28.05.2013 Views

Etude des marchés d'assurance non-vie à l'aide d'équilibres de ...

Etude des marchés d'assurance non-vie à l'aide d'équilibres de ...

Etude des marchés d'assurance non-vie à l'aide d'équilibres de ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

tel-00703797, version 2 - 7 Jun 2012<br />

4.3. Asymptotics – the A + B/u rule<br />

The expressions <strong>de</strong>rived when Θ is Lévy distributed, are much more complex than in the continuous<br />

time framework. In Subsection 4.3.3, we study asymptotics for the survival function.<br />

The ruin probability can be computed using I3(−1, u + 1, α 2 /4, θ0).<br />

Proposition 4.2.3. Let us consi<strong>de</strong>r the discrete time framework of Subsection 4.2.2 with a<br />

latent variable Θ Lévy distributed Le(α).<br />

<br />

α<br />

ψ(u) = erfc<br />

2 √ <br />

+<br />

θ0<br />

1 − q<br />

4qu+1 u+1<br />

<br />

u + 1<br />

(−1)<br />

j<br />

j=0<br />

j<br />

<br />

e α√ <br />

j−1 α<br />

erfc<br />

2 √ +<br />

θ0<br />

j − 1 <br />

θ0<br />

+e −α√ <br />

j−1 α<br />

erfc<br />

2 √ −<br />

θ0<br />

j − 1 <br />

θ0 ,<br />

with the convention ∗ √ −1 = i, θ0 = − log(1 − q) and for u ≥ 0.<br />

4.3 Asymptotics – the A + B/u rule<br />

This section is the core of the paper, where we establish the A + B/u asymptotic rule for<br />

the ultimate ruin probability for both continuous and discrete time mo<strong>de</strong>ls. We also obtain<br />

an expansion of the ruin probability as a power series of 1/u. Finally, we investigate the<br />

asymptotic behavior of the resulting claim distribution, which requires a special treatment<br />

with complex analysis.<br />

4.3.1 Notation<br />

We recall basics and notation of the asymptotic analysis; see e.g. Jones (1997), Olver<br />

et al. (2010). We introduce the standard Landau notation O(), o() and ∼. One says that f is<br />

asymptotically boun<strong>de</strong>d by g as x → x0, <strong>de</strong>noted by<br />

f(x) = O(g(x)) ,<br />

x0<br />

if there exists K, δ > 0, such that for all 0 < |x − x0| < δ, we have |f(x)| ≤ K|g(x)|. In other<br />

words, in a neighborhood of x0 excluding x0, |f(x)/g(x)| is boun<strong>de</strong>d.<br />

Then, f is said to be asymptotically smaller than g as x → x0, <strong>de</strong>noted by<br />

f(x) = o(g(x)) ,<br />

x0<br />

if for all ɛ > 0, there exists δ > 0, such that for all 0 < |x − x0| < δ, we have |f(x)| ≤ ɛ|g(x)|.<br />

That is to say, in a neighborhood of x0 excluding x0, |f(x)/g(x)| tends to 0.<br />

And finally, f is asymptotically equivalent to g around x0, if the ratio of f over g tends to<br />

1, i.e.,<br />

f(x) ∼ g(x) ⇔<br />

x0<br />

f(x)<br />

g(x) −→ 1.<br />

x→x0<br />

This is equivalent to f(x) = g(x) + o(g(x)).<br />

The asymptotic i<strong>de</strong>a aims to approximate a complicated function f at x0 by a sum of<br />

known and tractable terms g(x), controlling the error by o(g(x)). Note that x0 can be +∞.<br />

∗. One can check that the term j = 0 is still a real number.<br />

181

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!