laporan bersama perwakilan malaysia - Food Safety and Quality ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

HIGHLIGHTS OF DISCUSSION Regional Standard for Fermented Soybean Paste (CODEX STAN 298R-2009) Verbal Intervention “Malaysia supports the endorsement of maximum level 1000mg/kg monopotassium tartrate (INS 336(i)) in the Regional Standard for Fermented Soybean Paste” Questions to the CCASIA The Committee requested the CCASIA to consider whether: i) In the proposed Draft Regional Standard for Chili Sauce Other tartrates, included in the JECFA ADI, could be used as acidity regulators, singly or in combination and what the reporting basis would be in that case noting that in the GSFA the reporting basis is “as tartaric acid” for consistency with the JECFA; Other phosphates, included in the JECFA ADI could be used as acidity regulators, singly or in combination and what the reporting basis would be in that case; Methyl para-hydroxybenzoate (INS 218) should be listed as para-hydroxybenzoates (INS 214, 218) in line with the practice of the GSFA to establish food additive maximum levels based on all additives included in the JECFA ADI; and Sodium saccharin (INS954(iv)) should be listed as saccharins (INS 954(i), 954(ii), 954 (iii), 954(iv)), in line with the practice of the GSFA to establish food additive maximum levels based on all additives included in the JECFA ADI. ii) In the Regional Standard for Fermented Soybean Paste Other tartrates, included in the JECFA ADI, could be used as acidity regulators, singly or in combination and COMMITTEE'S DECISION The Committee endorsed the provision for monopotassium tartrate (INS 336(i)) in the Regional Standard for Fermented Soybean Paste, as proposed by the CCASIA. TINDAKAN MALAYSIA JKCK ASIA, JKCK FA dan JKCK CAC perlu ambil perhatian perkara ini. JKCK ASIA dan JKCK FA perlu ambil perhatian perkara ini. 12
HIGHLIGHTS OF DISCUSSION what the reporting basis would be in that case noting that in the GSFA the reporting basis is “as tartaric acid” for consistency with the JECFA. COMMITTEE'S DECISION TINDAKAN MALAYSIA 2.2.3 DISCUSSION PAPER ON FOOD ADDITIVE PROVISIONS IN THE STANDARD FOR INFANT FORMULAS AND FORMULA FOR SPECIAL MEDICAL PURPOSES (CODEX STAN 72-1981) (Agenda Item 4b) HIGHLIGHTS OF DISCUSSION (Documents: CX/ASIA 11/43/5, CRD 9 (Brazil, India, Indonesia, Kenya, Mali, Mexico, Peru, AIDGUM, IBFAN) The Committee recalled that the issue of food additives in the Codex Standard for Infant Formula and Formulas for Special Medical Purposes (CODEX STAN 72-1981) had been on its agenda for some time. The 40th CCFA had given an initial reply to the three general questions of the CCNFSDU: (i) To which extent an ADI established by JECFA, whether numerical or not specified, applied to young infants below 12 weeks; (ii) What scientific principles should apply to the evaluation of additives intended for this population group; and (iii) Whether the establishment of an ADI in itself was sufficient or whether other issues had to be addressed. Following further requests for clarification from the CCNFSDU, the 42 nd CCFA had asked the Delegation of Switzerland to prepare a discussion paper on the questions. The Delegation of Switzerland introduced the document explaining the background of the questions and the rationale for the proposed recommendations, which were in line with the reply given at the 40 th Session and based on the current Codex framework and JECFA guidance (Annex 3 of the report from the 15th meeting of JECFA (TRS 488, 1971) as well as guidance in COMMITTEE'S DECISION The Committee agreed with the two main recommendations of the discussion paper: (i) That the principle that was discussed and proposed by JECFA in 1971 and subsequently implemented by the Codex Alimentarius Commission when adopting standards for baby food remains valid: “Baby foods should be prepared without food additives whenever possible. Where the use of a food additive becomes necessary in baby foods, great caution should be exercised regarding both the choice of additive and its level of use.” (Annex 3 of TRS 488); (ii) Proposals for the inclusion of an additive in Codex standards for foods intended for infants below 12 weeks of age require a separate evaluation by JECFA since for additives used in foods for this population the toxicological investigations should be more extensive and include evidence of safety to young TINDAKAN MALAYSIA JKCK FA dan JKCK NFSDU perlu ambil perhatian perkara ini 13
Page 1 and 2: 1. Delegasi Malaysia Tiga (3) orang
Page 3 and 4: 2.2.2 MATTERS REFERRED BY THE CODEX
Page 5 and 6: HIGHLIGHTS OF DISCUSSION Working Pr
Page 7 and 8: HIGHLIGHTS OF DISCUSSION and asked
Page 9 and 10: HIGHLIGHTS OF DISCUSSION Proposed d
Page 11: HIGHLIGHTS OF DISCUSSION Proposed D
Page 15 and 16: HIGHLIGHTS OF DISCUSSION They expla
Page 17 and 18: HIGHLIGHTS OF DISCUSSION The pWG ha
Page 19 and 20: HIGHLIGHTS OF DISCUSSION sweeteners
Page 21 and 22: HIGHLIGHTS OF DISCUSSION their rese
Page 23 and 24: HIGHLIGHTS OF DISCUSSION expressed
Page 25 and 26: HIGHLIGHTS OF DISCUSSION Verbal int
Page 27 and 28: HIGHLIGHTS OF DISCUSSION this sessi
Page 29 and 30: 2.2.6 PROVISIONS FOR ALUMINIUM CONT
Page 31 and 32: HIGHLIGHTS OF DISCUSSION Recommenda
Page 33 and 34: HIGHLIGHTS OF DISCUSSION the descri
Page 35 and 36: HIGHLIGHTS OF DISCUSSION The Commit
Page 37 and 38: HIGHLIGHTS OF DISCUSSION the use of
Page 39 and 40: HIGHLIGHTS OF DISCUSSION amendments
Page 41 and 42: standards. HIGHLIGHTS OF DISCUSSION
Page 43 and 44: 2.2.11 PROPOSED DRAFT REVISION OF T
Page 45 and 46: HIGHLIGHTS OF DISCUSSION analytical
Page 47 and 48: HIGHLIGHTS OF DISCUSSION Recommenda
Page 49 and 50: HIGHLIGHTS OF DISCUSSION The FAO JE
Page 51 and 52: HIGHLIGHTS OF DISCUSSION The Commit
Page 53 and 54: JECFA. HIGHLIGHTS OF DISCUSSION The
Page 55 and 56: 2.2.17 OTHER BUSINESS AND FUTURE WO

laporan bersama perwakilan malaysia - Food Safety and Quality ...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?