30.05.2013 Views

A5V4d

A5V4d

A5V4d

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Clinical assessment of the child with fever<br />

Given the quality of the evidence, the GDG members were of the clinical opinion that children with<br />

pale/mottled/ashen/blue skin were not being incorrectly categorised as in the ‘red’ category. The GDG<br />

decided that there was no reason to change or remove this sign from the traffic light table.<br />

Activity<br />

Not responding normally to social cues or no response to social cues (included in 2007<br />

traffic light table)<br />

‘Activity’ was included in the 2007 traffic light as part of the YOS.<br />

The 2013 review found evidence to support assessing activity level at presentation. The reported<br />

evidence showed that children with decreased social interaction were not more likely to have a urinary<br />

tract infection than children with normal social interaction (not a strong positive likelihood ratio).<br />

Children without a urinary tract infection often showed decreased social interaction (low specificity).<br />

Children with a urinary tract infection did not usually show decreased social interaction (low<br />

sensitivity). The evidence was of low quality.<br />

The GDG acknowledged that it would be helpful to define ‘social cues’ for parents, caregivers or less<br />

experienced healthcare professionals. The glossary of the guideline has been updated to outline that<br />

this can include the parents’ perception of a baby behaving differently, response to their name,<br />

smiling and/or giggling.<br />

The GDG chose to keep decreased activity in the ‘amber’ column as the evidence did not support<br />

movement into the ‘red’ category based on definitions used in the study. If the decreased activity is<br />

severe, healthcare professionals may use their clinical judgement of ‘appears ill to a healthcare<br />

professional’ to manage the child appropriately. Therefore, no change was made to the traffic light<br />

table.<br />

Appears ill to a healthcare professional (included in 2007 traffic light table) and<br />

parents/carers<br />

‘Appears ill to a healthcare professional’ was included in the 2007 traffic light table as part of the YOS.<br />

The 2013 review supported the results of the 2007 review. The results of the studies were mixed, with<br />

some studies showing that children who appeared unwell were not more likely to have a serious<br />

illness than those who appeared well (not a strong positive likelihood ratio), and other studies showing<br />

that children who appeared unwell were more likely to have a serious illness (convincing positive<br />

likelihood ratio).<br />

The GDG members acknowledged that being ‘very ill’ was more predictive than ‘appears ill’. However,<br />

they were aware that it is hard to distinguish between the two terms. The majority of studies reporting<br />

this sign did not define ‘appears ill’, and those that did used a combination of symptoms and signs<br />

that are presented elsewhere in the traffic light table. As there was no separate data available on<br />

parent/carer reports of ‘appears ill’, the GDG decided that that no recommendation could be made<br />

specifically on parent/carer reports of ‘appears ill’. However, the GDG highlighted that parent/carer<br />

reports of fever and other specific symptoms were covered by other recommendations in the<br />

guideline.<br />

Based on their expert opinion, the GDG members noted that ‘appears ill to a healthcare professional’<br />

can be subjective and difficult to define. Therefore, the GDG concluded that for this sign, the definition<br />

of ‘healthcare professional’ should be restricted to those who are trained in assessing children, for<br />

example GPs, specialist nurses and paediatricians. The GDG members concluded, based on their<br />

clinical experience, that there was not a strain on resources for children who are inappropriately<br />

referred because of this sign.<br />

Given the mixed quality of the evidence, the GDG did not change ‘appears ill to a healthcare<br />

professional’ in the traffic light table.<br />

Wakes only with prolonged stimulation or does not wake, or if roused, does not stay awake<br />

(included in 2007 traffic light table)<br />

‘Wakes only with prolonged stimulation or does not wake, or if roused, does not stay awake’ was<br />

included in the 2007 traffic light table as part of the YOS.<br />

99<br />

2013 Update

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!