04.10.2012 Views

Carl%20Sagan%20-%20The%20Demon%20Haunted%20World

Carl%20Sagan%20-%20The%20Demon%20Haunted%20World

Carl%20Sagan%20-%20The%20Demon%20Haunted%20World

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

THE DEMON-HAUNTED WORLD<br />

however, provide a precedent in popular culture for the<br />

extraterrestrial/human hybrids that later became so central a<br />

component of the alien abduction story. There must be dozens of<br />

alien species on the various 'Star Trek' TV series and movies.<br />

Almost all we spend any time with are minor variants of humans.<br />

This is driven by economic necessity, costing only an actor and a<br />

latex mask, but it flies in the face of the stochastic nature of the<br />

evolutionary process. If there are aliens, almost all of them I think<br />

will look devastatingly less human than Klingons and Romulans<br />

(and be at widely different levels of technology). 'Star Trek'<br />

doesn't come to grips with evolution.<br />

In many TV programmes and films, even the casual science -<br />

the throwaway lines that are not essential to a plot already<br />

innocent of science - is done incompetently. It costs very little to<br />

hire a graduate student to read the script for scientific accuracy.<br />

But, so far as I can tell, this is almost never done. As a result we<br />

have such howlers as 'parsec' mentioned as a unit of speed instead<br />

of distance in the - in many other ways exemplary - film Star<br />

Wars. If such things were done with a modicum of care, they<br />

might even improve the plot; certainly, they might help convey a<br />

little science to a mass audience.<br />

There's a great deal of pseudoscience for the gullible on TV,<br />

a fair amount of medicine and technology, but hardly any<br />

science, especially on the big commercial networks, whose<br />

executives tend to think that science programming means<br />

ratings declines and lost profits, and nothing else matters.<br />

There are network employees with the title 'Science Correspondent',<br />

and an occasional news feature said to be devoted to<br />

science. But we almost never hear any science from them, just<br />

medicine and technology. In all the networks, I doubt if there's<br />

a single employee whose job it is to read each week's issue of<br />

Nature or Science to see if anything newsworthy has been<br />

discovered. When the Nobel Prizes in science are announced<br />

each fall, there's a superb news 'hook' for science: a chance to<br />

explain what the prizes were given for. But, almost always, all<br />

we hear is something like '. . . may one day lead to a cure for<br />

cancer. Today in Belgrade . . .'<br />

How much science is there on the radio or television talk shows,<br />

352

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!