Mid-Term Review of the AGIR Programme - Sida

More documents

Recommendations

Info

A N N E X 2 – T E R M S O F R E F E R E N C E Work plan and schedule The evaluation shall start no later than 2012-08-01. The final report should be submitted to the Embassy of Sweden no later than 2012-10-15. In their tender, the consultants should submit a draft overall time plan. A detailed work and time plan should be presented at the beginning of the assignment. Reporting The final report should not exceed 30 pages (excluding annexes) and should be submitted electronically. The report should be written in English and should include an executive summary in English and Portuguese. The final report must be presented in a way that enables publication without further editing, which means that it must for example be adequately proof-read. The format and outline of the report should, to the extent possible, follow the guidelines in the Sida Evaluation Manual. The Evaluation team should be available for a presentation and discussion seminar with the donors and intermediaries (and possibly selected partner organisations) at the end of the assignment. Qualifications of the Evaluation team The assignment should be carried out by a team of one or more international expert(s) and one or more national expert(s) familiar with the context and fluent in Portuguese (and possibly other local languages). One of the evaluators should be team leader with overall responsibility for the whole evaluation. The evaluators should be independent of the evaluated activities and have no stake in the outcome of the evaluation. The consultants shall submit CVs that document the following required qualifications: 1. International expert - Relevant academic background - Extensive relevant professional experience from development cooperation in the areas of democracy, accountability, human rights, national resource management and/or civil society support. - Extensive experience in evaluating projects/programmes within international development cooperation in the areas mentioned above. Experience of Sida evaluations is an asset. - Fluency in written and spoken English. Knowledge of Portuguese is a great asset. 2. National expert - Relevant academic background - Extensive relevant professional experience from development cooperation in the areas of democracy, accountability, human rights, natural resource management and/or civil society support. 83
A N N E X 2 – T E R M S O F R E F E R E N C E - Extensive experience in evaluating projects/programmes within international development cooperation in the areas mentioned above. Experience of Sida evaluations is an asset. - Fluency in written and spoken Portuguese. Knowledge of other local languages is an asset. 84
Page 1:
2013:3 Kevin Kelpin Vibe Johnsen Jo
Page 4 and 5:
Authors: Kevin Kelpin, Vibe Johnsen
Page 6 and 7:
Abbreviations and Acronyms AAAJC Pa
Page 8 and 9:
Preface This evaluation of AGIR (Ac
Page 10 and 11:
E X E C U T I V E S U M M A R Y The
Page 12 and 13:
E X E C U T I V E S U M M A R Y CSO
Page 14 and 15:
E X E C U T I V E S U M M A R Y imp
Page 16 and 17:
E X E C U T I V E S U M M A R Y eff
Page 18 and 19:
E X E C U T I V E S U M M A R Y iv)
Page 20 and 21:
E X E C U T I V E S U M M A R Y act
Page 22 and 23:
E X E C U T I V E S U M M A R Y ges
Page 24 and 25:
E X E C U T I V E S U M M A R Y des
Page 26 and 27:
1 I N T R O D U C T I O N ited numb
Page 28 and 29:
1 I N T R O D U C T I O N 1.2 EVALU
Page 30 and 31:
1 I N T R O D U C T I O N Field Vis
Page 32 and 33:
1 I N T R O D U C T I O N aftermath
Page 34 and 35:
2 F I N D I N G S tendency for the
Page 36 and 37: 2 F I N D I N G S ganisations work.
Page 38 and 39: 2 F I N D I N G S jor reason for th
Page 40 and 41: 2 F I N D I N G S This observation
Page 42 and 43: 2 F I N D I N G S 2.3.4 AGIR CSO Pa
Page 44 and 45: 2 F I N D I N G S gender policy, -
Page 46 and 47: 2 F I N D I N G S The mid-term revi
Page 48 and 49: 2 F I N D I N G S 2.4 EFFECTIVENESS
Page 50 and 51: 2 F I N D I N G S be relevant for t
Page 52 and 53: 2 F I N D I N G S the AGIR programm
Page 54 and 55: 2 F I N D I N G S production and qu
Page 56 and 57: 2 F I N D I N G S 2.5 IMPACT OF AGI
Page 58 and 59: 2 F I N D I N G S number of positio
Page 60 and 61: 2 F I N D I N G S Accountability o
Page 62 and 63: 2 F I N D I N G S Through campaign
Page 64 and 65: 2 F I N D I N G S offices, since th
Page 66 and 67: 2 F I N D I N G S Akilizetho has a
Page 68 and 69: 2 F I N D I N G S political partici
Page 70 and 71: 2 F I N D I N G S support the capac
Page 72 and 73: 2 F I N D I N G S The sustained par
Page 74 and 75: 3 C O N C L U S I O N S AGIR progr
Page 76 and 77: 2 findings 4 Recommendations The ke
Page 78 and 79: 4 R E C O M M E N D A T I O N S Ma
Page 80 and 81: 4 R E C O M M E N D A T I O N S rea
Page 82 and 83: A N N E X 1 - A G I R P A R T N E R
Page 84 and 85: A N N E X 2 - T E R M S O F R E F E
Page 88 and 89: 2 findings Annex 3 - Inception Repo
Page 90 and 91: A N N E X 3 - I N C E P T I O N R E
Page 106 and 107: 2 findings Annex 4 - Documents Revi
Page 108 and 109: A N N E X 4 - D O C U M E N T S R E
Page 116 and 117: A N N E X 5 - P E O P L E I N T E R
Page 118: Mid-Term Review of the AGIR Program
show all

Mid-Term Review of the AGIR Programme - Sida

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?