30.05.2013 Views

A5V4d

A5V4d

A5V4d

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Feverish illness in children<br />

Table 5.18 GRADE profile for evaluation of cough<br />

Number<br />

of<br />

studies<br />

Cough<br />

68<br />

Number<br />

of<br />

children<br />

Sensitivity<br />

(95%<br />

confidence<br />

interval)<br />

Specificity<br />

(95%<br />

confidence<br />

interval)<br />

Positive<br />

predictive<br />

value<br />

(95%<br />

confidence<br />

interval)<br />

For detecting pneumonia, urinary tract infection, or bacteraemia<br />

1 (Craig,<br />

2010)<br />

12,807 58 (55 to<br />

61) a<br />

For detecting urinary tract infection<br />

1<br />

(Newma<br />

n, 2002)<br />

46 (46 to 47)<br />

a<br />

1666 1 (0 to 2) a 98 (98 to 99)<br />

a<br />

For detecting meningococcal disease<br />

1<br />

(Nielsen,<br />

2001)<br />

208<br />

15 (4 to 27)<br />

a<br />

63 (55 to 70)<br />

a<br />

Negative<br />

predictive<br />

value<br />

(95%<br />

confidence<br />

interval)<br />

8 (7 to 8) a 93 (93 to<br />

94) a<br />

4 (0 to 11) a 90 (89 to<br />

92) a<br />

9 (2 to 15) a 76 (69 to<br />

83) a<br />

Positive<br />

likelihood<br />

ratio<br />

(95%<br />

confidence<br />

interval)<br />

1.1 (1.0 to<br />

1.1) a<br />

0.4 (0.1 to<br />

2.7) a<br />

0.4 (0.2 to<br />

0.9) a<br />

NA Not applicable<br />

a Calculated by a member of the technical team at the NCC-WCH based on results reported in the study<br />

Table 5.19 GRADE profile for evaluation of poor feeding<br />

Number<br />

of<br />

studies<br />

Poor intake<br />

Number<br />

of<br />

children<br />

Sensitivity<br />

(95%<br />

confidence<br />

interval)<br />

For detecting serious bacterial infection<br />

1<br />

(Bleeker,<br />

2001)<br />

Poor feeding<br />

231 36 (29 to<br />

44) a<br />

For detecting serious disease<br />

1<br />

(Nademi<br />

, 2001)<br />

141 78 (65 to<br />

90)<br />

For detecting serious bacterial infection<br />

1 (Shin,<br />

2009)<br />

Decreased feeding<br />

221 27 (13 to<br />

40) a<br />

For detecting urinary tract infection<br />

1<br />

(Newma<br />

n, 2002)<br />

1666 37 (29 to<br />

44) a<br />

Specificity<br />

(95%<br />

confidence<br />

interval)<br />

74 (63 to 85)<br />

a<br />

Positive<br />

predictive<br />

value<br />

(95%<br />

confidence<br />

interval)<br />

81 (72 to<br />

90) a<br />

43 (33 to 52) 36 (25 to<br />

45)<br />

63 (56 to 70)<br />

a<br />

63 (60 to 65)<br />

a<br />

15 (7 to 23)<br />

a<br />

Negative<br />

predictive<br />

value<br />

(95%<br />

confidence<br />

interval)<br />

28 (21 to<br />

35) a<br />

83 (72 to<br />

92)<br />

78 (71 to<br />

85) a<br />

9 (7 to 12) a 90 (88 to<br />

92) a<br />

Positive<br />

likelihood<br />

ratio<br />

(95%<br />

confidence<br />

interval)<br />

1.4 (0.9 to<br />

2.3) a<br />

1.4 (1.1 to<br />

1.7) a<br />

0.7 (0.4 to<br />

1.2) a<br />

1.0 (0.8 to<br />

1.2) a<br />

a Calculated by a member of the technical team at the NCC-WCH based on results reported in the study<br />

Negative<br />

likelihood<br />

ratio<br />

(95%<br />

confidence<br />

interval)<br />

0.9 (0.9 to<br />

1.0) a<br />

1.0 (1.0 to<br />

1.0) a<br />

1.3 (1.1 to<br />

1.6) a<br />

Negative<br />

likelihood<br />

ratio<br />

(95%<br />

confidence<br />

interval)<br />

0.9 (0.7 to<br />

1.0) a<br />

0.5 (0.3 to<br />

0.9) a<br />

1.2 (0.9 to<br />

1.4) a<br />

1.0 (0.9 to<br />

1.1) a<br />

Quality<br />

Moderate <br />

Moderate<br />

Very<br />

low<br />

Quality<br />

Very<br />

low<br />

Very<br />

low<br />

Low<br />

Low

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!