04.10.2012 Views

Carl%20Sagan%20-%20The%20Demon%20Haunted%20World

Carl%20Sagan%20-%20The%20Demon%20Haunted%20World

Carl%20Sagan%20-%20The%20Demon%20Haunted%20World

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

No Such Thing as a Dumb Question<br />

found that under suitable conditions make copies of themselves in<br />

the test tube. Some of these molecules are, like DNA and RNA,<br />

built out of nucleotides; others are not. Some use enzymes to<br />

hasten the pace of the chemistry; others do not. Sometimes there<br />

is a mistake in copying; from that point forward the mistake is<br />

copied in successive generations of molecules. Thus there get to<br />

be slightly different species of self-replicating molecules, some of<br />

which reproduce faster or more efficiently than others. These<br />

preferentially thrive. As time goes on, the molecules in the test<br />

tube become more and more efficient. We are beginning to<br />

witness the evolution of molecules. How much insight does this<br />

provide about the origin of life?<br />

• Why is ordinary ice white, but pure glacial ice blue?<br />

• Life has been found miles below the surface of the Earth. How<br />

deep does it go?<br />

• The Dogon people in the Republic of Mali are said by a French<br />

anthropologist to have a legend that the star Sirius has an<br />

extremely dense companion star. Sirius in fact does have such a<br />

companion, although it requires fairly sophisticated astronomy to<br />

detect it. So (1) did the Dogon people descend from a forgotten<br />

civilization that had large optical telescopes and theoretical astrophysics?<br />

Or, (2) were they instructed by extraterrestrials? Or, (3)<br />

did the Dogon hear about the white dwarf companion of Sirius<br />

from a visiting European? Or, (4) was the French anthropologist<br />

mistaken and the Dogon in fact never had such a legend?<br />

Why should it be hard for scientists to get science across? Some<br />

scientists, including some very good ones, tell me they'd love to<br />

popularize, but feel they lack talent in this area. Knowing and<br />

explaining, they say, are not the same thing. What's the secret?<br />

There's only one, I think: don't talk to the general audience as<br />

you would to your scientific colleagues. There are terms that<br />

convey your meaning instantly and accurately to fellow experts.<br />

You may parse these phrases every day in your professional work.<br />

But they do no more than mystify an audience of non-specialists.<br />

Use the simplest possible language. Above all, remember how it<br />

was before you yourself grasped whatever it is you're explaining.<br />

Remember the misunderstandings that you almost fell into, and<br />

313

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!