laporan bersama perwakilan malaysia - Food Safety and Quality ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

HIGHLIGHTS OF DISCUSSION Recommendations II and III Note : CX/FA 11/43/14 To request the CCNFSDU to comment as to whether carryover of food additives from ingredients is inappropriate for the foods included in the standards falling under food categories 13.1 and 13.2. This recommendation is due to the observed inconsistencies between the provisions in Section 4.2 to the Preamble to the GSFA, which prohibits carry-over of food additives in food categories 13.1 and 13.2, and the carryover provisions in standards for foods in categories 13.1 and 13.2. To request other Codex Committees, as appropriate, to inform whether there are other food categories, or specific foods that are included under Codex commodity standards that should be specifically listed under Section 4.2 of the Preamble to the GSFA. This recommendation considers the possibility of additional food categories or specific foods subject to commodity standards where carry-over of food additives is unacceptable. The eWG also recommends that, until Recommendations II and III can be implemented, the current text in Section 4.2 of the Preamble to the GSFA should be maintained. Recommendation IV Note: CX/FA 11/43/14 To delete all references to “The Principles Relating to the Carryover of Food Additives into Foods” in Volume 1 from Codex COMMITTEE'S DECISION sections (a), (b) and (c), as the GSFA is intended to be the single Codex reference for food additives. Proposed text referring to finished products (e.g. “composite food”) and “direct addition additives” was also not agreed. Recommendations II and III The Committee endorsed the recommendation to request clarification from the Committee on Nutrition and Food for Special Dietary Uses (CCNFSDU) on an inconsistency between Section 4.2 of the Preamble of the GSFA, which prohibits carry-over of food additives in food categories 13.1 and 13.2, and the carryover provisions in some Codex standards for foods in categories 13.1 and 13.2. The Committee did not deem it necessary to contact other Codex committees as there was no evidence of inconsistencies with other commodity standards. Recommendation IV The Committee noted that this recommendation had already been implemented by the Codex Secretariat TINDAKAN MALAYSIA JKCK FA dan JKCK NFSDU perlu ambil perhatian perkara ini Makluman 40
standards. HIGHLIGHTS OF DISCUSSION PHYSICAL WORKING GROUP ON THE GSFA(TERMS OF REFERENCE) COMMITTEE'S DECISION following a decision of the 32 nd session of the Commission. Conclusion 1) The Committee agreed to forward the revised text of Section 4 of the Preamble of the GSFA to the 34 th session of the Commission for adoption. 2) The Committee further agreed to request the CCNFSDU to clarify if carry-over of food additives from ingredients was inappropriate for the foods included in the standards falling under food categories 13.1 (Infant formulae, follow-up formulae, and formulae for special medical purposes for infants) and 13.2 (Complementary foods for infants and young children). 3) The Committee agreed to establish a physical working group (p-WG), which would meet immediately prior to its 44 th Session The Committee agreed to establish a physical working group (p-WG), which would meet immediately prior to its 44 th Session and be chaired by the United States of America, and work in English only, to consider and prepare recommendations for the plenary on: i. Pending proposals in CX/FA 11/43/7, taking into account written TINDAKAN MALAYSIA JKCK FA, JKCK NFSDU dan JKCK CAC perlu ambil perhatian perkara ini JKCK FA perlu ambil perhatian perkara ini. Delegasi Malaysia ke Mesyuarat 44 th CCFA perlu menghadiri pWG ini bagi memastikan pendirian negara dipertahankan. 41
Page 1 and 2: 1. Delegasi Malaysia Tiga (3) orang
Page 3 and 4: 2.2.2 MATTERS REFERRED BY THE CODEX
Page 5 and 6: HIGHLIGHTS OF DISCUSSION Working Pr
Page 7 and 8: HIGHLIGHTS OF DISCUSSION and asked
Page 9 and 10: HIGHLIGHTS OF DISCUSSION Proposed d
Page 11 and 12: HIGHLIGHTS OF DISCUSSION Proposed D
Page 13 and 14: HIGHLIGHTS OF DISCUSSION what the r
Page 15 and 16: HIGHLIGHTS OF DISCUSSION They expla
Page 17 and 18: HIGHLIGHTS OF DISCUSSION The pWG ha
Page 19 and 20: HIGHLIGHTS OF DISCUSSION sweeteners
Page 21 and 22: HIGHLIGHTS OF DISCUSSION their rese
Page 23 and 24: HIGHLIGHTS OF DISCUSSION expressed
Page 25 and 26: HIGHLIGHTS OF DISCUSSION Verbal int
Page 27 and 28: HIGHLIGHTS OF DISCUSSION this sessi
Page 29 and 30: 2.2.6 PROVISIONS FOR ALUMINIUM CONT
Page 31 and 32: HIGHLIGHTS OF DISCUSSION Recommenda
Page 33 and 34: HIGHLIGHTS OF DISCUSSION the descri
Page 35 and 36: HIGHLIGHTS OF DISCUSSION The Commit
Page 37 and 38: HIGHLIGHTS OF DISCUSSION the use of
Page 39: HIGHLIGHTS OF DISCUSSION amendments
Page 43 and 44: 2.2.11 PROPOSED DRAFT REVISION OF T
Page 45 and 46: HIGHLIGHTS OF DISCUSSION analytical
Page 47 and 48: HIGHLIGHTS OF DISCUSSION Recommenda
Page 49 and 50: HIGHLIGHTS OF DISCUSSION The FAO JE
Page 51 and 52: HIGHLIGHTS OF DISCUSSION The Commit
Page 53 and 54: JECFA. HIGHLIGHTS OF DISCUSSION The
Page 55 and 56: 2.2.17 OTHER BUSINESS AND FUTURE WO

laporan bersama perwakilan malaysia - Food Safety and Quality ...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?