., 1990; John, A.D., 1992, Wyatt-Smith, 1987). "Sustainable" forest<br />
management generally tries to mimic natural disturbances, and utilizes ecological succession and the<br />
mechanisms and factors that drive the processes <strong>of</strong> species change, population change and<br />
replacement through time to promote the regeneration <strong>of</strong> commercial species (Gomez-Pompa and<br />
Burley, 1991; Brown, 1992; Lawton, 1984). Interspecific competition for the establishment <strong>of</strong> sites<br />
has resulted in adaptive compromises in regenerative strategies, which results in varying competitive<br />
success <strong>of</strong> species in gaps. Differential species response will depend on the size <strong>of</strong> gaps, the timing<br />
<strong>of</strong> gap occurrence, the proximity and dispersal <strong>of</strong> seeds, growth rates, architectural construction that<br />
facilitates competition for light, nutrient requirements relative to competitors, nutrients available at<br />
the sight, water use and efficiency, and resistance to seed and seedling predation, pathogens and the<br />
increased herbivory associated with gaps (Denslow, 1980; Wyatt-Smith, 1987; Bazzaz, 1991; Nepsted<br />
et al., 1991; Hartshorn, 1980; Brown, 1992).<br />
37 Niering (1987) quotes Egler's 1947 statement that "the Climax and God have certain things in common for certain<br />
botanical atheists. To paraphrase Julian Huxley, the writer does not believe in the climax, because he thinks the idea has<br />
ceased to be a useful hypothesis. 1t<br />
38 The process <strong>of</strong> topling a tree, the fallen tree itself, together with the resultant hole in the canopy and accumulated<br />
debris on the forest floor is known as chablis or gap formation (Hendrison, 1990).<br />
39 The immigration <strong>of</strong> species and progress <strong>of</strong> succession can occur through a number <strong>of</strong> regeneration pathways:<br />
1) Seedlings and saplings <strong>of</strong> climax species present on the forest floor with little or no real growth toward adult size<br />
are stimulated by the new microenvironment resulting from canopy opening. UhI et al. (1990) found that in the<br />
Amazon, this advanced regeneration played a dominant role in tree fall gap formation and that four years after gap<br />
formation, composed 950/0 <strong>of</strong> the species> 1 m tall (Uhl et al., 1990; Bazzaz, 1991; Gomez-Pompa and Burley,<br />
1991).<br />
2) Sprouting from stem bases or roots following the destruction <strong>of</strong> above-ground plant parts also plays a major role<br />
in gap-phase regeneration (UhI et al., 1990; Irvine, 1989). Putz and Brokaw (1989) found in Panama that sprouted<br />
trees contributed more significantly to canopy closure in small gaps than in large, and that they initially grow faster<br />
than seedlings <strong>of</strong> the same species.<br />
3) Recolonization by the germination <strong>of</strong> pioneer species seed buried in soil seed bank, but not growing as seedlings<br />
or adult trees in the immediate area (Gomez-Pompa and Burley, 1991; Uhl et al., 1990).<br />
4) The arrival <strong>of</strong> seeds, which might fall from surrounding trees, or are dispersed from distant trees by wind, birds,<br />
bats, rodents and other mammals (UhI et al., 1990).<br />
19
20<br />
VI. Harvesting Operations in Managed Natural Forest<br />
The manner in which logging operations are conducted directly influences the present and future<br />
harvest <strong>of</strong> both timber and non-timber products from the forest. The extent <strong>of</strong> logging damage<br />
associated with most operations in the tropics results not only in the drastic decline <strong>of</strong> local species<br />
diversity and forest structural diversity, but also unfavourable rates <strong>of</strong> basal area growth <strong>of</strong><br />
commercial species through the destruction <strong>of</strong> seedlings, adolescent trees and soil surface and<br />
drainage pattems 40 (Whitmore, 1991; John, A.D., 1992; Dykstra and Heinrich, 1992; Dawkins,<br />
1958). Destructive logging operations can also result in increased fire hazards, lowland flooding, and<br />
decreased marine and coral reef productivity.<br />
Nepstad et al. (1991) found in the eastern Amazon that to harvest 1.6% <strong>of</strong> the trees in a forest, 12%<br />
<strong>of</strong> the trees with a dbh > 10 cm lost their crowns, 11 % were uprooted and 3% suffered substantial<br />
bark scarring. Uhl (1989) cites similar figures for residual stands in eastern Amazonian: 11%<br />
uprooted by bulldozers for roads, 12% crushed in felling, and 3% with excessive bark removal. In<br />
their efforts to extract 52 m 3 /ha, or eight trees, logging operators destroyed 26% <strong>of</strong> those remaining.<br />
Canopy cover (a summation <strong>of</strong> road area, felled tree area and log storage area) was reduced by half<br />
(Uhl, 1989; Wilkie et al., 1992). In Malaysia, A.D. John (1988) found that for the removal <strong>of</strong> 30-50<br />
m 3 /ha, or 3.3% <strong>of</strong> the trees, total canopy cover was reduced 50%.<br />
Damage in selective harvesting systems is usually patchy due to varying population densities <strong>of</strong><br />
commercial species. This is particularly pronounced in the highly diverse neotropical and African<br />
forests. In Malaysian dipterocarp forests, dominated by Dryobalanops aromatica or Shorea curtisii<br />
species, 14-72 trees may be removed per ha. Amazon terre firme forests yield on average 3-5<br />
trees/ha, and African forests can yield as few as 1.1 commercial trees/ha (John, A.D.; Uhl, 1989).<br />
Logging has numerous and potentially severe impacts on the soil surface <strong>of</strong> forests. The removal <strong>of</strong><br />
humus and topsoil during logging operations can result in high rates <strong>of</strong> soil erosion and leaching,<br />
particularly on slopes, and can produce high depositions <strong>of</strong> soil and debris on valley floors and flat<br />
areas during the wet season (Uhl et al., 1981). Rutting and the disturbance <strong>of</strong> the soil surface can also<br />
significantly disrupt the seed bank, seedlings, and superficial feeding roots critical to regeneration<br />
(Whitmore, 1991; Hendrison, 1990). But perhaps the most significant factor in the growth <strong>of</strong> future<br />
stands <strong>of</strong> timber and non-timber species on logged-over sites is soil compaction. Soil compaction<br />
affects tree growth through reduced porosity resulting in decreased diffusion <strong>of</strong> gases, root<br />
penetration, and the flow <strong>of</strong> water. The type and degree <strong>of</strong> soil compaction depends upon soil<br />
characteristics such as texture, structure, field moisture content, and organic matter content, and on<br />
the intensity <strong>of</strong> machinery traffic, its gross vehicle weight, steering system, and tire and track type<br />
(Hendrison, 1990; Jonson and Lindgren, 1990). Soil recovery is a slow process. Hendrison (1990)<br />
found in Suriname that skid trails used eight years previously were still maximally impacted. At Jarl,<br />
in eastern Amazonian Brazil, the clearance <strong>of</strong> large forest areas for plantations by machine was<br />
abandoned because trees grew so poorly on compacted soils (Whitmore, 1991).<br />
40 Damage to the residual stand can take the form <strong>of</strong> direct damage, wounds which are vulnerable to pathogen attack,<br />
water stress, the loss <strong>of</strong> symbiotic mycorrhizal infections, invasion by climbers due to excessive canopy opening, and<br />
windthrow resulting from increased turbulence <strong>of</strong> the uneven canopy (John, A.D., 1992; UbI, 1989).
Although adequate information exists to implement efficient and ecologically-improved logging<br />
systems, a number <strong>of</strong> economic and social factors have precluded its implementation. These include:<br />
short-term objectives that result in cost minimization and pr<strong>of</strong>it maximization; government concession<br />
agreements, incentives and payment schemes that do not stimulate sustained yield management; pr<strong>of</strong>it<br />
margins which have been unreasonably high in the past and have concessionaires "spoiled" with<br />
regards to expected returns; and the poor dissemination <strong>of</strong> knowledge from research to those<br />
conducting logging operations (lonson and Lindgren, 1990; Dykstra and Heinrich, 1992). But<br />
successful natural forest management depends on well-managed logging operations - as de Graaf and<br />
Poels (1990) said, "the first priority is to domesticate the logger, whereupon it is possible to<br />
domesticate the forest".<br />
A sustainable logging operation will involve more than felling and extracting timber. Harvest<br />
planning, technical supervision and post-harvest assessments that reflect concern about the biological<br />
diversity, non-timber forest products and long-term health <strong>of</strong> an ecosystem are required components<br />
<strong>of</strong> what Dykstra and Heinrich (1992) call "harvesting", as opposed to "logging", operations.<br />
Harvesting operations should be based on silvicultural considerations, as the success <strong>of</strong> silvicultural<br />
systems will in large part depend upon the preceding harvest. Wyatt-Smith (1987) describes timber<br />
felling as the first major silvicultural operation <strong>of</strong> a natural regeneration system. The key elements<br />
<strong>of</strong> a harvesting system are: harvest planning, forest roads, felling operations, skidding and yarding<br />
operations, and post-harvest assessments (Dykstra and Heinrich, 1992; Jonson and Lindgren, 1990).<br />
Harvest Planning<br />
Harvest plans are based on inventories and the collection <strong>of</strong> information necessary to ensure<br />
ecological sustainability and to plan transportation within the forest in a way that minimizes damage<br />
to residual stands and the total area disturbed by roads, landings, skid trails and cableways. All<br />
commercial and potentially commercial timber trees, trees to be felled (with a minimum <strong>of</strong> 20 m<br />
between two marked trees), seed trees, climbers to be cut, advanced growth for retention, mature<br />
species <strong>of</strong> importance for wildlife, important species and areas for local non-timber forest produce<br />
and biodiversity conservation, and filter/buffer strips for watercourses must be designated in the<br />
logging plan 41 • This information will result from integrated inventories conducted prior to the<br />
planning process, and should undergo subsequent monitoring through permanent sample plots and<br />
field visits to ascertain that management objectives have been met (ITTO Draft Guidelines, 1992;<br />
Dykstra and Heinrich, 1992; John, A.D., 1992; Jonson and Lindgren, 1990; Nair, 1991; Wilkie et al.,<br />
1992).<br />
The type <strong>of</strong> equipment to be used in a logging operation must be specified in a plan, as must the<br />
timing <strong>of</strong> the operation. The timing <strong>of</strong> logging operations will take into consideration rainy seasons,<br />
seedfalls, and the reproductive cycles <strong>of</strong> animals or species <strong>of</strong> non-timber value; contingency plans<br />
41 In the Guidelines for the Selective Logging <strong>of</strong> Rainforest Areas in North Queensland State Forests and Timber<br />
Reserves, for catchment areas> 60-100 ha, 30 m buffer strips are the required minimum for watercourses 20 m or more;<br />
20 m buffer strips are required for watercourses between 10-20 m wide; and 10 m buffer strips for those up to 10 m wide.<br />
The ITTO, in its Draft Guidelinesfor Conserving Biological Diversity in Forests Managed/or Timber, recommends 20<br />
m wide buffer strips along streams less than 20 m wide, and 50 m buffer strips along larger streams, rivers and lakes.<br />
These buffer strips provide vital habitat for many species <strong>of</strong> wildlife.<br />
21
22<br />
should be established for severe storms and other extreme events 42 • A floristic shift in diversity can<br />
result if parent trees are removed before fruiting or shedding <strong>of</strong> seeds occurs (Uhl et al., 1981). In<br />
the Malaysian Uniform System, the rule <strong>of</strong> thumb is that "felling must follow seeding".<br />
Local communities should be consulted about the timing <strong>of</strong> logging operations, and logging cycles<br />
should attempt to compliment the slack time in the agricultural cycle, so as to provide jobs for local<br />
people (Dykstra and Heinrich, 1992). Local people should also be infonned <strong>of</strong> logging operations and<br />
consulted on the timing with regards to the harvest <strong>of</strong> NTFPs. They should be allowed access to<br />
complimentarily harvest NTFPs prior to logging, as with the cutting <strong>of</strong> rattan 43 , the collection <strong>of</strong><br />
oil producing seeds and tapping <strong>of</strong> essential oils from valuable timber species such as Carapa<br />
guianensis and Copaifera species in the Amazon, or the collection <strong>of</strong> medicinal barks, such as those<br />
on the important timber Tabebuia species used to treat cancer, or Myroxylon balsamum in Peru.<br />
Following logging, local communities should be provided access to collect fuelwood and other<br />
products 44 •<br />
Harvest planning requires an initial increased expenditure, but cuts down on problems and costs by<br />
reducing wastage and increasing efficiency. Well-planned harvesting operations are not only<br />
preferable from a sustained use perspective, but have proven to be a great deal cheaper, as we11 45 •<br />
Road Construction<br />
In poorly planned logging operations, roads tend to occupy an inordinate portion <strong>of</strong> the forest. A.D.<br />
John (1992) found that roads and loading or landing areas occupied 6-20% <strong>of</strong> the forest area in<br />
Malaysia, and Uhl (1989) found roads to cover 8% <strong>of</strong> the logged forest in the eastern Amazon.<br />
Additionally, roads in tropical forest logging operations tend to lack effective drainage and sutface<br />
materials, so are susceptible to rain and traffic, resulting in > 90% <strong>of</strong> the soil erosion resulting from<br />
timber harvesting (Jonson and Lindgren, 1990; FAO, 1977). Dykstra and Heinrich (1992) find roads<br />
to be "unquestionably the most problematic feature <strong>of</strong> timber-harvesting operations". But competent<br />
technical supervision and planning can drastically minimize erosion and increase the retention <strong>of</strong><br />
forest cover. In North Queensland, the width <strong>of</strong> major extraction roads was limited to no wider than<br />
7.5 m, and for minor extraction roads 5.0 m; road grades were generally restricted to 8 degrees (14%)<br />
and 46-58 degrees (dependent on soil types) for sidecut roads (North Queensland Guidelines). This<br />
42 In North Queensland, no ttfelling <strong>of</strong> trees or snigging or hauling <strong>of</strong> logstl was allowed between 1 January and 31<br />
March in any year, except when drainage works were completed by 31 December in the previous year and weather<br />
conditions were suitable.<br />
43 In Sabah, Abdillah and Phillips found that logging resulted in a 76% reduction in the number <strong>of</strong> valuable<br />
commercial rattan and increased the number and size <strong>of</strong> patches devoid <strong>of</strong> rattan. The felling and extraction <strong>of</strong> timber<br />
accounted for 95% <strong>of</strong> this damage.<br />
44 In The Philippines, shifting cultivators settled recently logged-over forest and, utilizing income from the extraction<br />
<strong>of</strong> remaining timber and charcoal production, and applying knowledge <strong>of</strong> forest dynamics from their places <strong>of</strong> origin,<br />
developed a sustainable perennial tree-crop and root based agr<strong>of</strong>orestry system, reflecting an interactive process <strong>of</strong> change<br />
and adaptation between natural and human systems (Fujisaka and Wollenberg, 1991).<br />
45 The UNDP/FAO Forestry Development Project Sarawak found that improved forest management and harvesting<br />
resulted in a decrease in residual damage and a 20% reduction in costs. The Celos Management System in Suriname<br />
reported less residual damage to trees, less total disturbance <strong>of</strong> soil, and a 20-45% reduction <strong>of</strong> costs overall as a result<br />
<strong>of</strong> well-planned harvesting operations (de Graaf and Poels, 1990; Hendrison, 1990).
is in marked contrast to an average width <strong>of</strong> logging roads in Papua New Guinea reported by the<br />
FAO in 1989 as 18.4 m, and the average total deforested width <strong>of</strong> primary roads <strong>of</strong> 60 m in a logging<br />
concession in the Republic <strong>of</strong> Congo (Wilkie et al., 1992).<br />
Perhaps the largest impact <strong>of</strong> logging roads is the access they provide for small-scale loggers, hunters<br />
and fanner to once inaccessible land, timber trees and populations <strong>of</strong> wildlife (Davies, 1987;<br />
Caldecott, 1989; Dahaban, Nordin and Bennett, 1992). Guidelines for sustainable logging usually<br />
recommend the prompt closure or replanting <strong>of</strong> roads upon completion <strong>of</strong> the felling cycle. Many will<br />
deteriorate very quickly <strong>of</strong> their own accord due to the climatic extremes common in these regions 46<br />
(Redford, 1990).<br />
Felling Operations<br />
Selective felling <strong>of</strong> trees can mimic natural tree fall, but in reality is usually far more destructive. The<br />
extent <strong>of</strong> felling damage is largely determined by the felling intensity, or the number or volume <strong>of</strong><br />
trees felled per hectare. The Celos Management System found that a maximum <strong>of</strong> 5-8 trees per ha<br />
can be sustainably extracted from most tropical rainforests (Hendrison, 1990). Felling damage can<br />
also depend on the training and supervision <strong>of</strong> crews (for example, many crews do not know to make<br />
an undercut to direct the fall <strong>of</strong> a tree). With proper planing and measurement, the Celos Harvesting<br />
System crews felled 80% <strong>of</strong> trees in the desired direction, that is towards skid trails and gaps. Only<br />
11 % fell in an unfavourable position (Hendrison, 1990). Once down, proper cross-cutting <strong>of</strong> trees can<br />
maximize the value <strong>of</strong> the tree and reduce wastage. Manual pit-sawing, hand-held power chainsaws,<br />
or portable sawmills can produce boards and blocks, although these might be <strong>of</strong> lower quality than<br />
those produced in a mill; additionally, these systems do not require road construction and heavy<br />
machinery, so minimize damage to the forest (Dykstra and Heinrich, 1992; Jonson and Lindgren,<br />
1990; Hartshorn, 1990; Davies and Richards, 1991). The percentage <strong>of</strong> felled timber left unutilized<br />
in the forest is generally twice that in temperate regions. Combined with wastage during<br />
manufacturing, total timber utilization rates can be as low as 30% (Jonson and Lindgren, 1990).<br />
Cutting climbers prior to felling can also reduce damage and wastage by reducing the number <strong>of</strong> trees<br />
(many <strong>of</strong> the pole-sized classes that could form the next crop <strong>of</strong> commercial species) knocked over<br />
or broken by 25-50% (Dykstra and Heinrich, 1992; Jonson and Lindgren, 1990). Proper felling<br />
techniques can reduce the area logged each year to provide the current volume <strong>of</strong> tropical industrial<br />
roundwood.<br />
Skidding and Yarding Operations<br />
Most logging in tropical forests is characterized by heavy hauling and transporting machinery that<br />
is capital-rather than labour-intensive. This equipment, largely developed for other purposes, has<br />
become common to tropical logging operations since the 1950s, and has contributed to a 13-fold<br />
increase in the use <strong>of</strong> tropical hardwoods by the main importing countries (John, A.D.; Whitmore,<br />
1990). Conventional ground skidding equipment and extraction practices result in two major forms<br />
<strong>of</strong> damage: excessive damage to residual trees and advanced regeneration because skidders tend to<br />
wander through the forest in search <strong>of</strong> felled trees, which leads to a proliferation <strong>of</strong> skid trails; and<br />
46 In the Amazon, roads have <strong>of</strong>fered alternative transport for forest communities historically dependent upon the elites<br />
who violently controlled river transport, and so the trade in every forest commodity. If land title is assured for forest<br />
residents prior to the opening <strong>of</strong> roads, the movement <strong>of</strong> settlers and resulting unrestricted harvests <strong>of</strong> forest products can<br />
be somewhat minimized (Clay and Clement, 1993).<br />
23
24<br />
soil disturbance and compaction, which increases the potential for erosion and retards the growth <strong>of</strong><br />
regeneration (Dykstra and Heinrich, 1992)47.<br />
There also exist a number <strong>of</strong> potentially less-damaging alternative extraction systems. Cable systems<br />
reduce road needs and soil disturbance, but require highly skilled crews and are complicated and<br />
expensive to run. The ecological impact <strong>of</strong> manual extraction is minimal, but severely strains the<br />
laborer, and protective gear is rarely available. Animals have become a somewhat popular alternative<br />
to conventional mechanical skidding equipment. In Asia, elephants have long been used to extract<br />
logs, and in Latin America and Asia, bullocks and oxen are employed. The advantages <strong>of</strong> this system<br />
are the minimal ecological disturbance, high flexibility and adaptiveness, low investment costs, and<br />
intensive labour requirements, which results in the employment <strong>of</strong> more local people. The<br />
disadvantages include the need to care for the animals even when they are not being used, the loss<br />
<strong>of</strong> efficiency when harvesting logs > 70 cm dbh, and the relatively slow pace compared with<br />
mechanical equipment. In Palcazu, Peru, it was found that the positive attributes <strong>of</strong> this system far<br />
outweighed the negative (Ocana-Vidal, 1992; Hartshorn, 1992). Other alternative forms <strong>of</strong> extraction<br />
include railways, helicopters, and balloons, although none have caught on to any great extent (Jonson<br />
and Lindgren, 1990).<br />
Unlike tree fall gaps, mechanized transport <strong>of</strong> felled trees over the forest soil has no natural<br />
equivalent and damages the flora and soil beyond anything comparable to damage caused by large<br />
herbivores inhabiting the forest or by fallen trees sliding downhill (Hendrison, 1990). As a result, the<br />
objective <strong>of</strong> harvesting operations can only be to minimize negative impacts on both the potential<br />
timber and the many existing and potential non-timber values provided by the forest in which it is<br />
carried out.<br />
Post-harvest Assessments<br />
Post-harvest assessments determine the level to which a harvesting plan has been implemented and<br />
management objectives achieved. They are critical for sustainable forest management, as harvest<br />
plans are not <strong>of</strong>ten followed in spirit nor in practice. These assessments include: a report on operation<br />
costs and revenues, an evaluation <strong>of</strong> the degree to which silvicultural, non-timber product, and<br />
biodiversity conservation objectives are met, residual stand characteristics and the extent <strong>of</strong> damage,<br />
area disturbed by roads and skid trails, the quality and quantity <strong>of</strong> regeneration, and the extent <strong>of</strong><br />
revegetation and closing <strong>of</strong> skid trails, landing sites and logging roads. The results <strong>of</strong> these<br />
assessments must be shared with crews, and financial incentives or penalties imposed for the quality<br />
<strong>of</strong> the work (Dykstra and Heinrich, 1992; de Graaf and Poels, 1986; Jonson and Lindgren, 1990).<br />
47 But damage caused by ground skidders in combination with bulldozers, by far the most common method <strong>of</strong><br />
extraction, can be minimized. Low ground pressure tracked skidders cause less damage to the soil than wheeled skidders.<br />
Pre-planned skid trails, directional felling toward skid trails, and winching <strong>of</strong> logs from the stump 10 the skid trail when<br />
possible, can lead to a reduction in residual forest damage, in the number <strong>of</strong> merchantable logs left in the forest, and can<br />
reduce costs by a third (Dykstra and Heinrich, 1992; Jonson and Lindgren, 1990; Hendrison, 1990). The Celos Harvesting<br />
System, incorporating these practices, resulted in twice the production <strong>of</strong> conventional skidding, 8% damage to residual<br />
forest in the extraction <strong>of</strong> 8-10 trees (as compared with 14% resulting from conventional felling and skidding operations),<br />
and 40% less time required per unit product transported (Hendrison, 1990).
Box 3: Inventories <strong>of</strong> Non-Timber Forest Products for Natural Forest Management<br />
An inventory <strong>of</strong> NTFPs should provide a reasonably precise estimate <strong>of</strong> the total number <strong>of</strong> halVestable<br />
trees per hectare. For fruit and oil species, this means the total number <strong>of</strong> adult trees, for latexproducing<br />
species, medicinal plants and rattan, some juvenile trees may also be included. Before<br />
initiating field work, the merchantability limits <strong>of</strong> the resource should be established (peters, 1993).<br />
Assessment <strong>of</strong> NTFPs conducted in Ghana varied by plant type. For climbers, the number <strong>of</strong> stems is<br />
counted, and for herbaceous species the number <strong>of</strong> plant groups (clumps). For cane, the numbers <strong>of</strong><br />
mature, immature, and cut stems are recorded; this will provide a crude indication <strong>of</strong> plant densities and<br />
exploitation levels (Falconer, ODA, 1992).<br />
The inventory should also provide data on the current population structure or size-class distribution <strong>of</strong><br />
the species. The minimum diameter limit will be far below that for timber species, and will vary<br />
depending upon the size and abundance <strong>of</strong> species. For species that occur at relatively low density, 10<br />
cm dbh may be reasonable; more abundant species will probably require a slightly higher diameter cut<strong>of</strong>f<br />
(peters, 1993; Falconer, 1992; Boom, 1989). Tree sampling methods should be modified to<br />
incorporate species <strong>of</strong> economic importance that are halVested when small. In Ghana, for example,<br />
Garcinia epunctata is harvested at between 5-10 cm dbh for chewsticks (Falconer, 1992). In conducting<br />
an inventory <strong>of</strong> xate, allspice and chicle in Guatemala, Reining et al. (1992) set minimum diameter<br />
limits at 10 cm dbh for all species except allspice, which was measured down to 5 cm dbh. Gentry<br />
(1992) suggests that in the study he conducted with Peters (1989), in which they attempted to document<br />
the actual value <strong>of</strong> a single hectare <strong>of</strong> Amazonian forest, their values were probably underestimated<br />
because they did not include species utilized for fibre and medicine that are usually harvested from<br />
plants < 10 cm dbh (Gentry, 1992).<br />
A predetermined percentage <strong>of</strong> the area is sampled using plots or transects (<strong>of</strong> square or circular<br />
configuration), stratified among different forest types found within the area. NTFP inventories must<br />
<strong>of</strong>ten be incorporated into on-going inventory work. In Ghana, the NTFP inventory was forced for<br />
logistical reasons to use an existing sampling design <strong>of</strong> 1 ha sample plots stratified systematically.<br />
Temporary sample plots were established in forest logged within the last three years and in unlogged<br />
forest to assess the effects <strong>of</strong> varying intensities <strong>of</strong> logging on NTFPs (Falconer, 1992).<br />
Permanent sample plots, which can provide data on changes over time, should be established to monitor<br />
the impacts <strong>of</strong> non-timber and timber extraction on forest products. Ideally, plots should be random and<br />
stratified by forest type (pairs <strong>of</strong> 1 ha each), and probably <strong>of</strong> square or broadly rectangular shape to<br />
minimize edge effects and because they are faster and easier to demarcate than circular plots in most<br />
tropical forests. Plots will be periodically re-inventoried, usually every five years (Alder and Synnott,<br />
1992; Reining et al., 1992).<br />
The exact number <strong>of</strong> PSPs used will depend upon the abundance <strong>of</strong> populations - high-density<br />
populations will require fewer plots than scattered, low-density populations, which must be more<br />
intensively sampled (peters, 1993). The ODA Forest Resources Management Project in Ghana has<br />
established 629 100 m x 100 m PSPs to provide information on the NTFP growing stock and to<br />
measure the growth <strong>of</strong> individual trees in different forest types. In two sub-plots <strong>of</strong> each, trees will be<br />
measured down to 1 cm dbh so as to collect data on the species harvested at small sizes.<br />
25
26<br />
In this way, regeneration <strong>of</strong> species commercially harvested at much larger diameters can also be<br />
assessed, and the intensity <strong>of</strong> halVesting practices reduced if the density <strong>of</strong> seedlings and saplings are<br />
found to drop. The effectiveness <strong>of</strong> this harvest reduction will be verified and adjusted, if necessary,<br />
during the next inventory. (peters, 1993; Falconer, 1992; Salick, 1992). In the Si-a-Paz International<br />
Peace Park in Nicaragua and Costa Rica, stratified random subplots, totalling 10% <strong>of</strong> the PSPs<br />
established to measure regeneration, are used to inventory and voucher, with the help <strong>of</strong> a local,<br />
knowledgeable infonnant, useful plants and their community characteristics (species richness, diversity,<br />
density and cover) (Salick, 1992). The interview/inventory technique, involving the collection <strong>of</strong> plant<br />
specimens and the subsequent interviewing <strong>of</strong> informants as to names and uses, was employed by Boom<br />
(1989) in his study <strong>of</strong> the ethnobotany <strong>of</strong> the Chacabo Indians in Bolivia. PSPs can also be the subject<br />
<strong>of</strong> detailed botanical inventories, which record all plants found on the plot (Falconer, 1992; Salick,<br />
1992).<br />
VII. Silvicultural Systems for Natural Forest Management<br />
Silviculture and harvesting systems presuppose social, economic and ecological knowledge, as defined<br />
in management objectives (Schmidt, 1991). The characteristic tools <strong>of</strong> silviculture include the<br />
regulation <strong>of</strong> shade and canopy opening, treatments to promote valuable individuals and species and<br />
reduce unwanted trees, climber cutting, "refining", poisoning, enrichment, and selection (Poore et al.,<br />
1989).<br />
All silvicultural systems will, to some extent, change and usually coarsen the fine mosaic <strong>of</strong> gap,<br />
building and mature phases <strong>of</strong> a natural forest (Whitmore, 1991). Silvicultural systems that aim to<br />
maximize the variety <strong>of</strong> products extracted from the forest and retain species diversity should change<br />
the natural composition and structure <strong>of</strong> the forest as little as possible (Poore and Sayer, 1991;<br />
Parren, 1992). As the ITIO Guidelines for Sustainable Forest Management (1990) suggest: "the<br />
choice <strong>of</strong> silvicultural system should be aimed at sustained yield at minimum cost, enabling<br />
harvesting now and in the future while respecting recognized secondary objectives". In many cases,<br />
non-timber objectives will not be considered secondary and will have an economic and social value<br />
<strong>of</strong> equal or greater importance than timber; silvicultural systems should be selected and adapted to<br />
reflect this value.<br />
Silvicultural systems for natural forests are grouped into the polycyclic and monocyclic. Monocyclic<br />
systems remove all saleable trees from a forest at a single operation, resulting in bigger gaps in the<br />
canopy best suited for the growth <strong>of</strong> pioneer species with light, pale marketable timber (Whitmore,<br />
1991). Monocyclic systems dramatically alter forest structure and species diversity, and so severely<br />
limit any long-tenn harvesting <strong>of</strong> non-timber forest products.<br />
Polycyclic systems are usually more conducive to conservation and non-timber objectives, although<br />
it must be said that neither system truly reflects multiple-use management objectives that specifically<br />
promote the sustainable harvest <strong>of</strong> non-timber, as well as timber, products (Nair, 1991). Polycyclic<br />
systems result in scattered gaps in the canopy, favouring slower growing shade-bearers, and relying<br />
on the release <strong>of</strong> advanced regeneration <strong>of</strong> commercial adolescents on the forest floor. Under the best<br />
conditions, these systems can increase the timber yield over a full rotation, but this depends largely<br />
on the intensity <strong>of</strong> and residual damage incurred by timber harvesting, subsequent competition from
colonizers, and the success <strong>of</strong> advance regeneration that survives the microclimate changes resulting<br />
from canopy opening (Nair, 1991; Whitmore, 1992). "High grading" or "creaming" <strong>of</strong> commercial<br />
species that display desirable traits can result in disgenic effects in polycyclic systems, and must be<br />
carefully controlled (Hendrison, 1990; Queensland Guidelines).<br />
Natural forest management systems can be extensive or intensive. Intensive management has proved<br />
extremely problematic in the multi-age class and multi-species tropical moist forests due to our<br />
ignorance <strong>of</strong> the ecology <strong>of</strong> commercial species and the ecosystems in which they operate (Poore,<br />
1989). Extensive systems range, with increasing productivity and costs, from the "wait and see"<br />
demarcation <strong>of</strong> forests, to the "log and leave", to the minimum intervention, stand treatment and<br />
enrichment planting <strong>of</strong> low intensity natural regeneration silvicultural systems (Poore, 1989; Jonson<br />
and Lindgren, 1990). With increasing intensity in forest management, there exists a trade-<strong>of</strong>f with<br />
the conservation and non-timber values associated with a forest. "Wait and see" and "log and leave"<br />
forests (providing logging damage is minimized) will provide the most opportunity for the<br />
conservation <strong>of</strong> forest structural and species diversity and the variety <strong>of</strong> products resulting from this<br />
diversity. But in many forests timber production will be a primary management objective. Low<br />
intensity management, utilizing polycyclic, natural regeneration silvicultural systems, produces larger<br />
volumes <strong>of</strong> timber, while - to varying degrees - maintaining non-timber values. Low intensity,<br />
polycyclic management <strong>of</strong> natural forests can be broken down into three, more or less distinct,<br />
systems: light selective logging, light selective logging and silvicultural treatment, and light selective<br />
logging and enrichment planting 48 •<br />
Light Selective Logging or "Minimum Intervention"<br />
This is the simplest system, relying on silvicultural knowledge and using models to define the<br />
sustainable harvesting intensity, girth limits, and cutting cycles. Only stems <strong>of</strong> marketable species are<br />
removed, no other species being interfered with. Natural regeneration fills the gaps created by felling,<br />
without manipulation or enrichment. Forests managed in this way must be sufficiently stocked with<br />
timber trees <strong>of</strong> large dimensions to make utilization pr<strong>of</strong>itable. Management includes inventories and<br />
harvest planning. Upon completion <strong>of</strong> felling operations, the forest is closed until the next cycle.<br />
Although the growth rates <strong>of</strong> commercial species "managed" in this way are <strong>of</strong>ten considered<br />
uneconomically low, light selective logging, or "light creaming", is still widely practised in the<br />
tropics, can be integrated into existing NTFP harvesting practices, and is one <strong>of</strong> the least destructive<br />
land use systems practised in the tropics, provided responsible harvesting practices are employed<br />
(Gomez-Pompa and Burley, 1991; Poore, 1989; Jonson and Lindgren, 1990; Hendrison, 1990).<br />
Light Selective Logging and Stand Treatment<br />
In these systems logging is carried out as described above, but is followed by treatments to "direct"<br />
natural regeneration to increase the representation <strong>of</strong> commercial species. This includes the poisongirdling<br />
and weeding <strong>of</strong> undesirable species, and the cutting <strong>of</strong> competing lianas and brush, but does<br />
not include direct measures to change the forest structure (Jonson and Lindgren, 1990). Because<br />
tropical moist forests contain a mix <strong>of</strong> tree species, "refining" is employed to eliminate the<br />
undesirable competitors <strong>of</strong> commercial species. Competition is reduced by: liquidating all non-<br />
48 These types <strong>of</strong> silvicultural systems attempt to answer the following questions: are there sufficient seedlings,<br />
saplings, and advanced growth <strong>of</strong> merchantable species at the time <strong>of</strong> exploitation to provide adequate stocking for the<br />
next crop? what are the silvics <strong>of</strong> these species (most importantly their regeneration potential) and what ·treatment will<br />
be necessary? and what are the probable rates <strong>of</strong> growth and merchantable volume expectations <strong>of</strong> the different species?<br />
(Wyatt-Smith, 1987).<br />
27
28<br />
desirable species (and defective individuals <strong>of</strong> desirable species) above a planned girth limit;<br />
individual release <strong>of</strong> "leading desirables"; and liquidating non-desirables starting with the biggest<br />
trees downwards until a predetermined residual basal area is attained (van der Hout, 1992)49.<br />
It is difficult to detennine the change in forest productivity due to refinement, since growth<br />
variability is so extreme, and is influenced by so many interacting factors that it is "sufficiently<br />
random to frustrate any attempt to interpret it in detenninistic tenns" (Wadsworth, 1987; Schmidt,<br />
1991). "Sustainability" cannot be detennined before the third felling cycle, and this type <strong>of</strong> data is<br />
not currently available (Nair, 1991). Refining is also a direct attack on the ecological diversity <strong>of</strong><br />
forests, and may gradually eliminate more than half the tree species. De graaf and Poels (1990) admit<br />
ignorance <strong>of</strong> the ecological effects <strong>of</strong> reductions in the numbers <strong>of</strong> non-commercial species.<br />
Wadsworth (1987) suggests that developing additional uses for the existing forest stock would be<br />
preferable to attempts to induce something that does not already exist in the forest - that is, try to<br />
do through processing and marketing what is attempted through poisoning (although the harvest <strong>of</strong><br />
larger numbers <strong>of</strong> species creates the danger <strong>of</strong> increased logging intensity).<br />
The less tampering done with the undergrowth, top soil and microclimate <strong>of</strong> the forests, the easier<br />
it is to maintain the ecosystem commercial trees are dependent upon (Dawkins, 1958; Meijer, 1970).<br />
Meijer (1970) found that girdling the undergrowth in dipterocarp forests could enhance conditions<br />
for the invasive nomad trees for 20-40 years. It has also been found that species deemed<br />
noncommercial, and so "refined", have later proved to be important keystone species, or have<br />
exhibited significant economic value, if not a greater value than those their absence has liberated<br />
(Schmidt, 1991; Hammond and Brown, 1991; ITTO, 1992). In the Celos Management System,<br />
commercial species are "defined on market criteria and the technological qualities <strong>of</strong> the wood". In<br />
the forest area in Suriname where they work, this amounts to only 40-50 species (de Graaf and Poels,<br />
1990; 1991). There is obviously little room in this system for the development <strong>of</strong> markets for<br />
additional timber species or any long-term non-timber forest product extraction.<br />
But the CMS, and other systems like it, are attempting to create a fine balance between what is<br />
considered to be the uneconomically slow growth <strong>of</strong> commercial species in natural forests without<br />
silvicultural treatment, and the need to retain forest structural and species diversity. Many find that<br />
for timber production alone, logging without silvicultural treatments is not sufficiently economical<br />
(de Graaf and Pools, 1990; Silva et al., 1992; Chelunor Nwoboshi, 1987). In many areas, however,<br />
the economic and social importance <strong>of</strong> timber is equal or even secondary to that <strong>of</strong> non-timber<br />
products, and silvicultural treatments that coarsen forest structure and greatly impact forest diversity<br />
should be abandoned. Whitmore (1992) notes that in large part post-harvesting treatments have been<br />
abandoned due to their expense, and that growth rates can be improved through the control <strong>of</strong> logging<br />
operations. Thus, timber felling, usually regarded as the first major silvicultural operation in a natural<br />
regeneration system, has become the only canopy manipulation the forester can afford (Wyatt-Smith,<br />
1987; Whitmore, 1992).<br />
49 Refinements are expected to reduce the cutting cycle from 60 to 30 years in Sarawak, and the shifts in species<br />
composition it produces have been credited with 50-250% gains in yield (van der Hout, 1992; Wadsworth, 1987). De<br />
Graaf and Poels (1986; 1990) found that the reduction <strong>of</strong> non-commercial species by refinement (which eliminated 1(1<br />
2/3 <strong>of</strong> the standing stem volumes <strong>of</strong> these species) produced an increase in annual production <strong>of</strong> commercial timber to<br />
2m 3 /ha from 0.5 m 3 /ha. Wadsworth (1987) found that refinements most significantly created gains in quality, and not in<br />
increased wood volume.
Climber cutting is a perhaps less controversial issue in natural forest management. Climbers not only<br />
smother regeneration in logged over forest but, by binding trees together, can result in the destruction<br />
<strong>of</strong> large groups <strong>of</strong> trees during felling operations. It has been found that climber cutting, at least a<br />
year in advance <strong>of</strong> logging operations, reduced the number <strong>of</strong> trees pulled down during felling by 1/4<br />
(Jonson and Lindgren, 1990)50.<br />
Many climbers play an important role in local and international economies, and these should be<br />
harvested prior to the felling <strong>of</strong> timber, and any endangered species carefully avoided. Rare<br />
Ancistrocladus climbers in Cameroon, for example, have yielded potential anti-HIV compounds,<br />
which could generate significant economic returns should a pharmaceutical be developed (Katz<br />
Miller, 1993). The Amazonian liana Chondodendron tomentosum, used in curares, or arrow poisons,<br />
<strong>of</strong> Amerindians in Colombia, Ecuador and Peru, was found to contain the valuable skeletal muscle<br />
relaxant tubocurarine (Schultes, 1992). Amazonian shaman <strong>of</strong>ten cultivate the wild liana<br />
Banisteriopsis caapi to prepare the hallucinatory ayahuasca for ceremonies (Schultes, 1992). Gnetum<br />
bulchozi and Heinsia crinita are sources <strong>of</strong> important spinach-like greens in diets in West Africa<br />
(Agwu, pers. comm., 1993). Climbing palms are also important in this region for household and<br />
commercial weaving, including Eremospatha spp., Laccosperma opacum and Calamus deeratus<br />
(Falconer, 1992).<br />
The neotropical Desmoncus species have shown similar growth habits to the valuable Calamus<br />
species <strong>of</strong> rattan, are used in basket-making by indigenous peoples, and have been suggested as<br />
potential substitutes to Southeast Asian rattan (Gentry, 1992; Clay and Clement, 1993)51. Recently<br />
a cottage industry in rattan products has sprung up around Iquitos, Peru, where there is already a<br />
thriving fibre industry based on the aerial roots <strong>of</strong> Philodendron solimiesensis, which have long been<br />
extensively used in campesino handicrafts (Gentry, 1992). Many <strong>of</strong> these fibre plants occur in<br />
second-growth forest, and their utilization could generate substantial incomes locally. Fevillea spp.<br />
have seeds richer in oil than any other dicot, and Amerindians in Peru use them as candles (Gentry,<br />
1992).<br />
Light Selective Logging and Enrichment Planting<br />
In these systems, saplings <strong>of</strong> desired species are planted in lines or patches where stocking <strong>of</strong> residual<br />
stems is low. Species planted are usually rapid-growing, and can result in the gradual elimination <strong>of</strong><br />
existing stands (Wadsworth, 1983). In Venezuela, researchers have found a more than 30% drop in<br />
species in strips planted with non-indigenous timber. The impact <strong>of</strong> enrichment planting was<br />
particularly pronounced on specialist species (Grajal, pers. comm., 1993). The IITO Draft Guidelines<br />
for Biological Diversity Conservation in Forests Managed for Timber (1992) and The Global<br />
50 Following logging, the greater sprouting capacity <strong>of</strong>climbers, their competitive investment in resource procurement<br />
surfaces (relying on the trees' supportive tissues), and the climbing structures abundant in the slash <strong>of</strong> logged-over forest,<br />
<strong>of</strong>ten lead to the smothering <strong>of</strong> seedlings, damage to poles, and the formation <strong>of</strong> climber tangles through which<br />
regeneration has difficulty emerging (Fox, 1968; UbI et al., 1981). Pioneers might be better suited to survive climber<br />
infestations than climax species, as they are <strong>of</strong>ten flexible and fast growing, and have large compound leaves or leaf-like<br />
branches which may help them shed lianas (putz, 1984).<br />
51 The high economic value <strong>of</strong> rattan in Southeast Asia have resulted in organized teams (not always made up <strong>of</strong> local<br />
people, who may not be informed <strong>of</strong> the timing <strong>of</strong> logging operations or as aware <strong>of</strong> their implications as outside<br />
merchants and traders) extracting rattan prior to logging (Abdillah and Phillips; Stockdale, pers. comm., 1993).<br />
29
30<br />
Biodiversity Strategy (1992) recommend that enrichment planting use native wild seedlings or<br />
seedlings raised from locally collected sources. Recent research on enrichment planting <strong>of</strong> native<br />
species has suggested that, contrary to existing beliefs, native species can <strong>of</strong>ten be more productive<br />
than the exotics which replace them although in some cases these plantings could suffer from<br />
predation due to changes in density-dependent plant-herbivore relations «WRI et al., 1992; Hartshorn,<br />
1980).<br />
Enrichment plantings <strong>of</strong> multi-purpose species, such as Carapa guianensis (an important timber<br />
species in the Amazon, the seeds <strong>of</strong> which yield a valuable medicinal oil), Caryocar villosum (an<br />
important timber and fruit tree in the Amazon), and Brazil nut (Bertholletia excelsa) has been tried<br />
in some areas <strong>of</strong> the Amazon (Clay and Clement, 1993). Traditional agr<strong>of</strong>orestry and forest<br />
management systems <strong>of</strong>ten employ enrichment plantings <strong>of</strong> desirable species (Alcorn, 1990; Gomez<br />
Pompa, 1990; Balee, 1989). Clement (1993) suggests that enrichment planting with NTFP species<br />
could have the added benefit <strong>of</strong> introducing high-quality gennplasm into the forest. Combined with<br />
natural regeneration strategies, this could lead to an increase in yield and market quality. Gennplasm<br />
collections are expensive to develop, maintain, characterize and evaluate correctly, so traditional<br />
home gardens would probably provide the best varieties for enrichment (Clay and Clement, 1993).<br />
Clearing Systems and NTFPs<br />
In addition to the low intensity systems described above, some <strong>of</strong> the more intensive clearing systems<br />
(as defined by Gomez-Pompa and Burley, 1991), promote the natural regeneration <strong>of</strong> valuable<br />
commercial species and eliminate the undesirables; future forests are thus enriched with propagules<br />
coming only from the commercial species. Mature trees, seedlings and juveniles <strong>of</strong> most undesirable<br />
species are eliminated. As a result, the forest is converted from a multi-species, multi-aged to a more<br />
or less even aged forest with a greater percentage <strong>of</strong> commercial species.<br />
Although they utilize natural regeneration, these systems have a strong affinity to conversion and<br />
leave little room for the harvest <strong>of</strong> a significant variety <strong>of</strong> non-timber forest products (van der Hout,<br />
1992; Chiew Thang, 1987). Wyatt-Smith (1987) remarked that an example <strong>of</strong> this system, the<br />
Malaysian Unifonn System, produced areas that resemble Shorea plantations. These systems have<br />
proven extremely difficult to implement because: the soil seed bank produces numerous undesirable<br />
species, which require expensive cleaning and weeding operations; the commercial species may not<br />
flower for several years; the opening <strong>of</strong> the overstorey to favour rapid growth also stimulates weeds<br />
and climbers; and knowledge <strong>of</strong> the growing stock, its distribution by species, size classes and<br />
location and how these change with harvesting and treatment is extremely limited. (Gomez-Pompa<br />
and Burley, 1991; Wadsworth, 1987; Schmidt, 1991). After 38 years <strong>of</strong> effort to regenerate forest in<br />
Nigeria under the Tropical Shelterwood System, failure was admitted and the project terminated<br />
(Wadsworth, 1987).<br />
However, the strip clear-cutting, or strip shelterbelt, system employed by the Yanesha Indians in the<br />
Palacazu Valley in eastern Peru, has proved promising for natural forest management, and efforts<br />
have been undertaken to incorporate non-timber forest products into forest management (Salick,<br />
1992). The project is attempting to find markets for a variety <strong>of</strong> wood products and a large number<br />
<strong>of</strong> species, while promoting vertical integration <strong>of</strong> processing industries. Long (200-500 m), narrow<br />
(30-40 m wide) strips are clear cut, and rotated through the forest in 30-40 year felling cycles in such<br />
a way that the undisturbed forest provides a source <strong>of</strong> propagules for regeneration (Hartshorn, 1990;<br />
Gomez-Pompa and Burley, 1991; Jonson and Lindgren, 1990). Buffer zones are retained along
watercourses, steep slopes, and smaller reserved areas are set aside every six strips. Disturbance by<br />
weeds, climbers and pioneers, and the removal <strong>of</strong> nutrients stored in forest vegetation could influence<br />
the rotation and species composition <strong>of</strong> the forest, but natural regeneration <strong>of</strong> commercial species<br />
from seed and coppice appears to be "sticking" (Hartshorn, 1990; Jonson and Lindgren, 1990).<br />
Gentry (1992), found that the current approach to harvesting does not yet make the most <strong>of</strong> the<br />
forest's diversity. Small trees (and branches) are used for charcoal, medium-sized trees for posts and<br />
telephone poles, and large trees for timber. Thus, in essence, "the diverse forest is treated as though<br />
it consisted <strong>of</strong> three species", and the potentially higher value <strong>of</strong> individual species as fruits,<br />
medicines, nuts, latexes, ete. is lost (Gentry, 1992).<br />
Salick (1992) has undertaken a study to determine the number <strong>of</strong> plants regenerating in a cleared<br />
experimental strip that are useful to the Yanesha. Overall, the number <strong>of</strong> useful plants and plant<br />
species increased dramatically, due to the small size <strong>of</strong> individuals and changes in species<br />
composition resulting from the early successional nature <strong>of</strong> the strip. In some cases, however, some<br />
<strong>of</strong> the herbs and small grasses collected were found to be rare, and may have unusual gap niches<br />
(Salick, 1992). Some species <strong>of</strong> importance to Yanesha subsistence were lost, however, and there is<br />
no evidence that they will regenerate in the near future. These include medicinal, construction<br />
materials, arrow poison, thatch and - most importantly - Heteropsis and Maregravia spp. used to<br />
weave baskets, mats, and in the construction <strong>of</strong> houses, fish traps, and baby hammocks. These species<br />
are becoming increasingly scarce in this area, and must be collected as much as a day's walk away<br />
(Salick, 1992)52. Salick (1992) recommends that Yanesha indigenous management practices and their<br />
use <strong>of</strong> secondary forest products be integrated into strip management.<br />
Polycyclic, selection systems relying on natural regeneration have many limitations. Nair (1991)<br />
reports that there exists no case in which such a system has been applied over a number <strong>of</strong> cycles<br />
continuously. Management plans are continually revised to include new areas for timber extraction<br />
and reduce felling cycles and girth limits. Because <strong>of</strong> improved accessibility, the increase <strong>of</strong> lesser<br />
known species with markets, and the acceptability <strong>of</strong> low girth logs for industrial use, Nair (1991)<br />
believes that selective logging is in danger <strong>of</strong> being replaced by clear-felling, more intensive systems.<br />
Dawkins (1958), while describing selection systems as the ideal form <strong>of</strong> management for forests<br />
which are little understood and where violent conversions are liable to cause irreversible and<br />
unfavourable changes in forest ecosystems, found selection systems difficult to manage and<br />
52 Salick (1992) found that the regenerating forest included fewer species <strong>of</strong> palms and fewer individual ferns than<br />
the original vegetation, whereas more species and individuals <strong>of</strong> herbs and grasses were found. The post-harvest treatment<br />
<strong>of</strong> cutting and levelling slash apparently encourages the increased dominance <strong>of</strong> vines throughout the strip. Strip<br />
regeneration is different from natural gap fonnation, and resembles swidden fallows in the proportion <strong>of</strong> secondary plant<br />
species encountered and the importance <strong>of</strong> coppicing as a source <strong>of</strong> regeneration.<br />
31
32<br />
uneconomical 53 • But improvements in ecological knowledge, logging practices and an increase in<br />
the use <strong>of</strong> lesser-known-species have been shown to alleviate many <strong>of</strong> the problems associated with<br />
these systems.<br />
Most importantly, well-run selection systems are the only systems that serve natural forest<br />
management objectives geared towards producing the best total return from all forest products<br />
without depleting the resource base (although the strip-clearing cutting system described could have<br />
promise in some areas)54. Not all forests designated for timber production should be under lowintensity<br />
management, but the current unpredictability <strong>of</strong> both forest ecosystems and markets for<br />
forest products argues for a significant portion <strong>of</strong> the forest reserves <strong>of</strong> a country to be flexibly<br />
managed for a wide range <strong>of</strong> timber and non-timber values (Poore and Sayer, 1991; ITTO, 1992;<br />
ITIO, 1990).<br />
53 As summarized by Wadsworth (1987), Dawkins' argument against selection systems is that: the removal <strong>of</strong> 10-12<br />
mature trees/ha may be economically marginal; the yield <strong>of</strong> 3.5 m 3 /ha/year is far less than that <strong>of</strong> plantations; the cut<br />
destroys 20-250/0 <strong>of</strong> the adolescent and pole stocks and damage tends to be progressive; longer cycles mean a larger<br />
harvest but with more damage and fewer trees remaining for future crops; shorter cycles reduce the yield/cut and increases<br />
the damage per area per unit <strong>of</strong> time; large crown diameter/dbh ratios (20+) required for rapid-growing species must<br />
develop early but cannot be obtained beneath larger trees; and yield prospects, where there is no market for intermediatesized<br />
trees, are no more than 1.4 m 3 /ha/year.<br />
54 As Dawkins (1958) said himself, "where forest commerce is primitive and forest science underdeveloped, the<br />
conservative course is to retain as many existing trees over as wide an area as possible, for fear that what is lost can never<br />
be replaced".
Box 4:<br />
Examples <strong>of</strong> Multi-purpose Amazonian Species with Present and Future Potential for<br />
Natural Forest Management<br />
Brazil nut (Bertholletia excelsa) is an ideal multipurpose species. It is light-demanding and could be<br />
planted in larger gaps following logging operations. It yields nuts after 15-20 years and timber after 50<br />
100 years. Mature trees can yield 100-225 kg <strong>of</strong> unshelled nuts in a good year. Although it is illegal to<br />
fell a Brazil nut tree, large numbers continue to be cut for its fine timber (Smith et al., 1992). Brazil<br />
nut grows quickly with little vulnerability to pests and diseases, and with little intervention. Nuts are<br />
harvested in the rainy season, while rubber, its compliment in extractive systems, is tapped during the<br />
dry season (when timber harvesting operations also take place) (Clay and Oement, 1993; Balee, 1989;<br />
Mori, 1992; Richards, 1993).<br />
Andiroba (Carapa guianensis) is a fast growing moderate shade-bearer. Andiroba is widely distributed<br />
in the neotropics and is frequently found in the Amazon basin in association with Virola surinamensis<br />
and Hevea brasiliensis, both mUlti-purpose species (Sampaio in: Clay and Clement, 1993; Tropical<br />
Woods, vo!. 90, 1947). The wood <strong>of</strong> andiroba is considered one <strong>of</strong> the Amazon's fmest (Record and<br />
Mell, 1924). The seeds <strong>of</strong> andiroba produce an extremely bitter oil (its name derives from the Indian<br />
words "nhandi" (oil) and "rob" (bitter). Small quantities <strong>of</strong> oil are used to sooth muscular distentions,<br />
skin tumours and superficial skin ailments. The Indians <strong>of</strong> French Guiana extract oil <strong>of</strong> the andiroba<br />
seed, mix it with Bixi oreallana, and prepare an ointment applied to the skin to prevent mOSQuito and<br />
flea bites. Andiroba is an ideal species for enrichment planting following logging. Its seed oil could<br />
provide annual income after the tenth year until the trees are large enough to cut for timber at between<br />
18-23 years (Sampaio, 1993 in: Clay and Clement, 1993).<br />
Andiroba is endangered in its natural habitat, and was proposed for inclusion in Appendix 11 <strong>of</strong> the<br />
Convention on International trade in Endangered Species (CITES) (Wellner and Dickey, 1991).<br />
Copaiba (Copaifera multijuga) is a large tree that can attain 36 m in height with a dbh <strong>of</strong> up to 80 cm;<br />
average dbh is between 40-50 cm (Alencar, 1981). It generally occupies the upper canopy and may<br />
occasionally be an emergent. Like other upper canopy and emergent species, C. multijuga requires<br />
shade during the seedling stage but requires sun in order to attain height and girth (Sampaio in: Clay<br />
and Clement, 1993). C. multijuga is widely used for sawn lumber, construction and carpentry, and<br />
makes a good charcoa1 55 • Oil resin, collected by drilling a hole in the trunk <strong>of</strong> C. multijuga, C.<br />
reticulata, C. guianensis and C. <strong>of</strong>ficinalis has large regional and international markets. It is used as a<br />
component <strong>of</strong> high temperature resistant varnishes, as a perfume fixative in cosmetics, antibacterial in<br />
creams and soaps, as a substitute for linseed oil in paints, as a modifying agent in plastics, and to<br />
improve the clarity <strong>of</strong> the image in low-contrast areas in photographic film development. The oil resin<br />
is also a popular medicine in Amazonian. It is used to treat throat infections, bronchitis and other<br />
respiratory problems, as an antiseptic for wounds and scratches, and as a cure for diarrhoea and<br />
problems <strong>of</strong> the urinary tract. Controlled tapping <strong>of</strong> the oleo-resin <strong>of</strong> Copaijera species could yield a<br />
continual source <strong>of</strong> sustainable income throughout the growth cycle <strong>of</strong> the tree (Shanley, 1993; Sampaio<br />
in: Clay and Clement, 1993).<br />
55 The wood is heavy, with a regular grain and medium texture similar to that <strong>of</strong> Cedrella odorata (Sampeio in: Clay<br />
and Clement, 1993). Copaijera species can produce excellent export veneer with a very attractive gain. Although it is<br />
relatively uncommon, generally <strong>of</strong> small diameter and difficult to harvest, Copaijera spp. have been cut down at<br />
unsustainable rates in the Peruvian Amazon (Gentry and Vasquez, 1988).<br />
33
34<br />
Piquia (Caryocar villosum) is one <strong>of</strong> the largest forest trees in most <strong>of</strong> its distribution, frequently<br />
attaining 40-50 m when occurring as an emergent above the canopy. Piquia does not regenerate well in<br />
the shade <strong>of</strong> the high forest, but growth is rapid when released by increased light (Clement, 1993).<br />
Piquia represented 1.1% (26,540 m 3 ) <strong>of</strong> the timber commercialized in Manaus in 1972. The wood is<br />
used for ship-building, civil construction, and general carpentry. Amerindians rely heavily on its fruit,<br />
and caboclos know the location <strong>of</strong> most trees and visit them frequently during harvest season. Piquia<br />
could be planted in the larger gaps left after logging (Clay and Clement, 1993). Piquia is endangered;<br />
Caryocar costaricensis is listed in Appendix 11 <strong>of</strong> CITES (Wellner and Dickey, 1991).<br />
Pau Rosa (Aniba Duckei) reaches up to 30 m in height. Its wood is used in cabinetry, but its primary<br />
economic importance is the production <strong>of</strong> aromatic essential oil. Pau rosa is locally extinct in many<br />
parts <strong>of</strong> the Amazon, and is currently only found in inaccessible areas. To harvest the essential oil, the<br />
tree is cut, the wood cut into small chips and the wood pulverized. One ton <strong>of</strong> wood chips produces<br />
only 9 kg <strong>of</strong> the oil. (Alencar and Fernandez, 1978). Pau rosa grows well in both full sun and partial<br />
shade. It would be an ideal component in a natural management system, as it is a high value, low<br />
volume product that can be processed locally (Richards, 1993).<br />
Ucuuba (Virola surinamensis) can attain a height <strong>of</strong> 35 m and dbh <strong>of</strong> 45 cm in the forest. The wood is<br />
easy to work and is widely used in light carpentry, for shipping boxes, match sticks, plywood and pulp<br />
for paper. It is heavily exploited for plywood, and commercial timber size trees in the Brazilian<br />
Amazon are extremely rare today. The seeds contain oils useful to the perfume and cosmetics industry,<br />
and are locally used to treat rheumatism, stomach aches and dyspepsia. Cooked bark is used to sterilize<br />
wounds and aid healing. Its sap is used to treat haemorrhoids, and the bark is ground and smoked for<br />
its hallucinogenic effects by many Amazonian tribes (Sampaio in: Clay and Clement, 1993). In the<br />
lower Amazon River Basin, it occurs in association with the buriti (Mauritius flexuosa), assai (Euterpe<br />
oleracea) and ubucu (Manicaria sacci/era) palms, all <strong>of</strong> which have important non-timber uses 56<br />
(Peters et al., 1989; Anderson et al., 1991). These forests should be carefully managed to maintain the<br />
integrity <strong>of</strong> these valuable non-timber product yielding ecosystems. .<br />
Cumaru (Coumarouna odorata) is a large tree <strong>of</strong> the primary forest, attaining up to 30 m, and widely<br />
distributed throughout the Neotropics. Its primary value is its very heavy timber which is used in naval<br />
construction, for truck and train wagons and for high-quality cabinetry. Historically, the extraction <strong>of</strong><br />
coumarin from cumaru seeds was nearly as important as its timber. This perfumed oil was used in the<br />
perfume and cosmetic industries and to flavour tobacco. It is suggested by some authors that markets<br />
for coumarin could increase in the near future due to rising interest in alternative sources <strong>of</strong> vegetable<br />
oils for personal care products (Oay and Clement, 1993). Water extracted from the bark is used as an<br />
antispasmodic and general tonic, and the seeds are occasionally used to make ornamental necklaces and<br />
other handicrafts. Cumaru can grow in both full sun and partial shade, making it a good option for<br />
reforestation or agr<strong>of</strong>orestry. (Sampaio in: Oay and Clement, 1993).<br />
S6 Buriti (Mauritius flexuosa) produces one <strong>of</strong> the most important market fruits in western Amazonian; the thin, oily<br />
mesocarp is eaten raw, or processed into a sweet paste for candies, beverages, and ice creams; the mesocarp and seed<br />
kemal also yield good quality oil. Local inhabitants tend to locate plantations <strong>of</strong> cacao (Theobroma cacao) at the base<br />
<strong>of</strong> these palms (peters et al., 1989; Anderson et al., 1991).<br />
Assai (Euterpe oleracea) is an important source <strong>of</strong> palm heart in Brazil, and its fruit pulp provides a beverage that is a<br />
staple component <strong>of</strong> the regional diet. Local inhabitants actively manipulate the floodplain forests to promote the fruit<br />
<strong>of</strong> this palm (peters et al., 1989; Anderson et al., 1989).
Bacuri (Platonia esculenta) is a mid-to-upper canopy species, requiring full sun for good growth and<br />
yield. It is one <strong>of</strong> the most popular fruits in the Belem market and is used in jams, ice creams and as is.<br />
The yellow latex (both from the fruit and the trunk) has medicinal properties, specifically when applied<br />
topically for skin ailments. The heavy wood is employed in general carpentry and furniture making, as<br />
well as in civil and marine construction. Because it does well on nutrient poor soils and in full sunlight,<br />
bacuri could become a useful species for recuperation <strong>of</strong> degraded lands (Clement, 1993).<br />
Jatoba (Hymenaea courbaril) is generally a large tree, attaining 40 m in height and 2 m dbh. It is<br />
occasionally cultivated and frequently managed by local people, for example by being protected when a<br />
swidden clearing is opened. The wood is very heavy and durable and is used in heavy construction,<br />
such as hydraulic work, truck bodies, railroad ties, etc. The resin that exudes from the trunk, the<br />
branches and the fruit pericarp solidifies on the tree or fall in chunks to the ground, at which time it is<br />
collected. This resin is used industrially in the fabrication <strong>of</strong> varnishes, is used locally to make kitchen<br />
utensils, and as a sealant to reduce water penetration. In popular medicine, jatoba bark is used as a<br />
vennifuge and to treat cystitis; the sap, when mixed with bee's honey, is used to treat bronchitis and<br />
various heart ailments (Ferreira and Sampaio in Clay and Clement, 1993).<br />
VIII. Traditional Management <strong>of</strong> Neotropical Forests for Timber and Non<br />
Timber Products<br />
Traditional forest management has long relied on complex ecological processes to maximize the<br />
harvest <strong>of</strong> a wide variety <strong>of</strong> forest products. Unlike natural forest management geared primarily to<br />
timber production, which usually results in the coarsening <strong>of</strong> forest structure and depletion <strong>of</strong> species<br />
diversity, the traditional management <strong>of</strong> the forest for a multitude <strong>of</strong> products has usually promoted<br />
and required the maintenance <strong>of</strong> forest structural and species diversity (Gomez Pompa and Burley,<br />
1991; Alcorn, 1990; Posey, 1989; Anderson, 1990).<br />
Indigenous peoples have long managed critical forest resources, rather than just "adapting" to them,<br />
and over the millennia have transfonned much <strong>of</strong> the vegetation and forest types in the tropics<br />
through these elaborate systems <strong>of</strong> forest managemenr 7 (Balee, 1989; 1988; Posey, 1992; Schultes,<br />
1992). Many "natural" forests, therefore, may in fact represent arrested successional forest once<br />
managed by people, including the palm, bamboo, liana and Brazil nut forests. While natural forest<br />
management is generally used to mean the focused management <strong>of</strong> a particular forest product <br />
timber-producing trees, non-timber products, game, etc. - indigenous systems <strong>of</strong> forest management<br />
focus on processes, not only products, although products result from these processes (Alcorn, 1989).<br />
For example, the Ka'apor Indians <strong>of</strong> the Brazilian Amazon manage the forest to produce vegetational<br />
zones in different phases <strong>of</strong> recovery. Each vegetational zone is managed with varying degrees <strong>of</strong><br />
intensity, decreasing from house gardens to young swidden, old swidden, and fallow. These diverse<br />
vegetational zones create environments in which artificially high densities <strong>of</strong> useful plants and<br />
57 It is suggested that at least 11.8% <strong>of</strong> the terra firme forest in the Brazilian Amazon alone is <strong>of</strong> archaic, cultural<br />
origin (BaBe, 1989).<br />
35
36<br />
animals thrive to produce diverse products 58 (Balee and Gely, 1989). Similarly, the Mexican Husatec<br />
and Peruvian Bora fanners create mosaics <strong>of</strong> eco-units. In addition to the opened lands for<br />
agriculture, at any given time secondary successional species are reproducing somewhere in the<br />
mosaic and mature forest species are reproducing somewhere else. In this way, the elements<br />
necessary to regenerate forests are retained in the system (Alcom, 1990)59.<br />
Traditional agroecosystems focus on processes, rather than spatial structures, the usual subject <strong>of</strong><br />
western attention. They are a fluid complex <strong>of</strong> planted fields, fallows, savanna, dooryards, forests,<br />
rivers, and river banks, rather than distinct, static structures (Alcom, 1989; 1993). According to<br />
Alcom (199), indigenous agr<strong>of</strong>orestry systems share seven attributes: they take advantage <strong>of</strong> the<br />
variety <strong>of</strong> native trees and tree communities, planting or protecting those most desired; rely on natural<br />
successional processes to produce resources, improve and protect soils, and reduce pest problems;<br />
use natural environmental variation; incorporate numerous crop and native species; are flexible and<br />
personalisable, and may vary by site or year; spread risks by retaining diversity; and maintain a<br />
reliable back-up to meet needs should other sources fail.<br />
Indigenous sequential agr<strong>of</strong>orestry systems that integrate secondary successional vegetation are<br />
usually complimented by managed forest grove systems from which fruits, wood, and game are<br />
harvested. In Huastec communities, 25% <strong>of</strong> a community's land is held in forested groves, usually<br />
situated along creeks or on steep slopes where they prevent soil erosion and protect watersheds. They<br />
are managed by a combination <strong>of</strong> arboriculture and natural forest management to create a mixture<br />
<strong>of</strong> native species <strong>of</strong> primary and secondary forest, and introduced species. A typical forest grove<br />
contains over 300 species and 90% have known uses (as food, construction material, medicine,<br />
firewood and livestock forage)60 (Alcom, 1990).<br />
58 Over 76% <strong>of</strong> the plant species used by the Kayapo Indians <strong>of</strong> Brazil are not "domesticated" nor can they be<br />
considered "wild" since they have been systematically selected for desimble traits and propagated in a variety <strong>of</strong> habitats<br />
(posey, 1992).<br />
59 Irvine (1989) found that the Runa Indian community in Ecuador have an important impact on forest structure and<br />
composition through succession management. Regeneration in the fallow forest is managed to develop a characteristic<br />
form, and so alters the plant composition <strong>of</strong> the developing forests. Planting <strong>of</strong> species that can mature during the fallow<br />
period occurs early in the agricultural cycle. Light-demanding fruit trees are planted concurrently with manioc, for<br />
example, to benefit from the larger gap in the forest at this stage. Selective cutting <strong>of</strong> the forest understorey or overstory<br />
during garden clearing, and subsequent weeding, also favours certain forest species as sources <strong>of</strong> regeneration. Both<br />
planting and protection <strong>of</strong> valuable species vary from the careful to the casual. Managed fallows had a more diverse<br />
canopy, with a higher proportion <strong>of</strong>enrichment (8-19% planted species); unmanaged fallows were dominated by a unifonn<br />
canopy <strong>of</strong> Caecropia spp.<br />
60 An ethnobotanical survey conducted by Boom (1989) <strong>of</strong> the plants used by the Chacabo Indians <strong>of</strong> Amazonian<br />
Bolivia showed that 360 (or 82%, <strong>of</strong> the tree species and 95% <strong>of</strong> the individual trees) individuals in one hectare <strong>of</strong> forest<br />
near their principle village, Alto Ivon, were used: food (33 spp., 264 individuals), fuel (14 spp., 163 individuals),<br />
construction and crafts (23 spp., 225 individuals), medicines (23 spp., 271 individuals) and commercial sources <strong>of</strong> cash<br />
(2 species: Hevea brasiliensis and Bertholletia excelsa).
38<br />
With slight modification, this could be a list <strong>of</strong> management activities employed by the forester.<br />
Rarely, however, are these traditional management systems - developed over millennia by the<br />
inhabitants <strong>of</strong> extremely unique and complex ecosystems - seriously considered in the design <strong>of</strong><br />
natural forest management 63 • Elaborate scientific studies are undertaken to articulate the subtleties <strong>of</strong><br />
what <strong>of</strong>ten amounts to a small component <strong>of</strong> traditional management systems, and extensive<br />
ignorance <strong>of</strong> the ecology <strong>of</strong> tropical forests is widely pr<strong>of</strong>essed. While this research is <strong>of</strong> academic<br />
interest, it will take many decades to arrive at a well-articulated scientific understanding <strong>of</strong> even a<br />
small portion <strong>of</strong> the tropics, and the forest manager must rely on more immediate guidance. For lowintensity,<br />
multi-purpose natural forest management, traditional management systems provide an<br />
enormous headstart 64 (Alcorn, 1990; Gomez-Pompa, 1991; Salick, 1992; Posey, 1988; Zemer, 1993;<br />
Lamb, 1991).<br />
IX. Natural Forest Management and the Conservation <strong>of</strong> Biodiversity<br />
Approximately 1.4,000,000 species <strong>of</strong> animals and plants are known to science, and it is thought that<br />
more than three times this number exist (Sayer, 1991). Tropical forests, which cover only 7% <strong>of</strong> the<br />
earth's land mass, are estimated to contain well over half its species. One ha <strong>of</strong> tropical forest is<br />
estimated to contain between 100 and 300 trees species alone, with most species being represented<br />
by only one or two individuals per hectare. The general trend <strong>of</strong> high species diversity with low<br />
species density has been documented repeatedly in tropical forest inventories (Peters, 1993). As a<br />
result, tropical forest species appear especially prone to extinctions and sustainable resource<br />
63 Admittedly, there are numerous obstacles to this, not least <strong>of</strong> which is the lack <strong>of</strong> respect western-style managers<br />
<strong>of</strong>ten have for traditional systems <strong>of</strong> management that are based not upon fonnal science but rather on customary practice,<br />
cultural traditions, and local knowledge <strong>of</strong> land and natural resources (Othole and Anton, 1993; Poole, P. 1993; Berkes<br />
et al., 1991). Traditional, largely decentralized and consensus-based systems <strong>of</strong> management that are enforced through<br />
social sanctions, contrast markedly with the "western" hierarchical, centralized, regulatory, and time-based systems <strong>of</strong><br />
management.<br />
As the Zuni Indians Othole and Anyon (1993) state: "because the entire legal, regulatory, and guideline framework is a<br />
non-Indian construct, it is <strong>of</strong>ten difficult to fit the needs <strong>of</strong> the developer and agency with the needs <strong>of</strong> the tribe ... even<br />
the word 'property' albeit a necessity <strong>of</strong> tenninology because <strong>of</strong> the language <strong>of</strong> federal law ... can raise serious concerns<br />
within the traditional and religious leadership".<br />
64 For example, Salick (1992) has found that the increased dominance <strong>of</strong> secondary forest species and the importance<br />
<strong>of</strong> coppicing as a source <strong>of</strong> regeneration in the strip-clear cutting silvicultural system employed in Palcazu Peru,<br />
resembled fallows common to indigenous systems <strong>of</strong> forest management from the area. She recommended using<br />
indigenous forest and fallow management as the theoretical underpinning to natural forest management; by applying these<br />
techniques, forests may be more productive. For example, to maximize regeneration <strong>of</strong> desired species in the relatively<br />
large gaps <strong>of</strong> the strip clear-cut, in addition to managing seed sources, emphasis should be placed on management<br />
practices that encourage healthy coppicing, as has been done successfully in the indigenous system (Salick, 1992).<br />
Phillips and Gentry (1993) have developed a simple quantitative technique for evaluating the relative usefulness <strong>of</strong> plants<br />
to people; they feel that compilation-style approaches to ethnobotany must be modified by developing methods that allow<br />
researchers to quantitatively describe and analyze patterns in what they study. In this way, ethnobotanical studies will<br />
provide scientifically higher-quality infonnation on why and how people use plants, and so might more easily be<br />
incorpomted into the research and design <strong>of</strong> management systems for natural forests by other scientists, including<br />
foresters.
exploitation is a difficult management problem (Sayer, 1991; Peters, 1993)65. As A.D. John (1992)<br />
stated, "in practice, the precise environmental factors to which species may be responding are difficult<br />
to define". As a result, we cannot accurately determine the impact <strong>of</strong> logging on biodiversity and the<br />
many forest products that draw on this diversity. The implications <strong>of</strong> our ignorance <strong>of</strong> species<br />
diversity and tropical ecosystems for natural forest management are clear - we know little, are only<br />
very slowly learning more, and so must err on the side <strong>of</strong> caution.<br />
Nepsted et al. (1992) describe two types <strong>of</strong> biotic impoverishment, or ecological degradation, that<br />
result from human use <strong>of</strong> forest resources: population impoverishment and ecosystem<br />
impoverishment 66 . Ecosystem impoverishment always influences populations, but we do not have<br />
sufficient information to predict the exact nature <strong>of</strong> these impacts. The harvest <strong>of</strong> non-timber forest<br />
products, for example <strong>of</strong> tapir and brazil nuts in the extractive reserve <strong>of</strong> Porongaba in the Amazon,<br />
could result in population impoverishment, but rarely ecosystem impoverishment. Logging in the<br />
same area can lead to the population impoverishment <strong>of</strong> roughly 100 tree species and an unknown<br />
number <strong>of</strong> animal species, and potentially severe ecosystem impoverishment due largely to the 50%<br />
canopy reduction with which logging is associated (Nepstad et aI., 1989).<br />
Gaps in the natural forest created from disturbances such as landslides, earthquakes, rivers switching<br />
course, or individual tree falls are theorized to contribute to species diversity, but gaps created by<br />
logging regimes generally do not result in more diverse forests as a whole (Brown, 1992). In general,<br />
the smaller the scale <strong>of</strong> disturbance, the more likely local structural, floristic and faunistic diversity<br />
will be temporarily enhanced or remain the same. Larger scale disturbances tend to simplify<br />
ecosystems, which results in a loss <strong>of</strong> biodiversity both locally and regionally. There is always a<br />
trade-<strong>of</strong>f, then, between the intensity <strong>of</strong> timber production and the conservation <strong>of</strong> biodiversity (ITTO,<br />
Draft Guidelines for Biological Diversity Conservation, 1992; Poore and Sayer, 1991).<br />
65 There are exceptions to the rule <strong>of</strong> high species diversity in tropical forests. Oligarchic forests, dominated by only<br />
one or two tree species, occupy tens <strong>of</strong> millions <strong>of</strong> hectares in Amazonia. In many cases, the dominant species produce<br />
fruits, seeds or oils <strong>of</strong> economic importance. In terms <strong>of</strong> density and yield, oligarchic forests may rival many <strong>of</strong> the<br />
commercial fruit plantations in the tropics, and so are a valuable source <strong>of</strong> non-timber forest products (peters, 1993; Peters<br />
et al., 1989). For example, camu-camu (Myrciaria dubia), a shrub or small tree native to the floodplains <strong>of</strong> Amazonia,<br />
is <strong>of</strong>ten found in large, mono-specific populations; isolated individuals are rarely encountered. In natum! populations,<br />
12,310 individuals/hectare have been found (C. Peters, pers. comm, in Clay and Clement, 1993). Camu-camu fruits<br />
contain one <strong>of</strong> the highest concentrations <strong>of</strong> vitamin C in the plant kingdom (2,000-2,994 mg ascorbic acid/lOO g <strong>of</strong> fruit<br />
pulp), and are widely used locally in juices, ice creams and liqueurs (peters et al., 1989).<br />
66 Population impoverishment results when the genetic diversity or abundance <strong>of</strong> a population declines as a result <strong>of</strong><br />
human activity. Hunting or harvesting practices that favour certain types <strong>of</strong> animal or plant characteristics or that exceed<br />
the regenerative capacity <strong>of</strong> the population impoverish the population genetically and structurally. Populations can also<br />
decline as the indirect result <strong>of</strong> human activity if pollinators or seed dispersal agents are eliminated. Ecosystem<br />
impoverishment results when forest use alters the structural and functional integrity <strong>of</strong> the forest, changing its ability to<br />
regulate the storage and flow <strong>of</strong> water, energy, carbon, and mineral nutrients (Nepsted et al., 1992).<br />
39
40<br />
Timber harvesting may not always lead to a reduction in species numbers, but can produce qualitative<br />
changes whereby generalists replace old-growth specialists and a few species come to numerically<br />
dominate 67 (IITO, 1992; John, A.D., 1992; Dahaban, Nordin and Bennett, 1992; Kemp et al., 1993).<br />
Logging damage is essentially random, in that it is spread over all tree taxa. As a result, rare species<br />
are particularly susceptible to the impacts <strong>of</strong> logging, especially those that are also highly valued<br />
timbers 68 (John, A.D., 1992). Timber species with a limited geographic range, poor dispersal ability,<br />
and few seedlings and saplings in the understorey are generally less equipped to deal with logging<br />
pressures than those widely distributed, with long seed dispersal distances and with numerous<br />
seedlings and saplings in the understorey. Amazonian species such as Swietenia macrophylla,<br />
Vouacapoua americana, Torresia acreana (used locally for medicine and perfume) and Euxylophora<br />
paraensis were found to be susceptible to pressures in the face <strong>of</strong> intensive logging, while Tabebuia<br />
serratifolia, Hura creptans (exudate used locally for poisons) and Astronium urundeuva (wood used<br />
locally for crafts) might be favoured by changes induced by logging. Most species fell between the<br />
two extremes 69 (Martini et al., 1992). The qualitative changes in forest composition as a result <strong>of</strong><br />
logging can promote some timber species used locally for NTFPs, while reducing populations <strong>of</strong><br />
others. But most communities rely on a variety and range <strong>of</strong> forest products to meet their needs and<br />
a reduction in the diversity <strong>of</strong> available species can have significant repercussions on local<br />
consumption and trading patterns. Similarly, the conservation <strong>of</strong> biodiversity does not depend upon<br />
the total number <strong>of</strong> species in a small area, but the number within an entire region. While the<br />
disturbances created by logging, differential species success in varying gap sizes, and the resulting<br />
67 For example, in preliminary studies in unlogged and logged dipterocarp forest in Sarawak, environmental changes<br />
have produced considerable drops in termite species richness, favouring mound-building species over those constructing<br />
simple nests in soil (John, A.D., 1992). Another study in dipterocarp forest in Sarawak demonstrated that following<br />
logging the trend is for edge or colonizer species to replace primary forest species. A number <strong>of</strong> species appeared that<br />
had never been seen before in the forest, but are common to secondary forests and gardens, such as the plain-tail squirrel<br />
(Callosciurus notatus) and shrews (Tupaia sp.). Those that disappeared after logging were all endangered or totally<br />
protected species or both, such as the clouded leopard (Ne<strong>of</strong>elis nebulosa), sun bear (Helarctos malayanus) and oriental<br />
small-clawed otter (Aonyx conerea) (Dahaban, Nordin, and Bennett, 1992). Stoekdale (pers. comm., 1993) has found that<br />
in 12 year old logged forest in East Kalimantan, populations <strong>of</strong> the slow-growing, high quality Calamus and Daemonorops<br />
rattan species have been reduced, while the lower value, pioneer-like Korthalsia species have increased in number. This<br />
will obviously have important economic implications for future harvests <strong>of</strong> rattan in the region.<br />
68 For example, Brazilwood (Caesalpinia echinata) has been eradicated from most <strong>of</strong> its former range in Amazonian<br />
(John, A.D., 1992). Ceiba pentandra, which has religious importance for many traditional communities, and the seeds<br />
<strong>of</strong> which are used locally to stuff mattresses and the wood for construction, was extirpated from Iquitos, Peru by intensive<br />
logging operations (Gentry and Vasquez, 1988; Orejuela, 1992).<br />
69 The eight parameters used to evaluate a species' ability to resist the negative impacts <strong>of</strong> logging include: 1)<br />
effective long-distance dispersal ability; 2) abundance <strong>of</strong> saplings in the forest regeneration; 3) rapid growth in full sun;<br />
4) ability to resprout; 5) capacity to withstand fire (by virtue <strong>of</strong> thick bark); 6) broad geographic distribution; 7) even<br />
distribution over the landscape; and 8) high density <strong>of</strong> adults (Martini et al., 1992).
increases in "edges" can produce localized increases in diversity, it does not increase biodiversity for<br />
the region as a whole 70 (Dahaban, Nordin and Bennett, 1992).<br />
Logging can also impact the survival or density <strong>of</strong> keystone or pivotal species that control the<br />
structure <strong>of</strong> the community and help determine which other species are present (WRI et al., 1992).<br />
At Kutai, East Kalimantan, for example, it was found that the "keystone" Ficus species are<br />
significantly associated with some <strong>of</strong> the major timber species which logging selectively depletes<br />
(Whitmore, 1991)71. In these cases, population impoverishment, as described by Nepstad et al.<br />
(1992), can lead to ecosystem impoverishment, because keystone species are not "redundant" - there<br />
do not exist several other species that perform similar ecosystem functions.<br />
When species are left in small isolated populations they become susceptible to extinction by random<br />
events and genetic deterioration. This, again, is a potentially hidden side-effect <strong>of</strong> logging operations,<br />
and is particularly important in tropical regions where local endemism is high (John, A.D., 1992).<br />
Heywood and Stuart (1992) state that the loss <strong>of</strong> genetic variation in species' populations is at least<br />
as important as the loss <strong>of</strong> entire species, and is the "essence <strong>of</strong> the process <strong>of</strong> extinction". Genetic<br />
variation, like soil fertility, can be impossible or extremely slow to rehabilitate through management<br />
schemes. Therefore, fragmentation <strong>of</strong> forests during logging operations should be kept to a minimum;<br />
logging should be staggered so that various areas are at various stages <strong>of</strong> succession following<br />
disturbance and mature stands lie in close proximity to each other (WRI et al., 1992). Uncontrolled<br />
selective logging can also eliminate the more desirable genetic characteristics <strong>of</strong> a timber species by<br />
systematically "creaming" or removing individuals that display valuable traits (Uhl, 1989; Oldfield,<br />
1989; Schmidt, 1991; Clay and Clement, 1993). The intensive collection <strong>of</strong> fruits from trees that<br />
produce those <strong>of</strong> the highest quality can similarly result in a population dominated by trees <strong>of</strong><br />
marginal economic value (Peters, 1993).<br />
There exists no objective, long-term data on complete logging cycles, so we can only theorize on<br />
impacts over time. Different sites have a wide variation in species abundances and distribution over<br />
even quite small areas, so each forest area must be individually assessed with regards to local species<br />
diversity, endemism and degrees to which logging disturbance produces negative effects. In the short<br />
tenn, studies <strong>of</strong>ten demonstrate little decline in species diversity, so long-term studies must be<br />
implemented that detect not only changes in species numbers but in density, as well. The study <strong>of</strong><br />
local structural, floral and faunal diversity can be incorporated into permanent sample plots set up<br />
to measure the growth, mortality, and regeneration rates <strong>of</strong> commercial timber (and non-timber)<br />
species, and other changes in the forest over time (Alder and Synnott, 1992).<br />
70 There is little available information on the effect <strong>of</strong> disturbance on most species, nor on the relative effects <strong>of</strong><br />
shorter and longer felling cycles. (Ashton, pers. comm. in Heywood and Stuan, 1992). Species loss is a logarithmic<br />
function, and so repeated logging, or re-logging before full regeneration <strong>of</strong> the forest has occurred could lead to severe<br />
and permanent effects on biodiversity (John, A.D., 1992) Many studies which have attempted to detennine the impact<br />
<strong>of</strong> selective logging or other disturbances on species diversity have produced inconclusive results due to the variety <strong>of</strong><br />
factors involved (John, R.D., 1992).<br />
For example, RJ. John (1992) found that in Papua New Guinea he could not adequately detennine the effects <strong>of</strong> selective<br />
logging on species diversity. He suggests that the major impacts <strong>of</strong> logging are the physical effects <strong>of</strong> the removal <strong>of</strong> logs<br />
and post-logging development <strong>of</strong> lands made accessible through logging operations.<br />
71 Many <strong>of</strong> these species are used extensively by local peoples, as well. In the Gunung Leuser National Park, for<br />
example, Ficus species are collected for traditional medical treatments (Sayer, 1991).<br />
41
42<br />
The management <strong>of</strong> natural tropical forests for timber production will inevitably result in a loss <strong>of</strong><br />
species and structural diversity, but these forests can form an important component <strong>of</strong> national landuse<br />
systems that attempt to conserve biodiversity. In no tropical country today will the lands<br />
demarcated as strict nature reserves protect an adequate proportion <strong>of</strong> that country's biodiversity<br />
(Hansen et al., 1991; Blockhus et al., 1992; WRI et aI., 1992). Forest management for non-timber<br />
products alone is usually more compatible with biodiversity conservation 72 (Salick, 1992; Gomez<br />
Pompa, 1990). But because a significant proportion <strong>of</strong> the world's remaining natural forests are<br />
allocated for timber production, the survival <strong>of</strong> biodiversity depends in large part on the<br />
implementation <strong>of</strong> natural forest management systems that integrate timber, non-timber products and<br />
conservation objectives.<br />
Because forests are dynamic, they are reasonably robust in their ability to recover from localized and<br />
periodic disturbance. The selective removal <strong>of</strong> a small volume <strong>of</strong> timber and non-timber forest<br />
products, followed by management that allows regeneration to occur, can retain a significant portion<br />
<strong>of</strong> species. The number <strong>of</strong> species whose populations are critically reduced by logging, and so the<br />
speed with which the original animal and plant communities are reestablished, is related to: the<br />
degree to which the forest is disturbed; the proximity <strong>of</strong> undisturbed patches which can act as refuges<br />
for mobile species; and the maintenance or return <strong>of</strong> substantial portions <strong>of</strong> the forest to the mature<br />
phase structural complexity in which dominance by a few species becomes impossible and diversity<br />
is maintained (IITO, 1992; Reid, 1992; Blockhus et al., 1992; Brown and Brown, 1992, John, A.D.,<br />
1992).<br />
The Impact <strong>of</strong> Natural Forest Management on Wildlife<br />
Animal-plant relationships are a significant factor in the long-term success <strong>of</strong> natural forest<br />
management. Regeneration <strong>of</strong> valuable commercial timber species does not take place in an<br />
ecological vacuum, and is not based solely on the size and frequency with which gaps are opened<br />
during logging operations and the effectiveness <strong>of</strong> silvicultural treatments. Through predation,<br />
pollination, and seed dispersal, animals play an integral role the regeneration and survival <strong>of</strong> tree<br />
species.<br />
There exist wide variations in the response <strong>of</strong> wildlife to changed conditions <strong>of</strong> habitat and food<br />
supply due to logging. Small, less mobile species are most likely to suffer population reductions as<br />
a result <strong>of</strong> patchy food sources, and this may affect ranging patterns, breeding success and even gene<br />
flow. Large-bodied, wide-ranging species with generalized diets that may opt for alternative sources<br />
<strong>of</strong> food will fare best (John, A.D., 1992). Whitmore notes that elephants, rhinoceros, pigs, and other<br />
species that feed generally on lush herbs and shrubs found along valleys and on landslips actually<br />
benefit from the young regrowth along logging tracks, while specialists such as cuckoos, trogans and<br />
many insectivores do not fair as well (Whitmore, 1991). But Dahaban, Nordin and Bennett (1992)<br />
found that in dipterocarp forests in Sarawak the diversity and density <strong>of</strong>primates, squirrels, and other<br />
72 Salick (1992) found that forest under more or less traditional management, although containing fewer species than<br />
primary forest, had higher densities <strong>of</strong> those species <strong>of</strong> larger non-timber value, including ipecac and wicker. Selectively<br />
logged forest had fewer species overall and fewer useful non-timber species. Boom (1989) found that the Chacabo Indians<br />
in Bolivia similarly managed forest to increase the proportion <strong>of</strong> useful species in proximity to their village. High species<br />
dominance is <strong>of</strong>ten a reflection <strong>of</strong> past management activities, including the equivalent <strong>of</strong> forest gardens, and the<br />
protection and enrichment <strong>of</strong> valuable species (Gomez-Pompa, 1990).
mammals was severely affected following logging 73 . A.D. John (1991) found in Western Amazonian<br />
that avifaunas in disturbed habitats were dissimilar to that <strong>of</strong> undisturbed forest to a degree<br />
proportional to the extent <strong>of</strong> disturbance. Understorey insectivorous birds with specialized foraging<br />
strategies tend to be least able to adjust to conditions <strong>of</strong> disturbance (John, 1991; Alejandro Grajal,<br />
Wildlife Conservation Society, pers. comm., 1993).<br />
In most tropical countries over 70% <strong>of</strong> resident vertebrate species are commonly reported to be<br />
dependant upon closed forest, and the figure for invertebrates is probably a great deal higher (John,<br />
A.D., 1992). Invertebrates are far more species-rich than vertebrates and have high microhabitat<br />
specialization, so are likely to be severely affected by logging disturbance, but virtually nothing is<br />
known about them (John, A.D., 1992).<br />
Animals in recently logged forest may face three problems concerning food source trees: fewer trees,<br />
different spatial distribution <strong>of</strong> trees, and different patterns <strong>of</strong> fruit and leaf production. The initial<br />
loss during logging <strong>of</strong> trees used as food sources by wildlife might be buffered by increased levels<br />
<strong>of</strong> fruiting and new leaf production stimulated by increased light from the opening <strong>of</strong> the canopy, but<br />
the full range <strong>of</strong> food sources will not return until the regeneration <strong>of</strong> primary forest seedlings reach<br />
reproductive maturity (John, A.D., 1992; 1988)74.<br />
Crome (1991) found that while selectively logged forests can provide an excellent habitat for many<br />
species <strong>of</strong> wildlife, it can threaten specialist frugivorous that are important components <strong>of</strong> the forest<br />
ecosystem and through dispersal impact the demography <strong>of</strong> plant species 75 . Uhl (1989) found that<br />
in the Amazon many <strong>of</strong> the most sought-after timber species produce fruits that are important food<br />
for forest animals. For example, Manilkara huberi, which accounted for 30% <strong>of</strong> the 1988 timber<br />
volume harvested in Para, has cherry-sized fruits that are consumed by parrots, monkeys, coati, deer<br />
and turtles. A.D. John (1988) found in a West Malaysian dipterocarp forest that residual damage from<br />
logging operations drastically reduced overall availability <strong>of</strong> food sources for frugivorous and<br />
folivores, even where timber trees are not themselves used by animals.<br />
Post-logging silvicultural treatments can also negatively impact wildlife populations. By promoting<br />
the regeneration <strong>of</strong> larger proportions <strong>of</strong> commercial species, poisoning the undesirable, and<br />
"enriching" the forest - <strong>of</strong>ten with exotics - silvicultural interventions can alter plant species<br />
composition and destroy species that maintain wildlife populations (Caldecott, 1988; Crome, 1991).<br />
In a study <strong>of</strong> the commercial species <strong>of</strong> preference in Queensland Crome (1991) found that the vast<br />
73 Borean gibbons (Hylobates muellerz) decreased by more than 70% in group density after logging. The group density<br />
<strong>of</strong> maroon langurs (Presbytis rubicunda) dropped about 45% after logging, while that <strong>of</strong> the white-fronted langurs (P.<br />
frontata) decreased by 35%. Giant squirrels (Ratufa affinis) showed a reduction <strong>of</strong> 71 % in individual density after logging.<br />
The diversity <strong>of</strong> species in these areas also decreased markedly. (Dahaban, Nordin, and Bennett, 1992).<br />
74 The uncontrolled collection <strong>of</strong> non-timber forest product reproductive propagules (fruits, nuts/seeds, and oilseeds)<br />
can also disturb food availability for wildlife. In effect, collectors compete with forest frugivorous, reducing the total<br />
supply <strong>of</strong> food resources available to ground-foraging animals. Frugivorous might subsequently migrate <strong>of</strong>f-site and<br />
disrupt seed dispersal and seedling establishment for those species whose seeds require scarification by animals to<br />
germinate (peters, 1993).<br />
75 "Legitimate" frugivorous, which digest only the pericarp and void the seeds intact, require fruits <strong>of</strong> high nutritive<br />
value, are highly specialized and are maintained by a succession <strong>of</strong> appropriate plant species fruiting sequentially. In lean<br />
periods, they rely on "keystone" species and are highly vulnerable to the loss <strong>of</strong> a food source (Crome, 1991).<br />
43
44<br />
majority <strong>of</strong> frugivorous rely on uncommercial species, rather than the increasing proportions <strong>of</strong> highvalue<br />
commercial species with woody fruits and wind dispersed seeds. Silvicultural regimes,<br />
therefore, promoted a decrease in the populations <strong>of</strong> trees needed during lean times for food.<br />
Enrichment planting <strong>of</strong> local wild seedlings, such as those recommended by the ITTO, may not<br />
always adequately protect wildlife diversity, although they will undoubtably be an improvement on<br />
planting <strong>of</strong> exotics 76 (ITTO, Draft Guidelines for Biological Diversity Conservation, 1992). In<br />
Venezuela, enrichment plantings <strong>of</strong> non-indigenous commercial species in strips were found to<br />
contain 30% fewer species than the surrounding forest; this was less than the number in the logged<br />
over forest left to naturally regenerate (Alejandro Grajal, Wildlife Conservation Society, pers. comm.,<br />
1993).<br />
In Sarawak there is typically a sharp decline in wildlife harvests within ten years <strong>of</strong> an area first<br />
being logged due to a combination <strong>of</strong> ecological, social and economic factors 77 : the immediate<br />
physical disturbance resulting from logging; the long-term change in the forest composition and<br />
structure; the influx <strong>of</strong> timber company workers, many <strong>of</strong> whom will hunt themselves 78 ; and<br />
improved lines <strong>of</strong> communication and <strong>of</strong>ten additional cash incomes for many rural people. These<br />
factors result in increased hunting pressure as people take advantage <strong>of</strong> new markets and the access<br />
provided by logging road openings into previously undisturbed forest (Caldecott, 1989; John, R.J.,<br />
1992; Dahaban, Nordin and Bennett, 1992; Wilkie et aI., 1992). Some species are particularly<br />
vulnerable to extermination by hunting, such as rhinoceros, gibbons, bears, leaf monkeys, proboscis<br />
monkeys, clouded leopards and marine turtles (Caldecott, 1988; Dahaban, Nordin and Bennett, 1992).<br />
In this way, the increased opportunities for feeding on herbs along logging tracks suggested by<br />
Whitmore, and the resilience John (1992) suggests primates might show following logging operations,<br />
are <strong>of</strong>f-set by increased hunting pressures (John, A.D., 1986; Redford, 1991; Whitmore, 1991).<br />
In Sarawak, Dahaban, Nordin and Bennett (1992) found that the access provided by logging roads<br />
resulted in a sharp increase in hunting pressures on once remote forest (about 40 km from the nearest<br />
human settlement). Hunting was <strong>of</strong>ten carried out from vehicles, and hunters used spotlights at night<br />
to stun animals. In the Republic <strong>of</strong> Congo, Wilkie et al. (1992) found that the highly selective<br />
logging practised in the concession under study was unlikely to affect faunal populations, but that<br />
the active and passive facilitation providing by logging operations (vehicles, roads, facilities and<br />
company time were <strong>of</strong>ten used in support <strong>of</strong> poaching) increased pressures on wildlife substantially.<br />
76 Although F. Omari (pers. comm. in John, A.D., 1992) found that the impact on food sources for local wildlife was<br />
minimized by the replanting <strong>of</strong> Calophyllum inophyllum on Zanzibar Island.<br />
77 Hunting in logged areas results in a sharp decline in the estimated wild meat ration per person/year from 54 to 18<br />
g. This effect is exacerbated by a serious decline in riverine fish stocks due to mud and diesel pollution from logging<br />
operations (Caldecott, 1988).<br />
78 In the Neotropics as well, hunting is frequently perfonned by people engaged in forest extraction activities who<br />
are given ammunition but little food, and are expected to hunt to feed themselves. Venezuela et al. (1988) found that in<br />
a watershed near Iquitos, Peru, lumbennen accounted for 51 % <strong>of</strong>the ungulate harvest, illegal commercial hunters for 11 %<br />
and subsistence hunters for only 38% (Redford, 1991).
Many <strong>of</strong> the most popular game animals are also those which Terborgh refers to as having a<br />
"stabilizing function" and through "indirect effects" maintain the diversity <strong>of</strong> tropical forests 79<br />
(Terborgh, 1988). In Mexico, Dirzo and Miranda (1990 in Redford) compared two tropical forests,<br />
one with its full compliment <strong>of</strong> large mammals (peccaries, deer and tapir) and the other in which<br />
these species had been extirpated by hunters. The hunted forest was typified by seedling carpets, piles<br />
<strong>of</strong> uneaten rotting fruits and seeds, and herbs and seedlings undamaged by mammalian herbivores<br />
(Redford, 1991). Although many important forest animals may not yet be extinct, their populations<br />
may have been reduced to such an extent that they no longer perform their ecological functions SO<br />
(Redford, 1991). A decrease in the number <strong>of</strong> animals in a forest area can also lead to a number <strong>of</strong><br />
more subtle, largely unrecorded, changes within populations. These include changed reproductive<br />
behaviour, sex and age ratios, average body size, patterns in habitat use, and the genetic structure <strong>of</strong><br />
a population 81 •<br />
Unfortunately, the pressure to log primary tropical forests is too great to be able to wait for the type<br />
<strong>of</strong> information needed to determine the ecological mechanisms by which sustainable natural forest<br />
management is possible. In the interim, a compromise must be practised in which indicator species,<br />
coupled with long-term monitoring, allows us to determine a maximum threshold for damage to<br />
wildlife and biodiversity resulting from timber production.<br />
x. Conclusion<br />
In many ways the integration <strong>of</strong> non-timber and timber products is a new arena <strong>of</strong> forest<br />
management. Although forest-dwelling peoples have harvested both timber and NTFPs for millennia,<br />
and the harvest <strong>of</strong> NTFPs <strong>of</strong>ten occurs vicariously in recently logged forest or forests managed for<br />
timber production, the industrial, usually capital-intensive forestry practised over the past half a<br />
century, has been almost entirely divorced from non-timber concerns. There has also existed the<br />
perception that what isn't marketed in scale isn't important, and isn't "developed" (Redford, 1991;<br />
FAO, 1991).<br />
As a result, parallel fields <strong>of</strong> study, literature and academic departments have developed for the same<br />
forests. Ethnobotanists, anthropologists, "social" foresters, and cultural ecologists have a welldeveloped<br />
literature and discussion underway on the role <strong>of</strong> NTFPs in local forest management.<br />
Foresters, on the other hand, have developed their own plans for the same forests. Rarely will these<br />
pr<strong>of</strong>essionals interact - rarely will they read the same literature, attend the same conferences, or<br />
collaborate on projects. Lip service is being paid to the integration <strong>of</strong> the forest sciences and "multi-<br />
79 ttIndirect effects" refer to "the propagation <strong>of</strong> perturbations through one or more trophic levels in an ecosystem,<br />
so that consequences are felt in organisms that may seem far removed, both ecologically and taxonomically, from the<br />
subjects <strong>of</strong> perturbation" (Terborgh, 1988).<br />
80 "Ecological extinction tt is defined as "the reduction <strong>of</strong> a species to such a low abundance that although it is still<br />
present in the community it no longer interacts significantly with other species" (Estes et al., 1989).<br />
81 A.D. Johns (1992) describes changes in hummingbird communities in the neotropics as a result <strong>of</strong> logging.<br />
Hummingbirds are generally co-adapted with communities <strong>of</strong> flowering plants, with the different species <strong>of</strong> hummingbird<br />
diverging in bill shape to exploit corolla design. In the regeneration <strong>of</strong> logged forest, much available nectar comes from<br />
colonizing shrubs and climbers with flowers <strong>of</strong> generalized corolla shape. This resulted in the social reorganization <strong>of</strong><br />
hummingbird communities to one <strong>of</strong> aggressive defense <strong>of</strong> resources (interference competition).<br />
45
46<br />
disciplinarytf approaches to forest management, but schemes to integrate non-timber forest products<br />
and multiple-use with timber production are virtually non-existent. As a result, the successful<br />
practical integration <strong>of</strong> timber and non-timber forest products into natural management <strong>of</strong> tropical<br />
forests may still be some way <strong>of</strong>f.<br />
In this context, the certification and labelling <strong>of</strong> tropical timbers from sustainable sources has<br />
emerged. In their efforts to achieve "socially beneficial, economically viable, and environmentally<br />
benign" timber extraction, certifiers and their potential accreditors in the form <strong>of</strong> the Forest<br />
Stewardship Council, have come to realize that non-timber forest products are an integral component<br />
<strong>of</strong> sustainable natural forest management (Forest Stewardship, Draft Principles and Criteria, 1993;<br />
Donovan, 1993). As a result, they have made a significant step towards bridging the gap that lies<br />
between the non-timber product sphere <strong>of</strong> expertise and the timber. In the Draft Principles and<br />
Criteria <strong>of</strong> the Forest Stewardship Council, for example, "non-timber forest resources must be<br />
inventoried and continued access to such resources by local people incorporated into forest<br />
management" and "research must be conducted on the full range <strong>of</strong> timber and non-timber forest<br />
products and services found in the forest area, and incorporated into management planning" (FSC,<br />
1993).<br />
Following are some basic suggestions relevant to the integration <strong>of</strong> non-timber product and timber<br />
forest management. General principles <strong>of</strong> sound forest management and social and environmental<br />
responsibility, as outlined in the Forest Stewardship Council's Principles and Criteria, the ITIO<br />
Guidelines for the Conservation <strong>of</strong> Biological Diversity in Forests Managed for Timber and<br />
Guidelinesfor Sustainable Management, and The Smart Wood Certification Program Guidelines, will<br />
not be reiterated here.<br />
It is important that foresters, timber companies and governments do not try to implement integrated<br />
forest management on their own. Collaborations with local, national and international researchers,<br />
NGOs, and development agencies, can bring to the operation a knowledge <strong>of</strong> local forests, species,<br />
NTFPs, and people that will compliment that <strong>of</strong> the timber specialists.<br />
NTFPs should not be an add-on, randomly attached to established management plans. Inventories<br />
<strong>of</strong> species, assessments <strong>of</strong> their social and economic value to local people, and a rough estimate<br />
<strong>of</strong> existing trade patterns, must be quantified in some way prior to the setting <strong>of</strong> management<br />
objectives (De beer and McDermott (1989), for example, provide a list <strong>of</strong> quantifiable indicators<br />
<strong>of</strong> the economic value <strong>of</strong> NTFPs to rural people).<br />
Similarly, local people should not be "consulted tf regarding an existing management plan, but<br />
should be integrated into the process by which priorities and objectives are set and decisions<br />
made. This process not only acts as a catalyst by which various interest groups can imagine and<br />
formulate various futures, but when completed it serves as a contract setting out the<br />
responsibilities <strong>of</strong> the local users and the company/government (Berkes et al., 1991). Likewise,<br />
the practical management <strong>of</strong> forest resources should involve the active participation <strong>of</strong> local<br />
people, and their responsibility for the overall venture should be significant.<br />
The market values <strong>of</strong> NTFPs should be included in any financial analysis <strong>of</strong> forest management.<br />
Ethnobotanical literature on the region in which harvesting operations are to take place should<br />
be consulted. Traditional uses <strong>of</strong> species recorded in this literature can provide an idea <strong>of</strong> the
ange <strong>of</strong> products contained in the forest, and traditional management practices (such as<br />
management <strong>of</strong> fallows) can provide important "headstarts" in the design <strong>of</strong> appropriate<br />
silvicultural regimes.<br />
Harvesting operations should be staggered so that various areas are at various stages <strong>of</strong><br />
succession following disturbance and mature stands lie close to each other (WRI et al., 1992).<br />
By minimizing fragmentation, greater species diversity is maintained, and the likelihood <strong>of</strong> loss<br />
<strong>of</strong> NTFP species minimized.<br />
Refuges (composing 5-20% <strong>of</strong> the forest area), representing all forest types and particularly those<br />
with high species diversity and endemism, and corridors should be left between forest patches.<br />
Areas with unusual land fonns, geology or other physical features should be protected. Major<br />
saltlicks, feeding grounds, and other features which maintain particular wildlife populations<br />
should be preserved. Tree taxa that are important food sources for wild animals should be<br />
protected from harm during the logging operation and subsequent silvicultural regimes. Hunting<br />
by timber company employees or non-locals should be prohibited. Wildlife populations should<br />
be continuously monitored (Caldecott, 1988, Crome, 1991; John, A.D., 1992; ITIO Guidelines,<br />
1992).<br />
In addition to refuges established primarily to maintain wildlife and species diversity, areas<br />
containing significant numbers <strong>of</strong> non-timber forest product species should be avoided by logging<br />
operations (Lamb, 1991). Incentives and disincentives should be provided to loggers to insure<br />
that these measures are adequately carried out.<br />
Local communities should work with forest managers to design a schedule for logging operations<br />
that compliments their needs for employment, and incorporates the pre- and post-logging harvest<br />
<strong>of</strong> NTFPs. The planning <strong>of</strong> roads and skid trails should include provisions to not disrupt and<br />
perhaps facilitate the harvesting and transport <strong>of</strong> NTFPs.<br />
Silvicultural systems should not drastically alter the structural or species diversity <strong>of</strong> the forest.<br />
Enrichment plantings should be <strong>of</strong> native species, and should include multi-purpose species.<br />
The ecological sustainability <strong>of</strong> all NTFPs should be assessed, as far as is feasible, based on the<br />
plant part used, the floristic composition <strong>of</strong> the forest, the nature and intensity <strong>of</strong> harvesting, and<br />
the particular species or type <strong>of</strong> resource under exploitation (Peters, 1993), and should be<br />
monitored through a system <strong>of</strong> permanent sample plots.<br />
A diversity <strong>of</strong> non-timber forest products should be extracted from the forest to produce a system<br />
with seasonally complimentary harvests, and with reduced vulnerability to fluctuations in market<br />
demand for a particular product (Padoch et al., 1992; Reining and Heinzman, 1992; Phillips,<br />
1992).<br />
Where appropriate, local, regional and international NGOs should be enlisted to assist with the<br />
selection <strong>of</strong> species and development and expansion <strong>of</strong> external markets for a diversity <strong>of</strong><br />
products (Clay, 1992; Ziffer, 1992; Clay and Clement, 1993; Gentry, 1992). Where demand could<br />
exceed the capacity <strong>of</strong> existing harvesting systems to supply the market, alternative systems<br />
(including domestication <strong>of</strong> important species outside the forest area by local communities), must<br />
be employed (Cunningham, 1991).<br />
47
48<br />
The primary importance <strong>of</strong> non-timber forest products for subsistence and local markets should<br />
not be superseded by international demand for any NTFP product.<br />
Expropriation <strong>of</strong> resource use rights by powerful elites within these regions should be actively<br />
denied.<br />
The traditionally lopsided distribution <strong>of</strong> income from NTFPs - that is, the inverse relationship<br />
between the effort expended to produce a product and the income received - should be altered<br />
by the development or promotion <strong>of</strong> cooperatives, value-added processing and more equitable<br />
distribution <strong>of</strong> income along the chain <strong>of</strong> producers and marketers. The successful incorporation<br />
<strong>of</strong> NTFP extraction into forest management should not be dependent upon the physical and<br />
economic privation <strong>of</strong> extractors (Sizer, 1992; Browder, 1992).<br />
Traditional systems <strong>of</strong> resource management and regulation <strong>of</strong> harvesting should be employed,<br />
or their remnants built upon, to control resource extraction in the forest. Policing the removal <strong>of</strong><br />
NTFPs by local people is not a viable option. Collection <strong>of</strong> NTFPs by non-locals, however,<br />
should be discouraged, and methods employed devised by local communities.<br />
The long-tenn ownership and control <strong>of</strong> forest resources should clearly rest in the hands <strong>of</strong> local<br />
communities. In addition to the obvious ethical justification for land tenure, sustainable<br />
production is more likely to result from secure tenure in systems where the long-tenn, lowintensity<br />
harvesting <strong>of</strong>species from high-diversity forests can prove difficult and time-consuming.<br />
The nature and scale <strong>of</strong> timber harvesting operations should be adjusted to fit in with the existing<br />
NTFP harvest and trade patterns <strong>of</strong> local communities in cases where these are well-developed.<br />
Timber extraction should be seen as a compliment to these activities, rather than the primary<br />
objective <strong>of</strong> forest management.
Bibliography<br />
Abbiw, D.K. 1990. Useful Plants Of Ghana; West African Uses <strong>of</strong> Wild and Cultivated Plants.<br />
London: Intermediate Technology Publications.<br />
Abdillah, R. and C. Phillips. 1992. Preliminary Report on Rattan Damage Due to Selective Logging<br />
<strong>of</strong>Ridge Dipterocarp Forest in Sabah.<br />
Acquino, D.M. 1993. Non-Timber Forest Products Utilization in a Town in the Sierra Mountains.<br />
Paper presented at the International Association for the A Study <strong>of</strong> Common Property (IASCP)<br />
Fourth Annual Common Property Conference, The Philippines.<br />
Agyare, A.K. 1993. Partnership with indigenous peoples in sustainable natural resource use: a case<br />
in Ghana. paper presented at the Symposium for Indigenous People, The Pueblo <strong>of</strong> Zuni, New<br />
Mexico.<br />
Akerele, 0., V. Heywood and H. Synge (eds.). 1991. The Conservation <strong>of</strong> Medicinal Plants.<br />
Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge <strong>University</strong> Press.<br />
Alcom, J. 1989. Process as resource: the traditional agricultural ideology <strong>of</strong> Bora and Huastec<br />
resource management in Amazonian before conquest; beyond ethnographic projection. In: D.<br />
Posey and W. Balee (OOs.). Resource Management in Amazonian: Indigenous and Folk<br />
Strategies. Advances in Economic Botany, 7.<br />
Alc<strong>of</strong>fi, J. 1990. Indigenous Agr<strong>of</strong>orestry Strategies Meeting fanners' Needs. In: A. Anderson (ed.)<br />
1990. Alternatives to Deforestation: Steps Toward Sustainable Use <strong>of</strong>the Amazon Rain Forest.<br />
New York: Columbia <strong>University</strong> Press.<br />
Alcorn, J. 1993. Indigenous peoples and conservation. Conservation Biology 7(2): 424-426.<br />
Alder, D. and T.J. Synnott. 1992. Permanent Sample Plot Techniques for Mixed Tropical Forest.<br />
Tropical Forestry Papers, No. 25. <strong>Oxford</strong> Forestry Institute, <strong>Oxford</strong>, U.K.<br />
Alencar, I.C. and N.P. Fernandes. 1978. Densenvolvimento de arvores nativas em ensaios de<br />
especies. Acta Amazonica 8(4): 523-541.<br />
Alencar, J.C. 1981. Estudos silviculturais de uma populacao naturel de Copai[era multijuga Hayne <br />
Legumunosae, na Amazonian Central, Acta Amazonica 11 (1): 3-11.<br />
Allegretti, M.H. 1990. Extractive Reserves: An Alternative for reconciling Development and<br />
Environmental Conservation in Amazonian. In: A. Anderson (ed.) 1990. Alternatives to<br />
Deforestation: Steps Toward Sustainable Use o/the Amazon Rain Forest. New York: Columbia<br />
<strong>University</strong> Press.<br />
Anderson, A. (ed.) 1990. Alternatives to Deforestation: Steps Toward Sustainable Use o/the Amazon<br />
Rain Forest. New York: Columbia <strong>University</strong> Press.<br />
49
50<br />
Anderson, A. 1990. Deforestation in Amazonian: Dynamics, Causes, and Alternatives. In: A.<br />
Anderson (ed.) 1990. Alternatives to Deforestation: Steps Toward Sustainable Use <strong>of</strong> the<br />
Amazon Rain Forest. New York: Columbia <strong>University</strong> Press.<br />
Anderson, A., P.H. May, and M.I. Balick. 1991. The Subsidy from Nature; Palm Forests, Peasantry,<br />
and Development on an Amazonian Frontier. New York: Columbia <strong>University</strong> Press.<br />
Amold, M. 1991. The Long Term Global Demand for and Supply <strong>of</strong> Wood. Forestry Commission<br />
Occasional Paper, 36.<br />
Balee, W. 1988. Indigenous adaptation to Amazonian palm forests. Principes 32(2): 47-54.<br />
Balee, W. and A, Gely. 1989. Managed forest succession in Amazonian: the Ka'apor case. In: D.<br />
Posey and W. Balee (eds.). Resource Management in Amazonian: Indigenous and Folk<br />
Strategies. Advances in Economic Botany, 7.<br />
Balee, W. 1989. The culture <strong>of</strong> Amazonian forests. In: D. Posey and W. Balee (eds.). Resource<br />
Management in Amazonian: Indigenous and Folk Strategies. Advances in Economic Botany, 7.<br />
Balick, M.J. and R. Mendelssohn. 1992. Assessing the economic value <strong>of</strong> traditional medicines from<br />
tropical rain forests. Conservation Biology 6(1): 128-130.<br />
Barbier, E.B. 1987. The concept <strong>of</strong> sustainable economic development. Environmental Conservation<br />
14: 101-110.<br />
Bazzaz, F.A. 1991. Regeneration <strong>of</strong>tropical forests: physiological responses <strong>of</strong>pioneer and secondary<br />
species. in: A. Gomez-Pompa, T.C. Whitmore and M. Hadley (eds.) Rain Forest Regeneration<br />
and Management. Paris: UNESCO and The Parthenon Publishing Group Limited.<br />
Bennett, B. 1992. Plants and people <strong>of</strong> the Amazonian rainforests: the role <strong>of</strong> ethnobotany in<br />
sustainable development. Bioscience 42(8).<br />
Berkes, F., P. George, and R.J. Preston. 1991. Co-management: the evolution in theory and practice<br />
<strong>of</strong> the joint administration <strong>of</strong> living resources. Alternatives 18(2):12-39<br />
Blockhus, I.M., M. Dillenbeck, I.A. Sayer, and P. Wegge. 1992. Conserving Biological Diversity in<br />
Managed Tropical Forests. The IUCN Forest Conservation Programme, Cambridge, U.K.<br />
Boom, B. 1989. Use <strong>of</strong> plant resources by the Chacabo. In: D. Posey and W. Balee (eds.). Resource<br />
Management in Amazonian: Indigenous and Folk Strategies. Advances in Economic Botany, 7<br />
Browder, J.O. 1986. Logging The Rainforest: A Political Economy <strong>of</strong>Timber Extraction and Unequal<br />
Exchange in the Brazilian Amazon. <strong>University</strong> <strong>of</strong> Pennsylvania Dissertation.<br />
Browder, J.O. 1992. The limits <strong>of</strong> extractivism; tropical forest strategies beyond extractive reserves.<br />
Bioscience 42(3): 174-182.
Brown, K.S. and G.G. Brown. 1992. Habitat alteration and species loss in Brazilian forests. In: T.e.<br />
Whitmore and J.A. Sayer (eds.) Tropical Deforestation and Species Extinction. London:<br />
Chapman and HalL<br />
Brown, N. and M. Press. 1992. Logging rainforest the natural way? New Scientist, 14 March.<br />
Brown, N.D. and T.C. Whitmore. 1992. Do dipterocarp seedlings really partition tropical rain forest<br />
gaps? Philosophical Transactions <strong>of</strong> the Royal Society 335: 369-378.<br />
Burch, W.B. 1983. Summary: Toward Social Forestry in the Tropics. In: F. Mergen (ed.) Tropical<br />
Forests: Utilization and Conservation. Proceedings <strong>of</strong> an International Symposium held at Yale<br />
<strong>University</strong>, New Haven, CT.<br />
Bums, D. 1986. Runway and Treadmill Deforestation: Reflections on the Economics <strong>of</strong> Forest<br />
Development in the Tropics. London: lIED and Earthscan Publications ltd.<br />
Caldecott, J. 1988. Hunting and Wildlife Management in Sarawak. The mCN Tropical Forest<br />
Programme, Cambridge, UK.<br />
Chin, L.T. 1973. Occurrence <strong>of</strong> seeds in virgin forest top soil with particular reference to secondary<br />
species in Sabah. The Malaysian Forester 36(3):185-193.<br />
Clay, J. 1992. Some general principles and strategies for developing markets in North America and<br />
Europe for nontimber forest products. In: M. Plotkin and L. Famolare (eds.). Sustainable<br />
Harvest and Marketing <strong>of</strong>Rain Forest Products. Washington, D.C.: Island Press.<br />
Clay, J. 1992. Some general principles and strategies for developing markets in North America and<br />
Europe for non-timber forest products: lessons from Cultural Survival Enterprises, 1989-1990.<br />
In: D.C. Nepstad and S. Schwartzrnan (eds.). Non-Timber Products from Tropical Forests;<br />
Evaluation <strong>of</strong> a Conservation and Development Strategy. Advances in Economic Botany,<br />
Volume 9. The New York Botanical Garden, New York.<br />
Clay, J. and C.R. Clement. 1993. Selected Species and Strategies to Enhance Income Generation<br />
from Amazonian Forests. FAO Forestry Paper (Draft), Rome, Italy.<br />
Cleary, D.M. 1992. Overcoming socio-economic and political constraints to "wise forest<br />
management": lessons from the Amazon. In: F. Miller and K.L. Adam (eds.). 1992. Wise<br />
Management o/Tropical Forests. Proceedings <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Oxford</strong> Forestry Institute Conference on<br />
Tropical Forests.<br />
Crorne, F.H.J. 1991. Wildlife conservation and rain forest management - examples from North East<br />
Queensland. In: A. Gomez-Pompa, T.C. Whitmore and M. Hadley (eds.) Rain Forest<br />
Regeneration and Management. Paris: UNESCO and The Parthenon Publishing Group Limited.<br />
Cultural Survival. 1992. Cupuacu (Theobroma grandijlorum). Product Descriptions. Cambridge, MA.<br />
51
52<br />
Cunningham, A.B. 1989. Indigenous plant use: balancing human needs and resources. In: B. Huntley<br />
(eel.) Conserving Biological Diversity in Southern Africa. <strong>Oxford</strong>: <strong>Oxford</strong> <strong>University</strong> Press.<br />
Cunningham, A.B. 1990. African Medicinal Plants: Setting Priorities at the Interface Between<br />
Conservation and Primary Healthcare.Report for WWF Project 3331.<br />
Cunningham, A.B. 1991. Development <strong>of</strong> a conservation policy on commercially exploited medicinal<br />
plants: a case study from southern Africa. In: O. Akerele, V. Heywood and H. Synge (eds.). The<br />
Conservation <strong>of</strong> Medicinal Plants. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge <strong>University</strong> Press.<br />
Cunningham, A.B. 1992. People, Park and Plant Use: Research and Recommendations for Multiple<br />
Use Zones and Development Alternatives Around Bwindi-Impenetrable National Park, Uganda.<br />
Report prepared for CARE-International, Kampala, Uganda.<br />
Cunningham, A.B. and F.T. Mbenkum. 1993. Medicinal Bark in International Trade: a Case Study<br />
<strong>of</strong> the Afromontane Tree Prunus Africana. Report to WWF International.<br />
Dahaban, Z., M. Nordin and E.L. Bennett. 1992. Immediate effects on wildlife is selective logging<br />
in a hill dipterocarp forest in Sarawak: mammals. Department <strong>of</strong> Zoology, <strong>University</strong><br />
Kebangsaan, Malaysia and Wildlife Conservation Society.<br />
Davies, A.G. 1987. The Gola Forest Reserves, Sierra Leone; Wildlife Conservation and Forest<br />
Management. IUCN Tropical Forest Programme, Cambridge, U.K.<br />
Davies, A.G. and P. Richards. 1991. Rain Forest in Mende Life; resource and subsistence strategies<br />
in rural communities around the Gola North forest reserve. A report to ESCOR, UK Overseas<br />
Development Administration.<br />
Dawkins, H.C. 1958. The Management <strong>of</strong> Natural Tropical High-Forest with Special Reference to<br />
Uganda. Imperial Forestry Institute Paper, No. 34. <strong>University</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Oxford</strong>, <strong>Oxford</strong>.<br />
De Beer, J.H. and M.J. McDennott. 1989. The Economic Value <strong>of</strong>Non-Timber Forest Products in<br />
Southeast Asia with Emphasis on Indonesia, Malaysia and Thailand. Netherlands Committee for<br />
IUCN, Amsterdam.<br />
De Graaf, N.R. 1986. A Silvicultural System for Natural Regeneration <strong>of</strong> Tropical Rain Forest in<br />
Suriname. The Agricultural <strong>University</strong>, Wageningen, The Netherlands.<br />
De Graaf and R.L.H. Pools. 1990. The Celos Management System: A Polycyclic Method for<br />
Sustained Timber Production in South American Rainforest. In: A. Anderson (ed.) 1990.<br />
Alternatives to Deforestation: Steps Toward Sustainable Use <strong>of</strong>the Amazon Rain Forest. New<br />
York: Columbia <strong>University</strong> Press.<br />
De Graaf, N.R. 1991. Managing natural regeneration for sustained timber production in Suriname:<br />
the Celos Silvicultural and Harvesting System. In: A. Gomez-Pompa, T.C. Whitmore and M.<br />
Hadley (eds.) Rain Forest Regeneration and Management. Paris: UNESCO and The Parthenon<br />
Publishing Group Limited.
De Jong, W.D. and R. Mendelssohn. 1992. Managing the Non-Timber Forest Products <strong>of</strong>Southeast<br />
Asia. Paper prepared for the World Bank, Southeast Asia Division.<br />
Denslow, J.S. 1980. Gap partitioning among tropical rainforest trees. Tropical Succession: 47-55.<br />
Dixon, A., H. Roditi, and L. Silvennan. 1991. From Forest to Market: A Feasibility Study <strong>of</strong> the<br />
Development <strong>of</strong>Selected Non-Timber Forest Products from Borneo for the U.S. Market. Project<br />
Borneo, Cambridge, MA.<br />
Donovan, R. 1993. Independent Forestry Certification as a Tool for Improving Forestry Practices.<br />
Paper presented at the First Euro-Seminar on Promoting a Trade in Sustainably Produced<br />
Timber, EC, Brussels.<br />
Dwyer, I.D. 1951. The Central American, West Indian, and South American Species <strong>of</strong> Copaijera<br />
(Caesalpiniaceae). Brittonia 7(3): 143-172.<br />
Dykstra, D.P. and R. Heinrich. 1992. Sustaining tropical forests through environmentally sound<br />
harvesting practices. Unasylva 43 (169): 9-15.<br />
Elisabetsky, E. 1991. Sociopolitical, economic and ethical issues in medicinal plant research. Journal<br />
<strong>of</strong> Ethnophannacology 32.<br />
Estes, J.A., D.O. Duggins and G.B. Rathbun. 1989. The ecology <strong>of</strong> extinctions in jelp forest<br />
communities. Conservation Biology 3(3): 252-264.<br />
Ewel, J. 1980. Tropical succession: manifold routes to maturity. Tropical Succession: 2-7.<br />
Ewel, J. 1983. Environmental Implications <strong>of</strong> Utilization. In: F. Mergen (ed.) Tropical Forests:<br />
Utilization and Conservation. Proceedings <strong>of</strong> an International Symposium held at Yale<br />
<strong>University</strong>, New Haven, CT.<br />
Falconer, J. 1990. The Major Significance oj'Minor' Forest Products; The Local Use and Value <strong>of</strong><br />
Forests in the West African Humid Forest Zone. FAO Community Forestry Note No. 6, Rome.<br />
Falconer, J. 1992. A study <strong>of</strong> the non-timber forest products <strong>of</strong> Ghana's forest zone. In: The<br />
Rainforest Harvest; Sustainable Strategiesfor Saving the Tropical Forests? Friends <strong>of</strong>the Earth,<br />
London.<br />
Falconer, J. 1992. Non-Timber Forest Products in Southern Ghana. ODA Forestry Series, No. 2,<br />
London.<br />
Fanshawe, D.B. 1947. Studies <strong>of</strong> the Trees <strong>of</strong> British Guiana; Crabwood. Tropical Woods 90: 30-40.<br />
FAO. 1991. Non-wood Forest Products: The Way Ahead. FAO Forestry Paper 97, Rome.<br />
53
54<br />
Fearnside, P. 1990. Predominant land uses in Brazilian Amazon. In: A. Anderson (ed.) 1990.<br />
Alternatives to Deforestation: Steps Toward Sustainable Use <strong>of</strong>the Amazon Rain Forest. New<br />
York: Columbia <strong>University</strong> Press.<br />
Forest Stewardship Council. 1992. Draft Principles and Criteria for Forest Management.<br />
Fox, J.E.D. 1968. Logging damage and the influence <strong>of</strong> climber cutting prior to logging in the<br />
lowland Dipterocarp forest <strong>of</strong> Sabah. The Malaysian Forester 31(4): 326-347.<br />
Friends <strong>of</strong> the Earth. 1992. The Rainforest Harvest: Sustainable Strategies for Saving the Tropical<br />
Forests? London.<br />
Fujisaka, S. and E. Wollenberg. 1991. From forest to agr<strong>of</strong>orest and logger to agr<strong>of</strong>orester: a case<br />
study. Agr<strong>of</strong>orestry Systems 14: 113-129.<br />
Gane, M. 1992. Sustainable forestry. Commonwealth Forestry Review 71(2): 83-90.<br />
Gentry, A.H. and R. Vasquez. 1988. Where have all the Ceibas Gone? A Case History <strong>of</strong><br />
Mismanagement <strong>of</strong> a Tropical Forest Resource. Forest Ecology and Management 23: 73-76.<br />
Gentry, A.H. 1992. New nontimber forest products from western South America. In: M. Plotkin and<br />
L. Famolare (eds.). Sustainable Harvest and Marketing <strong>of</strong>Rain Forest Products. Washington,<br />
D.C.: Island Press.<br />
Godoy, R. and R. Lubowski. 1992. Guidelines for the Economic Valuation <strong>of</strong> Nontimber tropical<br />
Forest Products. Current Anthropology 33(4): 423-430.<br />
GOOoy, R., N.L.V. Brokaw, and D. Wilkie. 1992. The Effects <strong>of</strong> Economic Development on the<br />
Extraction <strong>of</strong> Non-Timber Tropical Forest Products: Hypotheses, Methods, and Information<br />
Requirements. Harvard Institute for International Development, Cambridge, MA.<br />
Gomez-Pompa, A., C. Vasquez-Yanes, and S. Guevara. 1972. The tropical forest: a nonrenewable<br />
resource. Science 177: 762-765.<br />
Gomez-Pompa, A. and A. Kaus. 1990. Traditional Management <strong>of</strong> Tropical Forests in Mexico. In:<br />
A. Anderson (ed.) 1990. Alternatives to Deforestation: Steps Toward Sustainable Use <strong>of</strong> the<br />
Amazon Rain Forest. New York: Columbia <strong>University</strong> Press.<br />
Gomez-Pompa, A. 1991. Learning from traditional ecological knowledge: insights from Mayan<br />
silviculture. in: A. Gomez-Pompa, T.C. Whitmore and M. Hadley (eds.) Rain Forest<br />
Regeneration and Management. Paris: UNESCO and The Parthenon Publishing Group Limited.<br />
Gomez-Pompa, A. and F.W. Burley. 1991. The management <strong>of</strong> natural tropical forests. In: A.<br />
Gomez-Pompa, T.e. Whitmore and M. Hadley (eds.) Rain Forest Regeneration and<br />
Management. Paris: UNESCO and The Parthenon Publishing Group Limited.
Gomez-Pompa, A., T.C. Whitmore and M. Hadley (eds.). 1991. Rain Forest Regeneration and<br />
Management. Paris: UNESCO and The Parthenon Publishing Group Limited.<br />
Grajal, Alejandro, Wildlife Conservation Society, personal communication, 1993.<br />
Grimes, A., S. Loomis, P. Jahnige, M. Bumham, K. Onthank, R. Alarcon, W. Palacios, C. Ceron, D.<br />
Neill, M. Balick, B, Bennett, and R. Mendelssohn. 1993. Valuing the Rain Forest: The<br />
Economic Value <strong>of</strong> Non-Timber Forest Products in Ecuador. Yale School <strong>of</strong> Forestry and<br />
Environmental Studies and The New York Botanical Garden.<br />
Guenther, E. 1948. Essential Oils. Van Nostrad Co. Publishers.<br />
Hansen, A.J., T.A. Spies, F.J. Swanson and J.L. Ohmann. 1991. Conserving Biodiversity in Managed<br />
Forests; Lessons from natural forests. Bioscience 41(6)382-392.<br />
Hart, R.D. 1980. A natural ecosystem analog approach to the design <strong>of</strong> a successional crop system<br />
for tropical forest environments. Tropical Succession: 73-82.<br />
Hartshorn, G.S. 1980. Neotropical Forest Dynamics. Tropical Succession: 23-30.<br />
Hartshorn, G. 1990. Natural Forest Management by the Yanesha Forestry Cooperative. In: A.<br />
Anderson (ed.) 1990. Alternatives to Deforestation: Steps Toward Sustainable Use <strong>of</strong> the<br />
Amazon Rain Forest. New York: Columbia <strong>University</strong> Press.<br />
Hecht, S. and Cockbum, A. 1989. The Fate <strong>of</strong>the Forest; Developers, Destroyers and Defenders <strong>of</strong><br />
the Amazon. London: Verso Press.<br />
Hendrison, J. 1990. Damage-Controlled Logging in Managed Rain Forest in Suriname. The<br />
Wageningen Agricultural <strong>University</strong>, The Netherlands.<br />
Heywood, V.H. and S.N. Stewart. 1992. Species extinction in tropical forests. In: T.C. Whitmore and<br />
J.A. Sayer (eds.) Tropical Deforestation and Species Extinction. London: Chapman and Hall.<br />
Hidalgo, R.C. 1992. The Tagua Initiative in Ecuador: a community approach to tropical rain forest<br />
conservation and development. In: M. Plotkin and L. Famolare (eds.). Sustainable Harvest and<br />
Marketing <strong>of</strong>Rain Forest Products. Washington, D.C.: Island Press.<br />
Husain, A. 1991. Economic aspects <strong>of</strong> exploitation <strong>of</strong> medicinal plants. In: O. Akerele, V. Heywood<br />
and H. Synge (eds.). The Conservation <strong>of</strong> Medicinal Plants. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge<br />
<strong>University</strong> Press.<br />
Irvine, D. 1989. Succession management and resource distribution in an Amazonian rain forest. In:<br />
D. Posey and W. Balee (eds.). Resource Management in Amazonian: Indigenous and Folk<br />
Strategies. Advances in Economic Botany, 7.<br />
ITIO. 1990. Guidelines for the Sustainable Management <strong>of</strong>Natural Tropical Forests.<br />
55
56<br />
ITIO. 1992. Draft Guidelines for Conserving Biological Diversity in Forests Managedfor Timber.<br />
IUCN Inter-Commission Task Force on Indigenous Peoples. 1993. Indigenous Peoples and Strategies<br />
for Sustainability. Workshop report, Gland, Switzerland.<br />
Jain, S.K. 1992. Folk Beliefs in Conservation <strong>of</strong> Nature and Culture. Paper presented at the<br />
International Congress <strong>of</strong> Ethnobiology, Mexico.<br />
John, A.D. 1988. Effects <strong>of</strong> "selective" timber extraction on rainforest structure and composition and<br />
some consequences for frugivorous and folivores. Biotropica 20(1): 31-37.<br />
John, A.D. 1992. Species conservation in managed tropical forests. In: T.C. Whitmore and J.A. Sayer<br />
(OOs.) Tropical Deforestation and Species Extinction. London: Chapman and Hall.<br />
John, A.D. 1991. Responses <strong>of</strong> Amazonian rain forest birds to habitat modification. Journal <strong>of</strong><br />
Tropical Ecology 7: 417-437.<br />
John, R.J. 1992. The influence <strong>of</strong> deforestation and selective logging operations on plant diversity<br />
in Papua New Guinea. In: T.C. Whitmore and J.A. Sayer (eds.) Tropical Deforestation and<br />
Species Extinction. London: Chapman and Hall.<br />
Jonson, T. and P. Lindgren. 1990. Logging Technology for Tropical Forests - for or against? Report<br />
from the ITTO pre-project "Improvement <strong>of</strong> Harvesting Systems for the Sustainable<br />
Management <strong>of</strong>Tropical Rain Forests". The Forest Operations Institute 'Skogsarbeten', Sweden.<br />
Katz-Miller, S. 1993. High hope hanging on a "useless" vine. New Scientist, 16 January.<br />
Kemp, R.H., G. Namkoong and F.R. Wadsworth. 1993. Conservation <strong>of</strong> Genetic Resources in<br />
Tropical Forest Management; Principles and Concepts. FAO Forestry Paper 107. FAO, Rome,<br />
Italy.<br />
Kraner, R., R. Realy and R. Mendelssohn. 1992. Forest Valuation. In: N.P. Shanna (ed.) Managing<br />
the World' s Forests. Kendall/Hunt.<br />
Lamb, D. 1991. Combining traditional and commercial uses <strong>of</strong> rain forests. Nature and Resources<br />
27(2):3-11.<br />
Lawton, R.M. 1989. The exploitation <strong>of</strong> the African rain forest and man's impact. In: H. Leith and<br />
M.J.A. Werger (OOs.). Tropical Rain Forest Ecosystems. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science<br />
Publishers.<br />
Leslie, A.J. 1987. The economic feasibility <strong>of</strong> natural management <strong>of</strong> tropical forests. In: F. Mergen<br />
and J.R. Vincent (OOs.). Natural Management <strong>of</strong> Tropical Moist Forests; Silvicultural and<br />
Management Prospects <strong>of</strong> Sustained Utilization. Yale <strong>University</strong>, School <strong>of</strong> Forestry and<br />
Environmental Studies, New Haven, CT.
Lock, I.M. 1986. Plant-animal interactions. In: G.W. Lawson (00.) Plant Ecology in West Africa.<br />
New York: John Wiley & Sons Ltd.<br />
Malhorta, K.C., M. P<strong>of</strong>fenberger, A. Bhattacharya and D. Dev. 1991. Rapid appraisal methodology<br />
trials in Southwest Bengal: assessing natural forest regeneration patterns and non-wood forest<br />
product harvesting practices. Forests, Trees and People Newsletter No. 15/16.<br />
Martini, A.M.Z., N. de A. Rosa, and C. UhI. 1992. A First Attempt to Predict Amazonian Tree<br />
Species Threatened by Logging Pressure. Instituto do Homen e Meio Ambiente da Amazonian<br />
(IMAZON), Belem, Brazil.<br />
Martins, P. Canadian International Development Agency, pers. comm., 1992.<br />
Mather, A.S. 1990. Global Forest Resources. Portland, Oregon: Timber Press.<br />
McNeely, I.A. 1988. Economics and Biological Diversity; Developing and Using Economic<br />
Incentives to Conserve Biological Resources. mCN, Gland, Switzerland.<br />
Meijer, W. 1970. Regeneration <strong>of</strong> tropical lowland forest in Sabah, Malaysia forty years after<br />
logging. The Malaysian Forester 33(3): 204-228.<br />
Mergen, F. (ed.). 1983. Tropical Forests: Utilization and Conservation. Proceedings <strong>of</strong> an<br />
International Symposium held at Yale <strong>University</strong>, New Haven, CT.<br />
Mergen, F. and J.R. Vincent (eds.). 1987. Natural Management <strong>of</strong> Tropical Moist Forests;<br />
Silvicultural and Management Prospects <strong>of</strong> Sustained Utilization. Yale <strong>University</strong>, School <strong>of</strong><br />
Forestry and Environmental Studies, New Haven, cr.<br />
Miller, F. and K.L. Adam (eds.). 1992. Wise Management <strong>of</strong> Tropical Forests. Proceedings <strong>of</strong> the<br />
<strong>Oxford</strong> Forestry Institute Conference on Tropical Forests.<br />
Milliken, W., R.P. Miller, S.R. Pollard, and E.V. Wandelli. 1992. Ethnobotany o/the Waimiri Atroari<br />
Indians <strong>of</strong>Brazil. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew.<br />
Mori, S. 1992. The Brazil nut industry - past, present, and future. In: M. Plotkin and L. Famolare<br />
(eds.). Sustainable Harvest and Marketing <strong>of</strong>Rain Forest Products. Washington, D.C.: Island<br />
Press.<br />
Nair, C.T.S. 1991. A comparative account <strong>of</strong> silviculture in the tropical wet evergreen forests <strong>of</strong><br />
Kerala, Andaman Islands and Assam. In: A. Gomez-Pompa, T.C. Whitmore and M. Hadley<br />
(eds.) Rain Forest Regeneration and Management. Paris: UNESCO and The Parthenon<br />
Publishing Group Limited.<br />
National Research Council. 1992. Conserving Biodiversity; A Research Agenda for Development<br />
Agencies. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.<br />
57
58<br />
Neiring, W.A. 1987. Vegetation dynamics (succession and climax) in relation to plant community<br />
management. Conservation Biology 1(4): 287-295.<br />
Nepstad, D.C., C. Uhl and E.A.S. Serrao. 1991. Recuperation <strong>of</strong> a degraded Amazonian landscape:<br />
forest recovery and agricultural restoration. Ambio 20(6): 248-255.<br />
Nepstad, D.C. and I.F. Brown, V. Viana and L. Luz. 1992. Biotic impoverishment <strong>of</strong> Amazonian<br />
forests by rubber tappers, loggers and cattle ranchers. In: D.C. Nepstad and S. Schwartzman<br />
(eds.). Non-Timber Products from Tropical Forests; Evaluation <strong>of</strong> a Conservation and<br />
Development Strategy. Advances in Economic Botany, Volume 9. The New York Botanical<br />
Garden, New York.<br />
Nepstad, D.C. and S. Schwartzman (eds.). 1992. Non-Timber Products from Tropical Forests;<br />
Evaluation <strong>of</strong> a Conservation and Development Strategy. Advances in Economic Botany,<br />
Volume 9. The New York Botanical Garden, New York.<br />
North Queensland Department <strong>of</strong> Forestry. Guidelines for the Selective Logging <strong>of</strong>Rainforest Areas<br />
in North Queensland State Forests and Timber Reserves.<br />
Ocana-Vidal, J. 1992. Natural forest management with strip clear-cutting. Unasylva 43(169): 24-27.<br />
Oldfield, M. 1989. The Value <strong>of</strong>Conserving Genetic Resources. Massachusetts: Sinauer Associates,<br />
Inc. Publishers.<br />
Othole, A. and R. Anyon. 1993. A Tribal Perspective on Traditional Cultural Property Consultation.<br />
Cultural Preservation Program. The Pueblo <strong>of</strong> Zuni, New Mexico.<br />
Padoch, C., T.C. Jessup, H. Soedjito and K. Kartawinata. 1991. Complexity and conservation <strong>of</strong><br />
medicinal plants: anthropological cases from Peru and Indonesia. In: O. Akerele, V. Heywood<br />
and H. Synge (eds.). The Conservation <strong>of</strong> Medicinal Plants. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge<br />
<strong>University</strong> Press.<br />
Padoch, C. and De Jong, W. 1992. Diversity, variation, and change in Ribereno agriculture. In: K.H.<br />
Redford and C. Padoch (eds.). Conservation <strong>of</strong>Neotropical Forests; Working from Traditional<br />
Resource Use. New York: Columbia <strong>University</strong> Press.<br />
Padoch, C. 1992. Marketing <strong>of</strong> non-timber forest products in western Amazonian: general<br />
observations and research priorities. In: D.C. Nepstad and S. Schwartzman (eds.). Non-Timber<br />
Products from Tropical Forests; Evaluation <strong>of</strong> a Conservation and Development Strategy.<br />
Advances in Economic Botany, Volume 9. The New York Botanical Garden, New York.<br />
Parren, M. 1992. Non-timber forest products: weighing the benefits against the costs. In: J. Hummel<br />
and M. Parren (oos.). Forests a Growing Concern. Proceedings <strong>of</strong> the XIXth International<br />
Forestry Students Symposium, Wageningen, The Netherlands.<br />
Pearce, D. 1991. Assessing the Returns to the Economy and to Society from Investments in Forestry.<br />
Forestry Commission Occasional Paper, 47.
Pearce, D. and S. Puroshothaman. 1993. Protecting Biological Diversity: The Economic Value <strong>of</strong><br />
Pharmaceutical Plants. Prepared for T. Swanson (ed.) Biodiversity and Botany: The Values <strong>of</strong><br />
Medicinal Plants. Forthcoming, CSERGE.<br />
Peluso, N.L. 1992. Rich Forests, Poor People; Resource Control and Resistance in Java. Berkeley:<br />
<strong>University</strong> <strong>of</strong> California Press.<br />
Pendelton, L.H. 1992. Trouble in paradise: practical obstacles to nontimber forestry in Latin America.<br />
In: M. Plotkin and L. Famolare (eds.). Sustainable Harvest and Marketing <strong>of</strong> Rain Forest<br />
Products. Washington, D.C.: Island Press.<br />
Peters, C.M., A.H. Gentry and R.O. Mendelssohn. 1989. Valuation <strong>of</strong> an Amazonian rainforest.<br />
Nature 339: 655-656.<br />
Peters, C.M., M.J. Balick, and F. Kahn. 1989. Oligarchic forests <strong>of</strong> economic plants in Amazonian:<br />
utilization and conservation <strong>of</strong> an important tropical resource. Conservation Biology 3(4): 341<br />
349.<br />
Peters, C.M. 1993. Ecology and Exploitation <strong>of</strong>Non-timber Tropical Forest Resources: A Primer on<br />
Sustainability. Draft report, Biodiversity Support Program, Washington, D.C.<br />
Phillips, O. 1993. The potential for harvesting fruits in tropical rainforests: new data from Amazonian<br />
Peru. Biodiversity and Conservation 2: 18-38.<br />
Phillips, O. and Gentry, A.H. 1993. The useful plants <strong>of</strong> Tambopata, Peru: I. statistical hypotheses<br />
tests with a new quantitative technique. Economic Botany 47(1): 15-32.<br />
Plotkin, M. and L. Famolare. 1992. Sustainable Harvest and Marketing <strong>of</strong> Rain Forest Products.<br />
Washington, D.C.: Island Press.<br />
Poole, P. 1993. Land-Based Communities and Biodiversity Conservation: A Survey <strong>of</strong> Current<br />
Activities in Relation to Implementation <strong>of</strong> the Biodiversity Convention. Prepared for the<br />
Biodiversity Office, Environment, Canada.<br />
Poore, D., P. Burgess, J. Palmer, S. Rietbergen and T. Synnott. 1989. No Timber Without Trees;<br />
Sustainability in the Tropical Forest. London: earthscan Publications Ltd.<br />
Poore, D. and J. Sayer. 1991. The Management <strong>of</strong> Tropical Moist Forest Lands: Ecological<br />
Guidelines. The IUCN Forest Conservation Programme, Cambridge, U.K.<br />
Posey, D.A. 1990. The Application <strong>of</strong> Ethnobiology in the Conservation 0/ Dwindling Natural<br />
Resources: Lost Knowledge or Options/or the Survival <strong>of</strong>the Planet. Proceedings from the First<br />
International Congress <strong>of</strong> Ethnobiology, Brazil: 47-61.<br />
Posey, D.A. 1992. Traditional knowledge, conservation and "the rain forest harvest". In: M. Plotkin<br />
and L. Famolare (eds.). Sustainable Harvest and Marketing <strong>of</strong> Rain Forest Products.<br />
Washington, D.C.: Island Press.<br />
59
60<br />
Posey, D.A. and W. Balee (eds.). 1989. Resource Management in Amazonian: Indigenous and Folk<br />
Strategies. Advances in Economic Botany, 7.<br />
Prescott-Allen, R. and C. 1982. What's Wildlife Worth? Economic Contributions o/Wild Plants and<br />
Animals to Developing Countries. London: Earthscan Publications Ltd.<br />
Principe, P.P. 1991. Valuing the biodiversity <strong>of</strong> medicinal plants. In: 0. Akerele, V. Heywood and<br />
H. Synge (eds.). The Conservation <strong>of</strong>Medicinal Plants. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge <strong>University</strong><br />
Press.<br />
Putz, F.E. 1984. How trees avoid and shed lianas. Biotropica 16(1): 19-23.<br />
Putz, F.E. and N.V.L. Brokaw. 1989. Sprouting <strong>of</strong> broken trees on Barro Colorado Island, Panama.<br />
Ecology 70(2): 508-512.<br />
Record, S.J. and C.D. Mel!. 1924. Timbers o/Tropical America. New Haven, CT: Yale <strong>University</strong><br />
Press.<br />
Redford, K.H. 1991. Hunting in Neotropical Forests: A Subsidy from Nature. Presented at "Nutrition<br />
in Tropical Forests", UNESCO, Paris.<br />
Redford, K.H. and C. Padoch. 1992. Conservation o[Neotropical Forests; Working from Traditional<br />
Resource Use. New York: Columbia <strong>University</strong> Press.<br />
Redford, K.H. and A.M. Stearman. 1993. Forest-dwelling native Amazonians and the conservation<br />
<strong>of</strong> biodiversity: interests n common or in collision? Conservation Biology 7(2): 248-255.<br />
Reid, W.V. 1992. How many species will there be? In: T.C. Whitmore and J.A. Sayer (eds.) Tropical<br />
Deforestation and Species Extinction. London: Chapman and Hall.<br />
Reining, C. and R. Heinzman. 1992. Nontimber forest products in the Peten, Guatemala: why<br />
extractive reserves are critical for both conservation and development. In: M. Plotkin and L.<br />
Famolare (eds.). Sustainable Harvest and Marketing <strong>of</strong>Rain Forest Products. Washington, D.C.:<br />
Island Press.<br />
Reining, C., R.M. Heinzman, M.C. Madrid, S. Lopez, and A. Solorzano. 1992. Non-Timber Forest<br />
Products <strong>of</strong> the Maya Biosphere reserve, Peten, Guatemala. Conservation International,<br />
Washington, D.C.<br />
Repetto, R. and M. Gillis. 1988. Public Policies and the Misuse <strong>of</strong> Forest Resources. Cambridge:<br />
Cambridge <strong>University</strong> Press.<br />
Richards, M. 1993. The potential <strong>of</strong> non-timber forest products in sustainable natural forest<br />
management in Amazonian. Commonwealth Forestry Review 72(1): 21-27.<br />
Rosenberg, D.B. and S.M. Freedman. 1984. Application <strong>of</strong> a model <strong>of</strong> ecological succession to<br />
conservation and land-use management. Environmental Conservation 11(4): 323-330.
Salick, J. 1992. Amuesha forest use and management: an integration <strong>of</strong> indigenous use and natural<br />
forest management. In: K.H. Redford and C. Padoch (OOs.). Conservation <strong>of</strong> Neotropical<br />
Forests; Working from Traditional Resource Use. New York: Columbia <strong>University</strong> Press.<br />
Salick, J. 1992. The sustainable management <strong>of</strong> nontimber rain forest products in the Si-a-Paz Peace<br />
Park, Nicaragua. In: M. Plotkin and L. Famolare (OOs.). Sustainable Harvest and Marketing <strong>of</strong><br />
Rain Forest Products. Washington, D.C.: Island Press.<br />
Saulei, S. 1984. Natural regeneration following clear-fell logging operations in the Gogol Valley,<br />
Papua New Guinea. Ambio 13(5-6): 351-354.<br />
Sayer, J. 1991. Rainforest Buffer Zones; Guidelines for Protected Area Managers. IUCN - The World<br />
Conservation Union, Forest Conservation Programme, Cambridge, U.K.<br />
Sayer, J.A. and Whitmore, T.C. 1991. Tropical moist forests: destruction and species extinction.<br />
Biological Conservation 55: 199-213.<br />
Schmidt, R.C. 1991. Tropical rain forest management: a status report. In: A. Gomez-Pompa, T.C.<br />
Whitmore and M. Hadley (eds.) Rain Forest Regeneration and Management. Paris: UNESCO<br />
and The Parthenon Publishing Group Limited.<br />
Schultes, R.E. 1992. Ethnobotany and technology in the northwest Amazon: a partnership. In: M.<br />
Plotkin and L. Famolare (eds.). Sustainable Harvest and Marketing <strong>of</strong> Rain Forest Products.<br />
Washington, D.C.: Island Press.<br />
Schwartzman, S. 1992. Land distribution and the social costs <strong>of</strong> frontier development in Brazil: social<br />
and historical context <strong>of</strong> extractive reserves. In: D.C. Nepstad and S. Schwartzman (OOs.). Non<br />
Timber Products from Tropical Forests; Evaluation <strong>of</strong> a Conservation and Development<br />
Strategy. Advances in Economic Botany, Volume 9. The New York Botanical Garden, New<br />
York.<br />
Sheldon, J.W., M.J. Balick and S.A. Laird. 1993. Medicinal Plants: Can Utilization and Conservation<br />
Co-Exist? Draft, Advances in Economic Botany. The New York Botanical Garden, New York.<br />
Silva, J.N.M., J.O.P. de Carvalho, J. do C.A. Lopes, B.F. de Almeida, D.H.M. Costa and L.C. de<br />
Oliveira. 1992. Growth and Yield <strong>of</strong>a Tropical Rain Forest <strong>of</strong>the Brazilian Amazon 13 Years<br />
After Logging. EMBRAPA and FCAP, Brazil.<br />
Sizer, N. 1992. Extractive Reserves in Amazonian; the Necessary Transformation <strong>of</strong>a Tradition. The<br />
Botany School, <strong>University</strong> <strong>of</strong> Cambridge.<br />
Smith, N.J.H., J.T. Williams, D.L. Plucknett, and J.P. Talbot. 1992. Tropical Forests and Their<br />
Crops. Ithaca, NY: Comell <strong>University</strong> Press.<br />
Stockdale, Mary, <strong>Oxford</strong> Forestry Institute. 1993. personal communication.<br />
Sullivan, F. 1990. The Fragile Forest. Timber Trades Journal, 9 June.<br />
61
62<br />
Swaine, M.D. and J.B. Hall. 1986. Forest Structure and dynamics. In: G.W. Lawson (ed.) Plant<br />
Ecology in West Africa. John Wiley & Sons Ltd.<br />
Swaine, M.D. and J.B. Hall. 1983. Early succession on cleared forest land in Ghana. British<br />
Ecological Society, London.<br />
Swanson, T.M. and E.B. Barbier. 1992. Economics/or the Wilds; Wildlife, Wildlands, Diversity and<br />
Development. London: Earthscan Publications Ltd.<br />
Terborgh, I. 1988. The big things that run the world - a sequel to E.O. Wilson. Conservation Biology<br />
2: 402-403.<br />
Thang, H. C. 1987. Forest management systems for tropical high forest, with special reference to<br />
Peninsular Malaysia. Forest Ecology and Management 21: 3-20.<br />
Toledo, V.M., A.!. Batis, R. Becerra, E. Martinez, and C.H. Ramos. 1992. Products from the tropical<br />
rain forests <strong>of</strong> Mexico: an ethnoecological approach. In: M. Plotkin and L. Famolare (eds.).<br />
Sustainable Harvest and Marketing <strong>of</strong>Rain Forest Products. Washington, D.C.: Island Press.<br />
Uhl, C., K. Clark, H. Clark and P. Murphy. 1981. Early plant succession after cutting and burning<br />
in the upper Rio Negro region <strong>of</strong> the Amazon basin. Journal <strong>of</strong> Ecology 69: 631-649.<br />
Uhl, C., H. Clark and K. Clark. Successional patterns associated with slash-and-bum agriculture in<br />
the upper Rio Negro region <strong>of</strong> the Amazon basin. Biotropica 14(4): 249-254.<br />
Uhl, C. and I.C.G. Vieira. 1989. Ecological Impacts <strong>of</strong> Selective Logging in the Brazilian Amazon:<br />
A Case Study from the Paragominas Region <strong>of</strong> the State <strong>of</strong> Para. Biotropica 21(2): 98-106.<br />
Vasquez, R. and A.H. Gentry. 1989. Use and misuse <strong>of</strong> forest-harvested fruits in the Iquitos area.<br />
Conservation Biology 3(4):350-361.<br />
Vincent, I.R., J.L. Chamberlain and S.T. Warren. 1987. Summary. In: F. Mergen and I.R. Vincent<br />
(eds.). Natural Management o/Tropical Moist Forests; Silvicultural and Management Prospects<br />
0/ Sustained Utilization. Yale <strong>University</strong>, School <strong>of</strong> Forestry and Environmental Studies, New<br />
Haven, cr.<br />
Wadsworth, F.R. 1983. Management Under Sound Ecological Principles. In: F. Mergen (ed.)<br />
Tropical Forests: Utilization and Conservation. Proceedings <strong>of</strong>an International Symposium held<br />
at Yale <strong>University</strong>, New Haven, CT.<br />
Wadsworth, F.R. 1987. Applicability <strong>of</strong> Asian and African silviculture systems to naturally<br />
regenerated forests <strong>of</strong> the Neotropics. In: F. Mergen and J.R. Vincent (eds.). Natural<br />
Management ojTropical Moist Forests; Silvicultural and Management Prospects <strong>of</strong>Sustained<br />
Utilization. Yale <strong>University</strong>, School <strong>of</strong> Forestry and Environmental Studies, New Haven, CT.
Wamulwange, G.L. 1993. Traditional Management Systems <strong>of</strong> Natural Resources: A Case for<br />
Western Province (Barotseland) Zambia. Paper presented at the Symposium for Indigenous<br />
People, 28-30 July, 1993. The Pueblo <strong>of</strong> Zuni, New Mexico.<br />
Wellner, P. and E. Dickey. 1991. The Wood Users Guide. The Rainforest Action Network, San<br />
Francisco, CA.<br />
Westoby, J. 1987. The Purpose <strong>of</strong> Forests; Follies <strong>of</strong>Development. <strong>Oxford</strong>: Basil Blackwell Ltd.<br />
Whitmore, T.C. 1991. Tropical Rain Forest Dynamics and its Implications for Management. In: A.<br />
Gomez-Pompa, T.C. Whitmore and M. Hadley (eds.) Rain Forest Regeneration and<br />
Management. Paris: UNESCO and The Parthenon Publishing Group Limited.<br />
Whitmore, T.C. 1992. An Introduction to Tropical Rain Forests. <strong>Oxford</strong>: Clarendon Press.<br />
Whitmore, T.e. and J.A. Sayer (eds.). 1992. Tropical Deforestation and Species Extinction. London:<br />
Chapman and Hall.<br />
Wilkie, D.S., J.G. Sidle and G.e. Boundzanga. 1992. Mechanized logging, market hunting, and a<br />
bank loan in Congo. Conservation Biology 6(4): 570-580.<br />
World Resources Institute, The World Conservation Union,and United Nations Environment<br />
Programme. 1992. Global Biodiversity Strategy; Guidelines for Action to Save, Study and Use<br />
Earth's Biotic Wealth Sustainably and Equitably.<br />
Wyatt-Smith, J. 1987. Problems and prospects for natural management <strong>of</strong> tropical moist forests. In:<br />
F. Mergen and J.R. Vincent (eds.). Natural Management o/Tropical Moist Forests; Silvicultural<br />
and Management Prospects <strong>of</strong> Sustained Utilization. Yale <strong>University</strong>, School <strong>of</strong> Forestry and<br />
Environmental Studies, New Haven, CT.<br />
Young, S. 1991. How plants fight back. New Scientist, 1 June: 41-45.<br />
Zerner, C. 1992. Indigenous Forest-Dwelling Communities in Indonesia's Outer Islands: Livelihood,<br />
Rights, and Environmental Management Institutions in the Era <strong>of</strong>Industrial Forest Exploitation.<br />
Report commissioned by the World Bank in preparation for the Forestry Sector Review.<br />
Ziffer, K. 1992. The Tagua Initiative: building the market for a rainforest product. In: M. Plotkin and<br />
L. Famolare (eds.). Sustainable Harvest and Marketing <strong>of</strong>Rain Forest Products. Washington,<br />
D.C.: Island Press.<br />
63