Carl%20Sagan%20-%20The%20Demon%20Haunted%20World
Carl%20Sagan%20-%20The%20Demon%20Haunted%20World Carl%20Sagan%20-%20The%20Demon%20Haunted%20World
THE DEMON-HAUNTED WORLD found. Why did they convene a press conference to announce so arcane a discovery? Because they thought they had detected an extraterrestrial civilization of immense powers. Surely, that's worth calling a press conference for. The report was briefly a media sensation, and the rock group, The Byrds, even composed and recorded a song about it. ('CTA-102, we're over here receiving you./ Signals tell us that you're there./ We can hear them loud and clear...') Radio emission from CTA-102? Certainly. But what is CTA-102? Today we know that CTA-102 is a distant quasar. At the time, the word 'quasar' had not even been coined. We still don't know very well what quasars are; and there is more than one mutually exclusive explanation for them in scientific literature. Nevertheless, no astronomers today, including those involved in that Moscow press conference, seriously contend that a quasar like CTA-102 is some extraterrestrial civilization billions of light years away with access to immense power levels. Why not? Because we have alternative explanations of the properties of quasars that are consistent with known physical laws and that do not invoke alien life. Extraterrestrials represent a hypothesis of last resort. You reach for it only if everything else fails. In 1967, British scientists found a much nearer intense radio source turning on and off with astonishing precision, its period constant to ten or more significant figures. What was it? Their first thought was that it was a message intended for us, or maybe an interstellar navigation and timing beacon for spacecraft that ply the space between the stars. They even gave it, among themselves at Cambridge University, the wry designation LGM-1 - LGM standing for Little Green Men. However, they were wiser than their Soviet counterparts. They did not call a press conference. It soon became clear that what they were observing was what is now called a 'pulsar', the first pulsar to be discovered. So, what's a pulsar? A pulsar is the end state of a massive star, a sun shrunk to the size of a city, held up as no other stars are, not by gas pressure, not by electron degeneracy, but by nuclear forces. It is in a certain sense an atomic nucleus a mile or so across. Now that, I maintain, is a notion at least as bizarre as an interstellar navigation beacon. The
The Dragon in My Garage answer to what a pulsar is has to be something mighty strange. It isn't an extraterrestrial civilization. It's something else: but a something else that opens our eyes and our minds and indicates unguessed possibilities in Nature. Anthony Hewish won the Nobel Prize in physics for the discovery of pulsars. The original Ozma experiment (the first intentional radio search for extraterrestrial intelligence), the Harvard University/ Planetary Society META (Megachannel Extraterrestrial Assay) programme, the Ohio State University search, the SERENDIP Project of the University of California, Berkeley, and many other groups have all detected anomalous signals from space that make the observer's heart palpitate a little. We think for a moment that we've picked up a genuine signal of intelligent origin from far beyond our solar system. In reality, we have not the foggiest idea what it is, because the signal does not repeat. A few minutes later, or the next day, or years later you turn the same telescope to the same spot in the sky with the same frequency, bandpass, polarization, and everything else, and you don't hear a thing. You don't deduce, much less announce, aliens. It may have been a statistically inevitable electronic surge, or a malfunction in the detection system, or a spacecraft (from Earth), or a military aircraft flying by and broadcasting on channels that are supposed to be reserved for radio astronomy. Maybe it's even a garage door opener down the street or a radio station a hundred kilometres away. There are many possibilities. You must systematically check out all the alternatives, and see which ones can be eliminated. You don't declare that aliens have been found when your only evidence is an enigmatic non-repeating signal. And if the signal did repeat, would you then announce it to the press and the public? You would not. Maybe someone's hoaxing you. Maybe it's something you haven't been smart enough to figure out that's happening to your detection system. Maybe it's some previously unrecognized astrophysical source. Instead, you would call scientists at other radio observatories and inform them that at this particular spot in the sky, at this frequency and bandpass and all the rest, you seem to be getting something funny. Could they please see if they can confirm? Only if several independent observers - all of them fully aware of the complexity 169
- Page 129 and 130: The Demon-Haunted World publish his
- Page 131 and 132: The Demon-Haunted World been father
- Page 133 and 134: The Demon-Haunted World It was thei
- Page 135 and 136: The Demon-Haunted World that UFO oc
- Page 137 and 138: The Demon-Haunted World encounter t
- Page 139 and 140: The Demon-Haunted World Long before
- Page 141 and 142: 8 On the Distinction between True a
- Page 143 and 144: On the Distinction between True and
- Page 145 and 146: On the Distinction between True and
- Page 147 and 148: On the Distinction between True and
- Page 149 and 150: On the Distinction between True and
- Page 151 and 152: On the Distinction between True and
- Page 153 and 154: On the Distinction between True and
- Page 155 and 156: 9 Therapy It is a capital mistake t
- Page 157 and 158: Therapy memories of rape and childh
- Page 159 and 160: Therapy and confabulations, and the
- Page 161 and 162: Therapy Survivors of Child Sexual A
- Page 163 and 164: Therapy name of God, Jesus and Moha
- Page 165 and 166: Therapy children in social assembli
- Page 167 and 168: Therapy by Corydon Hammond, PhD, pa
- Page 169 and 170: Therapy How much training in scient
- Page 171 and 172: Therapy alien abductions to help th
- Page 173 and 174: The Dragon in My Garage An so on. I
- Page 175 and 176: The Dragon in My Garage Purported a
- Page 177 and 178: The Dragon in My Garage planets of
- Page 179: The Dragon in My Garage by a thin l
- Page 183 and 184: The Dragon in My Garage tantamount
- Page 185 and 186: The Dragon in My Garage critical sc
- Page 187 and 188: The Dragon in My Garage Americans h
- Page 189 and 190: The Dragon in My Garage instrument,
- Page 191 and 192: 11 The City of Grief . . . how alie
- Page 193 and 194: The City of Grief • I don't know
- Page 195 and 196: The City of Grief space somewhere -
- Page 197 and 198: The City of Grief • You, sir, are
- Page 199 and 200: The City of Grief with] a silent ho
- Page 201 and 202: 12 The Fine Art of Baloney Detectio
- Page 203 and 204: The Fine Art of Baloney Detection b
- Page 205 and 206: The Fine Art of Baloney Detection f
- Page 207 and 208: The Fine Art of Baloney Detection w
- Page 209 and 210: The Fine Art of Baloney Detection w
- Page 211 and 212: The Fine Art of Baloney Detection m
- Page 213 and 214: The Fine Art of Baloney Detection e
- Page 215 and 216: The Fine Art of Baloney Detection w
- Page 217 and 218: The Fine Art of Baloney Detection i
- Page 219 and 220: 13 Obsessed with Reality A shipowne
- Page 221 and 222: Obsessed with Reality eating the gr
- Page 223 and 224: Obsessed with Reality stranger thin
- Page 225 and 226: Obsessed with Reality homes in Amer
- Page 227 and 228: Obsessed with Reality you put a rub
- Page 229 and 230: Obsessed with Reality 'miraculous'
The Dragon in My Garage<br />
answer to what a pulsar is has to be something mighty strange. It<br />
isn't an extraterrestrial civilization. It's something else: but a<br />
something else that opens our eyes and our minds and indicates<br />
unguessed possibilities in Nature. Anthony Hewish won the Nobel<br />
Prize in physics for the discovery of pulsars.<br />
The original Ozma experiment (the first intentional radio<br />
search for extraterrestrial intelligence), the Harvard University/<br />
Planetary Society META (Megachannel Extraterrestrial Assay)<br />
programme, the Ohio State University search, the SERENDIP<br />
Project of the University of California, Berkeley, and many other<br />
groups have all detected anomalous signals from space that make<br />
the observer's heart palpitate a little. We think for a moment that<br />
we've picked up a genuine signal of intelligent origin from far<br />
beyond our solar system. In reality, we have not the foggiest idea<br />
what it is, because the signal does not repeat. A few minutes later,<br />
or the next day, or years later you turn the same telescope to the<br />
same spot in the sky with the same frequency, bandpass, polarization,<br />
and everything else, and you don't hear a thing. You don't<br />
deduce, much less announce, aliens. It may have been a statistically<br />
inevitable electronic surge, or a malfunction in the detection<br />
system, or a spacecraft (from Earth), or a military aircraft flying<br />
by and broadcasting on channels that are supposed to be reserved<br />
for radio astronomy. Maybe it's even a garage door opener down<br />
the street or a radio station a hundred kilometres away. There are<br />
many possibilities. You must systematically check out all the<br />
alternatives, and see which ones can be eliminated. You don't<br />
declare that aliens have been found when your only evidence is an<br />
enigmatic non-repeating signal.<br />
And if the signal did repeat, would you then announce it to the<br />
press and the public? You would not. Maybe someone's hoaxing<br />
you. Maybe it's something you haven't been smart enough to<br />
figure out that's happening to your detection system. Maybe it's<br />
some previously unrecognized astrophysical source. Instead, you<br />
would call scientists at other radio observatories and inform them<br />
that at this particular spot in the sky, at this frequency and<br />
bandpass and all the rest, you seem to be getting something funny.<br />
Could they please see if they can confirm? Only if several<br />
independent observers - all of them fully aware of the complexity<br />
169