laporan bersama perwakilan malaysia - Food Safety and Quality ...

HIGHLIGHTS OF DISCUSSION
Verbal Intervention:
“Malaysia is of the view that Note 161 should not be deleted
at this juncture. We agree with Germany that such clause is
used in other Codex Committees in certain situations thus
we feel that further discussion at national level is needed
on the implication of this note at a broader sense. We are
agreeable with the Chair’s proposal to retain this note but
the use should be reduced and on a case-by-case basis.
Clear and transparent justification for the need of this note
should be given when proposing its addition in the GSFA.
Malaysia also believes that the proposal by Australia to
discuss further section 3.2 of the Preamble to identify
situations as highlighted by the EU could assist in the
decision for the criteria.”
COMMITTEE'S DECISION
TINDAKAN
MALAYSIA
2.2.10 DISCUSSION PAPER ON THE REVISION OF SECTION 4 “CARRY-OVER OF FOOD ADDITIVES INTO
FOOD” OF THE PREAMBLE OF THE GSFA (Agenda Item 5h)
HIGHLIGHTS OF DISCUSSION
(Documents: CX/FA 11/43/14; CRD 18 (Comments of
European Union, India, Jordan, Kenya and Thailand))
The Committee recalled that it had established an e-WG to
evaluate the necessity to revise Section 4 of the Preamble of the
GSFA to take into account differences between Section 4
“Carry-over of food additives into foods” and the “Carry-over
Principle of Food Additives” in Volume 1 of the Codex
Alimentarius.
The Delegation of Brazil introduced the report of the e-WG, as
presented in CX/FA 11/43/14, containing in Annex 1 proposed
COMMITTEE'S DECISION
TINDAKAN
MALAYSIA
38