A5V4d
A5V4d
A5V4d
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Total undiscounted 10-year cost<br />
(without staff costs)<br />
Model of infrared sensing thermometer (tympanic)<br />
TB-100 (thermo Buddy) First Temp. Genius<br />
£1,312,001 £843,716<br />
Discounted at 3.5% £930,102 £598,126<br />
Comparison of costs of axilla and tympanic measurement<br />
Health economics<br />
Table 11.5 shows the combined results for all types of thermometer used in axilla and tympanic<br />
measurement. It indicates that the relative cost of each type of thermometer changes depending on<br />
whether an expensive or a cheap model is used and whether staff time is included in the cost, as the<br />
time required to read the temperature is an important driver of total cost.<br />
Conclusions<br />
The cost analysis undertaken here is based on the use of thermometers on a ward of an acute<br />
hospital. The study 85 on which this analysis is based suggests that staff time is an important driver in<br />
determining which thermometer should be used. The analysis presented here supports this<br />
hypothesis. The 10 year cost of a (high- and low-priced) thermometer including staff time includes<br />
ranges between approximately £600,000 and £1,000,000 for all types of thermometers, except for the<br />
single-use chemical thermometer which is far more expensive. The analysis incorporates a number of<br />
assumptions about time to reading for accurate measurements, but it suggests that the initial<br />
purchase price of thermometers can be misleading as the total cost of using a specific model of<br />
thermometer depends on the number of uses, the cost of consumables and the staff time needed to<br />
make an accurate reading. Clearly different clinical settings will give different results and may change<br />
the relative cost between thermometers, making it more cost-effective to choose one type of<br />
thermometer in a low-volume clinical setting and another in a high-volume setting. This analysis<br />
shows that those in charge of purchasing thermometers need to consider staff costs and<br />
consumables as well as initial purchase price when considering bulk purchases.<br />
Table 11.5 10 year costs by thermometer, with and without staff costs, discounted at 3.5%: summary results for<br />
both axilla and tympanic measurements<br />
Minimum priced<br />
model (with staff<br />
costs)<br />
Maximum priced<br />
model (with staff<br />
costs)<br />
Minimum priced<br />
model (without<br />
staff costs)<br />
Maximum priced<br />
model (without<br />
staff costs)<br />
10 year cost by type of thermometer<br />
Chemical<br />
(single use)<br />
Chemical<br />
(reusable)<br />
Electronic<br />
contact<br />
Compact<br />
contact<br />
electronic<br />
Infrared sensing<br />
(tympanic)<br />
£12,856,243 £12,260,326 £758,535 £4,137,153 £1,064,403<br />
£14,724,244 £688,596 a £1,005,780 £877,437 a £732,427 a<br />
£769,177 £173,260 £834,153 £108,131 £930,102<br />
£2,637,178 £371,899 £737,178 £541,865 £598,126<br />
a Indicates a lower total discounted 10 year cost than the least expensive version of the model due either to higher cost of staff<br />
time or consumables.<br />
249