0444_Bk

[I, VII; _III. THE AN_..ECTS.
it reads : To day's fiUalness consists in and means ability
to nourish, but even (or down to) dogs and horses all can
have nourishment ; without reverence how can they be dis-
criminated ? The ancient comm. interpreted by "but dogs
and horses can offer sustenance." C. _= _ _ $l;
Bii _ _ lt!l _ _:g 1_ :_ _ _, If while he
can nourish his parents he yet falls short in reverencing
them, where is the difference between him and the-man
who feeds his dogs and horses? L. The filial piety of
now-a-days means the support of one's parents. But dogs
and horses likewise are able to do something in the way
of support ;--without reverence what is there to distinguish
the one support given from the other ? Z. nunc temporis
pietas filialis scilicet etc. ; at quoad canes et equos, tuque
possunt habere alituram etc. K. The duty of a good son
nowadays means only to be able to support his parents.
But you also keep your dogs etc. alive, etc. Couv. les
animaux ...... re_oivent aussi des hommes ce qui leur es_
n6cessaire.
CHAPTER. VIII.--FILIAL DUTY: HOW DONE
GREATER THAN WHAT DONE. Tz_ Hsia. Intro.
V. _, This. ]_ _; take to be. _ viands, dainties.
C. _ _, Filial, sons having _ _ deep love are
_i_ good tempered, being good tempered they carry
a _ _ cheerful countenance, having a cheerful
countenance they maintain _ _ an obliging _aring.
An old interpretation was fli¢ _[ _ _/= ;_ _ _1_
]_, To fit (or submit)oneself to one's parents'
demear_ur is the difficulty. _/_ _, _. _ _]_, Earlier
born=seniors. _, _ _ ;_'-I_, To give them to
i_6