Carl%20Sagan%20-%20The%20Demon%20Haunted%20World

Carl%20Sagan%20-%20The%20Demon%20Haunted%20World Carl%20Sagan%20-%20The%20Demon%20Haunted%20World

giancarlo3000
from giancarlo3000 More from this publisher
04.10.2012 Views

THE DEMON-HAUNTED WORLD trying to find missions that justify its existence - particularly a good reason for humans in space. If the Earth were being visited daily by hostile aliens, wouldn't NASA leap on this opportunity to augment its funding? And if an alien invasion were in progress, why would the Air Force, traditionally led by pilots, step back from manned spaceflight and launch all its payloads on unmanned boosters? Consider the former Strategic Defense Initiative Organization, in charge of 'Star Wars'. It's fallen on hard times now, particularly its objective of basing defences in space. Its name and perspective have been demoted. It's the Ballistic Missile Defense Organization these days. It no longer even reports directly to the Secretary of Defense. The inability of such technology to protect the United States against a massive attack by nuclear-armed missiles is manifest. But wouldn't we want at least to attempt deployment of defences in space if we were facing an alien invasion? The Department of Defense, like similar ministries in every nation, thrives on enemies, real or imagined. It is implausible in the extreme that the existence of such an adversary would be suppressed by the very organization that would most benefit from its presence. The entire post-Cold War posture of the military and civilian space programmes of the United States (and other nations) speaks powerfully against the idea that there are aliens among us - unless, of course, the news is also being kept from those who plan the national defence. Just as there are those who accept every UFO report at face value, there are also those who dismiss the idea of alien visitation out of hand and with great passion. It is, they say, unnecessary to examine the evidence, and 'unscientific' even to contemplate the issue. I once helped to organize a public debate at the annual meeting of the American Association for the Advancement of Science between proponent and opponent scientists of the proposition that some UFOs were spaceships; whereupon a distinguished physicist, whose judgement in many other matters I respected, threatened to set the Vice President of the United States on me if I persisted in this madness. (Nevertheless, the debate was held and published, the issues were a little better 90

Spoofing and Secrecy clarified, and I did not hear from Spiro T. Agnew.) A 1969 study by the National Academy of Sciences, while recognizing that there are reports 'not easily explained', concluded that 'the least likely explanation of UFOs is the hypothesis of extraterrestrial visitations by intelligent beings'. Think of how many other 'explanations' there might be: time travellers; demons from witchland; tourists from another dimension - like Mr Mxyztplk (or was it Mxyzptlk? I always forget) from the land of Zrfff in the Fifth Dimension in the old Superman comic books; the souls of the dead; or a 'noncartesian' phenomenon that doesn't obey the rules of science or even of logic. Each of these 'explanations' has in fact been seriously proffered. 'Least likely' is really saying something. This rhetorical excess is an index of how distasteful the whole subject has become to many scientists. It's telling that emotions can run so high on a matter about which we really know so little. This is especially true of the more recent flurry of alien abduction reports. After all, if true, either hypothesis - invasion by sexually manipulative extraterrestrials or an epidemic of hallucinations - teaches us something we certainly ought to know about. Maybe the reason for strong feelings is that both alternatives have such unpleasant implications. Aurora The number of reports and their consistency suggest that there may be some basis for these sightings other than hallucinogenic drugs. Mystery Aircraft report, Federation of American Scientists 20 August, 1992 Aurora is a high-altitude, extremely secret American reconnaissance aircraft, a successor to the U-2 and the SR-71 Blackbird. It either exists or it doesn't. By 1993, there 91

THE DEMON-HAUNTED WORLD<br />

trying to find missions that justify its existence - particularly a<br />

good reason for humans in space. If the Earth were being visited<br />

daily by hostile aliens, wouldn't NASA leap on this opportunity to<br />

augment its funding? And if an alien invasion were in progress,<br />

why would the Air Force, traditionally led by pilots, step back<br />

from manned spaceflight and launch all its payloads on unmanned<br />

boosters?<br />

Consider the former Strategic Defense Initiative Organization,<br />

in charge of 'Star Wars'. It's fallen on hard times now, particularly<br />

its objective of basing defences in space. Its name and perspective<br />

have been demoted. It's the Ballistic Missile Defense Organization<br />

these days. It no longer even reports directly to the Secretary<br />

of Defense. The inability of such technology to protect the United<br />

States against a massive attack by nuclear-armed missiles is<br />

manifest. But wouldn't we want at least to attempt deployment of<br />

defences in space if we were facing an alien invasion?<br />

The Department of Defense, like similar ministries in every<br />

nation, thrives on enemies, real or imagined. It is implausible in<br />

the extreme that the existence of such an adversary would be<br />

suppressed by the very organization that would most benefit from<br />

its presence. The entire post-Cold War posture of the military and<br />

civilian space programmes of the United States (and other<br />

nations) speaks powerfully against the idea that there are aliens<br />

among us - unless, of course, the news is also being kept from<br />

those who plan the national defence.<br />

Just as there are those who accept every UFO report at face value,<br />

there are also those who dismiss the idea of alien visitation out of<br />

hand and with great passion. It is, they say, unnecessary to<br />

examine the evidence, and 'unscientific' even to contemplate the<br />

issue. I once helped to organize a public debate at the annual<br />

meeting of the American Association for the Advancement of<br />

Science between proponent and opponent scientists of the proposition<br />

that some UFOs were spaceships; whereupon a distinguished<br />

physicist, whose judgement in many other matters I<br />

respected, threatened to set the Vice President of the United<br />

States on me if I persisted in this madness. (Nevertheless, the<br />

debate was held and published, the issues were a little better<br />

90

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!