15.05.2013 Views

ALINORM 03/26/1 - codex - BSN

ALINORM 03/26/1 - codex - BSN

ALINORM 03/26/1 - codex - BSN

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

REP12/CAC 9<br />

27. The amendments to the Procedural Manual are presented in Appendix II.<br />

DRAFT STANDARDS AND RELATED TEXTS AT STEP 8 OF THE PROCEDURE (INCLUDING<br />

THOSE SUBMITTED AT STEP 5 WITH A RECOMMENDATION TO OMIT STEPS 6 AND 7 AND<br />

AT STEP 5 OF THE ACCELERATED PROCEDURE) (Agenda Item 4) 4<br />

28. Taking into consideration the recommendation of the 67 th Session of the Executive Committee in<br />

performing the critical review, the Commission adopted the Draft Standards and Related Texts submitted by<br />

its subsidiary bodies at Step 8 (including those submitted at Step 5 with a recommendation to omit Steps 6<br />

and 7), as well as other standards and related texts submitted for adoption, as presented in Appendix III to<br />

this report. The standards and related texts were adopted as endorsed by the relevant committees as regards<br />

provisions for food additives, food hygiene, food labelling and methods of analysis and sampling, including<br />

editorial changes.<br />

29. The following paragraphs provide additional information on the comments made and the decisions<br />

taken on certain items.<br />

Nutrition and Foods for Special Dietary Uses (CCNFSDU)<br />

Proposed Draft Nutrient Reference Values (NRVs) 5<br />

30. The Delegation of Malaysia did not support the adoption at Step 5/8 because several major issues that<br />

would be considered in the Proposed Draft General Principles for Establishing Nutrient Reference Values for<br />

Nutrients Associated with the Risk of Diet-Related Non-communicable Diseases for General Population,<br />

currently at Step 3, were not solved. The Delegation was of the view that the adoption of NRVs for saturated<br />

fatty acids and sodium, before the draft principles and criteria had been fully resolved was inconsistent with<br />

the decision of the 30 th CCNFSDU (2008) to develop principles and criteria for the development of NRVs-<br />

NCD, and then select and prioritize nutrients for NRVs. This view was supported by an Observer.<br />

31. The WHO Representative informed the Commission of the work undertaken by the WHO Nutrition<br />

Guidance Expert Advisory Group (NUGAG) Subgroup on Diet and Health. Systematic reviews had been<br />

undertaken to update the guidelines on sodium, potassium, total fat and sugars intake. Regarding sodium, the<br />

guidelines are for reducing blood pressure and risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD), stroke and coronary<br />

heart disease (CHD) in adults and for reducing blood pressure in children. In developing the<br />

recommendations, the NUGAG reviewed the issues related to thresholds as well. Regarding saturated fatty<br />

acids (SFA), WHO is undertaking the systematic reviews to address health outcomes such as CHD, blood<br />

lipids, stroke, diabetes, CVD and all-cause mortality. This work also includes the assessment of thresholds<br />

for the prevention of the non-communicable diseases mentioned.<br />

32. The Commission agreed to adopt the Proposed Draft NRVs at Step 5 for further consideration by the<br />

CCNFSDU in the light of the outcome of the WHO work on sodium and saturated fatty acids.<br />

Food Hygiene (CCFH)<br />

Proposed Draft Guidelines on the Application of General Principles of Food Hygiene to the Control of<br />

Viruses in Food 6<br />

33. The Delegation of Norway, while not opposed to the adoption of the Guidelines, expressed the view<br />

that there was a need for more communication and cooperation among committees, so as to avoid duplication<br />

of work and to ensure that readers of Codex texts would find all relevant information on one subject in one<br />

document. The Delegation informed the Commission that Norway had raised this general issue in the<br />

Committee on General Principles (CCGP) and that CCGP had agreed to consider this question at its next<br />

session.<br />

4 CX/CAC 12/35/3 ; CX/CAC 12/35/3-Add.1; CX/CAC 12/35/3-Add.2; CX/CAC 12/35/4 (Comments of Argentina, Brazil,<br />

Canada, Chile, Colombia, Costa Rica, Cuba, European Union, Japan, Malaysia, Netherlands, Paraguay, Republic of Korea,<br />

United States of America, IFU) ; CRD 2 (Comments of Brazil, Argentina, Chile, Costa Rica, Cuba, Dominican Republic,<br />

Federation of St Kitts and Nevis, Paraguay, Suriname) ; CRD 5 (Comments of Kenya) ; CRD 6 (comments of European Union) ;<br />

CRD 7 (Comments of Nigeria) ; CRD 8 (Comments of Papua New Guinea) ; CRD 10 (Comments of Philippines) ; CRD 11<br />

(Comments of IFAH) ; CRD 12 (Comments of Indonesia) ; CRD 13 (Comments of India) ; CRD 14 (Comments of Dominican<br />

Republic) ; CRD 16 (Comments of Peru) ; CRD 17 (Comments of Honduras) ; CRD 18 (Comments of Haiti) ; CRD 19<br />

(Comments of Dominica) ; CRD 20 (Comments of Malaysia) ; CRD 21 (Comments of European Union) ; CRD 22 (Comments of<br />

CI).<br />

5 REP12/NFSDU para. 76, Appendix III.<br />

6 REP12/FH, para.50, Appendix III.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!