28.05.2013 Views

Etude des marchés d'assurance non-vie à l'aide d'équilibres de ...

Etude des marchés d'assurance non-vie à l'aide d'équilibres de ...

Etude des marchés d'assurance non-vie à l'aide d'équilibres de ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

tel-00703797, version 2 - 7 Jun 2012<br />

∂ lg k j (x)<br />

2.6. Appendix<br />

Hence, we get<br />

⎛<br />

∂xi<br />

= −δij ⎝ <br />

f<br />

l=j<br />

′ j1(xj, xl) lg l ⎞<br />

j(x) ⎠ lg k j (x) − (1 − δij)f ′ j2(xj, xi) lg i j(x) lg k j (x)<br />

<br />

+ (1 − δjk) δijf ′ j1(xj, xk) lg k j (x) + δikf ′ j2(xj, xk) lg k <br />

j (x) .<br />

Similarly, the second or<strong>de</strong>r <strong>de</strong>rivative is given by ∗<br />

∂2 lg k ⎛<br />

j (x)<br />

<br />

= −δij<br />

⎝δjm f<br />

∂xm∂xi<br />

l=j<br />

′′<br />

j11(xj, xl) lg l j +(1 − δjm)f ′′<br />

j12(xj, xm) lg m j + <br />

f<br />

l=j<br />

′ j1(xj, xl) ∂ lgl ⎞<br />

j ⎠ lg<br />

∂xm<br />

k j<br />

⎛<br />

− δij ⎝ <br />

f<br />

l=j<br />

′ j1(xj, xl) lg l ⎞<br />

⎠<br />

j<br />

∂ lgkj ∂xm<br />

<br />

δjmf −(1−δij)<br />

′′<br />

j21(xj, xi) + δimf ′′<br />

j22(xj, xi) lg i j lg k j +f ′ j2(xj, xi) ∂ lgi j<br />

lg<br />

∂xm<br />

k j +f ′ j2(xj, xi) lg i ∂ lg<br />

j<br />

k <br />

j<br />

∂xm<br />

<br />

f ′′<br />

+ (1 − δjk)δij j11(xj, xk)δjm + f ′′<br />

k<br />

j12(xj, xk)δkm lgj +f ′ j1(xj, xk) ∂ lgk <br />

j<br />

∂xm<br />

<br />

f ′′<br />

+ (1 − δjk)δik j21(xj, xk)δjm + f ′′<br />

k<br />

j22(xj, xk)δim lgj +f ′ j2(xj, xk) ∂ lgk <br />

j<br />

.<br />

∂xm<br />

Portfolio size function<br />

We recall that the expected portfolio size of insurer j is <strong>de</strong>fined as<br />

<br />

(x) +<br />

ˆNj(x) = nj × lg j<br />

j<br />

l=j<br />

nl × lg j<br />

l (x),<br />

where nj’s <strong>de</strong>notes last year portfolio size of insurer j and lg k j is <strong>de</strong>fined in equation (2.1).<br />

The function φj : xj ↦→ lg j<br />

j (x) has the following <strong>de</strong>rivative<br />

φ ′ j(xj) =<br />

∂ lgj<br />

j (x)<br />

∂xj<br />

For the two consi<strong>de</strong>red price function, we have<br />

f ′ 1<br />

j1(xj, xl) = αj<br />

⎛<br />

= − ⎝ <br />

f ′ j1(xj, xl) lg l ⎞<br />

j(x) ⎠ lg j<br />

j (x).<br />

xl<br />

l=j<br />

and ˜ f ′ j1(xj, xl) = ˜αj,<br />

which are positive. So, the function φj will be a <strong>de</strong>creasing function.<br />

(x) has the following <strong>de</strong>rivative<br />

For l = j, the function φl : xj ↦→ lg j<br />

l<br />

φ ′ l (xj) =<br />

∂ lgj<br />

l (x)<br />

∂xj<br />

= −f ′ j2(xl, xj) lg j<br />

l (x) lgj l (x)+f ′ j2(xl, xj) lg j<br />

l (x) = f ′ j2(xl, xj) lg j<br />

l (x)(1−lgj l (x)).<br />

∗. We remove the variable x when possible.<br />

127

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!