laporan bersama perwakilan malaysia - Food Safety and Quality ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

HIGHLIGHTS OF DISCUSSION committees in the area of animal feed/ feed additives and if residues of feed additives would be considered as contaminants. It was mentioned that the amendments proposed in Annex 1 could possibly apply to contaminants but not to food additives. The Secretariat clarified that there was a clear definition of “food additive” in the Procedural Manual by which the Committee was bound, and that the definition of “veterinary drugs” was relatively broad to encompass a wide range of substances applied or administered to food producing animals. The Committee further noted that the terms of reference of the Committee on Contaminants in Foods (CCCF) included contaminants in food and feed, and that the mandate of the newly established Task Force on Animal Feeding was limited to the development of guidelines on the application of risk assessment methodologies to the various types of hazards related to contaminants/ residues in feed ingredients and the establishment of a prioritized list of such hazards. The Secretariat recalled that the Committee on General Principles (CCGP) had forwarded the review of the risk analysis policies of Codex committees (CL 2010/1-GP) to the committees concerned in the context of completing Activity 2.1 (Review the consistency of risk analysis principles elaborated by the relevant Codex Committees) of the Strategic Plan. The Secretariat also recalled that it was for the Committee to decide how to undertake Activity 2.2 (Review risk analysis policies developed by relevant Codex committees) of the Strategic Plan with target year 2013. Malaysia Position: Malaysia is of the view that the Risk Analysis Principles Applied by CCFA and CCCF should be reviewed for consistency with the structure of the COMMITTEE'S DECISION accordance with the needs of each committee. Therefore, the Committee requested that the Codex Secretariat prepare draft Risk analysis principles applied by the CCFA, based on the current Codex Committee on Food Additives and the Codex Committee on Contaminants in Foods, by deleting any reference to CCCF, for consideration at the next session. TINDAKAN MALAYSIA 4
HIGHLIGHTS OF DISCUSSION Working Principles as recommended in the CL2010/1-GP. Malaysia agrees that having specific section based on the working principle would provide clear distinction and transparent role of each party involved. Malaysia can agree with the proposal to develop two separate sets of principles for additives and contaminants since some of the principles only apply to contaminants. Verbal Intervention: “Malaysia can agree with having separate risk analysis principles for food additives and contaminants to allow independent review in the future if necessary. However, Malaysia still considers that it is worth to review the format of the draft principles for consistency with the structure of the Working Principles as recommended in the CL2010/1- GP. Having specific sections based on the working principle would provide clear distinction and transparent role of each party involved”. Definition of “Hazard” The Committee considered the request for a revision of the definition of “hazard” in the Procedural Manual forwarded by the CCGP. COMMITTEE'S DECISION The Committee agreed that there was no need to revise the current definition. TINDAKAN MALAYSIA Makluman kepada JKCK FA dan JKCK GP 5
Page 1 and 2: 1. Delegasi Malaysia Tiga (3) orang
Page 3: 2.2.2 MATTERS REFERRED BY THE CODEX
Page 7 and 8: HIGHLIGHTS OF DISCUSSION and asked
Page 9 and 10: HIGHLIGHTS OF DISCUSSION Proposed d
Page 11 and 12: HIGHLIGHTS OF DISCUSSION Proposed D
Page 13 and 14: HIGHLIGHTS OF DISCUSSION what the r
Page 15 and 16: HIGHLIGHTS OF DISCUSSION They expla
Page 17 and 18: HIGHLIGHTS OF DISCUSSION The pWG ha
Page 19 and 20: HIGHLIGHTS OF DISCUSSION sweeteners
Page 21 and 22: HIGHLIGHTS OF DISCUSSION their rese
Page 23 and 24: HIGHLIGHTS OF DISCUSSION expressed
Page 25 and 26: HIGHLIGHTS OF DISCUSSION Verbal int
Page 27 and 28: HIGHLIGHTS OF DISCUSSION this sessi
Page 29 and 30: 2.2.6 PROVISIONS FOR ALUMINIUM CONT
Page 31 and 32: HIGHLIGHTS OF DISCUSSION Recommenda
Page 33 and 34: HIGHLIGHTS OF DISCUSSION the descri
Page 35 and 36: HIGHLIGHTS OF DISCUSSION The Commit
Page 37 and 38: HIGHLIGHTS OF DISCUSSION the use of
Page 39 and 40: HIGHLIGHTS OF DISCUSSION amendments
Page 41 and 42: standards. HIGHLIGHTS OF DISCUSSION
Page 43 and 44: 2.2.11 PROPOSED DRAFT REVISION OF T
Page 45 and 46: HIGHLIGHTS OF DISCUSSION analytical
Page 47 and 48: HIGHLIGHTS OF DISCUSSION Recommenda
Page 49 and 50: HIGHLIGHTS OF DISCUSSION The FAO JE
Page 51 and 52: HIGHLIGHTS OF DISCUSSION The Commit
Page 53 and 54: JECFA. HIGHLIGHTS OF DISCUSSION The
Page 55 and 56:
2.2.17 OTHER BUSINESS AND FUTURE WO
show all

laporan bersama perwakilan malaysia - Food Safety and Quality ...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?