A5V4d
A5V4d
A5V4d
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Parental concern<br />
Introduction<br />
It is clear that febrile illnesses continue to have a considerable impact on childhood mortality and<br />
morbidity. This impact is reflected in the concerns of parents and carers. Several authors have<br />
conducted surveys of parents’ responses to acute illness in their children and found that fever, cough<br />
and the possibility of meningitis were parents’ primary concerns when their children became acutely ill<br />
(Kai, 1996; Hugenholtz et al, 2009). Parents reported that they experienced high levels of worry when<br />
their children were ill, and had particular concerns that the presence of fever might herald potential<br />
harm. Parents also had anxieties relating to the outcome of fever, believing that it could indicate<br />
serious illness such as meningitis. They were fearful that fever itself could damage their children and<br />
could also result in fits which they believed would result in permanent brain damage and even death.<br />
This concern, which can lead to what has been described as fever phobia (Karwowska et al, 2002), is<br />
quite widespread and tends to increase with the height of temperature, rapid onset and duration of<br />
fever (Enarson et al, 2012). Additionally, it is important to recognise that fear of fever among parents<br />
can be influenced by ethnicity and cultural beliefs. These, compounded with concerns parents have<br />
for their children’s well-being and the need for reassurance, often prompt parents to request care from<br />
both primary and secondary healthcare services (Hugenholtz et al, 2009; Taveras et al, 2004; Sands<br />
et al, 2011).<br />
In scientific terms, fever is a natural response to infection and is not harmful in itself. Instead, it is the<br />
underlying infection that has the potential to cause harm. Indeed, there are some theoretical grounds<br />
to suggest that fever is beneficial in the body’s response to infection. In any event, it is clear that<br />
parents and carers could receive more useful advice about feverish illness from healthcare<br />
professionals as well as recognition that their concerns are valid. This could include information about<br />
detecting potential serious infections, how to manage fever appropriately at home and when to seek<br />
further advice (Taveras et al, 2004; Kai, 1996).<br />
Need for guidance<br />
It is a requirement of the Children’s National Service Framework that all ill children should have<br />
access to high-quality, cost-effective, evidence-based care. 15 Because it is difficult to evaluate the<br />
severity of the illness, there is a need for evidence-based guidance to inform healthcare professionals<br />
about how to judge whether a child who presents with a fever is likely to develop a serious illness.<br />
Healthcare professionals also need advice to support their decision on whether to observe the child,<br />
perform diagnostic tests, start treatment such as antibiotics or refer onwards for specialist care. The<br />
guidance should also include advice on the best ways to detect fever, the management of fever itself,<br />
and what to tell parents and carers who have made contact with healthcare services. The guidance<br />
should be applicable to primary and secondary care and should take account of the number of<br />
agencies that are involved in giving health care and giving advice to parents and carers. It is also<br />
important that parental preferences, as well as the child’s best interests in terms of health outcomes,<br />
should be taken into account when considering the various options for investigation and treatment.<br />
Need for 2013 update<br />
The decision to update the guideline was made based on deveopments in the NHS and new evidence<br />
becoming available that could affect existing recommendations.<br />
The introduction of new vaccination programmes in the UK may have significantly reduced the level of<br />
admissions to hospital resulting from diseases covered by this guideline. For example, early analysis<br />
of the pneumococcal vaccination programme in England shows that the incidence of pneumococcal<br />
related disease has fallen 98% in children younger than 2 years since vaccination was introduced.<br />
However, evidence suggests a 68% increase in the prevalence of disease caused by sub-types of<br />
bacteria not covered by vaccination programmes. Also, potentially serious cases of feverish illness<br />
are likely to be rare, so it is important that information is in place to help healthcare professionals<br />
distinguish these from mild cases.<br />
29<br />
2013 Update