30.05.2013 Views

A5V4d

A5V4d

A5V4d

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Total undiscounted 10-year cost<br />

(without staff costs)<br />

Model of infrared sensing thermometer (tympanic)<br />

TB-100 (thermo Buddy) First Temp. Genius<br />

£1,312,001 £843,716<br />

Discounted at 3.5% £930,102 £598,126<br />

Comparison of costs of axilla and tympanic measurement<br />

Health economics<br />

Table 11.5 shows the combined results for all types of thermometer used in axilla and tympanic<br />

measurement. It indicates that the relative cost of each type of thermometer changes depending on<br />

whether an expensive or a cheap model is used and whether staff time is included in the cost, as the<br />

time required to read the temperature is an important driver of total cost.<br />

Conclusions<br />

The cost analysis undertaken here is based on the use of thermometers on a ward of an acute<br />

hospital. The study 85 on which this analysis is based suggests that staff time is an important driver in<br />

determining which thermometer should be used. The analysis presented here supports this<br />

hypothesis. The 10 year cost of a (high- and low-priced) thermometer including staff time includes<br />

ranges between approximately £600,000 and £1,000,000 for all types of thermometers, except for the<br />

single-use chemical thermometer which is far more expensive. The analysis incorporates a number of<br />

assumptions about time to reading for accurate measurements, but it suggests that the initial<br />

purchase price of thermometers can be misleading as the total cost of using a specific model of<br />

thermometer depends on the number of uses, the cost of consumables and the staff time needed to<br />

make an accurate reading. Clearly different clinical settings will give different results and may change<br />

the relative cost between thermometers, making it more cost-effective to choose one type of<br />

thermometer in a low-volume clinical setting and another in a high-volume setting. This analysis<br />

shows that those in charge of purchasing thermometers need to consider staff costs and<br />

consumables as well as initial purchase price when considering bulk purchases.<br />

Table 11.5 10 year costs by thermometer, with and without staff costs, discounted at 3.5%: summary results for<br />

both axilla and tympanic measurements<br />

Minimum priced<br />

model (with staff<br />

costs)<br />

Maximum priced<br />

model (with staff<br />

costs)<br />

Minimum priced<br />

model (without<br />

staff costs)<br />

Maximum priced<br />

model (without<br />

staff costs)<br />

10 year cost by type of thermometer<br />

Chemical<br />

(single use)<br />

Chemical<br />

(reusable)<br />

Electronic<br />

contact<br />

Compact<br />

contact<br />

electronic<br />

Infrared sensing<br />

(tympanic)<br />

£12,856,243 £12,260,326 £758,535 £4,137,153 £1,064,403<br />

£14,724,244 £688,596 a £1,005,780 £877,437 a £732,427 a<br />

£769,177 £173,260 £834,153 £108,131 £930,102<br />

£2,637,178 £371,899 £737,178 £541,865 £598,126<br />

a Indicates a lower total discounted 10 year cost than the least expensive version of the model due either to higher cost of staff<br />

time or consumables.<br />

249

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!