laporan bersama perwakilan malaysia - Food Safety and Quality ...

HIGHLIGHTS OF DISCUSSION
Recommendation 2
The Committee noted that recommendation 2 was mainly for
information on exposure assessment and did not require any
specific action.
Recommendation 3
The Committee noted that the recommendation aimed at
reducing/limiting multiple exposures to aluminium-containing
food additives. However, the information compiled in CX/FA
11/43/10 did not allow to identify those provisions in the GSFA
where the addition of Note 174 “Singly or in combination:
sodium aluminium silicate (INS 554), calcium aluminium silicate
(INS 556) and aluminium silicate (INS 559)” was appropriate.
Recommendation 4
Recommendation 5
The Committee did not take any action on this recommendation
as the function of “processing aid” was not associated with any
aluminium-containing food additives in the GSFA.
Recommendation 6
The Committee noted that the concern for the use of aluminium
lakes of colours should be addressed by Members in the context
of the procedure of prioritisation of substances for evaluation by
JECFA.
COMMITTEE'S DECISION
Recommendation 4
The Committee agreed to recommend the
34 th session of the Commission to revoke
the provisions for sodium aluminium silicate
(INS 554), calcium aluminium silicate (INS
556) and aluminium silicate (INS 559) in
Table 3 of the GSFA (see Appendix IV).
Conclusion
The Committee agreed to establish an e-
WG, led by Brazil, open to all Members and
TINDAKAN
MALAYSIA
Makluman
Makluman
JKCK FA dan JKCK
CAC perlu ambil
perhatian perkara ini
Makluman
JKCK FA perlu ambil
perhatian perkara ini
31