17.05.2013 Views

ISS 25 (1995).pdf - The International Council of Museums

ISS 25 (1995).pdf - The International Council of Museums

ISS 25 (1995).pdf - The International Council of Museums

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

MUSEUMS AND COMMUNITY<br />

FINAL REMARKS<br />

(Mathilde Bellaigue)<br />

<strong>The</strong> core <strong>of</strong> the problem was to explore the threefold relation between the communjty (to<br />

define), our heritage which, whether in the museum or related to it, acts as a medium for that relation,<br />

and the museum itself.<br />

<strong>The</strong> community<br />

As a preambula, it appears necessary to give ourselves some theoretical bases: we have to<br />

distinguish between the anthropological acceptance <strong>of</strong> the word "commwtity" (a primary reference<br />

group characterized by its time, space, culture etc) and "commwtity" meaning a group <strong>of</strong> people<br />

taking position. <strong>The</strong> former one is commonly concerned by the museum.<br />

A commwtity, as a group <strong>of</strong> persons interacting with their environment, manipulating its<br />

resources, having social, economical, esthetical codes, and leaving their own traces as their<br />

expression, is continually shifting.<br />

But the "commwtity" can also be considered from the point <strong>of</strong> view <strong>of</strong> the museum, as a<br />

social and cultural group that wants to be in a dialectical and active relation with the museum.<br />

<strong>The</strong> heritage as a medium<br />

<strong>The</strong> museum is constituted <strong>of</strong> remaining things (our traces) that we choose to keep as our<br />

heritage. <strong>The</strong> functions <strong>of</strong> heritage have to be precised :<br />

- museum collections are not an end but a mean<br />

- heritage is not an identity but a reference<br />

- there is a relativity in collections : what is inside the museum is <strong>of</strong>ten strange to the society<br />

around that museum.<br />

If what is preserved is submitted to criticism (the museologist's choice), there is no effective<br />

criticism <strong>of</strong> that choice. However such a critical stage would in fact be the sign <strong>of</strong> modernity, the<br />

moment when we choose what we want to keep from our traces. (That is why destroying the cultural<br />

traces <strong>of</strong> a commwtity is the base <strong>of</strong> eUmocide : it both cuts the thread from the past, therefore<br />

annihilates the memory, and deprives the community from an instrument to organize its future).<br />

<strong>The</strong> museum<br />

<strong>The</strong> museum is altogether a place, a tool and a symbol for the preservation and restoration <strong>of</strong><br />

the memory. History gives birth to material and immaterial heritage. Museology helps us to manage<br />

the burden <strong>of</strong> the past in museums.<br />

Through the different museal stages, the objects acquire successive and different meanings.<br />

Objects <strong>of</strong> to-day are supposed to represent the present truth. At every moment we can change the<br />

construction, not only <strong>of</strong> the museum, but <strong>of</strong> history. but <strong>of</strong> memory. <strong>The</strong> museum has not to "take<br />

the colour <strong>of</strong> the community". For true relations lie upon alterity which is the base <strong>of</strong> dignity.<br />

123

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!