31.05.2013 Views

jbgotmar

jbgotmar

jbgotmar

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

More oxford books @ www.OxfordeBook.com<br />

LOVE IS EXCEPTION MAKING 237<br />

of being gay, always reminding myself that gay was ‘irrational.’ ” 54 If<br />

Objectivism was a religion to some people, it was a notably dogmatic<br />

and confi ning one. Led to Rand by a quest for answers and a need for<br />

certainty, her followers could fi nd themselves locked into the system she<br />

had created.<br />

The presence of Rand, a charismatic personality, was enough to tip<br />

Objectivism into quasi-religious territory, but Objectivism was also easy<br />

to abuse because of its very totalizing structure. There were elements<br />

deep within the philosophy that encouraged its dogmatic and coercive<br />

tendencies. Although Rand celebrated independence, the content of her<br />

thought became subsumed by its structure, which demanded consistency<br />

and excluded any contradictory data deriving from experience or<br />

emotion. Rand denied any pathway of knowledge that did not derive<br />

from rational, conscious thought and did not lead to the conclusions<br />

she had syllogistically derived. Thus Objectivism could translate quickly<br />

into blind obeisance to Rand. One former Objectivist remembered, “If<br />

you think to yourself, I have to be able to go by rational arguments, and<br />

you’re unable to refute them, then you’re really in a bind, which is where<br />

we all were.” At NBI balls dozens of women appeared in slinky, oneshouldered<br />

gowns, like Dagny wore in Atlas Shrugged. When Ayn and<br />

Frank purchased a new piece of furniture, the Objectivist dining table<br />

became all the rage. 55<br />

Roy Childs, an active Objectivist and later advocate for anarchocapitalism,<br />

remembered that many did not simply read Atlas Shrugged but<br />

were “dominated” by it. Rand’s fan letters refl ected this truth. “Your philosophy<br />

has affected me to such a depth that I can longer think outside<br />

its context, nor can I picture myself in any other activity, save the discussion<br />

of it,” one man wrote to her. Another college student reported<br />

cheerfully, “About a month ago I noticed how much I was talking about<br />

your books to my teachers and classmates. As a result of my enthusiasm<br />

I have lost two friends. I am beginning to realize how unimportant<br />

these people are. 56 Just as her fans mimicked Rand’s language and<br />

rhetorical structures, so too could they come to imitate her psychology,<br />

including the rejection of friends who did not measure up to Objectivist<br />

standards. Principled schisms and breaks were commonplace in the<br />

Objectivist subculture as fans followed Rand’s cues about proper human<br />

relationships.<br />

Fore more urdu books visit www.4Urdu.com

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!