31.05.2013 Views

jbgotmar

jbgotmar

jbgotmar

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

148<br />

More oxford books @ www.OxfordeBook.com<br />

FROM NOVELIST TO PHILOSOPHER, 1944–1957<br />

since the rise of scientifi c naturalism. 38 What differentiated Objectivism<br />

was its ambition. Rather than simply reassert the idea of objective and<br />

transcendent truth, a project supported by a host of other neo- Aristotelian<br />

thinkers, Rand attempted at the same time to vindicate a controversial<br />

and infl ammatory transvaluation of values that contradicted the basic<br />

teachings of Western religion and ethics.<br />

The scope of her project awed her young followers, who considered<br />

her a thinker of world-historical signifi cance. In her ideas they found a<br />

“round universe,” a completely comprehensible, logical world. Rand’s<br />

focus on reason led her to declare that paradoxes and contradictions<br />

were impossible. Thought, she explained, was a cycle of moving from<br />

abstract premises to concrete objects and events: “The cycle is unbreakable;<br />

no part of it can be of any use, until and unless the cycle is completed.”<br />

39 Therefore a premise and a conclusion could never clash, unless<br />

an irrational thought process had been employed. Nor could emotions<br />

and thoughts be at odds, Rand asserted. Emotions came from thought,<br />

and if they contradicted reality, then the thought underlying them was<br />

irrational and should be changed. Indeed even a person’s artistic and<br />

sexual preferences sprang from his or her basic philosophical premises,<br />

Rand taught the Collective.<br />

It was all adding up to one integrated system. Man was a rational<br />

creature who used his mind to survive. The rational faculty required<br />

independence and individuality to operate properly; therefore an ethics<br />

of selfi shness was appropriate for rational men. Any moral or ethical<br />

problem could be approached from this perspective. Was a person<br />

acting independently? Were his or her actions based on reason and<br />

consistent with his or her premises? That was the true determinant of<br />

right, Rand taught. Even more than her fi ction or the chance to befriend<br />

a famous author, Rand’s philosophy bound the Collective to her. She<br />

struck them all as a genius without compare. On Saturday nights they<br />

argued and debated the fi ne points and applications, but never questioned<br />

the basics Rand outlined. During these marathon sessions, Rand<br />

was indefatigable, often talking until the morning light. The Collective<br />

marveled at how the opportunity to talk philosophy rejuvenated her,<br />

even after a long day of writing. The obvious was also the unthinkable.<br />

To keep up with her younger followers, Rand fed herself a steady stream<br />

of amphetamines. 40<br />

Fore more urdu books visit www.4Urdu.com

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!