28.05.2013 Views

Etude des marchés d'assurance non-vie à l'aide d'équilibres de ...

Etude des marchés d'assurance non-vie à l'aide d'équilibres de ...

Etude des marchés d'assurance non-vie à l'aide d'équilibres de ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

tel-00703797, version 2 - 7 Jun 2012<br />

4.4. Focus on the <strong>de</strong>pen<strong>de</strong>nce structure<br />

any bivariate pair (X, Y ): B is not a distribution, whereas D is a distribution function but<br />

not a copula.<br />

Let us now consi<strong>de</strong>r two exponential random variables that are conditionally in<strong>de</strong>pen<strong>de</strong>nt<br />

given a factor Θ. We choose to focus here only on the bivariate case. Suppose that these<br />

variables are discretized by taking their integer parts. We will see that the two resulting<br />

random variables have geometric distributions; these are, of course, correlated. Our purpose<br />

in Subsections 4.4.1 - 4.4.4 below is precisely to study the <strong>de</strong>pen<strong>de</strong>nce involved.<br />

4.4.1 Depen<strong>de</strong>nce induced by the mixing approach<br />

We start by comparing the joint distributions of two mixed exponential random variables<br />

and of geometric approximations obtained by discretization.<br />

Continous case<br />

Now, consi<strong>de</strong>r Yi, i = 1, 2 to be conditionnaly in<strong>de</strong>pen<strong>de</strong>nt exponential random variables,<br />

i.e. Yi|Θ = θ i.i.d.<br />

∼ E(θ). We have<br />

FY1 (x) = P (Y1 ≤ x) =<br />

∞<br />

P (Y1 ≤ x|Θ = θ)dFΘ(θ) = 1 − LΘ(x),<br />

0<br />

where LΘ stands for the Laplace transform of the random variable Θ, assuming LΘ exists.<br />

Using this formulation, we can check that the random variable FYi (Yi) is uniformly distributed.<br />

In<strong>de</strong>ed we have<br />

P (FY1 (Y1) ≤ u) = P (Y1 ≤ L −1<br />

Θ<br />

−1<br />

(1 − u)) = 1 − LΘ(LΘ (1 − u)) = u.<br />

Furthermore, the (unique) copula of the couple (Y1, Y2) can be <strong>de</strong>rived by<br />

CY1,Y2 (u, v) = P (FY1 (Y1) ≤ u, FY2 (Y2) ≤ v) = P (Y1 ≤ L −1<br />

=<br />

∞<br />

0<br />

(1 − e −θL−1<br />

Θ (1−u) )(1 − e −θL−1<br />

Θ (1−v) )dFΘ(θ).<br />

Hence the copula function is given by<br />

CY1,Y2 (u, v) = u + v − 1 + LΘ<br />

Θ (1 − u), Y2 ≤ L −1<br />

Θ<br />

(1 − v))<br />

−1<br />

LΘ (1 − u) + L−1<br />

Θ (1 − v) . (4.10)<br />

We retrieve the fact that the couple (Y1, Y2) has an Archime<strong>de</strong>an survival copula with generator<br />

L −1<br />

Θ , see, e.g., Albrecher et al. (2011). In other words, the joint distribution of the tail is given<br />

by<br />

P ( ¯ FY1 (Y1) > u, ¯ FY2 (Y2)<br />

−1<br />

> v) = LΘ LΘ (u) + L−1<br />

Θ (v) .<br />

From Theorem 4.6.2 of Nelsen (2006), the above expression can be exten<strong>de</strong>d to any dimension.<br />

A n-dimension function C(u1, . . . , un) <strong>de</strong>fined by a generator φ and C(u1, . . . , un) =<br />

φ−1 (φ(u1) + · · · + φ(un)) is a n-copula for all n ≥ 2 if and only if the generator φ−1 is<br />

completely monotone, i.e. for all k ∈ N,<br />

(−1) k dk φ −1<br />

dt k (t) ≥ 0.<br />

As the generator is φ−1 (t) = LΘ(t) in our mo<strong>de</strong>l, then the Laplace transform is completely<br />

monotone. In particular, LΘ is a <strong>de</strong>creasing convex function. As φ is the generator of an<br />

Archime<strong>de</strong>an copula, φ is a convex <strong>de</strong>creasing function. Since φ(t) = L −1<br />

Θ (t), L−1<br />

Θ is also a<br />

convex <strong>de</strong>creasing function.<br />

197

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!