31.05.2013 Views

jbgotmar

jbgotmar

jbgotmar

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

118<br />

More oxford books @ www.OxfordeBook.com<br />

FROM NOVELIST TO PHILOSOPHER, 1944–1957<br />

implicit praise of equality as a social good was a particular sore spot.<br />

When Friedman and Stigler refused to alter their text, Read inserted a<br />

critical footnote, stating, “Even from the standpoint of those who put<br />

equality above justice and liberty, rent controls are the height of folly.”<br />

His willingness to publish a pamphlet he disliked indicated the paucity of<br />

libertarian intellectual resources at the time. That two economists with<br />

legitimate academic positions would take a public stand against rent<br />

control was enough to ensure FEE’s support. Still, the whole episode was<br />

problematic. In addition to incurring Rand’s wrath the pamphlet alienated<br />

Friedman and Stigler, who were deeply offended by Read’s unauthorized<br />

footnote. For many years they refused any collaboration with<br />

FEE or Read, until fi nally reconciling through their mutual connection<br />

to the Mont Pelerin Society. For her part, Rand felt betrayed by Read’s<br />

failure to understand the principles at stake in their work and wounded<br />

by his disregard for their “ghost” agreement. 47<br />

Only weeks later Read added insult to injury when he sent Rand<br />

a sheaf of anonymous comments on her short article, “Textbook of<br />

Americanism.” Rand had written the piece for The Vigil, the offi cial publication<br />

of the Motion Picture Alliance for the Preservation of American<br />

Ideals, the Hollywood anti-Communist group that had recruited her to<br />

its board. “Textbook” was a very brief piece that included her fi rst published<br />

discussion of rights. Written in the style of a catechism, the piece<br />

defi ned a right as “the sanction of independent action.” Rand offered<br />

a secular defense of natural rights, which were “granted to man by the<br />

fact of his birth as a man—not by an act of society.” Paramount in the<br />

“Textbook” was the noninitiation principle, the idea that “no man has<br />

the right to initiate the use of physical force against another man” (she<br />

capitalized the entire phrase for emphasis). 48 The noninitiation principle,<br />

sometimes called the nonaggression principle, can be traced to<br />

thinkers as varied as Thomas Aquinas, John Locke, and Herbert Spencer.<br />

Placing it at the center of her natural rights theory, Rand breathed new<br />

life into an old idea.<br />

At Rand’s urging, Read shared the “Textbook of Americanism” with<br />

the FEE staff and selected donors, all “men high in the country’s business<br />

and academic life.” The principle of noninitiation in particular<br />

appealed viscerally to Read. But most FEE friends were less enthusiastic.<br />

Rand had not spelled out or defended her basic premises, and much<br />

Fore more urdu books visit www.4Urdu.com

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!