30.05.2013 Views

A5V4d

A5V4d

A5V4d

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Table 5.42 – evaluation of tenderness on examination<br />

Table 5.43 – evaluation of urinary symptoms<br />

Table 5.44 – evaluation of abnormal ear, nose and throat signs<br />

Table 5.45 – evaluation of rigors and/or chills<br />

Table 5.46 – evaluation of Yale Observation Scale<br />

Table 5.47 – comparison of Yale Observation Scores<br />

Table 5.3 GRADE profile for evaluation of colour<br />

Number<br />

of<br />

studies<br />

Number<br />

of<br />

children<br />

Sensitivity<br />

(95%<br />

confidence<br />

interval)<br />

Specificity<br />

(95%<br />

confidence<br />

interval)<br />

Colour (cyanotic or pale or flushed/mottled)<br />

For detecting serious bacterial infection<br />

1<br />

(Berger,<br />

1996)<br />

138 36<br />

(20 to 53) a<br />

For detecting urinary tract infection<br />

1<br />

(Newma<br />

n, 2002)<br />

1666 9<br />

(5 to 14) a<br />

40<br />

(31 to 49) a<br />

92<br />

(90 to 93) a<br />

Positive<br />

predictive<br />

value<br />

(95%<br />

confidence<br />

interval)<br />

16<br />

(8 to 24) a<br />

11<br />

(6 to 16) a<br />

Clinical assessment of the child with fever<br />

Negative<br />

predictive<br />

value<br />

(95%<br />

confidence<br />

interval)<br />

67<br />

(55 to 78) a<br />

90<br />

(89 to 92) a<br />

Positive<br />

likelihood<br />

ratio<br />

(95%<br />

confidence<br />

interval)<br />

0.6<br />

(0.4 to 1.0) a<br />

1.1<br />

(0.7 to 1.8) a<br />

a Calculated by a member of the technical team at the NCC-WCH based on results reported in the study<br />

Table 5.4 GRADE profile for evaluation of social cues<br />

Number<br />

of<br />

studies<br />

Number<br />

of<br />

children<br />

Sensitivity<br />

(95%<br />

confidence<br />

interval)<br />

Decreased social interaction<br />

For detecting urinary tract infection<br />

1<br />

(Newma<br />

n, 2002)<br />

1666 24<br />

(17 to 30) a<br />

Specificity<br />

(95%<br />

confidence<br />

interval)<br />

74<br />

(71 to 76) a<br />

Positive<br />

predictive<br />

value<br />

(95%<br />

confidence<br />

interval)<br />

9<br />

(6 to 11) a<br />

Negative<br />

predictive<br />

value<br />

(95%<br />

confidence<br />

interval)<br />

90<br />

(88 to 92) a<br />

Positive<br />

likelihood<br />

ratio<br />

(95%<br />

confidence<br />

interval)<br />

0.9<br />

(0.7 to 1.2) a<br />

a Calculated by a member of the technical team at the NCC-WCH based on results reported in the study<br />

Negative<br />

likelihood<br />

ratio<br />

(95%<br />

confidence<br />

interval)<br />

1.6<br />

(1.1 to 2.3) a<br />

1.0<br />

(0.9 to 1.0) a<br />

Negative<br />

likelihood<br />

ratio<br />

(95%<br />

confidence<br />

interval)<br />

1.0<br />

(0.9 to 1.1) a<br />

Quality<br />

Low<br />

Low<br />

Quality<br />

Low<br />

57<br />

2013 Update

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!