laporan bersama perwakilan malaysia - Food Safety and Quality ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

HIGHLIGHTS OF DISCUSSION COMMITTEE'S DECISION technological purposes that due to time constraints could not be considered by the in-session working group. Status of the amendment to the International Numbering System (INS) for food additives The Committee agreed to forward the proposed draft amendments to the INS to the 34th Session of the Commission for adoption at Step 5/8, with the recommendation to omit Steps 6 and 7. In addition the Committee agreed to forward the proposed changes to the “Explanatory notes on the lay-out of the INS” in Section 1 “Introduction” of CAC/GL 36-1989 to the 34th Session of the Codex Alimentarius Commission for adoption TINDAKAN MALAYSIA JKCK FA dan JKCK CAC perlu ambil perhatian perkara ini 2.2.13 SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE IDENTITY AND PURITY OF FOOD ADDITIVES ARISING FROM THE 73 RD JECFA (Agenda Item 8) HIGHLIGHTS OF DISCUSSION (Documents : CX/FA 11/43/17; CX/FA 11/43/17 Add. 1 (Chile, Iran, Mexico and Paraguay)) COMMITTEE'S DECISION TINDAKAN MALAYSIA 48
HIGHLIGHTS OF DISCUSSION The FAO JECFA Secretary presented the results of the 73 rd Meeting of JECFA regarding the specifications for identity and purity of food additives as outlined in the Annex of CX/FA 11/43/17. The Secretary informed the Committee that a total of six food additives and 180 flavourings (new and revised) specifications had been prepared as full, the specification for one food additive had been assigned a status as tentative and the tentative specifications for 1 food additive had been withdrawn. The Committee also noted that necessary corrections and minor editorial revisions had been made to eight JECFA specifications concerning the limits and information on metals and arsenic published in the Combined Compendium of Food Additive Specifications (FAO JECFA Monographs 1) to correspond to those agreed and published in the relevant reports of JECFA. The Delegation of Paraguay suggested an alternative assay method in addition to the previous one for steviol glycosides (INS 960), pointing out the resolution problem of the analytical methodology used to define the specifications for the identity and purity of this food additive. The JECFA Secretariat clarified that the revision of the specifications for steviol glycosides had been undertaken at request of the Committee to include 2 additional steviol glycosides in the assay method and it was not possible to have 2 different assay methods in the specifications. She informed the Committee that according to her information, the stevia producers were working to harmonise their methods based on the JECFA specifications. The Committee noted the view expressed by the Delegation of Paraguay and agreed to adopt the specifications for this food additive as prepared by JECFA. The Committee agreed not to adopt the full specifications of the 13 flavourings for which JECFA had required additional data to complete their evaluations. The Observer from IOFI indicated COMMITTEE'S DECISION Status of the specifications for the identity and purity of food additives The Committee agreed to forward the specifications for 14 food additives and 167 flavourings (new and revised specifications) to the 34th Session of the Commission for adoption at Steps 5/8, with the recommendation to omit Steps 6 and 7. TINDAKAN MALAYSIA JKCK FA perlu ambil perhatian perkara ini. 49
Page 1 and 2: 1. Delegasi Malaysia Tiga (3) orang
Page 3 and 4: 2.2.2 MATTERS REFERRED BY THE CODEX
Page 5 and 6: HIGHLIGHTS OF DISCUSSION Working Pr
Page 7 and 8: HIGHLIGHTS OF DISCUSSION and asked
Page 9 and 10: HIGHLIGHTS OF DISCUSSION Proposed d
Page 11 and 12: HIGHLIGHTS OF DISCUSSION Proposed D
Page 13 and 14: HIGHLIGHTS OF DISCUSSION what the r
Page 15 and 16: HIGHLIGHTS OF DISCUSSION They expla
Page 17 and 18: HIGHLIGHTS OF DISCUSSION The pWG ha
Page 19 and 20: HIGHLIGHTS OF DISCUSSION sweeteners
Page 21 and 22: HIGHLIGHTS OF DISCUSSION their rese
Page 23 and 24: HIGHLIGHTS OF DISCUSSION expressed
Page 25 and 26: HIGHLIGHTS OF DISCUSSION Verbal int
Page 27 and 28: HIGHLIGHTS OF DISCUSSION this sessi
Page 29 and 30: 2.2.6 PROVISIONS FOR ALUMINIUM CONT
Page 31 and 32: HIGHLIGHTS OF DISCUSSION Recommenda
Page 33 and 34: HIGHLIGHTS OF DISCUSSION the descri
Page 35 and 36: HIGHLIGHTS OF DISCUSSION The Commit
Page 37 and 38: HIGHLIGHTS OF DISCUSSION the use of
Page 39 and 40: HIGHLIGHTS OF DISCUSSION amendments
Page 41 and 42: standards. HIGHLIGHTS OF DISCUSSION
Page 43 and 44: 2.2.11 PROPOSED DRAFT REVISION OF T
Page 45 and 46: HIGHLIGHTS OF DISCUSSION analytical
Page 47: HIGHLIGHTS OF DISCUSSION Recommenda
Page 51 and 52: HIGHLIGHTS OF DISCUSSION The Commit
Page 53 and 54: JECFA. HIGHLIGHTS OF DISCUSSION The
Page 55 and 56: 2.2.17 OTHER BUSINESS AND FUTURE WO

laporan bersama perwakilan malaysia - Food Safety and Quality ...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?