31.05.2013 Views

jbgotmar

jbgotmar

jbgotmar

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

More oxford books @ www.OxfordeBook.com<br />

INDIVIDUALISTS OF THE WORLD, UNITE! 45<br />

own, but could be granted or withheld by the masses whom he served.<br />

In her novel Wynand would illustrate this principle, with his failings<br />

contrasted starkly to Roark’s independence and agency.<br />

Her villain, Ellsworth Toohey, promised to transform Rand’s supposedly<br />

nonpolitical novel into a sharp satire on the leftist literary culture<br />

of 1930s New York. One evening she and Frank reluctantly accompanied<br />

two friends to a talk by the British socialist Harold Laski at the leftist<br />

New School for Social Research. When Laski took the stage Rand was<br />

thrilled. Here was Ellsworth Toohey himself! She scribbled frantically in<br />

her notebook, sketching out a brief picture of Laski’s face and noting his<br />

every tic and mannerism. She and Frank went back twice more in the<br />

following evenings.<br />

Most of Rand’s notes on Laski’s lecture, and her resultant description<br />

of Toohey, showcased her distaste for all things feminine. Rand was<br />

repelled by the women in the New School audience, whom she characterized<br />

as sexless, unfashionable, and unfeminine. She and Frank scoffed<br />

at their dowdy lisle stockings, trading snide notes back and forth. Rand<br />

was infuriated most by the “intellectual vulgarity” of the audience,<br />

who seemed to her half-wits unable to comprehend the evil of Laski’s<br />

socialism. What could be done about such a “horrible, horrible, horrible”<br />

spectacle, besides “perhaps restricting higher education, particularly<br />

for women?” she asked in her notes on the lecture. This misogyny<br />

rubbed off on Rand’s portrait of Toohey, who was insipidly feminine,<br />

prone to gossip, and maliciously catty “in the manner of a woman or<br />

a nance.” Through Toohey, Rand would code leftism as fey, effeminate,<br />

and unnatural, as opposed to the rough-hewn masculinity of Roark’s<br />

individualism. 19<br />

Before she saw Laski, Toohey was an abstracted antithesis of Roark.<br />

But a socialist intellectual fi t her purposes just as well, even as the characterization<br />

shifted the novel ever closer to a commentary on current<br />

events. Laski was not the sole inspiration, for Rand also used bits of<br />

the American critics Heywood Broun, Lewis Mumford, and Clifton<br />

Fadiman to round out Toohey’s persona. Fitting Toohey so squarely<br />

into the leftist literary culture signaled Rand’s emerging dual purposes<br />

for the book and ensured that when it was fi nally published, the<br />

novel would be understood as a political event as much as a literary<br />

achievement.<br />

Fore more urdu books visit www.4Urdu.com

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!