Etude des marchés d'assurance non-vie à l'aide d'équilibres de ...
Etude des marchés d'assurance non-vie à l'aide d'équilibres de ...
Etude des marchés d'assurance non-vie à l'aide d'équilibres de ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
tel-00703797, version 2 - 7 Jun 2012<br />
4.6. Appendix<br />
A large part of this paper focuses on the discrete time framework. We have seen that<br />
discrete time ruin probability asymptotics can be obtained in a similar way as in the continuous<br />
case. However, <strong>de</strong>riving asymptotics for the claim distribution is far more difficult: complex<br />
analysis is necessary to tackle the binomial alternating sum issue. Furthermore, the <strong>non</strong>uniqueness<br />
of discrete copulas is also studied. We quantify the maximal difference between<br />
the continuous and the discrete settings. Despite the issues encountered with discrete copula,<br />
the latent variable approach is consi<strong>de</strong>red in many other articles, e.g., Joe (1997); Frees and<br />
Wang (2006); Channouf and L’Ecuyer (2009); Braeken et al. (2007); Leon and Wu (2010).<br />
As mentioned in Albrecher et al. (2011), the approach proposed in this paper to <strong>de</strong>rive<br />
new explicit formula can be used for more general risk mo<strong>de</strong>ls. It could be interesting to<br />
test whether the A + B/u still applies for the ruin probability, say, with phase-type claim<br />
distributions. Beyond the study of ruin probability, the mixing approach and the asymptotic<br />
rule might probably be used for finite-time ruin probabilities and the Gerber-Shiu function.<br />
4.6 Appendix<br />
4.6.1 Usual special functions<br />
List of common special functions<br />
Let us recall the <strong>de</strong>finition of the so-called special functions, see Olver et al. (2010) for a<br />
comprehensive and updated list. In most cases, the <strong>de</strong>finition does not limit to z ∈ R, but<br />
can be exten<strong>de</strong>d to z ∈ C.<br />
– the gamma function Γ(α) = ∞<br />
0 xα−1 e −x dx,<br />
– the lower incomplete gamma function γ(α, z) = z<br />
0 xα−1 e −x dx,<br />
– the upper incomplete gamma function Γ(α, z) = ∞<br />
z xα−1 e −x dx,<br />
– the beta function β(a, b) = 1<br />
0 xa−1 (1 − x) b−1 dx,<br />
– the incomplete beta function β(a, b, z) = z<br />
0 xa−1 (1 − x) b−1 dx,<br />
– the complementary incomplete beta function ¯ β(a, b, z) = 1<br />
z xa−1 (1−x) b−1 dx = β(b, a, 1−<br />
z),<br />
– the error function erf(z) = 2<br />
z<br />
√<br />
π 0 e−t2dt,<br />
– the complementary error function erfc(z) = 2<br />
– the binomial coefficient n<br />
k =<br />
n!<br />
k!(n−k)! .<br />
Known asymptotics of usual special functions<br />
√ π<br />
+∞<br />
z e−t2dt, In this subsection, we list asymptotics of the main special functions, see Olver et al. (2010).<br />
Gamma function Known as the Stirling formula, the asymptotic expansion for Γ(z) is<br />
Γ(z) ∼ +∞ e −z z z<br />
2π<br />
z<br />
<br />
1 + 1<br />
12z<br />
gk<br />
+ · · · + + . . .<br />
zk for z ∈ C and | arg(z)| < π with g0 = 1, g1 = 1/12, g2 = 1/288, g3 = −139/51480. See page<br />
141 of Olver et al. (2010).<br />
We recall that the incomplete gamma functions are <strong>de</strong>fined as<br />
γ(a, z) =<br />
<br />
,<br />
z<br />
x<br />
0<br />
α−1 e −x ∞<br />
dx, and Γ(a, z) = x<br />
z<br />
α−1 e −x dx.<br />
205