Carl%20Sagan%20-%20The%20Demon%20Haunted%20World

Carl%20Sagan%20-%20The%20Demon%20Haunted%20World Carl%20Sagan%20-%20The%20Demon%20Haunted%20World

giancarlo3000
from giancarlo3000 More from this publisher
04.10.2012 Views

THE DEMON-HAUNTED WORLD corporate research - is not this solution tantamount to abandoning basic research? Cutting off fundamental, curiosity-driven science is like eating the seed corn. We may have a little more to eat next winter, but what will we plant so we and our children will have enough to get through the winters to come? Of course there are many pressing problems facing our nation and our species. But reducing basic scientific research is not the way to solve them. Scientists do not constitute a voting bloc. They have no effective lobby. However, much of their work is in everybody's interest. Backing off from fundamental research constitutes a failure of nerve, of imagination and of that vision thing that we still don't seem to have a handle on. It might strike one of those hypothetical extraterrestrials that we were planning not to have a future. Of course we need literacy, education, jobs, adequate medical care and defence, protection of the environment, security in our old age, a balanced budget, and a host of other matters. But we are a rich society. Can't we also nurture the Maxwells of our time? To take one symbolic example, is it really true that we can't afford one attack helicopter's worth of seed corn to listen to the stars? 376

24 Science and Witchcraft* Ubi dubium ibi libertas: Where there is doubt, there is freedom. Latin proverb The 1939 New York World's Fair - that so transfixed me as a small visitor from darkest Brooklyn - was about 'The World of Tomorrow'. Merely by adopting such a motif, it promised that there would be a world of tomorrow, and the most casual glance affirmed that it would be better than the world of 1939. Although the nuance wholly passed me by, many people longed for such a reassurance on the eve of the most brutal and calamitous war in human history. I knew at least that I would be growing up in the future. The sleek and clean 'tomorrow' portrayed by the Fair was appealing and hopeful. And something called science was plainly the means by which that future would be realized. But if things had gone a little differently, the Fair could have given me enormously more. A fierce struggle had gone on behind the scenes. The vision that prevailed was that of the Fair's * Written with Ann Druyan. The following two chapters include more political content than elsewhere in this book. I do not wish to suggest that advocacy of science and scepticism necessarily leads to all the political or social conclusions I draw. Although sceptical thinking is invaluable in politics, politics is not a science. 377

24<br />

Science and Witchcraft*<br />

Ubi dubium ibi libertas: Where there is doubt, there is<br />

freedom.<br />

Latin proverb<br />

The 1939 New York World's Fair - that so transfixed me as a<br />

small visitor from darkest Brooklyn - was about 'The World<br />

of Tomorrow'. Merely by adopting such a motif, it promised that<br />

there would be a world of tomorrow, and the most casual glance<br />

affirmed that it would be better than the world of 1939. Although<br />

the nuance wholly passed me by, many people longed for such a<br />

reassurance on the eve of the most brutal and calamitous war in<br />

human history. I knew at least that I would be growing up in the<br />

future. The sleek and clean 'tomorrow' portrayed by the Fair was<br />

appealing and hopeful. And something called science was plainly<br />

the means by which that future would be realized.<br />

But if things had gone a little differently, the Fair could have<br />

given me enormously more. A fierce struggle had gone on behind<br />

the scenes. The vision that prevailed was that of the Fair's<br />

* Written with Ann Druyan. The following two chapters include more political<br />

content than elsewhere in this book. I do not wish to suggest that advocacy of<br />

science and scepticism necessarily leads to all the political or social conclusions<br />

I draw. Although sceptical thinking is invaluable in politics, politics is not a<br />

science.<br />

377

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!