Etude des marchés d'assurance non-vie à l'aide d'équilibres de ...
Etude des marchés d'assurance non-vie à l'aide d'équilibres de ...
Etude des marchés d'assurance non-vie à l'aide d'équilibres de ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
tel-00703797, version 2 - 7 Jun 2012<br />
∂ lg k j (x)<br />
2.6. Appendix<br />
Hence, we get<br />
⎛<br />
∂xi<br />
= −δij ⎝ <br />
f<br />
l=j<br />
′ j1(xj, xl) lg l ⎞<br />
j(x) ⎠ lg k j (x) − (1 − δij)f ′ j2(xj, xi) lg i j(x) lg k j (x)<br />
<br />
+ (1 − δjk) δijf ′ j1(xj, xk) lg k j (x) + δikf ′ j2(xj, xk) lg k <br />
j (x) .<br />
Similarly, the second or<strong>de</strong>r <strong>de</strong>rivative is given by ∗<br />
∂2 lg k ⎛<br />
j (x)<br />
<br />
= −δij<br />
⎝δjm f<br />
∂xm∂xi<br />
l=j<br />
′′<br />
j11(xj, xl) lg l j +(1 − δjm)f ′′<br />
j12(xj, xm) lg m j + <br />
f<br />
l=j<br />
′ j1(xj, xl) ∂ lgl ⎞<br />
j ⎠ lg<br />
∂xm<br />
k j<br />
⎛<br />
− δij ⎝ <br />
f<br />
l=j<br />
′ j1(xj, xl) lg l ⎞<br />
⎠<br />
j<br />
∂ lgkj ∂xm<br />
<br />
δjmf −(1−δij)<br />
′′<br />
j21(xj, xi) + δimf ′′<br />
j22(xj, xi) lg i j lg k j +f ′ j2(xj, xi) ∂ lgi j<br />
lg<br />
∂xm<br />
k j +f ′ j2(xj, xi) lg i ∂ lg<br />
j<br />
k <br />
j<br />
∂xm<br />
<br />
f ′′<br />
+ (1 − δjk)δij j11(xj, xk)δjm + f ′′<br />
k<br />
j12(xj, xk)δkm lgj +f ′ j1(xj, xk) ∂ lgk <br />
j<br />
∂xm<br />
<br />
f ′′<br />
+ (1 − δjk)δik j21(xj, xk)δjm + f ′′<br />
k<br />
j22(xj, xk)δim lgj +f ′ j2(xj, xk) ∂ lgk <br />
j<br />
.<br />
∂xm<br />
Portfolio size function<br />
We recall that the expected portfolio size of insurer j is <strong>de</strong>fined as<br />
<br />
(x) +<br />
ˆNj(x) = nj × lg j<br />
j<br />
l=j<br />
nl × lg j<br />
l (x),<br />
where nj’s <strong>de</strong>notes last year portfolio size of insurer j and lg k j is <strong>de</strong>fined in equation (2.1).<br />
The function φj : xj ↦→ lg j<br />
j (x) has the following <strong>de</strong>rivative<br />
φ ′ j(xj) =<br />
∂ lgj<br />
j (x)<br />
∂xj<br />
For the two consi<strong>de</strong>red price function, we have<br />
f ′ 1<br />
j1(xj, xl) = αj<br />
⎛<br />
= − ⎝ <br />
f ′ j1(xj, xl) lg l ⎞<br />
j(x) ⎠ lg j<br />
j (x).<br />
xl<br />
l=j<br />
and ˜ f ′ j1(xj, xl) = ˜αj,<br />
which are positive. So, the function φj will be a <strong>de</strong>creasing function.<br />
(x) has the following <strong>de</strong>rivative<br />
For l = j, the function φl : xj ↦→ lg j<br />
l<br />
φ ′ l (xj) =<br />
∂ lgj<br />
l (x)<br />
∂xj<br />
= −f ′ j2(xl, xj) lg j<br />
l (x) lgj l (x)+f ′ j2(xl, xj) lg j<br />
l (x) = f ′ j2(xl, xj) lg j<br />
l (x)(1−lgj l (x)).<br />
∗. We remove the variable x when possible.<br />
127