laporan bersama perwakilan malaysia - Food Safety and Quality ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

2.2.16 DISCUSSION PAPER ON DEVELOPMENT OF A DATABASE ON PROCESSING AIDS (Agenda Item 10) HIGHLIGHTS OF DISCUSSION (Documents : CX/FA 11/43/20; CRD 22 (Comments of Brazil, Egypt, European Union, India and Thailand)) The Delegation of New Zealand presented the report of the e- WG, which provided suggestions on the structure and content of a database for processing aids. The Delegation explained that the structure and content of the database depended on its intended uses and users and could include: introduction and background; scope and purpose; information on the safe and technologically justified use of substances used as processing aids; definition of terms; and a main section on information about substances, based on the existing structure of the Inventory of Substances Used as Processing Aids (IPA). The e- WG report also presented options for the criteria for the entry and management of substances in the database. The JECFA Secretariat commented on the need to use innovative techniques when developing the database, especially in terms of “search” and “link” functions. She said that it would also be useful to consider existing databases, such as the JECFA food additive specifications, rather than focusing on the structure of the IPA paper document. Delegations also noted that: when considering the entries in the database it should not be assumed that all entries of the IPA are correct; the criteria on safety and technological used established in the Codex Guidelines on Substances Used as Processing Aids (CAC/GL 75-2010) should always be met. COMMITTEE'S DECISION Conclusion The Committee agreed to the proposal of the Chairperson to follow a stepwise approach. In the first step, China would develop a prototype of the database showing the main layout and present it at the next session of the Committee. The criteria for the entry of substances and the management of the database would be considered at a subsequent step. TINDAKAN MALAYSIA JKCK FA perlu ambil perhatian perkara ini 54
2.2.17 OTHER BUSINESS AND FUTURE WORK (Agenda Item 11) HIGHLIGHTS OF DISCUSSION The Committee noted that there was no other business. 2.2.18 DATE AND PLACE OF THE NEXT SESSION (Agenda Item 12) HIGHLIGHTS OF DISCUSSION The Committee was informed that its forty-fourth session was tentatively scheduled to be held in Beijing, China, from 12 to 16 March 2012. The exact venue and date would be determined by the host Government in consultation with the Codex Secretariat. 3. Syor dan Pemerhatian COMMITTEE'S DECISION COMMITTEE'S DECISION TINDAKAN MALAYSIA Makluman TINDAKAN MALAYSIA Makluman 3.1 Dicadangkan agar JKCK FA mengambil perhatian perkara berkaitan Note 161 dan mengkaji implikasi kepada negara dalam konteks yang lebih luas. Terdapat perbincangan informal di antara delegasi-delegasi yang mengatakan keputusan di CCFA mungkin akan memberi impak kepada codex committee yang lain. 3.2 Dicadangkan juga agar JKCK FA perlu lebih teliti mengkaji cadangan maximum level bagi aditif dalam GSFA dan impak kepada industri dan konsumer. Kerjasama dari pihak industri diperlukan untuk memberi input berkaitan paras penggunaan aditif di dalam pemprosesan. Justifikasi secara teknikal diperlukan jika negara ingin menyokong sebarang penggunaan aditif yang dicadangkan. Perhatian perlu diberikan terutama bagi aditif yang mengandungi aluminium memandangkan keputusan JECFA dan CCFA adalah supaya mengurangkan sebanyak mungkin penggunaan jenis aditif ini. Selain itu, bagi aditif lain yang mempunyai paras maksima di dalam GSFA, dicadangkan agar ia boleh dijadikan basis bagi exposure assessment dan pindaan di dalam Peraturan Makanan 1985. Negaranegara ASEAN seperti Thailand, Indonesia dan Singapura juga mempunyai paras maksima bagi kebanyakan aditif dan menggunakan GSFA sebagai panduan. 55
Page 1 and 2:
1. Delegasi Malaysia Tiga (3) orang
Page 3 and 4: 2.2.2 MATTERS REFERRED BY THE CODEX
Page 5 and 6: HIGHLIGHTS OF DISCUSSION Working Pr
Page 7 and 8: HIGHLIGHTS OF DISCUSSION and asked
Page 9 and 10: HIGHLIGHTS OF DISCUSSION Proposed d
Page 11 and 12: HIGHLIGHTS OF DISCUSSION Proposed D
Page 13 and 14: HIGHLIGHTS OF DISCUSSION what the r
Page 15 and 16: HIGHLIGHTS OF DISCUSSION They expla
Page 17 and 18: HIGHLIGHTS OF DISCUSSION The pWG ha
Page 19 and 20: HIGHLIGHTS OF DISCUSSION sweeteners
Page 21 and 22: HIGHLIGHTS OF DISCUSSION their rese
Page 23 and 24: HIGHLIGHTS OF DISCUSSION expressed
Page 25 and 26: HIGHLIGHTS OF DISCUSSION Verbal int
Page 27 and 28: HIGHLIGHTS OF DISCUSSION this sessi
Page 29 and 30: 2.2.6 PROVISIONS FOR ALUMINIUM CONT
Page 31 and 32: HIGHLIGHTS OF DISCUSSION Recommenda
Page 33 and 34: HIGHLIGHTS OF DISCUSSION the descri
Page 35 and 36: HIGHLIGHTS OF DISCUSSION The Commit
Page 37 and 38: HIGHLIGHTS OF DISCUSSION the use of
Page 39 and 40: HIGHLIGHTS OF DISCUSSION amendments
Page 41 and 42: standards. HIGHLIGHTS OF DISCUSSION
Page 43 and 44: 2.2.11 PROPOSED DRAFT REVISION OF T
Page 45 and 46: HIGHLIGHTS OF DISCUSSION analytical
Page 47 and 48: HIGHLIGHTS OF DISCUSSION Recommenda
Page 49 and 50: HIGHLIGHTS OF DISCUSSION The FAO JE
Page 51 and 52: HIGHLIGHTS OF DISCUSSION The Commit
Page 53: JECFA. HIGHLIGHTS OF DISCUSSION The
show all

laporan bersama perwakilan malaysia - Food Safety and Quality ...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?