01.06.2013 Views

Mid-Term Review of the AGIR Programme - Sida

Mid-Term Review of the AGIR Programme - Sida

Mid-Term Review of the AGIR Programme - Sida

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

A N N E X 3 – I N C E P T I O N R E P O R T<br />

“strategic direction <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> organisation” and to support and facilitate linkages and<br />

knowledge sharing between CSOs. 46<br />

The total funding available for <strong>the</strong> <strong>AGIR</strong> programme is 405,200.00 SEK over a five<br />

(5) year period. Emerging out <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> dialogue surrounding <strong>the</strong> production <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> document<br />

“Guidelines : The Swedish Embassy’s Support to Mozambican Civil Society<br />

Organisations” (2009), three INGOs were initially identified as having ongoing programmes<br />

in <strong>the</strong> <strong>the</strong>matic areas that coincided with <strong>the</strong> Embassy’s cooperation strategy.<br />

Each <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se three ‘intermediary’ INGOs – Oxfam Novib, IBIS and Diakonia –<br />

were approached in mid - 2009 (a fourth INGO SCC was added in 2011) 47 and encouraged<br />

to submit proposals in line with <strong>the</strong> “support modalities outlined in <strong>the</strong><br />

guidelines” and falling within <strong>the</strong> <strong>the</strong>matic focus areas or “clusters”.<br />

While each <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> intermediary organisations work in different <strong>the</strong>matic areas, <strong>the</strong>re<br />

are “strong joint features”. While considered as ‘sub-components’ within <strong>the</strong> larger<br />

<strong>AGIR</strong> programme <strong>the</strong> commonalities shared by <strong>the</strong> intermediaries include “(i) <strong>the</strong><br />

establishment <strong>of</strong> a division <strong>of</strong> labour between <strong>the</strong> three organisations, between and<br />

within <strong>the</strong> <strong>the</strong>matic “clusters”; (ii) <strong>the</strong> development <strong>of</strong> a joint program results framework<br />

as well as definition <strong>of</strong> joint capacity development activities; (iii) a joint MOU<br />

that regulates <strong>the</strong> interaction between <strong>the</strong> three partners; and (iv) definitions on how<br />

to coordinate work around <strong>the</strong> Paris agenda and to streng<strong>the</strong>n linkages between each<br />

o<strong>the</strong>rs’ CSO partners.” 48<br />

The funding for <strong>the</strong> <strong>AGIR</strong> programme is structured through different agreements with<br />

IBIS, Oxfam Novib, Diakonia and SCC, each implementing <strong>the</strong> following ‘subprograms:<br />

Access to information – IBIS<br />

Financial accountability; participation, social and legal accountability with focus<br />

on underlying causes <strong>of</strong> discrimination – Oxfam Novib<br />

Political accountability; participation, social and legal accountability with focus<br />

on <strong>the</strong> legal aspects <strong>of</strong> human rights – Diakonia<br />

Social accountability in natural resource management – SCC<br />

46 Streng<strong>the</strong>ning Civil Society – Enhancing Democratic Governance, p.5, 2010. <strong>Sida</strong>.<br />

47 The Swedish Cooperative Center (SCC) started up in 2011, one year later than <strong>the</strong> three original<br />

intermediaries. The initial agreement was with <strong>the</strong> intermediaries <strong>of</strong> Diakonia, IBIS, Oxfam. (SCC was<br />

not in mentioned in <strong>the</strong> initial programme proposals, but <strong>the</strong> area within which SCC works was mentioned<br />

as an area that was to be added – Social Accountability in Natural Resource Management).<br />

According to SCC, <strong>the</strong>ir late entry into <strong>the</strong> programme has to do with <strong>the</strong> fact that an important criteria<br />

for <strong>AGIR</strong> partners is that <strong>the</strong>ir programme and partners should have a national perspective, whereas<br />

SCC has primarily worked in a local perspective with local partners. O<strong>the</strong>r intermediary organisations<br />

have also challenged <strong>Sida</strong>’s centralised perspective, which according to <strong>the</strong> intermediary organisations<br />

has led to an opening for local dimensions in <strong>the</strong> programme.<br />

48 Streng<strong>the</strong>ning Civil Society – Enhancing Democratic Governance, p.5, 2010. <strong>Sida</strong>.<br />

90

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!