28.05.2013 Views

Etude des marchés d'assurance non-vie à l'aide d'équilibres de ...

Etude des marchés d'assurance non-vie à l'aide d'équilibres de ...

Etude des marchés d'assurance non-vie à l'aide d'équilibres de ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

tel-00703797, version 2 - 7 Jun 2012<br />

P1 P2 P3<br />

PLN 1.066 1.159 0.972<br />

NBLN 1.079 1.189 1.035<br />

Table 2.3: Actuarially based premium āj,0<br />

2.2. A one-period mo<strong>de</strong>l<br />

The weight parameters (ωj)j used in the computation of the insurer break-even premium<br />

are ω = (1/3, 1/3, 1/3). Before giving the sensitivity parameters βj’s, we present the lapse<br />

mo<strong>de</strong>ls. For customer behavior, we have two parameters µj, αj per player given a price<br />

sensitivity function. At first, we consi<strong>de</strong>r the price function based on the premium ratio<br />

¯fj(xj, xl) = µj + αj<br />

The central lapse rate parameters (i.e. lapse rate when every insurers use the same premium)<br />

are set to 10%, 14% and 18% for j = 1, 2 or 3, respectively. In addition to this first constraint,<br />

we also impose that on increase of 5% compared to other players increases the total lapse rate<br />

by 5 percentage points.<br />

Let x 1 = (1, 1, 1) and x 1.05 = (1.05, 1, 1). The two constraints are equivalent to<br />

lg 2 1(x 1 ) + lg 3 1(x 1 ) = 10% and lg 2 1(x 1.05 ) + lg 3 1(x 1.05 ) = 15%<br />

for Insurer 1. We get µ1 = −12.14284 and α1 = 9.25247. With this central lapse rate<br />

parameters, the expected numbers of lost policies when all insurers propose the same premium<br />

are 450.1, 448.0 and 414.0.<br />

Secondly, we consi<strong>de</strong>r the price function based on the premium difference<br />

xj<br />

xl<br />

˜fj(xj, xl) = ˜µj + ˜αj(xj − xl).<br />

Calibration is done similarly as for fj. In Figure 2.5 in Appendix 2.6.1, we plot the total lapse<br />

ratio function of each player for the two different price function fj (left graph) and ˜ fj (right<br />

graph). In a grey dot-dash horizontal line, we highlight the central rates at 10%, 14% and<br />

18% (the premium of other players is set to 1.4). In the central graph, we plot the total lapse<br />

rate function of player 1 with the two different price functions.<br />

Price sensitivity parameters βj <br />

of objective functions are fitted in the following way 1 −<br />

xj<br />

βj mj(x) − 1 ≈ lg j<br />

j (x). Using x = (1.05, 1, 1), we get<br />

1 − lgj j<br />

βj = (x)<br />

.<br />

0.05<br />

Using the premium ratio function ¯ fj, we have (β1, β2, β3) = (3.0, 3.8, 4.6).<br />

Last parameters are capital values and the expense rates. Capital values (K1, K2, K3)<br />

are set such that the solvency coverage ratio is 133%. Expense rates are (e1, e2, e3) =<br />

(10%, 10%, 10%).<br />

Results and sensitivity analysis<br />

Since we consi<strong>de</strong>r two loss mo<strong>de</strong>ls (PLN, NBLN) and two price sensitivity functions ¯ fj, ˜ fj<br />

(<strong>de</strong>noted by ‘ratio’ and ‘diff’, respectively), we implicitly <strong>de</strong>fine four sets of parameters, which<br />

.<br />

105

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!