31.05.2013 Views

jbgotmar

jbgotmar

jbgotmar

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

208<br />

WHO IS JOHN GALT? 1957–1968<br />

More oxford books @ www.OxfordeBook.com<br />

the political realities unfolding on the ground. The violence and unrest<br />

of 1964, including the Watts riot, stoked racial anxieties. Goldwater had<br />

staked out his territory as an opponent of the Democratic approach to<br />

civil rights; whether he liked it or not, he was becoming a central fi gure<br />

in the political clash over integration and desegregation, and these<br />

issues, far more than capitalism, underlay his political fortunes.<br />

An eager booster of Goldwater up to his triumphant nomination at<br />

San Francisco’s Cow Palace, Rand became disillusioned as he moved<br />

into the general election. It was the same mistake Willkie had made.<br />

Goldwater began to retreat from his pro-capitalist stance, repackaging<br />

himself as a moderate who could appeal to a broad swath of voters.<br />

Afterward Rand dissected his campaign angrily: “There was no discussion<br />

of capitalism. There was no discussion of statism. There was no discussion<br />

of the blatantly vulnerable record of the government’s policies<br />

in the last thirty years. There was no discussion. There were no issues.”<br />

A month before the election Rand warned her readers that Goldwater<br />

was moving toward defeat, and she urged them to prepare for the “bitter<br />

disappointment.” Perhaps hoping to reverse the tide, as the campaign<br />

drew to a close Rand sent him a speech to be used without attribution. 46<br />

Her speech, like her letter to Goldwater, recast conservatism along purely<br />

economic lines, celebrating the power of the free market. The campaign,<br />

by now past the point of rescue, ignored her contribution.<br />

In truth Goldwater faced a nearly impossible task. He was running<br />

against the master politician Lyndon Baines Johnson, who pulled the<br />

mantle of the deceased John F. Kennedy close around his shoulders. And<br />

Goldwater’s irreverent, shoot-from-the hip, folksy style, so attractive to<br />

straight-talking libertarians, was a huge liability. Caricatured as a racist<br />

fanatic who would drag the United States into nuclear war, Goldwater<br />

lost by a landslide in the general election. Besides Arizona the only states<br />

he won were in the Deep South, fi lled with the very southern Democrats<br />

Rand cited to disprove his racism. Yet Goldwater’s decisive defeat held<br />

within it the seeds of political transformation, for his positions had<br />

made the Republican Party nationally competitive in the South for the<br />

fi rst time since the Civil War. It was an augury of the fi rst national political<br />

realignment since FDR’s New Deal. 47<br />

“It’s earlier than we think,” Rand told the New York Times the day<br />

after Goldwater’s loss. Advocates of capitalism had to “start from<br />

Fore more urdu books visit www.4Urdu.com

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!