30.05.2013 Views

A5V4d

A5V4d

A5V4d

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Feverish illness in children<br />

Neck stiffness (in 2007 traffic light table)<br />

Nuchal rigidity was reported in three studies. The sensitivity was low for detecting bacterial meningitis<br />

or meningococcal disease. The specificity was high. The positive and negatives predictive values<br />

ranged from high to moderate. The positive likelihood ratio was either not calculable or convincing.<br />

The negative likelihood ratios were not strong.<br />

Status epilepticus (in 2007 traffic light table)<br />

No evidence was reported on the use of status epilepticus to detect serious illness.<br />

Focal neurological signs (in 2007 traffic light table)<br />

No evidence was reported on the use of focal neurological signs to detect serious illness.<br />

Focal seizures (in 2007 traffic light table)<br />

Focal seizures were reported in two studies. The sensitivity was low for detecting bacterial meningitis.<br />

The specificity was high. The positive predictive values were low and the negative predictive values<br />

were high. The positive likelihood ratios ranged from not strong to strong and the negative likelihood<br />

ratios were not strong.<br />

A new lump larger than 2 cm (in 2007 traffic light table)<br />

No evidence was reported on the use of a new lump larger than 2 cm to detect serious illness.<br />

Bile-stained vomiting (in 2007 traffic light table)<br />

No evidence was reported on the use of bile-stained vomiting to detect serious illness.<br />

Diarrhoea (identified in 2013 review)<br />

Diarrhoea was reported in five studies including diarrhoea alone, diarrhoea with vomiting, and ‘mild<br />

gastrointestinal symptoms’. The sensitivity, specificity and positive predictive value for using diarrhoea<br />

to detect serious bacterial infection was low. The negative predictive value ranged from high to low.<br />

The likelihood ratios were not strong. The specificity for using diarrhoea and vomiting or mild<br />

gastrointestinal symptoms to detect serious bacterial infection was moderate to high, although the<br />

sensitivity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value were not high and the likelihood<br />

ratios were not strong. One study reported that the odds of having a bacterial illness are 3.9 times<br />

greater in those with diarrhoea compared to those without diarrhoea. One study reported that<br />

diarrhoea was not predictive of urinary tract infection.<br />

Vomiting (identified in 2013 review)<br />

Vomiting was reported in 11 studies, including increased vomiting, vomiting reported with diarrhoea,<br />

and ‘mild gastrointestinal symptoms’. The sensitivity for detecting serious bacterial infection, serious<br />

disease, bacterial illness, urinary tract infection, bacterial meningitis or meningococcal disease was<br />

low. The specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value ranged from high to low.<br />

The likelihood ratios were not strong. One study reported that the odds of having a bacterial illness<br />

were not significantly different in those with vomiting compared with those without. One of the studies<br />

reported that vomiting was not predictive of urinary tract infection.<br />

Abdominal pain (identified in 2013 review)<br />

Abdominal pain was reported in two studies. One study reported a low sensitivity and positive<br />

predictive value and high specificity and negative predictive value for detecting serious illness. The<br />

likelihood ratios were not strong. The other study reported no significant association between<br />

abdominal pain and urinary tract infection.<br />

Crying on micturition/dysuria (identified in 2013 review)<br />

Crying on micturition/dysuria was reported in one study. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive<br />

value and negative predictive value were not high, and the likelihood ratios were not strong, for<br />

detecting urinary tract infection.<br />

Headache (identified in 2013 review)<br />

Headache was reported in one study. The sensitivity for detecting bacterial meningitis was low. The<br />

specificity was high. The positive predictive value was low and the negative predictive value was high.<br />

The positive likelihood ratio was convincing, although the negative likelihood ratio was not strong.<br />

96<br />

2013 Update

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!