31.05.2013 Views

jbgotmar

jbgotmar

jbgotmar

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

More oxford books @ www.OxfordeBook.com<br />

LOVE IS EXCEPTION MAKING 225<br />

values; to deem her unattractive was to reject her on the deepest level.<br />

Yet Nathan was still an Objectivist, still considered Rand a genius. He<br />

could fi nd no way to reconcile his esteem for Rand with the seeming<br />

contradiction that he no longer wished to be her lover. Even worse, how<br />

could he value the young and winsome Patrecia over her? What did that<br />

say about him?<br />

Nathan’s problems were compounded by his development of Objectivist<br />

psychology, which denied the autonomy and importance of emotions.<br />

Working with the base materials of Rand’s novels, Nathan<br />

constructed an airtight model of the psyche that downgraded emotions<br />

to a subordinate position. Rand trumpeted her distrust of emotion in<br />

almost all her writing. In For the New Intellectual she declared, “Emotions<br />

are not tools of cognition,” a statement that would resurface repeatedly<br />

in all Objectivist writing. To Rand an emotion “tells you nothing about<br />

reality” and could never be “proof” of anything. In his radio speech Galt<br />

declares, “Any emotion that clashes with your reason, any emotion that<br />

you cannot explain or control, is only the carcass of that stale thinking<br />

which you forbade your mind to revise.” 25 It was Rand’s loss that her primary<br />

intellectual collaborator did little to broaden her outlook, shake<br />

her loose from her inherent emotional repression, or introduce her to<br />

the teachings of modern psychology. Instead, captive to Rand’s mind<br />

since meeting her almost twenty years before at age nineteen, Nathan<br />

pushed her philosophical ideas into the realm of psychology, with devastating<br />

results.<br />

Nathan saw Objectivism’s deviation from the accumulated wisdom of<br />

psychology as evidence of pathbreaking innovation, rather than a denial<br />

of widely recognized human truth. Unlike all other schools of psychology,<br />

Branden boasted, Objectivism did not “regard desires and emotions<br />

as irreducible primaries, as the given.” Rather, emotions sprang<br />

from thought and “are the product of the thinking [a man] has done<br />

or has failed to do.” 26 Therefore, the way to handle painful or unpleasant<br />

emotions was to uncover and change the thinking that had created<br />

them. Objectivist psychotherapy was not unusual in its rational investigation<br />

of emotional patterns. What made Nathan’s form of therapy<br />

truly destructive was its emphasis on judgment, another inheritance<br />

from Rand. The emotions that Objectivist therapy uncovered were to be<br />

judged and changed rather than accepted and understood. Objectivist<br />

Fore more urdu books visit www.4Urdu.com

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!