jbgotmar
jbgotmar
jbgotmar
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
326 NOTES TO PAGES 190–194<br />
More oxford books @ www.OxfordeBook.com<br />
Sixties: the Conservative Capture of the GOP (Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina<br />
Press, 1995), 1; Maurice Isserman and Michael Kazin, America Divided: the Civil War of<br />
the 1960s (New York: Oxford University Press, 2000), 206; David Farber and Jeff Roche,<br />
The Conservative Sixties (New York: Peter Lang, 2003), 2–3; Rick Perlstein, Before the<br />
Storm: Barry Goldwater and the Unmaking of the American Consensus (New York: Hill<br />
and Wang, 2001).<br />
3. See Alex McDonald, introduction to Edward Bellamy, Looking Backward 2000–<br />
1887, ed. Alex McDonald (Ontario: Broadview Literary Texts, 2003).<br />
4. Barry Goldwater to AR, May 11, 1960, ARP 043–05A, and AR to Barry Goldwater,<br />
June 4, 1960, ARP 043–05A, Letters, 565–72.<br />
5. Barry Goldwater to AR, June 10, 1960, ARP 043–05A.<br />
6. Ayn Rand, “JFK: High Class Beatnik,” Human Events, September 1, 1960, 393.<br />
7. There was also the class that Rand frankly called “human ballast,” who mindlessly<br />
followed whichever of the three was ascendant. Ayn Rand, For the New Intellectual (New<br />
York: New American Library, 1961), 20.<br />
8. Webster’s Third New International Dictionary of English Language, Unabridged<br />
defi nes “altruism” as “uncalculated consideration of, regard for, or devotion to others’<br />
interests sometimes in accordance with an ethical principle.” Rand’s use of Comte’s defi -<br />
nition is debated in Robert L. Campbell, “Altruism in Auguste Comte and Ayn Rand,”<br />
and Robert H. Bass, “Egoism versus Rights,” Journal of Ayn Rand Studies 7, no. 2 (2006):<br />
357–69.<br />
9. Rand, For the New Intellectual, 11, 45.<br />
10. Sidney Hook, “Each Man for Himself,” New York Times Book Review, April 9, 1961,<br />
3, 28. Other negative reviews of For the New Intellectual are Charles Frederick Schroder,<br />
“Ayn Rand: Far Right Prophetess,” Christian Century, December 13, 1961,1493–95; James<br />
Collins, “State of the Question: Ayn Rand’s Talent for Getting Headlines,” America,<br />
July 29, 1961, 569; “Born Eccentric,” Newsweek, March 27, 1961, 104; Joel Rosenblum, “The<br />
Ends and Means of Ayn Rand,” New Republic, April 24, 1961, 28–29; Bruce Goldberg,<br />
“Ayn Rand’s For the New Intellectual,” New Individualist Review, November 1961, 17–24.<br />
For the New Intellectual went through fi ve hardcover editions in the fi rst year and was<br />
issued in a fi rst paperback printing of two hundred thousand.<br />
11. Gore Vidal, “Two Immoralists: Orville Prescott and Ayn Rand,” in Rocking the<br />
Boat (Boston: Little, Brown, 1962), 232, reprinted from Esquire, July 1961.<br />
12. Daniel Bell ed., The New American Right (New York: Criterion, 1955) and The<br />
Radical Right, 3rd ed. (1963; New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction, 2002). Once dominant,<br />
this interpretation is now universally acknowledged to reveal more about the views of<br />
midcentury liberal historians than the conservatives they analyzed. See Michael Paul<br />
Rogin, The Intellectuals and McCarthy: The Radical Specter (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press,<br />
1967); Alan Brinkley, “The Problem of American Conservatism,” American Historical<br />
Review 99, no. 2 (1994): 409–29.<br />
13. The centrality of the rebel identity to postwar society, and conservatism specifi -<br />
cally, is explored in Grace Hale, Rebel, Rebel: Why We Love Outsiders and the Effects of<br />
This Romance on Postwar American Culture and Politics (New York: Oxford University<br />
Fore more urdu books visit www.4Urdu.com