laporan bersama perwakilan malaysia - Food Safety and Quality ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

11 – 12 Mac 2011. Mesyuarat telah dipengerusikan oleh Dr. Dennis Keefe dari Amerika Syarikar dan telah dihadiri oleh 31 negara ahli termasuk Malaysia, satu (1) negara pemerhati serta 22 organisasi antarabangsa dan wakil FAO dan WHO. 2.2 Perbincangan mesyuarat 2.2.1 ADOPTION OF THE AGENDA (AGENDA ITEM 1) (Document : CX/FA 11/43/1) HIGHLIGHTS OF DISCUSSION The Committee adopted the Provisional Agenda as its Agenda for the Session with additional proposal from Peru on huito or jagua (Genipa anericana) (CRD 23) under Agenda Item 9a. COMMITTEE'S DECISION The Committee agreed to establish insession Working Groups, open to all interested members and observers and working in English only, on: i) Endorsement and/or revision of maximum levels for food additives and processing aids in Codex standards (Agenda Item 4a), under the Chairmanship of Australia; ii) The International Numbering System (INS) for food additives (Agenda Item 7), under the Chairmanship of Finland; and iii) The priority list of substances proposed for evaluation by JECFA (Agenda Item 9a), under the Chairmanship of Canada. The Committee agreed to discuss the Agenda Items in the following order: 1, 2, 3, 8, 9b, 4b, 4c, 4a, 5e, 5g, 5a, 5b, 5c, 5h, 5f, 5d, 6, 7, 9a, 10, 11, 12. TINDAKAN MALAYSIA Makluman. Malaysia telah hadir dalam semua insession working group 2
2.2.2 MATTERS REFERRED BY THE CODEX ALIMENTARIUS COMMISSION AND OTHER CODEX COMMITTEES AND TASK FORCES (AGENDA ITEM 2) HIGHLIGHTS OF DISCUSSION (Document : CX/FA 11/43/2, CRD 7 (EU, Indonesia, Mali)) The Committee noted the information presented in CX/FA 11/43/2 concerning the decisions and discussions of the Commission, the Executive Committee and other Codex committees related to its work. Applicability of Risk Analysis Principles Applied by the Codex Committee on Food Additives and the Codex Committee on Contaminants in Foods to Animal Feeding / Review of risk analysis principles The Secretariat recalled that the Commission, while considering future work on animal feeding, had requested that the relevant committees review their risk analysis policies and principles as to their applicability to animal feeding and had asked the Committee to review the proposed amendments to the Risk Analysis Principles Applied by the Codex Committee on Food Additives and the Codex Committee on Contaminants in Foods presented in Annex 1 of CX/FA 11/43/2. Several delegations supported the proposed amendments in Annex 1 concerning animal feed while other delegations did not consider the amendments appropriate for the Committee. Some delegations stated they lacked clarity as to definitions and responsibility of different Codex COMMITTEE'S DECISION The Committee requested that the insession Working Group on Endorsement consider the proposal of the 17th Session of the FAO/WHO Coordinating Committee for Asia (CCASIA) on monopotassium tartrate (INS 336(i)) in the Regional Standard for Fermented Soybean Paste (CODEX STAN 298R- 2009). The Committee agreed that the proposed amendments to the Risk Analysis Principles Applied by the Codex Committee on Food Additives and the Codex Committee on Contaminants in Foods to address animal feed were not relevant to its work, that the present format of its risk analysis principles was adequate, and that there was no merit in reformatting or reviewing the principles at present. The Committee thus considered Activity 2.2 as completed. The Committee agreed that separate risk analysis principles for the CCFA and the CCCF were useful to allow the texts to develop independently in TINDAKAN MALAYSIA Makluman Keputusan berkaitan perkara ini akan dimaklumkan dalam Agenda 4(a) JKCK FA dan JKCK CAC perlu ambil perhatian perkara ini. Draft risk analysis principles yang khusus bagi CCFA akan didraf oleh pihak Sekretariat Codex berdasarkan format principles sedia ada dan akan dibincang di dalam Mesyuarat 44 th CCFA. Jika Malaysia masih berpendapat supaya format perlu mengikut struktur Working Principles, mungkin perlu memberi komen ke atas draf tersebut nanti. 3
Page 1: 1. Delegasi Malaysia Tiga (3) orang
Page 5 and 6: HIGHLIGHTS OF DISCUSSION Working Pr
Page 7 and 8: HIGHLIGHTS OF DISCUSSION and asked
Page 9 and 10: HIGHLIGHTS OF DISCUSSION Proposed d
Page 11 and 12: HIGHLIGHTS OF DISCUSSION Proposed D
Page 13 and 14: HIGHLIGHTS OF DISCUSSION what the r
Page 15 and 16: HIGHLIGHTS OF DISCUSSION They expla
Page 17 and 18: HIGHLIGHTS OF DISCUSSION The pWG ha
Page 19 and 20: HIGHLIGHTS OF DISCUSSION sweeteners
Page 21 and 22: HIGHLIGHTS OF DISCUSSION their rese
Page 23 and 24: HIGHLIGHTS OF DISCUSSION expressed
Page 25 and 26: HIGHLIGHTS OF DISCUSSION Verbal int
Page 27 and 28: HIGHLIGHTS OF DISCUSSION this sessi
Page 29 and 30: 2.2.6 PROVISIONS FOR ALUMINIUM CONT
Page 31 and 32: HIGHLIGHTS OF DISCUSSION Recommenda
Page 33 and 34: HIGHLIGHTS OF DISCUSSION the descri
Page 35 and 36: HIGHLIGHTS OF DISCUSSION The Commit
Page 37 and 38: HIGHLIGHTS OF DISCUSSION the use of
Page 39 and 40: HIGHLIGHTS OF DISCUSSION amendments
Page 41 and 42: standards. HIGHLIGHTS OF DISCUSSION
Page 43 and 44: 2.2.11 PROPOSED DRAFT REVISION OF T
Page 45 and 46: HIGHLIGHTS OF DISCUSSION analytical
Page 47 and 48: HIGHLIGHTS OF DISCUSSION Recommenda
Page 49 and 50: HIGHLIGHTS OF DISCUSSION The FAO JE
Page 51 and 52: HIGHLIGHTS OF DISCUSSION The Commit
Page 53 and 54:
JECFA. HIGHLIGHTS OF DISCUSSION The
Page 55 and 56:
2.2.17 OTHER BUSINESS AND FUTURE WO
show all

laporan bersama perwakilan malaysia - Food Safety and Quality ...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?