01.06.2013 Views

laporan bersama perwakilan malaysia - Food Safety and Quality ...

laporan bersama perwakilan malaysia - Food Safety and Quality ...

laporan bersama perwakilan malaysia - Food Safety and Quality ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

HIGHLIGHTS OF DISCUSSION<br />

what the reporting basis would be in that case noting that<br />

in the GSFA the reporting basis is “as tartaric acid” for<br />

consistency with the JECFA.<br />

COMMITTEE'S DECISION<br />

TINDAKAN MALAYSIA<br />

2.2.3 DISCUSSION PAPER ON FOOD ADDITIVE PROVISIONS IN THE STANDARD FOR INFANT FORMULAS<br />

AND FORMULA FOR SPECIAL MEDICAL PURPOSES (CODEX STAN 72-1981) (Agenda Item 4b)<br />

HIGHLIGHTS OF DISCUSSION<br />

(Documents: CX/ASIA 11/43/5, CRD 9 (Brazil, India,<br />

Indonesia, Kenya, Mali, Mexico, Peru, AIDGUM, IBFAN)<br />

The Committee recalled that the issue of food additives in the<br />

Codex St<strong>and</strong>ard for Infant Formula <strong>and</strong> Formulas for Special<br />

Medical Purposes (CODEX STAN 72-1981) had been on its<br />

agenda for some time. The 40th CCFA had given an initial reply<br />

to the three general questions of the CCNFSDU:<br />

(i) To which extent an ADI established by JECFA, whether<br />

numerical or not specified, applied to young infants<br />

below 12 weeks;<br />

(ii) What scientific principles should apply to the evaluation<br />

of additives intended for this population group; <strong>and</strong><br />

(iii) Whether the establishment of an ADI in itself was<br />

sufficient or whether other issues had to be addressed.<br />

Following further requests for clarification from the CCNFSDU,<br />

the 42 nd CCFA had asked the Delegation of Switzerl<strong>and</strong> to<br />

prepare a discussion paper on the questions.<br />

The Delegation of Switzerl<strong>and</strong> introduced the document<br />

explaining the background of the questions <strong>and</strong> the rationale for<br />

the proposed recommendations, which were in line with the<br />

reply given at the 40 th Session <strong>and</strong> based on the current Codex<br />

framework <strong>and</strong> JECFA guidance (Annex 3 of the report from the<br />

15th meeting of JECFA (TRS 488, 1971) as well as guidance in<br />

COMMITTEE'S DECISION<br />

The Committee agreed with the two main<br />

recommendations of the discussion paper:<br />

(i) That the principle that was discussed<br />

<strong>and</strong> proposed by JECFA in 1971 <strong>and</strong><br />

subsequently implemented by the Codex<br />

Alimentarius Commission when adopting<br />

st<strong>and</strong>ards for baby food remains valid:<br />

“Baby foods should be prepared without<br />

food additives whenever possible.<br />

Where the use of a food additive<br />

becomes necessary in baby foods, great<br />

caution should be exercised regarding<br />

both the choice of additive <strong>and</strong> its level<br />

of use.” (Annex 3 of TRS 488);<br />

(ii) Proposals for the inclusion of an<br />

additive in Codex st<strong>and</strong>ards for foods<br />

intended for infants below 12 weeks of<br />

age require a separate evaluation by<br />

JECFA since for additives used in foods<br />

for this population the toxicological<br />

investigations should be more extensive<br />

<strong>and</strong> include evidence of safety to young<br />

TINDAKAN<br />

MALAYSIA<br />

JKCK FA dan JKCK<br />

NFSDU perlu ambil<br />

perhatian perkara ini<br />

13

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!