30.05.2013 Views

A5V4d

A5V4d

A5V4d

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Health economics<br />

pathways for children with medical problems reduce invasive investigations, and lead to more<br />

appropriate treatment and reduced time spent in accident and emergency (A&E) services. 246<br />

GDG justification of the 2 hour waiting time for an urgent referral<br />

An important feature of this clinical guideline on children with feverish illness is the introduction of a<br />

‘traffic light’ system to identify children with varying degrees of risk of serious illness. The guideline<br />

makes clear recommendations on which children are unlikely to require medical attention beyond<br />

information and reassurance (children with ‘green’ features) and who can thus be confidently<br />

managed at home. The guideline identifies children who require an urgent face-to-face consultation<br />

with a healthcare professional (‘red’) and those who may require a face-to-face consultation or require<br />

a healthcare ‘safety net’ to be put in place (‘amber’).<br />

Because of the limited information that can be obtained from a remote assessment, the GDG<br />

originally recommended that all children with ‘red’ or ‘amber’ features should be referred for urgent<br />

face-to-face assessment. The GDG felt it was necessary to make a recommendation on the maximum<br />

time a child should have to wait to be first assessed by a healthcare professional if they were<br />

classified as requiring an urgent consultation during a remote assessment. The aim of this was to<br />

recommend a time frame within which action taken will make a difference to the outcome for the child.<br />

Despite an extensive search of the published and grey literature, no clinical data could be identified to<br />

define this limit. The GDG debated the issue among themselves and decided that it was such an<br />

important question that wider consensus was required. Accordingly, the question went out as part of<br />

the Delphi consultation exercise as agreed in the guideline methods protocol. A high level of<br />

agreement was reached for a maximum wait of 2 hours following referral for urgent face-to-face<br />

assessment (83% agreement). 2 hours was chosen as one of the time periods for the Delphi exercise<br />

because it is an existing Department of Health standard for urgent referrals for out-of-hours health<br />

care. 247<br />

It was recognised by the GDG that children with one or more ‘amber’ signs included children who may<br />

not require an urgent referral. It was agreed to make a recommendation on specific waiting times only<br />

for children with ‘red’ features, and to recommend that a child with one or more ‘amber’ features is<br />

seen face-to-face by a healthcare professional, but that the timing of the consultation for these<br />

children could be carried out within a longer time frame which could be based on the clinical<br />

judgement of the person carrying out the initial remote assessment.<br />

The GDG believes that a 2 hour maximum wait for an urgent consultation does not represent an uplift<br />

in care and is a cost-effective use of NHS resources. The reasons for this conclusion are outlined<br />

here. First, there is audit data to suggest that this is already accepted routine practice for children at a<br />

high risk of SBI. Second, the GDG strongly believes that a wait longer than 2 hours could potentially<br />

increase mortality and morbidity. Finally, the GDG believes that by using a traffic light system to<br />

classify children according to their risk of having a serious illness, healthcare professionals will have a<br />

clearer indication as to which children do genuinely require an assessment by a healthcare<br />

professional within 2 hours. By excluding the children with ‘green’ features and most of the children<br />

with ‘amber’ features from this urgent referral group, the GDG believes the number of children who<br />

are referred for a face-to-face assessment by a healthcare professional within 2 hours will be<br />

reduced.<br />

Evidence was presented to the GDG to show that the Department of Health has already set a national<br />

standard for response to urgent calls as part of the National Quality Requirements in the Delivery of<br />

Out-of-Hours Services. 247 This specifies a maximum 2 hour wait for a face-to face urgent consultation<br />

for out-of-hours care: ‘Face-to-face consultations (whether in a centre or in the patient’s place of<br />

residence) must be started within the following timescales, after the definitive clinical assessment has<br />

been completed:<br />

Emergency: Within 1 hour.<br />

Urgent: Within 2 hours.<br />

Less urgent: Within 6 hours’.<br />

257

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!