31.05.2013 Views

jbgotmar

jbgotmar

jbgotmar

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

242<br />

WHO IS JOHN GALT? 1957–1968<br />

More oxford books @ www.OxfordeBook.com<br />

conversation and counseling, so painful and taxing to Rand, had been<br />

a pretense and a ruse to distract her from his deceptions. In the meantime,<br />

NBI had grown from a small lecture series to a national institution.<br />

Nathan had become famous and wealthy speaking in Rand’s name. He<br />

had a book contract with her publisher and a therapy practice fi lled with<br />

followers of her philosophy. As Rand saw it, he passed himself off as John<br />

Galt or Howard Roark—but was worse than any villain she could have<br />

conjured. The public face of Objectivism and the one who would carry<br />

her legacy forward was nothing more than a contemptible second-hander,<br />

unable to practice the principles he preached. He had struck deeply at<br />

Rand’s heart and her philosophy, and made a mockery of both.<br />

In the days after Nathan’s confession, Rand moved swiftly to dismantle<br />

his businesses and strip him of all association with her and<br />

Objectivism. She sent her lawyer to demand that he sign over control of<br />

The Objectivist to her and deed NBI to Barbara. By week’s end she was no<br />

longer speaking to Barbara either because she had attempted to defend<br />

Nathan against Rand’s onslaught. Now Rand insisted that NBI be dismantled<br />

altogether. Word of the crisis spread rapidly through Objectivist<br />

circles. Nathan appeared, ashen-faced, before his staff and announced<br />

his resignation, explaining that he had committed grave moral wrongs<br />

and Rand had justifi ably severed their relationship. Rumors fl ew wildly.<br />

New Yorkers willing to hear the gossip quickly divined the full story of<br />

Nathan and Rand’s affair and its aftermath. 64<br />

In the NBI offi ces factions quickly emerged. Some Objectivists found<br />

the situation absurd and refused to repudiate Nathan without more<br />

information about his transgressions. Others were willing to take Rand<br />

at her word. Leonard Peikoff emerged as Rand’s staunchest defender,<br />

asking rhetorically if anyone “could possibly believe that the author<br />

of Atlas Shrugged had done anything fundamentally wrong.” Nathan<br />

quickly found himself isolated and alone, with Barbara his only prominent<br />

supporter. Over the years his arrogant reign over NBI and his aura<br />

of superiority had created a deep reservoir of resentment. Now he was<br />

shunned by some of his closest friends and relatives. 65 He and Barbara<br />

began the dreary work of liquidating NBI, splitting the leftover money<br />

between them.<br />

The coup de grâce came in the next issue of The Objectivist, published<br />

in October but datelined May. In a letter addressed “To Whom It May<br />

Fore more urdu books visit www.4Urdu.com

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!