A5V4d
A5V4d
A5V4d
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Health economics<br />
pathways for children with medical problems reduce invasive investigations, and lead to more<br />
appropriate treatment and reduced time spent in accident and emergency (A&E) services. 246<br />
GDG justification of the 2 hour waiting time for an urgent referral<br />
An important feature of this clinical guideline on children with feverish illness is the introduction of a<br />
‘traffic light’ system to identify children with varying degrees of risk of serious illness. The guideline<br />
makes clear recommendations on which children are unlikely to require medical attention beyond<br />
information and reassurance (children with ‘green’ features) and who can thus be confidently<br />
managed at home. The guideline identifies children who require an urgent face-to-face consultation<br />
with a healthcare professional (‘red’) and those who may require a face-to-face consultation or require<br />
a healthcare ‘safety net’ to be put in place (‘amber’).<br />
Because of the limited information that can be obtained from a remote assessment, the GDG<br />
originally recommended that all children with ‘red’ or ‘amber’ features should be referred for urgent<br />
face-to-face assessment. The GDG felt it was necessary to make a recommendation on the maximum<br />
time a child should have to wait to be first assessed by a healthcare professional if they were<br />
classified as requiring an urgent consultation during a remote assessment. The aim of this was to<br />
recommend a time frame within which action taken will make a difference to the outcome for the child.<br />
Despite an extensive search of the published and grey literature, no clinical data could be identified to<br />
define this limit. The GDG debated the issue among themselves and decided that it was such an<br />
important question that wider consensus was required. Accordingly, the question went out as part of<br />
the Delphi consultation exercise as agreed in the guideline methods protocol. A high level of<br />
agreement was reached for a maximum wait of 2 hours following referral for urgent face-to-face<br />
assessment (83% agreement). 2 hours was chosen as one of the time periods for the Delphi exercise<br />
because it is an existing Department of Health standard for urgent referrals for out-of-hours health<br />
care. 247<br />
It was recognised by the GDG that children with one or more ‘amber’ signs included children who may<br />
not require an urgent referral. It was agreed to make a recommendation on specific waiting times only<br />
for children with ‘red’ features, and to recommend that a child with one or more ‘amber’ features is<br />
seen face-to-face by a healthcare professional, but that the timing of the consultation for these<br />
children could be carried out within a longer time frame which could be based on the clinical<br />
judgement of the person carrying out the initial remote assessment.<br />
The GDG believes that a 2 hour maximum wait for an urgent consultation does not represent an uplift<br />
in care and is a cost-effective use of NHS resources. The reasons for this conclusion are outlined<br />
here. First, there is audit data to suggest that this is already accepted routine practice for children at a<br />
high risk of SBI. Second, the GDG strongly believes that a wait longer than 2 hours could potentially<br />
increase mortality and morbidity. Finally, the GDG believes that by using a traffic light system to<br />
classify children according to their risk of having a serious illness, healthcare professionals will have a<br />
clearer indication as to which children do genuinely require an assessment by a healthcare<br />
professional within 2 hours. By excluding the children with ‘green’ features and most of the children<br />
with ‘amber’ features from this urgent referral group, the GDG believes the number of children who<br />
are referred for a face-to-face assessment by a healthcare professional within 2 hours will be<br />
reduced.<br />
Evidence was presented to the GDG to show that the Department of Health has already set a national<br />
standard for response to urgent calls as part of the National Quality Requirements in the Delivery of<br />
Out-of-Hours Services. 247 This specifies a maximum 2 hour wait for a face-to face urgent consultation<br />
for out-of-hours care: ‘Face-to-face consultations (whether in a centre or in the patient’s place of<br />
residence) must be started within the following timescales, after the definitive clinical assessment has<br />
been completed:<br />
Emergency: Within 1 hour.<br />
Urgent: Within 2 hours.<br />
Less urgent: Within 6 hours’.<br />
257