28.05.2013 Views

Etude des marchés d'assurance non-vie à l'aide d'équilibres de ...

Etude des marchés d'assurance non-vie à l'aide d'équilibres de ...

Etude des marchés d'assurance non-vie à l'aide d'équilibres de ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

tel-00703797, version 2 - 7 Jun 2012<br />

Chapitre 3. Calcul d’équilibre <strong>de</strong> Nash généralisé<br />

For a general discussion of quasi-Newton methods, we refer to Dennis and Morée (1977)<br />

and for <strong>de</strong>tails on quasi-Newton methods specialized to <strong>non</strong>linear equations, see Broy<strong>de</strong>n<br />

(1965) or (Nocedal and Wright, 2006, Chap. 11).<br />

Another way to solve the equation F (z) = 0 requires minimizing the norm f(z) =<br />

1<br />

2 ||F (z)||22 . But not all minima of the function f are roots of F because we must have f(z) = 0.<br />

A wi<strong>de</strong>ly known method for this least square problem is the Gauss-Newton method. We minimize<br />

the mo<strong>de</strong>l function 1<br />

2M N k (dk) T M N k (dk). We get<br />

J(zk) T J(zk)dk = −J(zk) T F (zk). (3.14)<br />

To prevent the right-hand si<strong>de</strong> matrix to be <strong>non</strong>singular, the Levenberg-Marquardt method<br />

modifies Equation (3.14) to<br />

J(zk) T J(zk) + λkI dk = −J(zk) T F (zk), (3.15)<br />

where I <strong>de</strong>notes the n×n i<strong>de</strong>ntity matrix and λk ≥ 0. Various choices of Levenberg-Marquart<br />

with δ ∈ [1, 2].<br />

parameter are possible: Fan and Yuan (2005) consi<strong>de</strong>r terms λk = ||F (zk)|| δ 2<br />

In practice, δ = 1, i.e. λ = ||F (zk)||2, works much better than other δ’s. We may also use<br />

||Jk|| or min(||F (zk)|| 2 , ||J T k F (zk)|| 2 ). The Levenberg-Marquart is sometimes referred to as<br />

the modified Gauss-Newton method for its relation to Gauss-Newton method.<br />

Summarizing this first subsection, local methods consi<strong>de</strong>r sequences of the form zk+1 =<br />

zk+dk where the direction dk is a solution of one of the above equations. Newton direction uses<br />

Equation (3.12), quasi-Newton Equation (3.13) and Levenberg-Marquardt Equation (3.15).<br />

3.2.2 Globalization schemes<br />

Now, we focus on globalization schemes, as Figures 3.2 and 3.3 show their relevancy. There<br />

are mainly two frameworks: line search and trust-region methods. To our knowledge, only<br />

two other methods exist continuation/homotopy, e.g., Allgower and Georg (2003) or Chapter<br />

8 of Facchinei and Pang (2003)), or successive approximations, see, e.g., Qi and Jiang (1997)<br />

or Qi and Chen (1995).<br />

Line-search techniques<br />

Line-search techniques are a refinement of the local sequence by consi<strong>de</strong>ring the sequence<br />

zk+1 = zk + tkdk where tk ∈]0, 1] is the stepsize in direction dk at the current iterate zk. Note<br />

that the direction dk is not unitary, i.e. ||dk|| >> 1 generally. Line-search techniques propose<br />

criteria to choose tk. As the stepsize may reduces the (full) step from zk to zk+1, line-search<br />

version of an algorithm is sometimes called the damped version of that algorithm.<br />

Let f be a merit function. We <strong>de</strong>fine the function t ↦→ φk(t) = f(zk + tdk). We want to<br />

find a good minimizer of φk. However, it is useless to find the global minimizer arg min φk(t),<br />

because we want to solve the outer problem F (z) = 0, and not the inner problem min φk(t).<br />

In the following, we assume we have a <strong><strong>de</strong>s</strong>cent direction dk for the merit function f, as a<br />

minimal condtion to choose tk is f(zk+1) < f(zk). This <strong><strong>de</strong>s</strong>cent direction condition translates<br />

to φ ′ k (0) < 0. We are focused on two things, tk should be big enougth to ensure a sufficient<br />

<strong>de</strong>crease of φ, and also tk should not be too small to guarantee a sufficient big step.<br />

One could think that requiring f(zk+1) < f(zk) is enough to show convergence, but unfortunately<br />

not. In literature, see, e.g., Dennis and Schnabel (1996); Nocedal and Wright (2006);<br />

146

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!