ALINORM 03/26/1 - codex - BSN
ALINORM 03/26/1 - codex - BSN
ALINORM 03/26/1 - codex - BSN
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
8 REP12/CAC<br />
15. The 66 th Session had discussed the possibility of using a web-based platform for electronic working<br />
groups to facilitate submission of comments and had agreed that the Codex Secretariat would further identify<br />
the tools available, development costs and training needs of countries.<br />
16. The 67 th Session had recommended the development of a Codex logo with a view to promoting it<br />
internationally for greater visibility of Codex, together with a communication strategy to be prepared for the<br />
next session. It had also considered proposals to celebrate the 50 th anniversary of the Commission’s sessions<br />
in 2013 and agreed to establish an organising committee for this purpose. Both items will be discussed under<br />
Agenda 16 - Other Business.<br />
PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO THE PROCEDURAL MANUAL (Agenda Item 3) 3<br />
Provisions on the Use of Proprietary Methods in Codex Standards<br />
17. The Delegation of India proposed to refer the draft provisions back to the CCMAS for further<br />
consideration, as the use of proprietary methods raised several concerns and had important implications for<br />
governments, and the draft had been finalized in only one session, while some countries could not attend the<br />
last session.<br />
18. The Chair of the CCMAS clarified that the question of proprietary methods had been discussed for<br />
three years and that at the last session the proposed text had been agreed unanimously.<br />
19. After some discussion, the Commission adopted the text as proposed.<br />
Risk Analysis Principles and Procedures Applied by the Codex Committee on Food Hygiene<br />
Risk Analysis Principles Applied by the Codex Committee on Food Additives<br />
Risk Analysis Principles Applied by the Codex Committee on Contaminants in Foods<br />
20. The Commission adopted the texts as proposed.<br />
Definition of “Contaminant”<br />
21. The Commission recalled that the revision of the definition of contaminant followed the revision of the<br />
Risk Analysis Principles applied by the Codex Committee on Contaminants in Foods and the revision of the<br />
Code of Practice for Source Directed Measures to Reduce Contamination of Food with Chemicals to make it<br />
more explicit as regards its applicability to feed as recommended by the 33 rd Session of the Commission.<br />
22. A Delegation requested clarification as to whether the revised definition excluded substances<br />
intentionally added to feed and whether residues of veterinary drugs in food of animal origin as carry over<br />
from feed (i.e. medicated feed) would be included in the revised definition. The Delegation also suggested<br />
that a review of the Section on contaminants in the Format of Commodity Standards may be needed, with the<br />
revision of the definition (Procedural Manual, 20 th edition, page 52).<br />
23. The Commission noted that the Committee on Residues of Veterinary Drugs in Foods had the<br />
responsibility for feed additives when establishing maximum residue limits for veterinary drugs in food of<br />
animal origin arising from the addition of veterinary drugs to feed (i.e. medicated feed).<br />
24. The Commission adopted the revised definition of “contaminant” as proposed by the Committee and<br />
endorsed by the Committee on General Principles. In addition, as part of the ongoing editorial revision of the<br />
GSCTFF, the Commission requested the Committee to look into the relevant sections of the General<br />
Standard e.g. Section 1.1 (Scope) and 1.2.2 (List of substances that meet the definition of contaminants) to<br />
fix any possible discrepancy in relation to the revised definition and the issue of feed additives / feed additive<br />
residues.<br />
Proposed revision of the Risk Analysis Principles Applied by the CCRVDF and of the Risk Assessment<br />
Policy for Residues of Veterinary Drugs in Foods<br />
25. Some delegations were of the opinion that the text should be retained as it had not been reviewed by<br />
the Committee on General Principles (CCGP) due to the schedule of meetings.<br />
<strong>26</strong>. The Commission adopted the text as proposed and noted that the CCGP could review the document for<br />
consistency at its next session.<br />
3 CX/CAC 12/35/2 and-Add.1, CX/CAC 12/35/2-Add.2 (Comments of Brazil, Colombia and Kenya), CRD 7 (Nigeria), CRD 10<br />
(Philippines), CRD 12, (Indonesia), CRD 13 (India), CRD 14 (Dominican Republic), CRD 16 (Peru), and CRD 17 (Honduras).