Carl%20Sagan%20-%20The%20Demon%20Haunted%20World

Carl%20Sagan%20-%20The%20Demon%20Haunted%20World Carl%20Sagan%20-%20The%20Demon%20Haunted%20World

giancarlo3000
from giancarlo3000 More from this publisher
04.10.2012 Views

THE DEMON-HAUNTED WORLD knowledgeably? Then the bamboozle has free rein. So how is shamanistic or theological or New Age doctrine different from quantum mechanics? The answer is that even if we cannot understand it, we can verify that quantum mechanics works. We can compare the quantitative predictions of quantum theory with the measured wavelengths of spectral lines of the chemical elements, the behaviour of semiconductors and liquid helium, microprocessors, which kinds of molecules form from their constituent atoms, the existence and properties of white dwarf stars, what happens in masers and lasers, and which materials are susceptible to which kinds of magnetism. We don't have to understand the theory to see what it predicts. We don't have to be accomplished physicists to read what the experiments reveal. In every one of these instances, as in many others, the predictions of quantum mechanics are strikingly, and to high accuracy, confirmed. But the shaman tells us that his doctrine is true because it too works - not on arcane matters of mathematical physics but on what really counts: he can cure people. Very well, then, let's accumulate the statistics on shamanistic cures, and see if they work better than placebos. If they do, let's willingly grant that there's something here - even if it's only that some illnesses are psychogenic, and can be cured or mitigated by the right attitudes and mental states. We can also compare the efficacy of alternative shamanistic systems. Whether the shaman grasps why his cures work is another story. In quantum mechanics we have a purported understanding of Nature on the basis of which, step by step and quantitatively, we make predictions about what will happen if a certain experiment, never before attempted, is carried out. If the experiment bears out the prediction - especially if it does so numerically and precisely - we have confidence that we knew what we were doing. There are at best few examples with this character among shamans, priests and New Age gurus. Another important distinction was suggested in Reason and Nature, the 1931 book by Morris Cohen, a celebrated philosopher of science: To be sure, the vast majority of people who are untrained can accept the results of science only on authority. But there is 238

Antiscience obviously an important difference between an establishment that is open and invites every one to come, study its methods, and suggest improvement, and one that regards the questioning of its credentials as due to wickedness of heart, such as [Cardinal] Newman attributed to those who questioned the infallibility of the Bible . . . Rational science treats its credit notes as always redeemable on demand, while non-rational authoritarianism regards the demand for the redemption of its paper as a disloyal lack of faith. The myths and folklore of many pre-modern cultures have explanatory or at least mnemonic value. In stories that everyone can appreciate and even witness, they encode the environment. Which constellations are rising or the orientation of the Milky Way on a given day of the year can be remembered by a story about lovers reunited or a canoe negotiating the sacred river. Since recognizing the sky is essential for planting and reaping and following the game, such stories have important practical value. They can also be helpful as psychological projective tests or as reassurances of humanity's place in the Universe. But that doesn't mean that the Milky Way really is a river or that a canoe really is traversing it before our eyes. Quinine comes from an infusion of the bark of a particular tree from the Amazon rain forest. How did pre-modern people ever discover that a tea made from this tree, of all the plants in the forest, would relieve the symptoms of malaria? They must have tried every tree and every plant - roots, stems, bark, leaves - tried chewing on them, mashing them up, making an infusion. This constitutes a massive set of scientific experiments continuing over generations, experiments that moreover could not be duplicated today for reasons of medical ethics. Think of how many bark infusions from other trees must have been useless, or made the patient retch or even die. In such a case, the healer chalks these potential medicines off the list, and moves on to the next. The data of ethnopharmacology may not be systematically or even consciously acquired. By trial and error, though, and carefully remembering what worked, eventually they get there - using the rich molecular riches in the plant kingdom 239

THE DEMON-HAUNTED WORLD<br />

knowledgeably? Then the bamboozle has free rein.<br />

So how is shamanistic or theological or New Age doctrine different<br />

from quantum mechanics? The answer is that even if we cannot<br />

understand it, we can verify that quantum mechanics works. We can<br />

compare the quantitative predictions of quantum theory with the<br />

measured wavelengths of spectral lines of the chemical elements, the<br />

behaviour of semiconductors and liquid helium, microprocessors,<br />

which kinds of molecules form from their constituent atoms, the<br />

existence and properties of white dwarf stars, what happens in<br />

masers and lasers, and which materials are susceptible to which kinds<br />

of magnetism. We don't have to understand the theory to see what it<br />

predicts. We don't have to be accomplished physicists to read what<br />

the experiments reveal. In every one of these instances, as in many<br />

others, the predictions of quantum mechanics are strikingly, and to<br />

high accuracy, confirmed.<br />

But the shaman tells us that his doctrine is true because it too<br />

works - not on arcane matters of mathematical physics but on what<br />

really counts: he can cure people. Very well, then, let's accumulate<br />

the statistics on shamanistic cures, and see if they work better than<br />

placebos. If they do, let's willingly grant that there's something here<br />

- even if it's only that some illnesses are psychogenic, and can be<br />

cured or mitigated by the right attitudes and mental states. We can<br />

also compare the efficacy of alternative shamanistic systems.<br />

Whether the shaman grasps why his cures work is another story.<br />

In quantum mechanics we have a purported understanding of<br />

Nature on the basis of which, step by step and quantitatively, we<br />

make predictions about what will happen if a certain experiment,<br />

never before attempted, is carried out. If the experiment bears out<br />

the prediction - especially if it does so numerically and precisely -<br />

we have confidence that we knew what we were doing. There are<br />

at best few examples with this character among shamans, priests<br />

and New Age gurus.<br />

Another important distinction was suggested in Reason and<br />

Nature, the 1931 book by Morris Cohen, a celebrated philosopher<br />

of science:<br />

To be sure, the vast majority of people who are untrained can<br />

accept the results of science only on authority. But there is<br />

238

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!