30.05.2013 Views

A5V4d

A5V4d

A5V4d

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Management by remote assessment<br />

The traffic light system would encourage the referral of children with ‘red’ features for<br />

urgent assessment while discouraging the referral of the much larger number of children<br />

with ‘green’ features and most children with ‘amber’ features.<br />

2 hours is an existing standard for referral for face-to-face assessment by out-of-hours<br />

providers and NHS Direct. *<br />

Fewer than 3% children undergoing remote assessment are likely to have ‘red’ features.<br />

At present a greater proportion of children with fever undergoing assessment by NHS<br />

Direct* are referred for urgent consultation.<br />

GDG translation<br />

The GDG recognised that remote assessment of symptoms and signs can be difficult as the quality of<br />

the information provided can vary.<br />

However, some children will need an immediate assessment in view of the serious nature of the<br />

symptoms or combination of symptoms reported.<br />

Other children will need an urgent face-to-face review by a healthcare professional who can examine<br />

the child.<br />

The GDG felt it was not appropriate to identify individual symptoms as immediately life threatening<br />

because healthcare professionals will need to make a judgment in individual cases, based on the<br />

overall picture described.<br />

As a result of stakeholder feedback and to ensure clarity of the recommendation, the GDG made the<br />

decision to combine the recommendation about which children should have an urgent face-to-face<br />

assessment and the recommendation about the time frame within which that assessment should take<br />

place into a single recommendation.<br />

The GDG recognised that owing to the limitations of remote assessment, some children who are not<br />

seriously ill will be referred for urgent face-to-face assessment based on symptoms reported but not<br />

subsequently confirmed on examination. Nevertheless, the health economic analysis suggested that<br />

the recommendation of a 2 hour limit for urgent assessment could save lives and would not present<br />

an undue burden to the health service.<br />

The GDG recognised that there have been no prognostic or validation studies on the predictive value<br />

of symptoms reported to remote assessors in children with feverish illness. It was therefore decided to<br />

call for research in this area.<br />

Recommendations<br />

Number Recommendation<br />

Management according to risk of serious illness<br />

33 Healthcare professionals performing a remote assessment of a child with fever<br />

should seek to identify symptoms and signs of serious illness and specific diseases<br />

as described in chapter 5 and summarised in tables 5.2 and 5.63. [2007]<br />

34 Children whose symptoms or combination of symptoms suggest an immediately lifethreatening<br />

illness (see recommendation 7) should be referred immediately for<br />

emergency medical care by the most appropriate means of transport (usually 999<br />

ambulance). [2007]<br />

35 Children with any ‘red’ features but who are not considered to have an immediately<br />

life-threatening illness should be urgently assessed by a healthcare professional in a<br />

face-to-face setting within 2 hours. [2007]<br />

* Please note that this service will be replaced by NHS 111, which is due to be implemented nationally in 2013.<br />

143

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!