laporan bersama perwakilan malaysia - Food Safety and Quality ...
laporan bersama perwakilan malaysia - Food Safety and Quality ...
laporan bersama perwakilan malaysia - Food Safety and Quality ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
HIGHLIGHTS OF DISCUSSION<br />
what the reporting basis would be in that case noting that<br />
in the GSFA the reporting basis is “as tartaric acid” for<br />
consistency with the JECFA.<br />
COMMITTEE'S DECISION<br />
TINDAKAN MALAYSIA<br />
2.2.3 DISCUSSION PAPER ON FOOD ADDITIVE PROVISIONS IN THE STANDARD FOR INFANT FORMULAS<br />
AND FORMULA FOR SPECIAL MEDICAL PURPOSES (CODEX STAN 72-1981) (Agenda Item 4b)<br />
HIGHLIGHTS OF DISCUSSION<br />
(Documents: CX/ASIA 11/43/5, CRD 9 (Brazil, India,<br />
Indonesia, Kenya, Mali, Mexico, Peru, AIDGUM, IBFAN)<br />
The Committee recalled that the issue of food additives in the<br />
Codex St<strong>and</strong>ard for Infant Formula <strong>and</strong> Formulas for Special<br />
Medical Purposes (CODEX STAN 72-1981) had been on its<br />
agenda for some time. The 40th CCFA had given an initial reply<br />
to the three general questions of the CCNFSDU:<br />
(i) To which extent an ADI established by JECFA, whether<br />
numerical or not specified, applied to young infants<br />
below 12 weeks;<br />
(ii) What scientific principles should apply to the evaluation<br />
of additives intended for this population group; <strong>and</strong><br />
(iii) Whether the establishment of an ADI in itself was<br />
sufficient or whether other issues had to be addressed.<br />
Following further requests for clarification from the CCNFSDU,<br />
the 42 nd CCFA had asked the Delegation of Switzerl<strong>and</strong> to<br />
prepare a discussion paper on the questions.<br />
The Delegation of Switzerl<strong>and</strong> introduced the document<br />
explaining the background of the questions <strong>and</strong> the rationale for<br />
the proposed recommendations, which were in line with the<br />
reply given at the 40 th Session <strong>and</strong> based on the current Codex<br />
framework <strong>and</strong> JECFA guidance (Annex 3 of the report from the<br />
15th meeting of JECFA (TRS 488, 1971) as well as guidance in<br />
COMMITTEE'S DECISION<br />
The Committee agreed with the two main<br />
recommendations of the discussion paper:<br />
(i) That the principle that was discussed<br />
<strong>and</strong> proposed by JECFA in 1971 <strong>and</strong><br />
subsequently implemented by the Codex<br />
Alimentarius Commission when adopting<br />
st<strong>and</strong>ards for baby food remains valid:<br />
“Baby foods should be prepared without<br />
food additives whenever possible.<br />
Where the use of a food additive<br />
becomes necessary in baby foods, great<br />
caution should be exercised regarding<br />
both the choice of additive <strong>and</strong> its level<br />
of use.” (Annex 3 of TRS 488);<br />
(ii) Proposals for the inclusion of an<br />
additive in Codex st<strong>and</strong>ards for foods<br />
intended for infants below 12 weeks of<br />
age require a separate evaluation by<br />
JECFA since for additives used in foods<br />
for this population the toxicological<br />
investigations should be more extensive<br />
<strong>and</strong> include evidence of safety to young<br />
TINDAKAN<br />
MALAYSIA<br />
JKCK FA dan JKCK<br />
NFSDU perlu ambil<br />
perhatian perkara ini<br />
13