A5V4d
A5V4d
A5V4d
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Management by remote assessment<br />
The traffic light system would encourage the referral of children with ‘red’ features for<br />
urgent assessment while discouraging the referral of the much larger number of children<br />
with ‘green’ features and most children with ‘amber’ features.<br />
2 hours is an existing standard for referral for face-to-face assessment by out-of-hours<br />
providers and NHS Direct. *<br />
Fewer than 3% children undergoing remote assessment are likely to have ‘red’ features.<br />
At present a greater proportion of children with fever undergoing assessment by NHS<br />
Direct* are referred for urgent consultation.<br />
GDG translation<br />
The GDG recognised that remote assessment of symptoms and signs can be difficult as the quality of<br />
the information provided can vary.<br />
However, some children will need an immediate assessment in view of the serious nature of the<br />
symptoms or combination of symptoms reported.<br />
Other children will need an urgent face-to-face review by a healthcare professional who can examine<br />
the child.<br />
The GDG felt it was not appropriate to identify individual symptoms as immediately life threatening<br />
because healthcare professionals will need to make a judgment in individual cases, based on the<br />
overall picture described.<br />
As a result of stakeholder feedback and to ensure clarity of the recommendation, the GDG made the<br />
decision to combine the recommendation about which children should have an urgent face-to-face<br />
assessment and the recommendation about the time frame within which that assessment should take<br />
place into a single recommendation.<br />
The GDG recognised that owing to the limitations of remote assessment, some children who are not<br />
seriously ill will be referred for urgent face-to-face assessment based on symptoms reported but not<br />
subsequently confirmed on examination. Nevertheless, the health economic analysis suggested that<br />
the recommendation of a 2 hour limit for urgent assessment could save lives and would not present<br />
an undue burden to the health service.<br />
The GDG recognised that there have been no prognostic or validation studies on the predictive value<br />
of symptoms reported to remote assessors in children with feverish illness. It was therefore decided to<br />
call for research in this area.<br />
Recommendations<br />
Number Recommendation<br />
Management according to risk of serious illness<br />
33 Healthcare professionals performing a remote assessment of a child with fever<br />
should seek to identify symptoms and signs of serious illness and specific diseases<br />
as described in chapter 5 and summarised in tables 5.2 and 5.63. [2007]<br />
34 Children whose symptoms or combination of symptoms suggest an immediately lifethreatening<br />
illness (see recommendation 7) should be referred immediately for<br />
emergency medical care by the most appropriate means of transport (usually 999<br />
ambulance). [2007]<br />
35 Children with any ‘red’ features but who are not considered to have an immediately<br />
life-threatening illness should be urgently assessed by a healthcare professional in a<br />
face-to-face setting within 2 hours. [2007]<br />
* Please note that this service will be replaced by NHS 111, which is due to be implemented nationally in 2013.<br />
143